Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jan 16, 2018; 10(1): 16-22
Published online Jan 16, 2018. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i1.16
Table 1 Patient characteristics
n = 38
Men/women21/17
Age (yr)70 (52-90)
PS (0/1/2)8/21/9
Diagnosis
Pancreatic cancer36
Bile duct cancer1
Metastatic nodes1
Clinical stage III/IV1/37
Tumor size (mm)33 (13-70)
Length of the biliary stricture (mm)27 (10-60)
Maximum diameter of the proximal bile duct (mm)13.5 (7-20)
Table 2 Results of stent placement
n (%)
Technical success38 (100)
Functional success38 (100)
Selected stent length (60/80 mm)14/24 (36.8/63.2)
Endoscopic sphincterotomy20 (52.6)
Previous drainage (RBD/NBD)9/2 (23.7/5.3)
Replacement for CSEMS5 (13.2)
Table 3 Retrograde biliary drainage, time to retrograde biliary drainage, and survival time
n (%)
RBO2 (5.3)
Tumor ingrowth1 (2.6)
Tumor overgrowth1 (2.6)
Median TRBO (d)190 (164-215)
Non-obstruction rates of 3, 6, 12 mo (%)100, 91, 78
Median survival time (d)120 (18-502)
Table 4 Complications other than recurrent biliary obstruction
Complications11/38 (28.9%)Time to event (d)
Acute cholecystitis4 (10.3)3, 32, 217, 487
PEP3 (7.9)1 (each)
Hemorrhage2 (5.3)92, 119
Fever without exacerbation of liver injury1 (2.6)1
Liver abscess1 (2.6)17