Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Apr 16, 2015; 7(4): 417-428
Published online Apr 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i4.417
Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteriaExclusion criteria
ESD in patientsCase report
Report ESD successen blocresection rate, local recurrence rateComment
(R0) and the incidence of procedure-related complicationsReview
(perforation, bleeding)Letters to editor
Written in EnglishInsufficient data
Guidelines
Table 2 Endoscopic submucosal dissection studies in animal models
Ref.YearModelnOrganMain conclusion
González et al[17]2013Porcine30StomachA sequential ESD training program of a unique endoscopist contributed to learning ESD for its subsequent application in humans, yielding good results in efficacy and safety
Takizawa et al[13]2013Porcine30ColonLarge mucosal target sites in the rectum and distal colon could be safely removed en bloc by means of a hybrid technique, SEMR, with blunt submucosal balloon dissection
Moss et al[115]2012Porcine10ColonHK-ESD with SG submucosal injection is superior to CSI-EMR for en bloc excision of 50 mm diameter lesions. The technique is rapidly learn
Gostout et al[41]2012Porcine16Rectum and colonLarge mucosal target sites in the rectum and distal colon can be safely removed en bloc by means of a hybrid technique, ie, submucosal endoscopy with mucosal resection, combining elements of ESD with our SEMF method
Kumano et al[117]2012Porcine24EsophagusPCH permits more reliable ESD of the esophagus without complications than do SH and HS
Balogh et al[51]2012Porcine15EsophagusTraining in live pig models could help endoscopists to overcome the learning curve and minimize the risk of complications before starting the procedure in humans Reduction in the resection time and low risk of complications, especially bleeding, could be achieved by the application of a flush knife
Tanaka et al[63]2012Porcine ex vivo10stomachEx vivo training model was helpful to endoscopists with experience in gastric ESD in acquiring the basic skills for performing esophageal ESD
Parra-Blanco et al[29]2011Porcine18StomachA Clip-band traction technique is feasible, safe, effective, and relatively inexpensive gastric ESD
Von Renteln et al[118]2011Porcine12StomachSubmucosal mesna injection did not affect ESD procedure times but was associated with a trend toward a lower incidence of intraprocedural bleeding
Tanimoto et al[94]2011Canine10EsophagusECE-ESD training is feasible in canine models for postgraduate endoscopy fellows
Hon et al[96]2010Porcine10ColonTechnical proficiency improved by repetition. This setup may be a promising training model for endoscopists working in areas with a low incidence of early gastric cancer
Von Renteln et al[119]2010Porcine12StomachThe flexible Maryland dissector was demonstrated to be efficient, safe, and feasible for facilitating gastric ESD
Parra-Blanco et al[34]2010Porcine30Esophagus stomachTraining in animal models could help endoscopists overcome the learning curve before starting ESD in humans
Moss et al[116]2010Porcine10ColonCSI-EMR with submucosal injection of succinylated gelatin is safe and superior to conventional EMR.With experience, total procedure duration is comparable
Von Delius et al[120]2008Porcine10StomachPMT-ESD is feasible and safe. With the use of PA-ES, mucosal pieces of various sizes can be resected en bloc in gastric locations that are difficult to access by flexible endoscopy alone
Yamasaki et al[121]2006Porcine2StomachESD by submucosal injection of viscous SCMC solution appeared to be an easy, safe, and technically efficient method for dissection of gastric lesions
Neuhaus et al[83]2006Porcine17StomachThe R-scope (double channel endoscope) facilitated ESD of large gastric areas. Procedure is technically demanding and time-consuming, with a high risk of perforation may be related to an insufficient volume of solution being injected submucosally