Research studies aimed at improving the outcomes of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have brought about limited progress, and in clinical practice, the optimized use of surgery, chemotherapy and supportive care have led to modest improvements in survival that have probably reached a plateau. As a result, PDAC is expected to be the second leading cause of cancer-related death in Western societies within a decade. The development of therapeutic advances in PDAC has been challenging owing to a lack of actionable molecular targets, a typically immunosuppressive microenvironment, and a disease course characterized by rapid progression and clinical deterioration. Yet, the progress in our understanding of PDAC and identification of novel therapeutic opportunities over the past few years is leading to a strong sense of optimism in the field. In this Perspective, we address the aforementioned challenges, including biological aspects of PDAC that make this malignancy particularly difficult to treat. We explore specific areas with potential for therapeutic advances, including targeting mutant KRAS, novel strategies to harness the antitumour immune response and approaches to early detection, and propose mechanisms to improve clinical trial design and to overcome various community and institutional barriers to progress.

We investigated the association between serum MUC5AC (sMUC5AC) levels and patient outcomes in individuals who underwent resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA), including those treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and those who had upfront surgery (UpS) followed by adjuvant therapy.

Serum samples from the Ohio State University biorepository collected from January 2010 to June 2021 were utilized. The human MUC5AC kit (NBP2-76703) was used to perform enzyme-linked immunoassays to measure sMUC5AC levels. Logistic regression, Cox regression models (univariate and multivariate), recurrence prediction, analysis of variance (ANOVA), t-tests, and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analysis.

In the NAT cohort (n = 23), elevated sMUC5AC levels were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with pathological treatment response, margin positivity, and residual disease. Among 21 patients who had an R0/R1 resection (R2 resection, n=2), higher sMUC5AC levels were associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 1.64, P = 0.0006) and overall survival (OS) (HR: 1.6, P = 0.005) on univariate analysis. Multivariate models confirmed sMUC5AC as an independent predictor of PFS and OS alongside pathological differentiation and postoperative therapy. Patients with lower sMUC5AC levels had more favorable pathological characteristics, better treatment responses, and improved survival outcomes. These findings were consistent in the FOLFIRINOX subgroup (n = 17). In the UpS cohort (n = 17), post-resection sMUC5AC levels tend to be associated with PFS (P = 0.07) and OS (P = 0.05). Combining sMUC5AC with Carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 enhanced sensitivity (79%) and specificity (67%) to predict recurrence. Higher sMUC5AC levels were associated with earlier recurrence and poor survival outcomes, highlighting its utility in post-surgery risk stratification. Among patients with pre-treatment data (n = 11), sMUC5AC levels were significantly higher among patients with poorly differentiated tumors.

This study provides compelling evidence for the clinical utility of sMUC5AC as a prognostic biomarker among patients with resected PDA. Future large-scale studies are needed to validate these findings and establish standard thresholds for sMUC5AC integration into clinical practice.

Background: This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine plus S-1-based chemoradiotherapy (GS-CRT) among patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), especially among those with unresectable locally advanced (UR-LA) cases. Methods: A total of 351 consecutive PDAC patients were enrolled and prognostic predictors of disease-specific survival (DSS) were identified. Results: The treatment completion rate was 98.9% and Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 181 cases (51.6%). Among 319 re-evaluated patients, pancreatectomy was performed in 184 (57.7%). Based on resectability, the 5-year DSS rates for the entire cohort were 39.6% (R), 43.8% (BR-PV), 21.2% (BR-A) and 13.3% (UR-LA), while the predictors of DSS were performance status (PS), hemoglobin (Hb) level, celiac artery (CA) involvement of ≥180 degrees and JPS 8th T category. In the resected cases, the predictors of DSS were preoperative PS, preoperative CA19-9 level, preoperative JPS-T factor, degree of histological response and adjuvant chemotherapy. In UR-LA resected patients, preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI), absence of pathological venous invasion and adjuvant chemotherapy were predictors of DSS. Conclusions: Even though Grade 3 or higher adverse events were encountered in about half of the cases, they were uneventfully managed. Therefore, GS-CRT is safe and highly tolerable with potential to improve patients' prognosis. Preoperative PS, CA19-9 levels and histological response are important prognostic factors, as well as adjuvant therapy. In UR-LA patients, prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and adjuvant chemotherapy were important for curative intent surgery.

Local and distant progression remains common following resection of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) despite adjuvant multiagent chemotherapy. We report a prospective institutional phase 1 trial incorporating adjuvant GVAX vaccine, low-dose cyclophosphamide (Cy), and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) followed by FOLFIRINOX (FFX) among patients who underwent resection of high-risk PDAC.

The study design was a modified 3+3. Cohort 1 received 5-fraction SBRT to 33 Gy to the tumor bed and 25 Gy to elective nodes followed by 6 cycles of full-dose FFX. After toxicity review, cohort 2 had SBRT and was switched to modified FFX (mFFX). Cohort 3 had 1 cycle of Cy/GVAX followed by SBRT, mFFX, and 4 cycles of maintenance Cy/GVAX with 6-month Cy/GVAX boosts until progression.

