Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 16, 2015; 7(3): 162-168
Published online Mar 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i3.162
Table 1 Incidence of Ingestions 2006-2010 in the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections
YearIIFO incidents seen (n)Total prisoners incarcerated[12] (n)
20061748534
20072049691
20082250371
20094750371
20102650944
132249911 (5-yr census)
Table 2 Published series of intentional ingestion of foreign objects with patient treatment plans when available n (%)
Ref.YearPatients (n)Not undergoing interventionWith psych dxSurgeryEndoscopyObjects ingested (n)
O’Sullivan et al[1]199636 (20 prisoners)31 (86)6 (16)2 (6)4 (11)308
1Dalal et al[2]201330 (141 episodes)33 (23)27 (19)11 (7)97 (68)649
1Weiland et al[3]200222 (256 episodes)23 (9)10 (4)64 (25)256
Barros et al[4]1991167 (39 prisoners)14 (8)6 (3)51 (30)117 (70)167
Selivanov et al[8]198410042 (42)4 (6)12 (12)42 (42)101
Blaho et al[13]199888 (100)6 (75)14
Velitchkov et al[14]1996542 (379 prisoners)410 (75)124 (23)26 (5)19 (3)1203
Karp et al[15]19911918 (95)
1Lee et al[17]200733 (52 episodes)06 (12)46 (88)104
Bisharat et al[18]2008117 (63)3 (27)2 (18)
Huang et al[19]2010334 (12)27 (81)2 (6)299305
Ribas et al[20]20148214262 (75)5 (6)15 (18)162
Grimes et al[7]2013159 (23 prisoners)34 (21)5 (3)231254
Total26131014 (39)317 (12)190 (7)1129 (43)3153
Table 3 Most common types of objects ingested
O’Sullivan et al[1]Batteries, sharp metal objects (nails, razor blades, pins)
Dalal et al[2]Pens, razor blades, spoons, sporks1, toothbrush, screws, bolts
Weiland et al[3]Metal bezoars
Barros et al[4]Wires, needles, balloons (filled with narcotics)
Selivanov et al[8]Coins, bones, food, razor blades, safety pins
Blaho et al[13]Razor blades
Velitchkov et al[14]Screws, pins, spoons
Huang et al[19]Pens, batteries, knives
Karp et al[15]Razors, glass, toothbrush
Lee et al[17]Metal wires, pens, toothbrush, needles
Bisharat et al[18]Razors, batteries
Ribas et al[20]Razor blades, cylindrical batteries, mattress springs
Grimes et al[7]Toothbrush, pencil
Table 4 Relative frequency of intentional ingestion of foreign objects management strategies employed in 141 episodes of intentional ingestion of foreign objects
No intervention16%
Hospital admission10%
Surgery alone5%
Endoscopy + surgery3%
Endoscopy alone12%
Endoscopy (successful)54%