1
|
Labiad C, Alric H, Barret M, Cazelles A, Rahmi G, Karoui M, Manceau G. Management after local excision of small rectal cancers. Indications for completion total mesorectal excision and possible alternatives. J Visc Surg 2024; 161:173-181. [PMID: 38448362 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2024.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
The treatment of superficial rectal cancers (local excision, or proctectomy with total mesorectal excision (TME) remains controversial. Endoscopy and endorectal ultrasonography are essential for the precise initial definition of these small cancers. During endoscopy, the depth of the lesion can be estimated using virtual chromoendoscopy with magnification, thereby aiding the assessment of the possibilities of local excision. Current international recommendations indicate completion proctectomy after wide local excision for cases where the pathologic examination reveals poorly-differentiated lesions, lymphovascular invasion, grade 2 or 3 tumor budding, and incomplete resection. But debate persists regarding whether the depth of submucosal invasion can accurately predict the risk of lymph node spread. Recent data from the literature suggest that the depth of submucosal invasion should no longer, by itself, be an indication for additional oncological surgery. Adjuvant radio-chemotherapy could be an alternative to completion proctectomy in patients with pT1 rectal cancer and unfavorable histopathological criteria. A Dutch randomized controlled trial is underway to validate this strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camélia Labiad
- Digestive and Oncological Surgery Department, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Cité, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Hadrien Alric
- Gastroenterology Department, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Maximilien Barret
- Gastroenterology Department, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital Cochin, université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Antoine Cazelles
- Digestive and Oncological Surgery Department, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Cité, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Gabriel Rahmi
- Gastroenterology Department, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Mehdi Karoui
- Digestive and Oncological Surgery Department, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Cité, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Gilles Manceau
- Digestive and Oncological Surgery Department, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Cité, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kimoto Y, Sawada R, Banjoya S, Iida T, Kimura T, Furuta K, Nagae S, Ito Y, Yamazaki H, Takeuchi N, Takayanagi S, Kano Y, Sakuno T, Ono K, Negishi R, Sakai E, Minato Y, Chiba H, Ohata K. Comparison of cold snare polypectomy for sessile serrated lesions ≥10 mm between experienced and trainee endoscopists: A propensity score matching cohort study. DEN OPEN 2024; 4:e328. [PMID: 38188356 PMCID: PMC10771227 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Previous studies of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) ≥10 mm were performed by experienced endoscopists, and therefore their skills might have significantly influenced results. In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of CSP for SSLs ≥10 mm between experienced and trainee endoscopists. METHODS In a 1:1 propensity score matched retrospective cohort study, we compared the complete resection rate, en-bloc resection rate, adverse event rate, and procedure time between experienced and trainee groups. Thirteen endoscopists performed CSP, and we defined the experienced group as endoscopists with board certification from the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. RESULTS We examined 616 lesions with SSLs ≥10 mm resected by CSP between February 2018 and May 2022. We excluded 61 lesions from the analysis because they had simultaneously undergone hot snare polypectomy (n = 57) or had been taken over by experienced endoscopists from trainees in the CSP procedure (n = 4). Finally, we identified 217 propensity score-matched pairs (n = 434). Between experienced and trainee groups, the results were complete resection rate (100 vs. 100%; p = 1.00), en-bloc resection rate (73.2 vs. 75.6%; p = 0.24), adverse event rate (3.2 vs. 2.8%; p = 0.77), or procedure time (6.2 vs. 5.9 min; p = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS We have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of CSP for SSLs ≥10 mm performed by experienced and trainee endoscopists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiaki Kimoto
- Department of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyNTT Medical Center TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Rikimaru Sawada
- Department of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyNTT Medical Center TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Susumu Banjoya
- Department of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyNTT Medical Center TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Toshihumi Iida
- Department of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyNTT Medical Center TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Tomoya Kimura
- Department of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyNTT Medical Center TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Koichi Furuta
- Department of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyNTT Medical Center TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Shinya Nagae
- Department of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyNTT Medical Center TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Yohei Ito
- Department of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyNTT Medical Center TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroshi Yamazaki
- Department of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyNTT Medical Center TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Nao Takeuchi
- Department of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyNTT Medical Center TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Syunya Takayanagi
- Department of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyNTT Medical Center TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Yuki Kano
- Department of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyNTT Medical Center TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Takashi Sakuno
- Department of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyNTT Medical Center TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Kohei Ono
- Department of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyNTT Medical Center TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Ryoju Negishi
- Division of GastroenterologyItabashi Chuo Medical CenterTokyoJapan
| | - Eiji Sakai
- Division of GastroenterologyYokohama Sakae Kyosai HospitalKanagawaJapan
| | - Yohei Minato
- Department of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyNTT Medical Center TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Hideyuki Chiba
- Department of GastroenterologyOmori Red Cross HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Ken Ohata
- Department of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyNTT Medical Center TokyoTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ishikawa T, Okimoto K, Matsumura T, Ogasawara S, Fukuda Y, Kitsukawa Y, Yokoyama Y, Kanayama K, Akizue N, Iino Y, Ohta Y, Ishigami H, Taida T, Tsuchiya S, Saito K, Kamezaki H, Kobayashi A, Kikuchi Y, Tada M, Shiko Y, Ozawa Y, Kato J, Yamaguchi T, Kato N. Risk factors of unintentional piecemeal resection in endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps ≥ 10 mm. Sci Rep 2024; 14:493. [PMID: 38177176 PMCID: PMC10766986 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50815-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the lesion and endoscopist factors associated with unintentional endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (uniEPMR) of colorectal lesions ≥ 10 mm. uniEPMR was defined from the medical record as anything other than a preoperatively planned EPMR. Factors leading to uniEPMR were identified by retrospective univariate and multivariate analyses of lesions ≥ 10 mm (adenoma including sessile serrated lesion and carcinoma) that were treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) at three hospitals. Additionally, a questionnaire survey was conducted to determine the number of cases treated by each endoscopist. A learning curve (LC) was created for each lesion size based on the number of experienced cases and the percentage of uniEPMR. Of 2557 lesions, 327 lesions underwent uniEPMR. The recurrence rate of uniEPMR was 2.8%. Multivariate analysis showed that lesion diameter ≥ 30 mm (odds ratio 11.83, 95% confidence interval 6.80-20.60, p < 0.0001) was the most associated risk factor leading to uniEPMR. In the LC analysis, the proportion of uniEPMR decreased for lesion sizes of 10-19 mm until 160 cases. The proportion of uniEPMR decreased with the number of experienced cases in the 20-29 mm range, while there was no correlation between the number of experienced cases and the proportion of uniEPMR ≥ 30 mm. These results suggest that 160 cases seem to be the minimum number of cases needed to be proficient in en bloc EMR. Additionally, while lesion sizes of 10-29 mm are considered suitable for EMR, lesion sizes ≥ 30 mm are not applicable for en bloc EMR from the perspective of both lesion and endoscopist factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsubasa Ishikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo-ku, Chiba-City, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Okimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo-ku, Chiba-City, 260-8670, Japan.