Nineteen patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 36.2 months. To be eligible, patients were required to have close/positive margins (within ≤1 mm) (71%) and/or lymph node metastasis (79%). Overall, 63% of patients had both. In cohort 1, 67% of patients received 6 cycles of FFX; in cohort 2, 75% received 6 cycles of modified FFX. In cohort 3, 12 patients received the first dose of Cy/GVAX and SBRT with 10 individuals (83%) receiving 6 cycles of mFFX. Cohort 3 had acceptable levels of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and diarrhea after 2 cycles of mFFX. Median overall survival (OS)/disease-free survival (DFS) for the overall cohort and cohort 3 was 36.2/18.2 months and 61.3/24.1 months, respectively. One- and 2-year OS for cohort 3 was 83%/75%, respectively. At the last follow-up (median = x), 5 patients were alive (42%) in cohort 3.

This is the first prospective trial to evaluate adjuvant GVAX, Cy, SBRT, and mFFX in resected PDAC patients with high-risk features. This combination regimen was well tolerated with limited toxicity and promising survival outcomes, warranting future studies to validate this regimen in the adjuvant setting.

High drug-loading nanocrystals show significant advantages in delivering hydrophobic small-molecule drugs. However, these nanocrystals face challenges, including inherent instability and limited targetability. In this study, we developed a paclitaxel nanocrystal delivery platform based on chondroitin sulfate modified with 3-indoleacetic acid (CS-IAA). Paclitaxel and CS-IAA assembled into stable nanocrystals (PTX@CS-IAA, PC) with a high drug loading (up to 46.6%), facilitated by π-π stacking and hydrophobic interactions. CS-IAA targets tumors through CD44 receptors, which helps to minimize off-target effects. Additionally, CS-IAA, serving as a functional delivery vehicle, can significantly increase reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels at the tumor site. In an orthotopic pancreatic cancer mouse model, PTX@CS-IAA nanocrystals showed significantly enhanced antitumor effects. When PTX@CS-IAA was combined with the αPD-L1 antibody, the survival of mice with pancreatic tumors was further prolonged. This study provides valuable insights into alternative treatment options for pancreatic cancer, with the potential to improve patient prognosis and survival.

Low skeletal muscle mass and impaired muscle quality (myosteatosis) have been associated with poor outcomes in cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of pre-therapeutic low muscle mass and myosteatosis on chemoradiotherapy (CRT)-induced toxicity and survival outcomes in patients with non-resectable pancreatic cancer (PC).

In this retrospective study, pre-therapeutic CT scans were used to measure muscle mass/density. Low muscle mass was defined as a skeletal muscle index <38.5 cm²/m² (women) and <52.4 cm²/m² (men), and myosteatosis as a mean psoas density <41 HU if BMI < 25 kg/m² or <33 HU if BMI > 25 kg/m². Adverse effects were collected per week (W) of treatment. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any toxicity leading to dose reduction, treatment delays or permanent discontinuation.

Among the 85 included patients, 75 (88.2%) and 18 (22.2%) had pre-therapeutic low muscle mass and myosteatosis, respectively. Only 12 patients (14.1%) experienced DLT. Patients with low muscle mass developed significantly more toxicities at W2 (p = 0.013) and W5 (p = 0.026), notably more nausea (p = 0.037) and anemia (p = 0.004). Low muscle mass was associated with poorer overall survival (HR 4.41 [1.50-12.94], p = 0.007) in multivariate Cox analysis, while myosteatosis was not associated with CRT toxicities, DLT and overall survival (p = 0.408).

Patients with low muscle mass experienced more toxicities and poorer outcomes during CRT for non-resectable PC.

We demonstrated for the first time the safety and feasibility of escalating up to 55 Gy/11 Gy/fr/5fr in borderline (BRPC)/unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), using the standard LINAC platform. The aim of the present study is to assess for the first time the impact of this high-dose neoadjuvant stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABRT) protocol on tumor resectability and pathological responses.

From June 2017 to December 2022, patients with BRPC/LAPC were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ChT) and SABRT-escalated doses of SIB at 45 Gy, 50 Gy, and up to 55 Gy (BED ≥ 100). Radiological evaluation was conducted with a CT scan 6-8 weeks post-treatment to determine resectability status based on established criteria (SAR/APA2014). Surgical decisions were made by the multidisciplinary tumor board of the participating institutions. Pathological assessments post-surgery used criteria from the College of American Pathologists (CAP), categorizing resection status as R0 (negative margins), R1 (microscopic tumor margins), and R2 (macroscopic tumor margins). Tumor response was evaluated with the Tumor Response Scoring (TRS) system, as G0 (no viable cancer cells), G1 (single cells or rare small groups), G2 (residual cancer with evident regression), and G3 (extensive residual cancer).

Thirty-three patients (p) were included: 39.4% (13p) BRPC/60.6% (20p) LAPC. After ChT-SABRT, 45.5% (15p) were considered resectable, with 11/13 (84.6%) BRPC and 4/20 (20%) LAPC (p < 0.0001). One patient refused surgery and other patient died of COVID sepsis. Two more patients had disseminated disease at surgery. Among the 11 patients who underwent full surgery, all patients achieved either clean margins R0: 72.7% (8p) or microscopic affected margins R1: 27.3% (3p). TRS scores were G1: 27.3% (3p), G2: 54.5% (6p), and G3: 18.2% (2p). The present follow-up (FUP) was closed on 1 November 2024 (23.55 months, range: 6-71 months). The mean freedom from local progression as the first cause of disease failure was 43.30 ± 3.09 (37.23-49.38), and the median was not reached. The actuarial 1- and 2-year rates for freedom from local relapse as a first cause of disease failure were 92.3% (87.7-93.3%) and 79.7% (79.7-87.7%), respectively.

