Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 25, 2016; 8(10): 409-417
Published online May 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i10.409
Table 1 Classification system for endoscopic findings
Group 0: No findings
Normal study
Group 1: Abnormal findings that do not change surgical approach/ postpone surgery
Mild esophagitis, gastritis, and/or duodenitis
Esophageal webs
Group 2: Findings that change the surgical approach/postpone surgery
Mass lesions (mucosal/submucosal)
Ulcers (any location)
Severe erosive esophagitis, gastritis, and/or duodenitis
Barrett’s esophagus
Bezoar
Hiatal hernia (any size)
Peptic stricture
Zenker’s diverticula
Esophageal diverticula
Arteriovenous malformations
Group 3: Absolute contraindications to surgery
Upper GI cancer
Varices
Table 2 Patient characteristics
VariableSummary = 3219
Age37 ± 9 yr
Female:male79%:21%
BMI43 ± 13
Haemoglobin13 ± 4 g/dL
Upper GI symptoms: 902 (28%)1
Heartburn19.2%
Acid regurgitation17.6%
Abdominal pain7.3%
Nausea with or without vomiting5.7%
Comorbedities: 1159 (36%)2
Obstructive sleep apnea4.9%
Hypertension57.8%
Arthritis56.9%
Diabetes mellitus40.5%
Hypothyroidism36.6%
Asthma/COPD15.1%
Coronary artery disease9.9%
Type of endoscopy
Conscious sedation354 (11%)
Local anesthesia spray2865 (89%)
Type of bariatric procedure
Vertical sleeve gastrectomy2415 (75%)
Roux-en-Y gastricbypass322 (10%)
Laparoscopic minigastric bypass482 (15%)
Table 3 Endoscopic findings during routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and their prevalence
EGD findingsGroup A (n = 902)Group B (n = 2317)P value
Esophagus
Normal = 65%19%46%0.001
Abnormal = 35%25%10%0.001
Hiatal hernia21.9%7.9%
Esophagitis19%6%
Barrett’s esophagus1.1%0.1%
Stomach
Normal = 77%24%53%0.001
Abnormal = 23%17%6%0.001
Spotty gastropathy4%1.3%
Erythematous gastropathy7%2.5%%
Erosive gastropathy8%1.2%%
Atrophic gastropathy1%0.48%
Multiple polyps0.1%0.02%
Ulcer2.4%0.5%
Duodenum
Normal = 87%23%64%0.001
Abnormal = 13%9%4%0.001
Erythematous bulbopathy6%2.2%
Erosive bulbopathy2.6%1%
Ulcer1.4%0.8%
+ve biopsy for H. pylori, 407 (14.6%)10.7%3.9%0.001
Table 4 Lesions identified on upper endoscopy and impact on bariatric surgery, n = 219 (6.8%)
LesionGroup AGroup BResult
Hiatal hernia25%10%Crural repair/reduction of hernia
Gastritis17%6%Medical treatment, postpone surgery
Esophagitis19%6%Medical treatment, postpone surgery
Gastric ulcer2.4%0.5%Await biopsy results, medical treatment, repeat endoscopy
Barrett’s esophagus1.1%0.1%Await biopsy results, medical treatment, repeat endoscopy
Duodenal ulcer1.4%0.8%Await Helicobacter pylori results, medical treatment
Table 5 Univariate analysis of clinical predictors of abnormal upper endoscopy
VariablesTotal populationNormal EGD (65%)Abnormal EGD (35%)P value
Age (yr)37 ± 931 ± 943 ± 100.26
BMI43 ± 1343 ± 1147 ± 160.09
Gender (F:M)79%:21%64%:36%69%:31%0.17
GIT symptoms13.80%72%28%0.001
Haemoglobin (g/dL)13 ± 413 ± 3.411 ± 3.20.07
Comorbidities36%52%48%0.18
Table 6 Multivariate regression analysis of clinical predictors of abnormal esophagogastroduodenoscopy
VariablesOR95%CIP value
Age1.4140.772-2.590.26
BMI1.0920.923-1.7230.38
Gender0.2250.028-1.8260.162
GIT symptoms2.6491.904-3.6840.001
Comorbidities0.680.335-1.3810.286
Anaemia0.9451.241-2.0930.274
Table 7 Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of bleeding episodes
1st episode n = 1192nd episode n = 403rd episode n = 11
Presentation
Hematemesis93335
Melena39199
Hypotension173-
Management
EGD287-
Observation913311
Blood transfusion43193
Prominent findings on EGD
Active blood oozing17/287/3
Bleeding vessel28/67/4
Adherent clot28/4-
Other findings (visible vessel, red streaks, etc.)28/4-
Endoscopic therapy
Epinephrine injection105
Heater probe94
Clip73