| | - Tomoaki Matsumura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo-ku, Chiba-City, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Sadahisa Ogasawara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo-ku, Chiba-City, 260-8670, Japan
- Translational Research and Development Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Fukuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seikei-kai Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yoshio Kitsukawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chiba Municipal Aoba Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuya Yokoyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chibaken Saiseikai Narashino Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kengo Kanayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo-ku, Chiba-City, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Naoki Akizue
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo-ku, Chiba-City, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Yotaro Iino
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kimitsu Chuo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuki Ohta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo-ku, Chiba-City, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Hideaki Ishigami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chiba Rosai Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Taida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo-ku, Chiba-City, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Shin Tsuchiya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Funabashi Central Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Keiko Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo-ku, Chiba-City, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Hidehiro Kamezaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Akitoshi Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Funabashi Municipal Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yasuharu Kikuchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Numazu City Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Minoru Tada
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Chiba Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuki Shiko
- Biostatistics Section, Clinical Research Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Ozawa
- Biostatistics Section, Clinical Research Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Jun Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo-ku, Chiba-City, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Taketo Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Funabashi Central Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Naoya Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chuo-ku, Chiba-City, 260-8670, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Morimoto S, Tanaka H, Takehara Y, Yamamoto N, Tanino F, Kamigaichi Y, Yamashita K, Takigawa H, Yuge R, Urabe Y, Oka S. Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection as a salvage option for difficult colorectal conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:222-228. [PMID: 37968384 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10544-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When total submucosal dissection is difficult to achieve during conventional colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD), the lesion can be resected by final snaring through salvage hybrid ESD (SH-ESD). This study aimed to examine the outcomes of SH-ESD and identify its indications that could achieve en bloc resection. METHODS We recruited 1039 consecutive patients with colorectal lesions that underwent ESD at Hiroshima University Hospital between January 2015 and December 2020. C-ESD was attempted thoroughly in 924 lesions (C-ESD group, including 9 lesions in which ESD was discontinued), and SH-ESD was performed owing to some difficulties in 115 lesions (SH-ESD group). Risk factors for incomplete resection by SH-ESD and ESD discontinuation were evaluated using multivariate analysis. The outcomes were compared between cases with remaining undissected submucosa of < 20 mm in diameter in the SH-ESD and C-ESD groups, using propensity score matching. RESULTS Multivariate analysis revealed that a procedure time > 80 min and remaining undissected submucosa ≥ 20 mm in diameter were significant risk factors for incomplete resection after SH-ESD and ESD discontinuation. By propensity score matching analysis, procedure time was significantly shorter in the SH-ESD group with remaining undissected submucosa < 20 mm in diameter than in the C-ESD group (71 min vs. 90 min, p = 0.0053), although no significant difference was found in the en bloc resection rate (94% vs. 87%, p = 0.0914). CONCLUSION SH-ESD can be an alternative surgical method when conventional ESD is difficult to continue in cases in which the remaining undissected submucosa is < 20 mm in diameter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shin Morimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Hidenori Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
| | - Yudai Takehara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Noriko Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Fumiaki Tanino
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Yuki Kamigaichi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Ken Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Hidehiko Takigawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Ryo Yuge
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Yuji Urabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Shiro Oka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minamiku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen X, Peng D, Liu D, Li R. The feasibility of endoscopic resection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors. Updates Surg 2023; 75:2235-2243. [PMID: 37812317 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01650-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of endoscopic resection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) in different size groups. This retrospective study included 2699 patients with LSTs who underwent endoscopic treatment at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from May 2012 to February 2022. The patient baseline and procedure outcomes were compared between the < 5 cm group, 5-10 cm group, and ≥ 10 cm group. Meanwhile, lesions larger than 5 cm in diameter were longitudinally compared for endoscopic safety using ESD with surgical operation outcomes. There were 2105 patients in the < 5 cm group, 547 patients in the 5-10 cm group, and 47 patients in the ≥ 10 cm group. En bloc resection and R0 resection rates, the incidence of adverse events, length of stay (LOS), and medical costs significantly differed between the groups (P < 0.01). Comorbidity of diabetes or hypertension, history of antithrombotic drug use, lesion size, location, gross type, endoscopic procedures selection, and circumferential extent of the mucosal defect were independent risk factors for delayed bleeding (P < 0.05). En bloc resection, R0 resection, and lesion canceration were associated with local recurrence. For lesions larger than 5 cm in diameter, ESD had similar R0 resection and local recurrence rates compared with a surgical operation but a lower en bloc rate, LOS, and medical costs. Expert endoscopists can significantly increase en bloc and R0 resection rates and reduce the incidence of adverse events. Endoscopic resection results distinguish in different size groups of colorectal LSTs, yet its safety and feasibility are not inferior to a surgical operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingcen Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan Province, China
- Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan Province, China
- Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases of Hunan Province, Changsha, 410011, Hunan Province, China
| | - Dongzi Peng
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan Province, China
- Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan Province, China
- Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases of Hunan Province, Changsha, 410011, Hunan Province, China
| | - Deliang Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan Province, China
- Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan Province, China
- Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases of Hunan Province, Changsha, 410011, Hunan Province, China
| | - Rong Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan Province, China.
- Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Central South University, No. 139 Middle Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan Province, China.
- Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases of Hunan Province, Changsha, 410011, Hunan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jacques J, Neuhaus H, Enderle MD, Biber U, Linzenbold W, Schenk M, Khalaf K, Repici A. Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Performance of a Novel Hybrid-Technology Knife in an Animal Trial. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3347. [PMID: 37958243 PMCID: PMC10650536 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13213347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was developed for the removal of benign and early malignant lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. We aimed to evaluate the performance and safety of a novel high-pressure waterjet-assisted ESD knife in colorectal applications. Six female German Landrace pigs with an average weight of 62 kg (range 60-65 kg) were used in this prospective, randomized, and controlled study. Twenty-four ESDs were performed by three endoscopists: Twelve each with the new Erbe HYBRIDknife® flex T-Type (HK-T) and the Olympus DualKnife® J (DK-J), including six rectal and six colonic ESDs per instrument. The order of performance was randomized regarding anatomic position and instrument. As the primary endpoint, ESD knife performance characteristics were combined and rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with 5 Likert points (LP) representing the best response (5 = very good). The HK-T was rated significantly better than the DK-J (4.7 LP versus 4.4 LP, p = 0.0295), mainly because of HK-T injection ability (5 LP versus 3 LP, p < 0.0001) and hemostasis (5 LP versus 4 LP, p = 0.0452). There was no difference in procedure time (HK-T: 35 min versus DK-J: 34 min, p = 0.8005), resection diameter (3.1 cm versus 2.8 cm, p = 0.3492), injection volume (41 mL versus 46 mL, p = 0.5633), and complication rates. HK-T is as effective as DK-J in colorectal ESD in terms of dissection quality but has better injection and hemostatic properties. The impact of these technical advantages on the ESD treatment of patients with large superficial colorectal lesions remains to be clinically verified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérémie Jacques
- Department of Hepato-Gastro-Enterology, University Hospital Center, 87042 Limoges, France
| | - Horst Neuhaus
- Medical Clinic for Gastroenterology at the Hospital Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Ulrich Biber
- Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, 72072 Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Martin Schenk
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University Hospital Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Kareem Khalaf
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bi D, Zhang LY, Alqaisieh M, Shrigiriwar A, Farha J, Mahmoud T, Akiki K, Almario JA, Shah-Khan SM, Gordon SR, Adler JM, Radetic M, Draganov PV, David YN, Shinn B, Mohammed Z, Schlachterman A, Yuen S, Al-Taee A, Yunseok N, Trasolini R, Bejjani M, Ghandour B, Ramberan H, Canakis A, Ngamruengphong S, Storm AC, Singh S, Pohl H, Bucobo JC, Buscaglia JM, D'Souza LS, Qumseya B, Kumta NA, Kumar A, Haber GB, Aihara H, Sawhney M, Kim R, Berzin TM, Khashab MA. Novel through-the-scope suture closure of colonic EMR defects (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:122-129. [PMID: 36889364 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Large colon polyps removed by EMR can be complicated by delayed bleeding. Prophylactic defect clip closure can reduce post-EMR bleeding. Larger defects can be challenging to close using through-the-scope clips (TTSCs), and proximal defects are difficult to reach using over-the-scope techniques. A novel, through-the-scope suturing (TTSS) device allows direct closure of mucosal defects without scope withdrawal. The goal of this study was to evaluate the rate of delayed bleeding after the closure of large colon polyp EMR sites with TTSS. METHODS A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed involving 13 centers. All defect closure by TTSS after EMR of colon polyps ≥2 cm from January 2021 to February 2022 were included. The primary outcome was rate of delayed bleeding. RESULTS A total of 94 patients (52% female; mean age, 65 years) underwent EMR of predominantly right-sided (n = 62 [66%]) colon polyps (median size, 35 mm; interquartile range, 30-40 mm) followed by defect closure with TTSS during the study period. All defects were successfully closed with TTSS alone (n = 62 [66%]) or with TTSS and TTSCs (n = 32 [34%]), using a median of 1 (interquartile range, 1-1) TTSS system. Delayed bleeding occurred in 3 patients (3.2%), with 2 requiring repeated endoscopic evaluation/treatment (moderate). CONCLUSION TTSS alone or with TTSCs was effective in achieving complete closure of all post-EMR defects, despite a large lesion size. After TTSS closure with or without adjunctive devices, delayed bleeding was seen in 3.2% of cases. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings before wider adoption of TTSS for large polypectomy closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danse Bi
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jad Farha
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Tala Mahmoud
- Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Karl Akiki
- Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | | - Stuart R Gordon
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Adler
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Mark Radetic
- University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | | | | | - Brianna Shinn
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Zahraa Mohammed
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Sofia Yuen
- NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Heiko Pohl
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anand Kumar
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Mandeep Sawhney
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Raymond Kim
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Tyler M Berzin
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kimoto Y, Sakai E, Inamoto R, Kurebayashi M, Takayanagi S, Hirata T, Suzuki Y, Ishii R, Konishi T, Kanda K, Negishi R, Takita M, Ono K, Minato Y, Muramoto T, Ohata K. Safety and Efficacy of Cold Snare Polypectomy Without Submucosal Injection for Large Sessile Serrated Lesions: A Prospective Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:e132-e138. [PMID: 33152541 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.10.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has become the standard resection method for small colorectal polyps (<10 mm). Sessile serrated lesions (SSL) have low prevalence of advanced histology irrespective of size, and thus could be amenable to CSP. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of CSP for SSLs ≥10 mm. METHODS Between November 2018 and January 2020, we prospectively enrolled 300 consecutive patients who underwent CSP for 474 SSLs ≥10 mm. To delineate SSL borders, indigo carmine chromoendoscopy and/or image-enhanced endoscopy was conducted. Piecemeal CSP (pCSP) was performed in cases where en-bloc resection was difficult. Biopsy specimens were obtained from the margins of the post-polypectomy defect to confirm complete resection. Surveillance colonoscopy was performed to screen for local recurrence. RESULTS All lesions were successfully resected using CSP without submucosal injection. The median diameter of the resected lesions was 14 mm, and pCSP was used to resect 106 (22%) lesions. Post-polypectomy biopsies revealed residual serrated tissue in only one case (0.2%). Adverse events included immediate bleeding in 8 (3%) patients; no delayed bleeding events occurred, irrespective of the use of antithrombotic drugs. During a 7-month median follow-up period, surveillance colonoscopies were performed for 384 lesions (81%), and no local recurrences were detected. CONCLUSIONS CSP without submucosal injection is a safe and effective treatment for SSLs ≥10 mm. UMIN Clinical Trials, Number: UMIN000034763.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiaki Kimoto
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiji Sakai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Yokohama Sakae Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Rin Inamoto
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Marie Kurebayashi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Syunya Takayanagi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoya Hirata
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Suzuki
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rindo Ishii
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Konishi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Keisuke Kanda
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kameda Family Clinic, Tateyama, Japan
| | - Ryoju Negishi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Maiko Takita
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kohei Ono
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yohei Minato
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Muramoto
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ken Ohata
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Most patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) were diagnosed in advanced stage and the prognosis is poor. Therefore, early detection and prevention of CRC are very important. As with other cancers, there is also the tertiary prevention for CRC. The primary prevention is etiological prevention, which is mainly the treatment of adenoma or inflammation for preventing the development into cancer. The secondary prevention is the early diagnosis and early treatment for avoiding progressing to advanced cancer. The tertiary prevention belongs to the broad category of prevention, mainly for advanced CRC, through surgical treatment and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy for preventing tumor recurrence or metastasis. This consensus is based on the recent domestic and international consensus guidelines and the latest progress of international researches in the past five years. This consensus opinion seminar was hosted by the Chinese Society of Gastroenterology and Cancer Collaboration Group of Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, and was organized by the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology & Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. The consensus opinion contains 60 statement clauses, the standard and basis of the evidence-based medicine grade and voting grade of the statement strictly complied with the relevant international regulations and practice.
