Salerno R, Davies SEC, Mezzina N, Ardizzone S. Comprehensive review on EUS-guided biliary drainage. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11(5): 354-364 [PMID: 31205596 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.354]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Raffaele Salerno, MD, Doctor, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco - Department of Biochemical and Clinical Sciences “L. Sacco”, University of Milan, Corso Porta Nuova 23, Milan 20100, Italy. raffaele.salerno@asst-fbf-sacco.it
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Minireviews
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2019; 11(5): 354-364 Published online May 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.354
Table 1 Current indications for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage after failure of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in referral centers
Accessible papilla
Ampullary pathology
Periampullary diverticulum
Ampullary neoplastic infiltration
Non-accessible papilla
Peptic GI stenosis
Malignant GI strictures
Gastrointestinal bariatric bypass
Roux-en Y gastric by-pass
Billroth II gastroenterostomy
Table 2 Algorithms for guidance endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage
“Enhanced guidewire manipulation protocol” EUS-RV/EUS-AS with guidewire manipulation protocol as a first-line In case of failure or duodenal invasion, transmural EUS-BD
“Patient anatomy” Dilated IHBT on cross-sectional imaging, received IHa Nondilated IHBT on cross-sectional imaging, received EHa In case of failure of IHa, conversion to an EHa
52
96%
10%
Table 3 Comparative studies among different techniques of biliary drainage