Neoadjuvant ChT-SABRT in LAPC improves resectability rates and induces relevant tumor regression. These promising findings should be validated by larger sample sizes and extended follow-up.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest cancers. Surgical resection is the most reliable chance for cure, but high rates of positive margins and local failure persist. Neoadjuvant therapies (NAT), including chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT), are being explored to improve surgical outcomes, particularly in borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). This review aims to summarize the current landscape and future directions for neoadjuvant RT (NART) in PDAC.

The review includes a detailed analysis of past and ongoing clinical trials investigating various NART approaches in PDAC, with an emphasis on different RT techniques, fractionation schemes, and their integration into multimodal treatment strategies.

Early evidence suggests that NART can improve resection margins and local control. However, recent trials, including the Alliance A021501 and LAP-07 trials, have failed to demonstrate significant survival benefits with the addition of RT to NAT. Nevertheless, nuances in trial design and execution continue to keep the question of NART open. Newer approaches, such as stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART), show promise in improving local control and survival, but further phase 3 trials are needed.

While NART has shown potential in improving local control in PDAC, its impact on overall survival remains unclear. Ongoing trials, particularly those utilizing advanced techniques like SMART, are critical in defining the role of RT in the neoadjuvant setting for PDAC. Collaboration across multidisciplinary teams is essential to optimize treatment strategies and trial outcomes.

The use of radiation therapy (RT) for pancreatic cancer continues to be controversial, despite recent technical advances. Improvements in systemic control have created an evolving role for RT and the need for improved local tumor control, but currently, no standardized approach exists. Advances in stereotactic body RT, motion management, real-time image guidance, and adaptive therapy have renewed hopes of improved outcomes in this devastating disease with one of the lowest survival rates. This case-based guide provides a practical framework for delivering stereotactic body RT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In conjunction with multidisciplinary care, an intradisciplinary approach should guide treatment of the high-risk cases outlined within these guidelines for prospective peer review and treatment safety discussions.

Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is a recent development in radiotherapy technology and treatment personalization that allows treatment to be tailored to the daily anatomical changes of patients. While it was until recently only performed "offline", i.e. between two radiotherapy sessions, it is now possible during ART to perform a daily online adaptive process for a given patient. Therefore, ART allows a daily customization to ensure optimal coverage of the treatment target volumes with minimized margins, taking into account only the uncertainties related to the adaptive process itself. This optimization appears particularly relevant in case of daily variations in the positioning of the target volume or of the organs at risk (OAR) associated with a proximity of these volumes and a tenuous therapeutic index. ART aims to minimize severe acute and late toxicity and allows tumor dose escalation. These new achievements have been possible thanks to technological development, the contribution of new multimodal and onboard imaging modalities and the integration of artificial intelligence tools for the contouring, planning and delivery of radiation therapy. Online ART is currently available on two types of radiotherapy machines: MR-linear accelerators and recently CBCT-linear accelerators. We will first describe the benefits, advantages, constraints and limitations of each of these two modalities, as well as the online adaptive process itself. We will then evaluate the clinical situations for which online adaptive radiotherapy is particularly indicated on MR- and CBCT-linear accelerators. Finally, we will detail some challenges and possible solutions in the development of online ART in the coming years.

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most aggressive solid tumors. As a systemic disease, despite the improvement of multi-modality treatment strategies, the prognosis of pancreatic cancer was not improved dramatically. For resectable or borderline resectable patients, the surgical strategy centered on improving R0 resection rate is consensus; however, the role of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable patients and the optimal neoadjuvant therapy of chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in borderline resectable patients were debated. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy of gemcitabine/capecitabine or mFOLFIRINOX is recommended regardless of the margin status. Chemotherapy as the first-line treatment strategy for advanced or metastatic patients included FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, or NALIRIFOX regimens whereas 5-FU plus liposomal irinotecan was the only standard of care second-line therapy. Immunotherapy is an innovative therapy although anti-PD-1 antibody is currently the only agent approved by for MSI-H, dMMR, or TMB-high solid tumors, which represent a very small subset of pancreatic cancers. Combination strategies to increase the immunogenicity and to overcome the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment may sensitize pancreatic cancer to immunotherapy. Targeted therapies represented by PARP and KRAS inhibitors are also under investigation, showing benefits in improving progression-free survival and objective response rate. This review discusses the current treatment modalities and highlights innovative therapies for pancreatic cancer.

Significant progress has been made in the management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in recent years. In this population-based study, we aimed to compare incidence, therapeutic strategies, and survival outcomes of PDAC patients in France over a decade.

This study was performed using a nationwide French database. All patients receiving care for PDAC during years 2009, 2014 and 2018 were included. Treatment modalities and survival outcomes were analyzed.

A total of 8143/8771/10494 patients were considered in 2009/2014/2018, respectively. Incidence increased mainly among patients aged >60 years. In localized PDAC, the proportion of patients receiving best supportive care (BSC) only decreased at 43.6/36.4/32.4 % and 27.8/29.1/34.3 % received chemo(radio)therapy alone. The rate of upfront surgery remained stable while 3/8/18 % of operated patients received neoadjuvant therapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 7.0/7.9/8.5 months in the overall population. Among treated patients, 1-year OS was 61.4/67.7/68.8 % and 30.3/36.3/38.8 % for localized and metastatic PDAC, respectively.