Collapse
|
10
|
Chandan S, Facciorusso A, Ramai D, Deliwala S, Mohan BP, Kassab LL, Draganov PV, Othman MO, Kochhar GS. Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large (> 20 mm) non pedunculated colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E74-E81. [PMID: 35047337 PMCID: PMC8759936 DOI: 10.1055/a-1635-6112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) > 20 mm in size can be challenging. Piecemeal EMR of these lesions results in high rates of adenoma recurrence at first surveillance colonoscopy (SC1). Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) of post resection margins is a safe and effective technique to prevent adenoma recurrence. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of this technique. Patients and methods Multiple databases were searched through April 2021 for studies that reported on outcomes of post EMR STSC for LSTs > 20 mm in size. Meta-analysis was performed to determine pooled odds of adenoma recurrence as well as pooled proportion of adverse events including intraprocedural and delayed bleeding as well as intraprocedural perforation events. Results Six studies including two randomized controlled trials (RCT) and four cohort studies with 2122 patients were included in the final analysis. Overall pooled odds of adenoma recurrence at SC1 with post EMR STSC compared to no STSC was 0.27 (95 % 0.18-0.42; I2 = 0 %), P < 0.001. Pooled rate of adenoma recurrence at SC1 in post EMR STSC cohort was 6 %. Rates of intraprocedural bleeding, delayed bleeding and intraprocedural perforation were 10.3 %, 6.5 % and 2 % respectively. Conclusions Our results show that thermal ablation of resection margins with STSC in LSTs > 20 mm is a safe and effective technique in reducing the incidence of adenoma recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurabh Chandan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHI Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Internal Medicine, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York, United States
| | - Smit Deliwala
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hurley Medical Center, Flint, Michigan, United States
| | - Babu P. Mohan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
| | - Lena L. Kassab
- Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Peter V. Draganov
- Gastroenterology, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Mohamed O. Othman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Gursimran S. Kochhar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nishimura T, Oka S, Tanaka S, Kamigaichi Y, Tamari H, Shimohara Y, Okamoto Y, Inagaki K, Matsumoto K, Tanaka H, Yamashita K, Ninomiya Y, Kitadai Y, Arihiro K, Chayama K. Long-term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients aged over 80 years. BMC Gastroenterol 2021; 21:324. [PMID: 34425746 PMCID: PMC8381532 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01899-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In Japan, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is standardized for large colorectal tumors. However, its validity in the elderly population is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ESD for colorectal tumors in elderly patients aged over 80 years.
Methods ESD was performed on 178 tumors in 165 consecutive patients aged over 80 years between December 2008 and December 2018. We retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes of ESD. We also assessed the prognosis of 160 patients followed up for more than 12 months. Results The mean patient age was 83.7 ± 3.1 years. The number of patients with comorbidities was 100 (62.5%). Among all patients, 106 (64.2%) were categorized as class 1 or 2 according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of physical status (ASA-PS), and 59 (35.8%) were classified as class 3. The mean procedure time was 97.7 ± 79.3 min. The rate of histological en bloc resection was 93.8% (167/178). Delayed bleeding in 11 cases (6.2%) and perforation in 7 cases (3.9%) were treated conservatively. The 5-year survival rate was 89.9%. No deaths from primary disease (mean follow-up time: 35.3 ± 27.5 months) were observed. Overall survival rates were significantly lower in the non-curative resection group that did not undergo additional surgery than in the curative resection group (P = 0.0152) and non-curative group that underwent additional surgery (P = 0.0259). Overall survival rates were higher for ASA-PS class 1 or 2 patients than class 3 patients (P = 0.0105). Metachronous tumors (> 5 mm) developed in 9.4% of patients. Conclusions ESD for colorectal tumors in patients aged over 80 years is safe. Colorectal cancer-associated deaths were prevented although comorbidities pose a high risk of poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyuki Nishimura
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Shiro Oka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
| | - Shinji Tanaka
- Department of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yuki Kamigaichi
- Department of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hirosato Tamari
- Department of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | | | - Yuki Okamoto
- Department of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Katsuaki Inagaki
- Department of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kenta Matsumoto
- Department of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hidenori Tanaka
- Department of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Ken Yamashita
- Department of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yuki Ninomiya
- Department of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yasuhiko Kitadai
- Department of the Faculty of Human Culture and Science, Prefectural University of Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Koji Arihiro
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Chayama
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Does precutting prior to endoscopic piecemeal resection of large colorectal neoplasias reduce local recurrence? A KASID multicenter study. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:3433-3441. [PMID: 34341906 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08664-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It would be expected that local recurrence could be reduced by performing precutting (with sufficient margins) prior to endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR). We explored the clinical outcomes and local recurrence after precutting EPMR of large colorectal neoplasias. METHODS Between January 2005 and December 2015, in total, 223 patients with colorectal neoplasias ≥ 2 cm in diameter removed via EPMR in four tertiary hospitals were enrolled. The patients were divided into a precut EPMR group (n = 62) and a non-precut EPMR group (n = 161). We retrospectively evaluated clinical outcomes and factors associated with local recurrence. RESULTS The mean total procedure time was significantly shorter in the non-precut EPMR group than in the precut EPMR group. However, the number of pieces, and the complete resection and recurrence rates, did not differ significantly [for the latter, precut 8.1% vs. non-precut 9.9%, P = 0.668]. The complete resection rate, number of pieces, and use of argon plasma coagulation (APC) were significantly associated with the local recurrence rate on univariate analysis. In the Cox's proportional hazards model, prophylactic APC [hazard ratio 0.307, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.114-0.823; P = 0.019] and complete resection rate (odds ratio 0.083, 95% CI 0.011-0.655; P = 0.018) were significantly associated with the local recurrence rate. CONCLUSION Precutting prior to EPMR did not significantly reduce the local recurrence rate or the number of resected pieces. Histologically complete resection, reducing the number of pieces, and prophylactic APC seem to be important in terms of reducing local recurrence.
