Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 16, 2020; 12(2): 60-71
Published online Feb 16, 2020. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i2.60
Table 1 Stenting in diverticular disease
Ref.Number of patientsType of studySingle vs multicenterMean age (range)Site of obstructionStent typeEarly adverse eventsDuration of stentingOutcome
Baron et al[28], 19983ProspectiveSingle center63 yr (19-89)Sigmoid colonWallstent12 migrationNot stated3 BTS
Tamim et al[63], 20003ProspectiveSingle centerNot statedSigmoid colonWallstent1NoneNot stated2 BTS, 1 declined surgery
Meisner et al[64], 20045RetrospectiveSingle centerNot statedSigmoid colonWallstent, Ultraflex1, Memotherm21 migration, 1 fistulaNot stated1 Hartman after migration, 2 BTS, 1 early removal, 1 death
Suzuki et al[47], 20046RetrospectiveSingle center67 yr (43-91)Sigmoid colonUltraflex, Wallstent1 Memotherm22 migration, 1 reobstruction7.5 mo6
Syn et al[65], 20043ProspectiveSingle center75.2 yr (42-92)Sigmoid colon/ RectumUncovered; Ultraflex, Wallstent1None3-24 d1 unable to pass wire: Colostomy, 2 BTS
Stefanidis et al[66], 20051Retrospective, case reportSingle center63Sigmoid colonWallstent11 reobstruction139 dBTS but stoma
Athreya et al[67], 20063RetrospectiveSingle center75 yr (46-102)Sigmoid colonUltraflex, Wallstent1 Memotherm2NoneNot stated3 palliation
Jost et al[68], 20077ProspectiveSingle center67.3 yr (25-93)Sigmoid colon/ Descending/RectumWallstent11 migration, 1 reobstruction, 2 perforationNot stated7 BTS
Small et al[10], 200816RetrospectiveSingle center66 yr (41-97)Sigmoid colon/ Descending/RectumUltraflex, Wallstent12 perforation, 4 reobstruction30 d14 BTS, 2 declined surgery
Pommergaard et al[69], 20097RetrospectiveSingle center76.6 yr (46-97)Sigmoid colon/left flexureUltraflex, Wallstent11 migration, 1 reobstruction, 3 perforation, 2 mortality8 d (BTS) 91 d (palliation)5 BTS, 2 palliation
Forshaw et al[7], 20103RetrospectiveSingle center67 yr (47-89)Sigmoid colonWallstent11 migration, 1 failure to decompress17 d (range 5-30)2 BTS, 1 failure of stent placement
Keränen et al[9], 201010RetrospectiveSingle center72 yr (58-89)Not indicatedUncovered and covered. Ultraflex, Wallstent13 perforation, 1 colorectal fistula, 1 abscess21 d2 BTS, 5 palliation 3 emergent surgery for perforation
Arya et al[70], 20112RetrospectiveSingle center69.4 yr (46-85)Sigmoid colonWallstent1NoneNot stated2 BTS
Table 2 Stenting in inflammatory bowel diseases
Ref.Number of patientsType of studySingle vs multicenterMean age (range)Site of obstructionStent typeEarly adverse eventsDuration of stentingOutcome
Keränen et al[9], 20102 (1 BTS 1 refused surgery)Case seriesSingle center41 yr (36-47)Crohn’s anastomotic stricture1 covered 1 uncovered; Wallstent, Ultraflex1None30 d (pt 1), 4 yr (pt 2)BTS (pt 1), refused surgery, ileostomy after perforation (pt 2)
Matsuhashi et al[45], 20002Case seriesSingle center28 yr (27-29)1 descending colon 1 ileo-colonic anastomosisCovered steel Z-stent Gianturco Rosch61 migration30 d (pt 1), 150 d (pt 2)Both
Wholey et al[46], 19981Case reportSingle centerNot indicatedAnastomotic stricture in the descending colonWallstent1None21 dElective surgery 3 wk after stent placement
Suzuki et al[47], 20042Case seriesSingle centerNot indicatedNot indicatedWallstent, Ultraflex1, Memotherm21 reobstruction (pt 1)30 d (pt 1), 90 d (pt 2)Colostomy and stent removal in pt 2 for abscess after 3 mo
Wada et al[48], 20051Case reportSingle center25 yrSigmoid colonCovered metallic Gianturco Rosch6None32 moPerforation of the stent and ileosigmoid fistula: Ileostomy and resection
Bickston et al[49], 20051Case reportSingle center49 yrTerminal ileum (refractory to balloon dilation)Wallstent1None60 dYes
Dafnis et al[50], 20071 (unfit for surgery)Case reportSingle center65 yrRecto-sigmoid junctionUncovered; Wallstent 1None126 dSecond and third coaxial uncovered walls tent for ingrowth (after 126 and 267 d)
Martines et al[51], 20081 (BTS)Case reportSingle center45 yrIleocolic anastomosisCovered; Niti-S3None7 dScheduled surgery
Levine et al[52], 20125RetrospectiveSingle center49 yr (29 - 67)4 ileocolic anastomosis 1 ileosigmoid anastomosisUncovered; Wallflex, Wallstent11 reobstruction at 3 wk34.8 mo (4.5–109)Yes
Attar et al[53], 201211ProspectiveSingle center34 yr (18-66) refractory to previous balloon dilation8 ileocolic anastomosis 1 ileosigmoid anastomosis 2 terminal ileum7 Hanarostent4, 4 Niti-S31 failure due to angulation 1 ingrowth 8 migration15 d (1-35)5 surgery 5 scheduled remotion of stent
Branche et al[54], 20127ProspectiveSingle center50 yr (36 – 59)5 ileocolic anastomosis 2 ileosigmoid anastomosisPartially Covered; Hanarostent 4None7 dYes
Loras et al[55], 201217RetrospectiveSingle center45.7 yr (21–62) refractory to previous balloon dilationColon and ileocolic anastomosis4 partially covered and 21 fully covered (Hanarostent 4 and Niti-S3) (5 for stent migration, 2 stents for 1 stenosis)1 proximal migration requiring surgery 13 spontaneous migration (11 after resolution of stenosis)28 d (range 1–112)Treatment was successful in 11 of 17 patients (64.7%)
Rejchrt et al[56], 201111ProspectiveSingle center43 yr (32–58)2 colon, 1 ileum, 8 ileocolic anastomosisBiodegrad-able stent; SX-ELLA51 failure to release, 3 spontaneous migration4 wk for degradationAfter median of 16 mo symptom free if no migration occurred
Di Mitri et al[59], 20171Case reportSingle center28 yrSigmoid colon (UC 29 wk of pregnancyCovered; Niti-S3None75 dRemoved after delivery