This study confirms the rising incidence of PDAC. Improved outcomes were seen in localized PDAC, with a wider use of chemotherapy and neoadjuvant strategies, and in treated metastatic patients. A modest survival gain was seen overall, hindered by the still high rate of patients receiving BSC only.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains a deadly disease with 5 year overall survival of 10% among all stages. Standard of care for resectable disease remains surgical resection and adjuvant systemic therapy, but paradigms for borderline resectable and unresectable cases remain more nuanced. Radiation has been explored in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and definitive settings in a variety of randomized and non-randomized trials with mixed results. There is strong evidence to support the use of neoadjuvant radiation for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Utilization of radiation in the adjuvant setting remains unclear while the results of radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) 0848 are pending.

The primary treatment for operable pancreatic cancer (PC) involves surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. Nevertheless, perioperative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) may be used to mitigate the likelihood of recurrence and mortality. This network meta-analysis (NMA) assesses the comparative efficacy of various treatment approaches for resectable PC. A thorough search was carried out on January 31, 2023, encompassing PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. We incorporated randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared surgical interventions with or without (neo)adjuvant or perioperative therapies for operable PC. We conducted a fixed-effects Bayesian NMA. We presented the effect sizes in terms of hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) along with 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs). The treatment was deemed statistically superior when the 95% credible interval (CrI) did not encompass a null value (hazard ratio < 1). Treatment rankings were established based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). A total of 24 studies were incorporated, comparing 21 treatments with surgery in isolation. Eleven treatments showed superior efficacy compared to surgery alone, with HRs ranging from 0.38 for perioperative treatments to 0.73 for adjuvant 5-fluorouracil. After the exclusion of studies conducted in Asia, it was found that the perioperative regimen of gemcitabine combined with nab-paclitaxel was the most effective regimen (SUCRA, p = 0.99). The findings endorse the utilization of perioperative CT, especially multi-agent CT, as the favored intervention for operable PC in Western nations.

To assess overall survival (OS), compare the effects of neoadjuvant treatment, and describe surgical outcomes for patients undergoing pancreatic resection following chemotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

We approach BR/LA PDAC using chemotherapy followed by selective CRT to the primary site of disease where either the surgical margin remains radiologically threatened following chemotherapy or as a further downstaging treatment.

Retrospective study of patients between December 2005 and June 2023 at the Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

A total of 54 patients were included. The OS between R1 and R0 patients was significantly different: 7.5 versus 23 versus 42 versus 51 months for R1 chemo, R1 chemo and CRT, R0 chemo and R0 chemo, and CRT groups, respectively, P < 0.001. Similarly, 9 versus 18 versus 42 versus 41 months for N1 chemo, N1 chemo and CRT, N0 chemo and N0 chemo, and CRT groups, respectively, P = 0.0026. Multivariable Cox regression model demonstrated that perineural invasion (hazard ratio: 2.88, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-7.81; P = 0.038) and perivascular invasion (PVI) (HR: 2.76, 95% CI: 1.24-6.13; P = 0.013) were associated with significantly worse OS. Chemo and CRT conferred OS benefit compared to chemo only (7 vs 23 months, P = 0.004) in PVI-positive patients.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by CRT compared to chemotherapy alone for resected BD and LA PDAC was demonstrated to significantly improve median OS, in particular, in patients with R1 resection margins, ypN1 nodal status, and perivascular invasion.

In 2023 alone, it's estimated that over 64,000 patients will be diagnosed with PDAC and more than 50,000 patients will die of the disease. Current guidelines recommend neoadjuvant therapy for patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced PDAC, and data is emerging on its role in resectable disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may increase the number of patients able to receive complete chemotherapy regimens, increase the rate of microscopically tumor-free resection (R0) margin, and aide in identifying unfavorable tumor biology. To date, this is the largest study to examine surgical outcomes after long-duration neoadjuvant chemotherapy for PDAC.

Retrospective analysis of single-institution data.

The routine use of long-duration therapy in our study (median cycles: FOLFIRINOX = 10; gemcitabine-based = 7) is unique. The majority (85%) of patients received FOLFIRINOX without radiation therapy; the R0 resection rate was 76%. Median OS was 41 months and did not differ significantly among patients with resectable, borderline-resectable, or locally advanced disease.

This study demonstrates that in patients who undergo surgical resection after receipt of long-duration neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX therapy alone, survival outcomes are similar regardless of pretreatment resectability status and that favorable surgical outcomes can be attained.

Retrospective analysis suggests that dose escalation to a biologically effective dose of more than 70 Gy may improve overall survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but such treatments in practice are limited by proximity of organs at risk (OARs). We hypothesized that CT-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (OART) can account for interfraction movement of OARs and allow for safe delivery of ablative doses.

This is a single institution retrospective analysis of patients with PDAC treated with OART on the Ethos platform (Varian Medical Systems, a Siemens Healthineers Company, Palo Alto). All patients were treated to 40 Gy in 5 fractions. PTV overlapping with a 5 mm planning risk volume expansion on the stomach, duodenum and bowel received 25 Gy. Initial treatment plans were created conventionally. For each fraction, PTV and OAR volumes were recontoured with AI assistance after initial cone beam CT (CBCT). The adapted plan was calculated, underwent QA, and then compared to the scheduled plan. A second CBCT was obtained prior to delivery of the selected plan. Total treatment time (first CBCT to end of radiation delivery) and active physician time (first to second CBCT) were recorded. PTV_4000 V95 %, PTV_2500 V9 5%, and D0.03 cc to stomach, duodenum and bowel were reported for scheduled (S) and adapted (A) plans. CTCAEv5.0 toxicities were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-sided T test and α of 0.05.