Collapse
|
13
|
Ali S, Khetpal N, Idrisov E, Rahman AU, Khalid S, Du Y, Navaneethan U, Varadarajulu S, Hawes R, Hasan MK. Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colonic Mucosal Neoplasia and Evaluation of Long-Term Recurrence: A Single-Center Experience of 500 Cases. South Med J 2021; 114:199-206. [PMID: 33787931 DOI: 10.14423/smj.0000000000001234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an alternative to surgery for the treatment of large laterally spreading lesions. Residual or recurrent adenoma is a major limitation. This study aimed to quantify early and late recurrences and to assess its associated risk factors. METHODS The study was a single-center, multiendoscopist, longitudinal study conducted between January 1, 2013 and April 26, 2017. A total of 480 patients with 500 polyps who underwent an endoscopic resection were included. Surveillance colonoscopy (SC) was performed at 4 to 6 months (SC1) and 16 to 18 months (SC2). RESULTS At SC1, early recurrence was noted in 77 of 354 (21.8%) lesions; 76 (98.7%) were treated endoscopically. The remaining 277 of 354 (78.2%) lesions had no recurrence at SC1; only 41 lesions (15%) were followed up at SC2. Recurrence at SC2 was found in 4 lesions (9.8%), all of which were treated endoscopically. Lesion size >40 mm was associated with recurrence. Recurrence at both SC1 and SC2 was successfully treated endoscopically in 78 of 81 lesions (96.3%). CONCLUSIONS EMR is an effective, minimally invasive technique for the treatment of large laterally spreading lesions. Although recurrence is a concern, its risk is low (21.8% on SC1 and 9.8% on SC2) and was managed endoscopically in 96.3% cases on follow-up endoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saeed Ali
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, the Department of Internal Medicine, Hartford Healthcare, Hartford, Connecticut, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, AdventHealth Research Institute and the Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, Florida
| | - Neelam Khetpal
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, the Department of Internal Medicine, Hartford Healthcare, Hartford, Connecticut, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, AdventHealth Research Institute and the Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, Florida
| | - Evgeny Idrisov
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, the Department of Internal Medicine, Hartford Healthcare, Hartford, Connecticut, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, AdventHealth Research Institute and the Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, Florida
| | - Asad Ur Rahman
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, the Department of Internal Medicine, Hartford Healthcare, Hartford, Connecticut, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, AdventHealth Research Institute and the Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, Florida
| | - Sameen Khalid
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, the Department of Internal Medicine, Hartford Healthcare, Hartford, Connecticut, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, AdventHealth Research Institute and the Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, Florida
| | - Yuan Du
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, the Department of Internal Medicine, Hartford Healthcare, Hartford, Connecticut, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, AdventHealth Research Institute and the Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, Florida
| | - Udayakumar Navaneethan
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, the Department of Internal Medicine, Hartford Healthcare, Hartford, Connecticut, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, AdventHealth Research Institute and the Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, Florida
| | - Shyam Varadarajulu
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, the Department of Internal Medicine, Hartford Healthcare, Hartford, Connecticut, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, AdventHealth Research Institute and the Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, Florida
| | - Robert Hawes
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, the Department of Internal Medicine, Hartford Healthcare, Hartford, Connecticut, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, AdventHealth Research Institute and the Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, Florida
| | - Muhammad Khalid Hasan
- From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, the Department of Internal Medicine, Hartford Healthcare, Hartford, Connecticut, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, AdventHealth Research Institute and the Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Indications and outcomes of colorectal hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection: a large multicenter 10-year study. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:1894-1902. [PMID: 33847798 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08471-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a colorectal lesion resection procedure that includes both planned and salvage procedures. Previous colorectal hybrid ESD studies have involved single institutions or few operators over a short timeframe, and the size for indication has not been established. In this multicentre study, we investigated the clinical outcomes of hybrid ESD for colorectal tumors that met the 30 mm lesion size criterion. METHODS From January 2008 to December 2018, colorectal hybrid ESD was performed for 172 lesions (diameter range, ≥ 20- < 30 mm) at Hiroshima GI Endoscopy Research Group. We compared clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes between 56 and 116 lesions in planned and salvage groups, respectively. We also compared data between 2008 and 2013 (the first period) and 2014 and 2018 (the second period) to assess operator experience. RESULTS No significant difference was found in the complete en bloc resection rate between the planned and salvage groups (92.9% vs. 83.6%, respectively). Procedure time was shorter in the planned group (44.5 min) than in the salvage group (72.0 min, p < 0.01). The perforation rate was higher in the salvage group (21.6%) than in the planned group (0%, p < 0.01); however, the perforation rate during snaring in the salvage group was 1.8%. During the second period relative to the first period, we recorded a significantly higher complete en bloc resection rate (95.7% vs. 75.6%, respectively, p < 0.01) and experienced operator rate (75.5% vs. 53.9%, respectively, p < 0.01). Furthermore, no significant difference was found in the complete en bloc resection rate between the planned and salvage groups during the second period (100% vs. 94.4%, respectively). CONCLUSION Colorectal hybrid ESD, especially salvage hybrid ESD performed by experienced operators, is adoptable and safe for lesions with diameters ranging from ≥ 20 to < 30 mm.
Collapse
|
15
|
Tanaka S, Saitoh Y, Matsuda T, Igarashi M, Matsumoto T, Iwao Y, Suzuki Y, Nozaki R, Sugai T, Oka S, Itabashi M, Sugihara KI, Tsuruta O, Hirata I, Nishida H, Miwa H, Enomoto N, Shimosegawa T, Koike K. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps. J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:323-335. [PMID: 33710392 PMCID: PMC8005396 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-021-01776-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE) published ''Daicho Polyp Shinryo Guideline 2014'' in Japanese and a part of this guideline was published in English as "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps" in the Journal of Gastroenterology in 2015. A revised version of the Japanese-language guideline was published in 2020, and here we introduce a part of the contents of revised version. METHODS The guideline committee discussed and drew up a series of clinical questions (CQs). Recommendation statements for the CQs were limited to items with multiple therapeutic options. Items with established conclusions that had 100% agreement with previous guidelines (background questions) and items with no (or old) evidence that are topics for future research (future research questions: FRQs) were given descriptions only. To address the CQs and FRQs, PubMed, ICHUSHI, and other sources were searched for relevant articles published in English from 1983 to October 2018 and articles published in Japanese from 1983 to November 2018. The Japan Medical Library Association was also commissioned to search for relevant materials. Manual searches were performed for questions with insufficient online references. RESULTS The professional committee created 18 CQs and statements concerning the current concept and diagnosis/treatment of various colorectal polyps, including their epidemiology, screening, pathophysiology, definition and classification, diagnosis, management, practical treatment, complications, and surveillance after treatment, and other colorectal lesions (submucosal tumors, nonneoplastic polyps, polyposis, hereditary tumors, ulcerative colitis-associated tumors/carcinomas). CONCLUSIONS After evaluation by the moderators, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps were proposed for 2020. This report addresses the therapeutic related CQs introduced when formulating these guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinji Tanaka
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan.
- Department of Endoscopy, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Minami-ku, KasumiHiroshima, 734-8551, Japan.
