Retrospective Study
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2014; 6(5): 186-192
Published online May 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.186
Table 1 Criteria used to classify bowel preparation quality
Bowel preparation qualityCriteria
ExcellentMucosal detail clearly visible without washing (suctioning of liquid allowed
GoodMinimal turbid fluid in colonic segments and entire mucosa well seen after cleaning
FairThere is minor residual material in the colonic segments. Necessary to suction liquid to adequately view the colonic segments
PoorNecessary to wash and suction to obtain a reasonable view. Portion of mucosa in colonic segments seen after cleaning but up to 15% of the mucosa not seen because of retained material
UnsatisfactorySolid stool not cleared with washing and suctioning. More than 15% of the mucosa not seen
Table 2 Patient characteristics based on bowel preparation quality n (%)
CharacteristicsQuality of bowel preparation
Excellent (n = 108)Good (n = 4051)Fair (n = 2889)Poor (n = 1045)Unsatisfactory (n = 238)
Mean age ± SD, yr58 ± 7.659 ± 7.659 ± 7.960 ± 7.759 ± 8.3
Women65 (60)2481 (61)1596 (55)537 (51)117 (49)
Race
Asian1 (1)32 (1)16 (1)4 (0)0 (0)
White1 (1)47 (1)34 (1)15 (1)5 (2)
Black25 (23)875 (22)697 (24)280 (27)82 (35)
Hispanic81 (75)3097 (77)2142 (74)746 (71)151 (63)
Morning procedure45 (42)1877 (46)1212 (42)428 (41)78 (33)
Table 3 Withdrawal time and polyp detection based on bowel preparation quality n (%)
Quality of bowel preparation
P-value
Excellent (n = 108)Good (n = 4051)Fair (n = 2889)Poor (n = 1045)Unsatisfactory (n = 238)
Mean duration of colonoscope withdrawal ± SD, min10 ± 5.512 ± 5.313 ± 5.912 ± 5.211 ± 9.4< 0.001
No. of colonic segments with polyps< 0.001
085 (77)2707 (67)1799 (62)703 (67)181 (76)
117 (16)769 (19)581 (20)223 (21)38 (16)
23 (3)375 (9)305 (11)74 (7)13 (6)
31 (1)136 (3)145 (5)31 (3)6 (3)
42 (2)43 (1)38 (1)11 (1)0 (0)
50 (0)16 (0)18 (1)3 (0)0 (0)
60 (0)2 (0)3 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
70 (0)2 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
80 (0)1 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Total No. of colonic polyps< 0.001
085 (77)2707 (67)1799 (62)703 (67)181 (76)
113 (12)581 (14)446 (15)42 (4)30 (13)
22 (2)231 (6)164 (6)60 (6)8 (3)
34 (4)256 (6)195 (7)37 (4)10 (4)
42 (2)152 (4)155 (5)22 (2)5 (2)
51 (1)73 (2)90 (3)6 (1)4 (2)
> 51 (1)51 (1)30 (1)2 (0)0 (0)
Table 4 Predictors of higher number of colonic segments with polyps and total number of colonic polyps during screening colonoscopy
No. colonic segment with polyps
Total No. colonic polyps
OR (95%CI)P-valueOR (95%CI)P-value
Older age1.01 (1.00-1.03)0.0111.01 (1.00-1.02)0.026
Gender of male11.31 (1.11-1.55)0.0021.18 (1.00-1.39)0.047
Race
Asian20.89 (0.34-2.25)NS1.06 (0.41-2.73)NS
White20.69 (0.33-1.45)NS0.70 (0.33-1.45)NS
Black21.17 (0.97-1.41)NS1.22 (1.01-1.47)0.041
Later time of colonoscopy1.00 (1.00-1.00)NS1.00 (1.00-1.00)0.043
Better bowel preparation quality1.10 (1.00-1.21)0.041.11 (1.01-1.22)0.030
Longer duration of colonoscope withdrawal1.14 (1.12-1.16)< 0.00011.14 (1.12-1.16)< 0.0001
Adenoma detection rate of endoscopist1.03 (1.02-1.04)< 0.00011.03 (1.02-1.04)< 0.0001
Duration of colonoscopy practice of endoscopist0.98 (0.97-0.98)< 0.00010.98(0.97-0.99)< 0.0001
Involvement of trainee during colonoscopy0.93 (0.72-1.19)NS0.93(0.73-1.19)NS
Table 5 Association between longer withdrawal time and higher polyp detection in various bowel preparation qualities
No. of colonic segments with polyps
Total No. colonic polyps
OR (95%CI)1P-valueOR (95%CI)1P-value
Excellent1.07 (0.99-1.26)NS1.11 (0.99-1.24)NS
Good1.16 (1.13-1.19)< 0.00011.15 (1.13-1.18)< 0.0001
Fair1.13 (1.10-1.17)< 0.00011.13 (1.10-1.16)< 0.0001
Poor1.18 (1.11-1.26)< 0.00011.20 (1.13-1.29)< 0.0001
Unsatisfactory/very poor1.02 (0.99-1.12)NS1.05 (0.99-1.10)NS