21 patients with unresectable or locally-recurrent PDAC were analyzed, with a total of 105 fractions. Average total time was 29 min and 16 s (16:36-49:40) and average active physician time was 19:41 min (9:25-39:34). All fractions were treated with adapted plans. 97 % of adapted plans met PTV_4000 V95.0 % >95.0 % coverage goal and 100 % of adapted plans met OAR dose constraints. Median follow up was 6.6 months. Only 1 patient experienced acute grade 3+ toxicity directly attributable to radiation. Only 1 patient experienced late grade 3+ toxicity directly attributable to radiation.

Daily CT-based OART was associated with significantly reduced dose OARs while achieving superior PTV coverage. Given the relatively quick total treatment time, radiation delivery was generally well tolerated and easily incorporated into the clinic workflow. Our initial clinical experience demonstrates OART allows for safe dose escalation in the treatment of PDAC.

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) comprises 40% of pancreatic cancer diagnoses and has a relatively poor prognosis. Trans-arterial micro perfusion (TAMP)-mediated chemotherapy delivery to the primary tumor is a novel approach worthy of investigation. The RR1 (dose escalation) and RR2 (observational) studies examined the safety and preliminary efficacy of TAMP-delivered gemcitabine for LAPC.

RR1 and RR2 data were pooled. Both studies enrolled patients with LAPC with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma. Participant data, including age, sex, race, stage, previous treatments, toxicity, disease progression, and death, were collected. Median number of cycles and average treatment dosage were calculated. Overall survival (OS) was determined for the whole group and separately for patients who received and did not receive previous treatments. Aims of the analysis were to assess procedure safety, OS, and evaluate factors associated with OS.

The median age of the 43 patients enrolled in RR1 and RR2 was 72 years (range, 51-88 years). Median OS for the 35 eligible patients with stage III disease was 12.6 months (95% CI, 2.1-54.2 months). Previous chemoradiation was associated with significantly longer OS [27.1 months (95% CI, 8.4-40.6 months)] compared to previous systemic chemotherapy [14.6 months (95% CI, 6.4-54.2 months)] or no prior treatment [7.0 months (95% CI, 2.1-35.4 months)] (P < .001). The most common adverse events were GI related (abdominal pain, emesis, and vomiting); the most common grade 3 toxicity was sepsis.

Study results indicate that TAMP-mediated gemcitabine delivery in patients with LAPC is potentially safe, feasible, and provides potential clinical benefits.

NCT02237157 (RR1) and NCT02591082 (RR2).

Adjuvant therapy is associated with improved pancreatic cancer survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. However, whether adjuvant treatment should include radiotherapy is unclear in this setting.

This study queried the National Cancer Database for pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients who underwent curative resection after multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2010 and 2019 and received adjuvant treatment. Adjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (external beam, 45-50.4 gray) was compared with adjuvant chemotherapy alone. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression was used to assess survival associations. Analyses were repeated in a propensity score-matched subgroup.

Of 1983 patients who received adjuvant treatment after multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection, 1502 (75.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy alone and 481 (24.3%) received concomitant adjuvant radiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy). The patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were younger, were treated at non-academic facilities more often, and had higher rates of lymph node metastasis (ypN1-2), positive resection margins (R1), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI+). The median survival was shorter for the chemoradiotherapy-treated patients according to the unadjusted analysis (26.8 vs 33.2 months; p = 0.0017). After adjustment for confounders, chemoradiotherapy was associated with better outcomes in the multivariable model (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.93; p = 0.008). The association between chemoradiotherapy and improved outcomes was stronger for the patients with grade III tumors (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37-0.74) or LVI+ tumors (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44-0.75). In a subgroup of 396 propensity-matched patients, chemoradiotherapy was associated with a survival benefit only for the patients with LVI+ or grade III tumors.

After multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection for pancreatic cancer, additional adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy alone is associated with improved survival for patients with LVI+ or grade III tumors.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising new modality for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). The current study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of SBRT in patients with LAPC (NCT03648632).

This prospective single institution phase II study recruited patients with histologically or cytologically proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreas after more than two months of combination chemotherapy with no sign of progressive disease. Patients were prescribed 50-60 Gy in 5-8 fractions. Patients were initially treated on a standard linac (n = 4). Since 2019, patients were treated using online magnetic resonance (MR) image-guidance on a 1.5 T MRI-linac, where the treatment plan was adapted to the anatomy of the day. The primary endpoint was resection rate.

Twenty-eight patients were enrolled between August 2018 and March 2022. All patients had non-resectable disease at time of diagnosis. Median follow-up from inclusion was 28.3 months (95 % CI 24.0-NR). Median progression-free and overall survival from inclusion were 7.8 months (95 % CI 5.0-14.8) and 16.5 months (95 % CI 10.7-22.6), respectively. Six patients experienced grade III treatment-related adverse events (jaundice, nausea, vomiting and/or constipation). One of the initial four patients receiving treatment on a standard linac experienced a grade IV perforation of the duodenum. Six patients (21 %) underwent resection. A further one patient was offered resection but declined.

This study demonstrates that SBRT in patients with LAPC was associated with promising overall survival and resection rates. Furthermore, SBRT was safe and well tolerated, with limited severe toxicities.

For patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), who are candidates for radiation therapy, dose-escalated radiation therapy (RT) offers unique benefits over traditional radiation techniques. In this review, we present a historical perspective of dose-escalated RT for LAPC. We also outline advances in SBRT delivery, one form of dose escalation and a framework for selecting patients for treatment with SBRT.

Techniques for delivering SBRT to patients with LAPC have evolved considerably, now allowing for dose-escalation and superior respiratory motion management. At the same time, advancements in systemic therapy, particularly the use of induction multiagent chemotherapy, have called into question which patients would benefit most from radiation therapy. Multidisciplinary assessment of patients with LAPC is critical to guide management and select patients for local therapy. Results from ongoing trials will establish if there is a role of dose-escalated SBRT after induction chemotherapy for carefully selected patients.

Patients with LAPC have more therapeutic options than ever before. Careful selection for SBRT may enhance patient outcomes, pending the maturation of pivotal clinical trials.

To assess feasibility, toxicity and outcome of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy concomitant to capecitabine after induction chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer without distant progression after induction chemotherapy (CHT) were considered. Radiochemotherapy (RCT) consisted of 44.25 Gy in 15 fractions to the tumor and involved lymph-nodes concomitant to capecitabine 1250 mg/m2/day. Feasibility and toxicity were evaluated in all pts. Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), distant PFS (DPFS) and local PFS (LPFS) were assessed only in stage III patients.

254 patients, 220 stage III, 34 stage IV, were treated. Median follow up was 19 months. Induction CHT consisted of Gemcitabine (35 patients), or drug combination (219 patients); median duration was 6 months.Four patients (1.6 %) did not complete RT (1 early progression, 3 toxicity), median duration of RT was 20 days, 209 patients (82 %) received ≥ 75 % of capecitabine dose.During RCT G3 gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in 3.2% of patients, G3-G4 hematologic toxicity in 5.4% of patients. Subsequently, G3, G4, G5 gastric or duodenal lesions occurred in 10 (4%), 2 (0.8%) and 1 patients (0.4%), respectively.Median PFS, LPFS, and DPFS were 11.9 months (95 % CI:11.4-13), 16 months (95 % CI:14.2-17.3) and 14.0 months (95 % CI:12.6-146.5), respectively.Median OS was 19.5 months (95 % CL:18.1-21.3). One- and two-year survival were 85.2 % and 36 %, respectively.

The present schedule of hypofractionated RT after induction CHT is feasible with acceptable toxicity rate and provides an outcome comparable with that achievable with standard doses and fractionation.

The administration of dose-escalated radiation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains challenging because of the proximity of dose-limiting stomach and bowel, particularly the duodenum for pancreatic head tumors. We explore whether endoscopic injection of a temporary, absorbable hydrogel into the pancreatico-duodenal (PD) groove is safe and feasible for the purpose of increasing spatial separation between pancreatic head tumors and the duodenum.

Six patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent endoscopic injection of hydrogel into the PD groove. Safety was assessed based on the incidence of procedure-related adverse events resulting in a delay of radiation therapy initiation. Feasibility was defined as the ability to create spatial separation between the pancreas and duodenum, as assessed on simulation CT.

All 6 patients were able to undergo endoscopic injection of hydrogel into the PD groove. No device-related events were experienced at any point in follow-up. Presence of hydrogel in the PD groove was apparent on simulation CT in all 6 patients. Mean space created by the hydrogel was 7.7 mm +/- 2.4 mm. In 3 patients who underwent Whipple resection, presence of hydrogel in the PD groove was pathologically confirmed with no evidence of damage to the duodenum.

Endoscopic injection of hydrogel into the PD groove is safe and feasible. Characterization of the dosimetric benefit that this technique may offer in the setting of dose-escalated radiation should also be pursued, as should the ability of such dosimetric benefit to translate into clinically improved tumor control.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) poses a significant challenge in oncology due to its advanced stage upon diagnosis and limited treatment options. Surgical resection, the primary curative approach, often results in poor long-term survival rates, leading to the exploration of alternative strategies like neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). While NAT aims to enhance resectability and overall survival, there appears to be potential for improvement, prompting consideration of alternative neoadjuvant strategies integrating full-dose chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in TNT approaches. TNT integrates chemotherapy and radiotherapy prior to surgery, potentially improving margin-negative resection rates and enabling curative resection for locally advanced cases. The lingering question: is more always better? This article categorizes TNT strategies into six main groups based on radiotherapy (RT) techniques: (1) conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT), (2) the Dutch PREOPANC approach, (3) hypofractionated ablative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (HFA-IMRT), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) techniques, which further divide into (4) non-ablative SBRT, (5) nearly ablative SBRT, and (6) adaptive ablative SBRT. A comprehensive analysis of the literature on TNT is provided for both borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), with detailed sections for each.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) ranks among the 15 most prevalent cancers globally, characterized by aggressive growth and late-stage diagnosis. Advances in imaging and surgical techniques have redefined the classification of pancreatic PDAC into resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. While surgery remains the most effective treatment, only 20% of patients are eligible at diagnosis, necessitating innovative strategies to improve outcomes. Therefore, traditional treatment paradigms, primarily surgical resection for eligible patients, are increasingly supplemented by neoadjuvant therapies (NAT), which include chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or a combination of both. By administering systemic therapy prior to surgery, NAT aims to reduce tumor size and increase the feasibility of complete surgical resection, thus enhancing overall survival rates and potentially allowing more patients to undergo curative surgeries. Recent advances in treatment protocols, such as FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel, now integral to NAT strategies, have shown promising results in increasing the proportion of patients eligible for surgery by effectively reducing tumor size and addressing micrometastatic disease. Additionally, they offer improved response rates and survival benefits compared to traditional regimes. Despite these advancements, the role of NAT continues to evolve, necessitating ongoing research to optimize treatment regimens, minimize adverse effects, and identify patient populations that would benefit most from these approaches. Through a detailed analysis of current literature and recent clinical trials, this review highlights the transformative potential of NAT in managing PDAC, especially in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced stages, promising a shift towards more personalized and effective management strategies for PDAC.