| | - Yusuke Saitoh
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Takahisa Matsuda
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Masahiro Igarashi
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Takayuki Matsumoto
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Yasushi Iwao
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Yasumoto Suzuki
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Nozaki
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Tamotsu Sugai
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Shiro Oka
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Michio Itabashi
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Ken-Ichi Sugihara
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Osamu Tsuruta
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Ichiro Hirata
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Nishida
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Hiroto Miwa
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Enomoto
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Tooru Shimosegawa
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Koike
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Colorectal Polyps", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Bldg., 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rajendran A, Pannick S, Thomas-Gibson S, Oke S, Anele C, Sevdalis N, Haycock A. Systematic literature review of learning curves for colorectal polyp resection techniques in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:1085-1100. [PMID: 31925890 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM The performance of therapeutic procedures in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy (LGI) can be challenging and carries an increased risk of adverse events. There is increasing demand for the training of endoscopists in these procedures, but limited guidelines exist concerning procedural competency. The aim of this study was to assess the learning curves for LGI polypectomy, colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). METHOD A systematic review of electronic databases between 1946 and September 2019 was performed. Citations were included if they reported learning curve data. Outcome measures that defined the success of procedural competency were also recorded. RESULTS A total of 34 out of 598 studies met the inclusion criteria of which 28 were related to ESD, three to polypectomy and three to EMR. Outcome measures for polypectomy competency (en bloc resection, delayed bleeding and independent polypectomy rate) were achieved after completion of between 250 and 400 polypectomies and after 300 colonoscopies. EMR outcome measures, including complete resection and recurrence, were achieved variably between 50 and 300 procedures. Outcome measures for ESD included efficiency (resection rates and procedural speed) and safety (adverse events). En bloc resection rates of over 80% and R0 resection rates of over 70% were achieved at 20-40 cases and procedural speed increased after 30 ESD cases. Competency in safety metrics was variably achieved at 20-200 cases. CONCLUSION There is a paucity of data on learning curves in LGI polypectomy, EMR and ESD. Despite limited evidence, we have identified relevant outcome measures and threshold numbers for the most common LGI polyp resection techniques for potential inclusion in training programmes/credentialing guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Rajendran
- The Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
- Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, UK
- Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Uxbridge, UK
| | - S Pannick
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - S Thomas-Gibson
- The Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - S Oke
- Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Uxbridge, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - C Anele
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - N Sevdalis
- Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A Haycock
- The Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Park EY, Baek DH, Song GA, Kim GH, Lee BE, Park DY. Long-term outcomes of endoscopically resected laterally spreading tumors with a positive histological lateral margin. Surg Endosc 2020; 34:3999-4010. [PMID: 31605216 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07187-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With advances in diagnostic endoscopy, the incidence of superficial colorectal tumors, including laterally spreading tumors (LSTs), has increased. However, little is known about the long-term results of LSTs with positive lateral margin after endoscopic treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes and risk factors for local recurrence of LSTs with positive lateral margin after initial endoscopic resection. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of the medical records of 324 patients who had 363 LSTs with positive lateral margin after endoscopic resection at a tertiary academic medical center. The medical records from 2011 to 2015 were analyzed. Local recurrence was confirmed through endoscopic finding and subsequent biopsy analysis. We assessed the local recurrence rate and performed multivariate analyses to identify the factors associated with local recurrence. RESULTS Follow-up colonoscopy was performed in 176 of 363 LSTs. The local recurrence rate was 6.3% (11/176), with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up period of 19.8 (12.4-46.5) months. In multivariate analysis, local recurrence was associated with piecemeal resection (odds ratio [OR] 6.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-34.33; p = 0.024) and inversely associated with thermal ablation (OR 0.033, 95% CI 0.00-0.45; p = 0.011). At surveillance colonoscopy, histology of the recurrent tumor was adenoma in 10 (90.9%) of 11; these were treated endoscopically. CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective study, we found that endoscopically resected LSTs with positive lateral margin have a low recurrence rate. Piecemeal resection was associated with higher local recurrence, and thermal ablation was inversely associated with local recurrence. Endoscopic resection with positive lateral margin combined with thermal ablation leads to a low recurrence rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Young Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, 179, Gudeok-ro, Seo-Gu, Busan, 49421, South Korea
| | - Dong Hoon Baek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, 179, Gudeok-ro, Seo-Gu, Busan, 49421, South Korea.
| | - Geun Am Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, 179, Gudeok-ro, Seo-Gu, Busan, 49421, South Korea
| | - Gwang Ha Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, 179, Gudeok-ro, Seo-Gu, Busan, 49421, South Korea
| | - Bong Eun Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, 179, Gudeok-ro, Seo-Gu, Busan, 49421, South Korea
| | - Do Youn Park
- Department of Pathology, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rashid MU, Khetpal N, Zafar H, Ali S, Idrisov E, Du Y, Stein A, Jain D, Hasan MK. Colon mucosal neoplasia referred for endoscopic mucosal resection: Recurrence of adenomas and prediction of submucosal invasion. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 12:198-211. [PMID: 32733641 PMCID: PMC7360516 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i7.198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an effective and minimally invasive alternative to surgery for large polyps and laterally spreading lesions. Gross morphology and surface characteristics may help predict submucosal invasion of the lesion (SMIL) during endoscopic evaluation. This is one of the largest single-center studies reporting endoscopic mucosal resection for larger (≥ 20 mm) colorectal lesions in the United States.
AIM To determine the recurrence rate of adenomas and endoscopic features that may predict submucosal invasion of colonic mucosal neoplasia.
METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of all the patients referred for endoscopic mucosal resection for lesions ≥ 20 mm, spanning a period from January 2013 to February 2017. The main outcome measure was identifying features that may predict submucosal invasion of mucosal lesions and predict recurrence of adenomas on follow-up surveillance colonoscopy performed at 4-6 mo.
RESULTS A total of 480 patients with 500 lesions were included in the study. The median age was 68 (Inter quantile range: 14) with 52% males. The most common lesion location was ascending colon (161; 32%). Paris classification 0-IIa (Flat elevation of mucosa - 316; 63.2%); Kudo Pit Pattern IIIs (192; 38%) and Granular surface morphology (260; 52%) were most prevalent. Submucosal invasion was present in 23 (4.6%) out of 500 lesions. The independent risk factors for SMIL were Kudo Pit Pattern IIIL + IV and V (Odds ratio: 4.5; P value < 0.004) and Paris classification 0-IIc (Odds ratio: 18.2; P value < 0.01). Out of 500, 354 post-endoscopic mucosal resection scars were examined at surveillance colonoscopy. Recurrence was noted in 21.8% (77 cases).
