Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 16, 2014; 6(11): 555-563
Published online Nov 16, 2014. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i11.555
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flow chart of the search strategy. EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection; ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Quality of included studies according to the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines[7].
Figure 3
Figure 3 Forest plot of mean operation time. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection; df: Degrees of freedom.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Funnel plot of publication bias for mean operation time.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Forest plot of en bloc resection rate. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection; M-H: Mantel-Haenszel; df: Degrees of freedom.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Forest plot of complete histologic resection rate. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection; IV: Inverse variance; df: Degrees of freedom.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Forest plot of recurrence rate. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection; M-H: Mantel-Haenszel; df: Degrees of freedom.
Figure 8
Figure 8 Forest plot of perforation rate. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection; M-H: Mantel-Haenszel; df: Degrees of freedom.
Figure 9
Figure 9 Forest plot of bleeding rate. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection; M-H: Mantel-Haenszel; df: Degrees of freedom.