The escalating prevalence of gastrointestinal cancers underscores the urgency for transformative approaches. Current treatment costs amount to billions of dollars annually, combined with the risks and comorbidities associated with invasive surgery. This highlights the importance of less invasive alternatives with organ preservation being a central aspect of the treatment paradigm. The current standard of care typically involves neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by surgical resection. There is a growing interest in organ preservation approaches by way of minimizing extensive surgical resections. Endoscopic ablation has proven to be useful in precursor lesions, as well as in palliative cases of unresectable disease. More recently, there has been an increase in reports on the utility of adjunct endoscopic ablative techniques for downstaging disease as well as contributing to non-surgical complete clinical response. This expansive field within endoscopic oncology holds great potential for advancing patient care. By addressing challenges, fostering collaboration, and embracing technological advancements, the gastrointestinal cancer treatment paradigm can shift towards a more sustainable and patient-centric future emphasizing organ and function preservation. This editorial examines the evolving landscape of endoscopic ablation strategies, emphasizing their potential to improve patient outcomes. We briefly review current applications of endoscopic ablation in the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, pancreas, bile ducts, and colon.

A multimodality approach, which usually includes chemotherapy, surgery, and/or radiotherapy, is optimal for patients with localized pancreatic cancer. The timing and sequence of these interventions depend on anatomic resectability and the biological suitability of the tumor and the patient. Tumors with vascular involvement (ie, borderline resectable/locally advanced) require surgical reassessments after therapy and participation of surgeons familiar with advanced techniques. When indicated, venous reconstruction should be offered as standard of care because it has acceptable morbidity. Morbidity and mortality of pancreas surgery may be mitigated when surgery is performed at high-volume centers.

The aim was to explore the optimal neoadjuvant therapy strategy for resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer, in order to provide a theoretical basis for the development of new neoadjuvant treatment protocols for clinical use.

The authors reviewed literature titles and abstracts comparing three treatment strategies (neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and upfront surgery) in PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science from 2009 to 2023 to estimate relative odds ratios for resection rate and hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) in all include trials.

A total of nine studies involving 889 patients were included in the analysis. The treatment methods included upfront surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. The network meta-analysis results demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery was an effective approach in improving OS for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) patients compared to upfront surgery (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.98) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.98). Additionally, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy significantly increased the margin negative resection (R0) rate and pathological negative lymph node (pN0) rate in patients with resectable and borderline RPC. However, it is worth noting that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy increased the risk of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events, including in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

The current evidence suggests that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is the optimal choice for treating patients with resectable and borderline RPC. Future research should focus on optimizing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens to effectively improve OS while reducing the occurrence of adverse events.

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Over the past decade, significant therapeutic advancements have improved the survival rates of patients with pancreatic cancer. One of the primary factors contributing to these positive outcomes is the evolution of chemotherapy, from monotherapy to doublet or triplet regimens, and the integration of multimodal approaches. Additionally, targeted agents tailored to patients with specific genetic alterations and the development of cell therapies show promise in benefiting certain subpopulations. This article focuses on examining pivotal studies that explore the role of chemotherapy in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, maintenance, and salvage settings; highlights interesting findings related to cell therapy; and provides an overview of ongoing trials concerning metastatic settings. This review primarily aimed to offer recommendations based on therapeutic evidence, recent advancements in new treatment combinations, and the most innovative approaches. A unique aspect of this review is the inclusion of published papers on clinical trials and real-world data in Taiwan, thus adding a valuable perspective to the overall analysis.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which is notorious for its aggressiveness and poor prognosis, remains an area of great unmet medical need, with a 5-year survival rate of 10% - the lowest of all solid tumours. At diagnosis, only 20% of patients have resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) or borderline RPC (BRPC) disease, while 80% of patients have unresectable tumours that are locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) or have distant metastases. Nearly 60% of patients who undergo upfront surgery for RPC are unable to receive adequate adjuvant chemotherapy (CHT) because of postoperative complications and early cancer recurrence. An important paradigm shift to achieve better outcomes has been the sequence of therapy, with neoadjuvant CHT preceding surgery. Three surgical stages have emerged for the preoperative assessment of nonmetastatic pancreatic cancers: RPC, BRPC, and LAPC. The main goal of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is to improve postoperative outcomes through enhanced selection of candidates for curative-intent surgery by identifying patients with aggressive or metastatic disease during initial CHT, reducing tumour volume before surgery to improve the rate of margin-negative resection (R0 resection, a microscopic margin-negative resection), reducing the rate of positive lymph node occurrence at surgery, providing early treatment of occult micrometastatic disease, and assessing tumour chemosensitivity and tolerance to treatment as potential surgical criteria. In this editorial, we summarize evidence concerning NAT of PDAC, providing insights into future practice and study design. Future research is needed to establish predictive biomarkers, measures of therapeutic response, and multidisciplinary strategies to improve patient-centered outcomes.

Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) is one of the standard first-line therapies in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC). However, there is no globally accepted second-line therapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX.

Patients with BRPC and LAPC (n = 647) treated with first-line mFOLFIRINOX between January 2017 and December 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. The details of the treatment outcomes and patterns of subsequent therapy after mFOLFIRINOX were reviewed.

With a median follow-up duration of 44.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.3-47.6), 322 patients exhibited disease progression on mFOLFIRINOX-locoregional progression only in 177 patients (55.0%) and distant metastasis in 145 patients (45.0%). The locoregional progression group demonstrated significantly longer post-progression survival (PPS) than that of the distant metastasis group (10.1 vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.002). In the locoregional progression group, survival outcomes did not differ between second-line chemoradiation/radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy (progression-free survival with second-line therapy [PFS-2], 3.2 vs. 4.3 months; p = 0.649; PPS, 10.7 vs. 10.2 months; p = 0.791). In patients who received second-line systemic chemotherapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX (n = 211), gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was associated with better disease control rates (69.2% vs. 42.3%, p = 0.005) and PFS-2 (3.8 vs. 1.7 months, p = 0.035) than gemcitabine monotherapy.

The current study showed the real-world practice pattern of subsequent therapy and clinical outcomes following progression on first-line mFOLFIRINOX in BRPC and LAPC. Further investigation is necessary to establish the optimal therapy after failure of mFOLFIRINOX.

Currently, there are no studies showing which neoadjuvant therapy modality can provide better prognosis for patients after pancreatic cancer surgery. This study explores the optimal neoadjuvant therapy model by comparing the survival differences between patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer (cT1-4N0-1M0) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NARCT).

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 723 patients with cT1-4N0-1M0 pancreatic cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy before surgery from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. After propensity score matching (PSM), we compared the effects of NACT and NARCT on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer, and then performed subgroup analyze. Finally, we used univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis to explore potential risk factors for OS and CSS in patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with preoperative neoadjuvant therapy.

Before PSM, mOS (30.0 months VS 26.0 months, P=0.122) and mCSS (30.0 months VS 26.0 months, P=0.117) were better in patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with NACT compared with NARCT, but this was not statistically significant (P>0.05). After PSM, mOS (30.0 months VS 25.0 months, P=0.032) and mCSS (33.0 months VS 26.0 months, P=0.028) were better in patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with NACT compared with NARCT, and this difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis results showed that age, lymph node positivity, and NARCT were independent adverse prognostic factors for OS and CSS in patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer.

The study results show that compared with NARCT, NACT is the best preoperative neoadjuvant therapy mode for patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer. This result still needs to be confirmed by more prospective randomized controlled trials.

For patients with locoregionally confined pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), margin-negative surgical resection is the only known curative treatment; however, the majority of patients are not operable candidates at initial diagnosis. Among patients with resectable disease who undergo surgery alone, the 5-year survival remains poor. Adjuvant therapies, including systemic therapy or chemoradiation, are utilized as they improve locoregional control and overall survival. There has been increasing interest in the use of neoadjuvant therapy to obtain early control of occult metastatic disease, allow local tumor response to facilitate margin-negative resection, and provide a test of time and biology to assist with the selection of candidates most likely to benefit from radical surgical resection. However, limited guidance exists regarding the relative effectiveness of treatment options. In this systematic review, the American Radium Society multidisciplinary gastrointestinal expert panel convened to develop Appropriate Use Criteria evaluating the evidence regarding neoadjuvant treatment for patients with PDAC, including surgery, systemic therapy, and radiotherapy, in terms of oncologic outcomes and quality of life. The evidence was assessed using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Study (PICOS) design framework and "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses" 2020 methodology. Eligible studies included phases 2 to 3 trials, meta-analyses, and retrospective analyses published between January 1, 2012 and December 30, 2022 in the Ovid Medline database. A summary of recommendations based on the available literature is outlined to guide practitioners in the management of patients with PDAC.

Despite the advancements in the treatment of localized pancreatic cancer, several unresolved issues persist in clinical practice, especially in the neoadjuvant setting. These include determining the criteria for selecting patients for treatment, identifying the most effective chemotherapy regimens, understanding the role of radiotherapy, and accurately assessing how patients respond to treatment. Current strategies for assessing patients before surgery involve thoroughly evaluating their overall health status, analyzing tumor markers, and using advanced imaging techniques. However, existing methods for staging the disease still have limitations when it comes to accurately detecting metastatic cancer. The ongoing debate between performing surgery upfront or administering neoadjuvant therapy highlights the need for robust clinical evidence to guide treatment decisions effectively. This review analyzes the evidence regarding controversial topics in neoadjuvant pancreatic cancer treatment and discusses further research efforts to enhance patient outcomes. To improve the outcomes found with surgery alone, multimodal treatment with chemotherapy.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an aggressive disease marked by high rates of both local and distant failure. In the minority of patients with potentially resectable disease, multimodal treatment paradigms have allowed for prolonged survival in an increasingly larger pool of well-selected patients. Therefore, it is critical for surgical oncologists to be abreast of current guideline recommendations for both surgical management and multimodal therapy for pancreas cancer. We discuss these guidelines, as well as the underlying data supporting these positions, to offer surgical oncologists a framework for managing patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.