CONCLUSION There was overall low prevalence of SMIL in our study. Kudo pit pattern (IIIL + IV and V) and Paris classification 0-IIc were the only factors identified as an independent risk factor for submucosal invasion. The independent risk factor for recurrence was adenoma size (> 40 mm). Almost all recurrences (98.8%) were treated endoscopically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mamoon Ur Rashid
- Department of Internal Medicine, Advent Health Graduate Medical Education, Orlando, FL 32804, United States
| | - Neelam Khetpal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Advent Health Graduate Medical Education, Orlando, FL 32804, United States
| | - Hammad Zafar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Advent Health Graduate Medical Education, Orlando, FL 32804, United States
| | - Saeed Ali
- Department of Internal Medicine, Univerity of Iowa hospital, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States
| | - Evgeny Idrisov
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma, OK 73104, United States
| | - Yuan Du
- Department of Internal Medicine, Advent Health Graduate Medical Education, Orlando, FL 32804, United States
| | - Assaf Stein
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL 32803, United States
| | - Deepanshu Jain
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL 32803, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mangira D, Cameron K, Simons K, Zanati S, LaNauze R, Raftopoulos S, Brown G, Moss A. Cold snare piecemeal EMR of large sessile colonic polyps ≥20 mm (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91:1343-1352. [PMID: 31954132 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Conventional EMR using a hot snare is the standard of care for resection of large (≥20 mm) nonmalignant sessile colonic polyps. Serious adverse events are predominantly because of electrocautery. This could potentially be avoided by cold snare piecemeal EMR (CSP-EMR). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CSP-EMR of sessile colonic polyps sized ≥20 mm. METHODS All cases of CSP-EMR at 5 Australian academic hospitals for sessile polyps ≥20 mm over a 2-year period, from January 2016 to December 2017, were identified retrospectively. Efficacy was defined as the absence of residual or recurrent polyp tissue during the first surveillance colonoscopy (SC1) and second surveillance colonoscopy (SC2). Clinically significant intraprocedural or delayed adverse events and surveillance colonoscopy findings were assessed by reviewing medical records. RESULTS CSP-EMR was performed on 204 polyps sized ≥20 mm in 186 patients (men, 33.8%; median age, 68 years). SC1 for 164 polyps (80.4%) at a median interval of 150 days showed residual or recurrent polyp in 9 cases (5.5%; 95% confidence interval, 3%-11%). SC2 for 113 polyps (72.9%) at a median interval of 18 months showed late residual or recurrent polyp in 4 cases (3.5%; 95% confidence interval, .9%-8.5%) after a normal SC1. Intraprocedural bleeding was successfully treated in 4 patients (2.2%), whereas 7 patients (3.8%) experienced self-limited clinically significant post-EMR bleeding and 1 patient (.5%) required overnight observation for nonspecific abdominal pain that resolved spontaneously. None experienced other adverse events. CONCLUSIONS CSP-EMR of sessile colonic polyps ≥20 mm is technically feasible, effective, and safe. The adverse event rate and polyp recurrence rate were low. Randomized or large prospective trials are required to confirm the noninferiority and improved safety of CSP-EMR compared with conventional EMR and to further determine the polyp morphologies that are best suited for CSP-EMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dileep Mangira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, Western Health, Melbourne Medical School
| | - Karla Cameron
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Koen Simons
- Western Health Office for Research, Western Health, Melbourne, St Albans, Australia; School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Simon Zanati
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Richard LaNauze
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Spiro Raftopoulos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Gregor Brown
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alan Moss
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, Western Health, Melbourne Medical School
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tate DJ, Sidhu M, Bar-Yishay I, Desomer L, Brown G, Hourigan LF, Lee EYT, Moss A, Raftopoulos S, Singh R, Williams SJ, Zanati S, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Impact of en bloc resection on long-term outcomes after endoscopic mucosal resection: a matched cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91:1155-1163.e1. [PMID: 31887274 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Residual or recurrent adenoma (RRA) is the major limitation of piecemeal EMR (p-EMR) for large colonic laterally spreading lesions (LSLs) ≥20 mm. En bloc EMR (e-EMR) has been shown to achieve low rates of RRA but specific procedural and long-term outcomes are unknown. Our aim was to compare long-term outcomes of size-matched LSLs stratified by whether they were resected e-EMR or p-EMR. METHODS Data from a prospective tertiary referral multicenter cohort of large LSLs referred for EMR over a 10-year period were analyzed. Outcomes were compared between sized-matched LSLs (20-25 mm) resected by p-EMR or e-EMR. RESULTS Five hundred seventy LSLs met the inclusion criteria of which 259 (45.4%) were resected by e-EMR. The risk of major deep mural injury (DMI) was significantly higher in the e-EMR group (3.5% vs 1.0%, P = .05), whereas rates of other intraprocedural adverse events did not differ significantly. Five of 9 (56%) LSLs, with endoscopic features of submucosal invasion (SMI), resected by e-EMR were saved from surgery. RRA at first surveillance was lower in the e-EMR group (2.0% vs 5.7%, P = .04), but this difference was negated at subsequent surveillance. Rates of surgical referral were not significantly different between the groups at either surveillance interval. CONCLUSION When comparing e-EMR against p-EMR for lesions ≤25 mm in size of similar morphology in a large prospective multicenter cohort, e-EMR offered no additional advantage for predicted-benign LSLs. However, it was associated with an increased risk of major DMI. Thus, en bloc resection techniques should be reserved for lesions suspicious for invasive disease. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01368289.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Tate
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Gent, Gent, Belgium
| | - Mayenaaz Sidhu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Iddo Bar-Yishay
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lobke Desomer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gregor Brown
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Epworth Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Luke F Hourigan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Gallipoli Medical Research Institute, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Eric Y T Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alan Moss
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Footscray Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Spiro Raftopoulos
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Rajvinder Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Lyell McEwan Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Stephen J Williams
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Simon Zanati
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Footscray Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicholas Burgess
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sato Y, Ozawa SI, Yasuda H, Kato M, Kiyokawa H, Yamashita M, Matsuo Y, Yamamoto H, Itoh F. Tip-in endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal sessile polyps. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:1820-1826. [PMID: 32356110 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07581-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tip-in endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a modified EMR technique using which en bloc resection of large colorectal sessile polyps can be performed; however, its usefulness for colorectal sessile polyps of > 20 mm has not been reported. This study examined treatment outcomes of tip-in and conventional EMR for large colorectal sessile polyps of ≥ 20 mm. METHODS This was a retrospective case-control study conducted at a single tertiary center in Japan. Subjects included those with large colorectal sessile polyps of ≥ 20 mm, excluding pedunculated-type polyps, who underwent endoscopic resection between January 2010 and January 2019. The primary outcome was endoscopic treatment outcomes when using tip-in and conventional EMR, and the secondary outcome was the local recurrence rate after endoscopic treatment. RESULTS Forty-three colorectal lesions were treated using tip-in EMR and 83 using conventional EMR. Tip-in EMR had a significantly higher en bloc resection rate (90.7% vs. 69.8.%), and significantly shorter treatment duration (6.64 ± 0.64 min vs. 10.47 ± 0.81 min) than conventional EMR. However, for lesions > 30 mm, en bloc resection rate was 50.0% and 52.6% for tip-in and conventional EMR, respectively, indicating no significant difference. Perforation rates with tip-in and conventional EMR were 4.6% and 3.6%, respectively, indicating no significant difference. Local recurrence was examined in 80 cases who were followed up for > 6 months after endoscopic resection; recurrence rate was 0% and 7.0% in tip-in and conventional EMR cases, respectively, without significance difference. CONCLUSIONS Tip-in EMR showed high en-block resection rate, particularly in polyps of < 30 mm, and no residual tumor was found. This technique is a potential endoscopic treatment alternative for large colorectal sessile polyps of ≥ 20 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshinori Sato
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Sugao Street 2-16-1, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.
