Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 16, 2019; 11(2): 95-102
Published online Feb 16, 2019. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i2.95
Table 1 Summary of the main characteristics of the included studies (study design, population, intervention, radiofrequency ablation probe, outcomes, main findings)
Author (reference), Country, YearPatients numberStudy designInterventionProbeTumour typeControl groupOutcomesMain findings
Steel et al[17], UK 201122ProspectiveERFA before SEMSHabib EndoHPBCC, PCNoTechnical and clinical success; adverse events(1) 21/22 technical success; 18/21 stent patency at 90 d; and (2) 3 AE (1 pancreatitis, 2 cholecystitis)
Figueroa- Barojas et al[18], USA 201320ProspectiveERFA before stenting (metallic or plastic)Habib EndoHPBMBONo30 d patency, stricture size; adverse events(1) Significant increase of 3.5 mm CBD diameter after RFA; and (2) 2 AE (1 pancreatitis, 1 cholecystitis)
Dolak et al[19], Austria 201458RetrospectiveMiscellaneous (ERFA before stenting, ERFA for blocked SEMS, percutaneous RFA)Habib EndoHPBMBO (mainly CC)NoPatency, adverse events, mortality(1) Median stent patency 170 d (95%CI 63-277): Metal vs plastic stenting (218 d vs 115 d, P = 0.051); and (2) 12 AE (1 partial liver infarction, 5 Cholangitis, 2 hemobilia, 2 cholangiosepsis, 1 hepatic coma, 1 left bundle branch block)
Sharaiha et al[20], USA 201466RetrospectiveERFA before stenting (26pts) vs stenting alone (40 pts)Habib EndoHPBCC, PCYesSurvival, stricture size; Adverse events(1) ERFA independent predictor of survival [HR 0.29 (0.11-0.76), P = 0.012]; and (2) No differences in AE (2 RFA vs 3 no-RFA)
Strand et al[21], USA 201448RetrospectiveERFA (16 pts) vs PDT (32 pts)Habib EndoHPBCCYesSurvival; Adverse eventsSimilar survival; more stent occlusions in RFA group
Kallis et al[22], UK 201569RetrospectiveERFA before stenting (23 pts) vs stenting alone (46 pts)Habib EndoHPBPCYesSurvival, morbidity, and stent patency ratesMedian survival in RFA group 226 d vs 123.5 d in controls (P < 0.01); SEMS patency equivalent
Sharaiha et al[23], USA 201569Retrospective (multicentric registry)Miscellaneous (mainly ERFA before stenting)Habib EndoHPBMBO (mainly CC)NoSurvival; Adverse events(1) Median survival 11.46 mo (6.2 mo-25 mo); and (2) AE 10 % (1 pancreatitis 2 cholecystitis, 1 hemobilia, 3 abdominal pain)
Laleman et al[24], Belgium 201718ProspectiveERFA before stentingELRACC, PCNoFeasibility, safety, and biliary patency rate of a new RFA device(1) Biliary patency 80% and 69% at 90 d and 180 d respectively; and (2) 6 AE (4 cholangitis, 2 pancreatitis)
Yang et al[25], China 201865RCTERFA before stenting (32 pts) vs stenting alone (33 pts)Habib EndoHPBCCYesOverall survival, biliary patency; post-ERCP AE(1) OS RFA + stent vs the stent-only (13.2 mo ± 0.6 mo vs 8.3 mo ± 0.5 mo, P < 0.001); Biliary patency RFA + stent longer than stent-only (6.8 mo vs 3.4 mo, P = 0.02); and (2) Similar AE [6.3% (2/32) vs 9.1% (3/33), P = 0.67]