| | - Shun-Ichiro Ozawa
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Sugao Street 2-16-1, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Yokohama City Seibu Hospital, Yashi-cho 1197-1, Asahi-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, 241-0811, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yasuda
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Sugao Street 2-16-1, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Masaki Kato
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Sugao Street 2-16-1, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Kiyokawa
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Sugao Street 2-16-1, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Masaki Yamashita
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Sugao Street 2-16-1, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Yasumasa Matsuo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Sugao Street 2-16-1, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Yamamoto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Sugao Street 2-16-1, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Fumio Itoh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Sugao Street 2-16-1, Miyamae-ku, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S, Hisabe T, Yao T, Watanabe M, Yoshida M, Saitoh Y, Tsuruta O, Sugihara KI, Igarashi M, Toyonaga T, Ajioka Y, Kusunoki M, Koike K, Fujimoto K, Tajiri H. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc 2020; 32:219-239. [PMID: 31566804 DOI: 10.1111/den.13545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 257] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Suitable lesions for endoscopic treatment include not only early colorectal carcinomas but also several types of precarcinomatous adenomas. It is important to establish practical guidelines wherein preoperative diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia and selection of endoscopic treatment procedures are appropriately outlined and to ensure that actual endoscopic treatment is useful and safe in general hospitals when carried out in accordance with guidelines. In cooperation with the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, the Japanese Society of Coloproctology, and the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society compiled colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines by using evidence-based methods in 2014. The first edition of these guidelines was published 5 years ago. Accordingly, we have published the second edition of these guidelines based on recent new knowledge and evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinji Tanaka
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society of Coloproctology, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yutaka Saito
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naohisa Yahagi
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroo Yamano
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoichi Saito
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Hisabe
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Yao
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiko Watanabe
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society of Coloproctology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yoshida
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan.,Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Saitoh
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Tsuruta
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Yoichi Ajioka
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Hisao Tajiri
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mankowski Gettle L, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ. Anorectal pitfalls in computed tomography colonography. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:3606-3624. [PMID: 31432213 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02186-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
There is a wide array of pathological lesions seen in the anorectal region with CT colonography (CTC), much of which is unique to this location. Many relatively common findings in the anorectal region are typically benign, but can be misinterpreted as malignant. There are also technique-related pitfalls that can impede accurate diagnosis of anorectal findings at CTC. Understanding common and uncommon lesions in the anorectal region as well as recognizing technical pitfalls will optimize interpretation of CTC and decrease the number of missed cancers and false positives. This review will systematically cover that they key pitfalls confronting the radiologist at CTC interpretation of the anorectal region, primarily dividing them into those related to underlying anatomy and those related to technique. Tips for how to effectively handle these potential pitfalls will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lori Mankowski Gettle
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/380 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI, 53792, USA
| | - David H Kim
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/380 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI, 53792, USA
| | - Perry J Pickhardt
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/380 Clinical Science Center, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Saito T, Kobayashi K, Sada M, Matsumoto Y, Mukae M, Kawagishi K, Yokoyama K, Koizumi W, Saegusa M, Murakami Y. Comparison of the histopathological characteristics of large colorectal laterally spreading tumors according to growth pattern. JOURNAL OF THE ANUS RECTUM AND COLON 2019; 3:152-159. [PMID: 31768465 PMCID: PMC6845292 DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2018-036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) are widely recognized owing to their structural characteristics. This study aims to clarify the histopathological characteristics of large colorectal LSTs according to growth pattern. METHODS We studied 297 colorectal LSTs measuring ≥20 mm in diameter. The LSTs were classified into four types: granular homogenous type (LST-G-H), granular nodular mixed type (LST-G-M), non-granular flat elevated type (LST-NG-F), and non-granular pseudo-depressed type (LST-NG-PD). Retrospectively collected data were examined to compare the histopathological characteristics of LSTs according to the growth pattern. RESULTS LST-G-M lesions (142 lesions) were most common, followed by LST-NG-F (74 lesions), LST-G-H (61 lesions), and LST-NG-PD (20 lesions). The mean tumor diameter of LST-G lesions (38.5 ± 17.2 mm) was significantly greater than that of LST-NG lesions (26.3 ± 7.0 mm, P < 0.001). In particular, 45% of LST-G-M lesions were ≥40 mm in diameter. Adenomas accounted for 54% of LST-G-H lesions compared with only 10% of LST-NG-PD lesions. Pathological T1 carcinomas accounted for 55% of LST-NG-PD lesions and were not found among LST-G-H lesions. CONCLUSIONS The biological malignancy of colorectal LSTs differs considerably depending on the growth pattern even among large lesions and therefore should be considered when selecting treatment regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoya Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University, School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Kiyonori Kobayashi
- Research and Development Center for New Medical Frontiers, Kitasato University, School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Miwa Sada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University, School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Matsumoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University, School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Miyuki Mukae
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University, School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Kana Kawagishi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University, School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Kaoru Yokoyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University, School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Wasaburo Koizumi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University, School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Makoto Saegusa
- Department of Pathology, Kitasato University, School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Murakami
- Department of Medical Statistics, Toho University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kobayashi K, Tanaka S, Murakami Y, Ishikawa H, Sada M, Oka S, Saito Y, Iishi H, Kudo SE, Ikematsu H, Igarashi M, Saitoh Y, Inoue Y, Hisabe T, Tsuruta O, Sano Y, Yamano H, Shimizu S, Yahagi N, Matsuda K, Nakamura H, Fujii T, Sugihara K. Predictors of invasive cancer of large laterally spreading colorectal tumors: A multicenter study in Japan. JGH OPEN 2019; 4:83-89. [PMID: 32055702 PMCID: PMC7008164 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2019] [Revised: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background and Aim Although colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) can be classified into four subtypes, the histopathological characteristics are known to differ among these subtypes. We therefore performed a logistic regression analysis to determine whether the risk of pathological T1 cancer of large colorectal LSTs can be predicted based on factors such as endoscopic findings in a large group of patients enrolled in a multicenter study in Japan. Methods In the main study, we assessed 1236 colorectal adenomas or early cancers that were classified as LSTs measuring 20 mm or more in diameter and treated endoscopically. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether factors such as the subtype of LST could be used to predict the risk of pathological T1 cancer. A validation study of 356 large colorectal LSTs was conducted to confirm the validity of the results obtained in the main study. Results The locations and tumor diameter of the LSTs in the main study were found to differ significantly according to the LST subclassification (P < 0.001). The frequency of pathological T1 cancers was the highest at 36% of LST nongranular pseudodepressed type, followed by 14% of LST nongranular flat‐elevated type, 11% of LST granular nodular mixed type, and 3% of LST granular homogenous type lesions. The risk of pathological T1 cancer was significantly associated with LST subclassification and tumor diameter. The area under the curve (AUC) was high (0.743). In the validation study, the AUC was 0.573. Conclusions In patients with large colorectal LSTs resected endoscopically, the risk of pathological T1 cancer can be predicted on the basis of the LST subclassification and tumor diameter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiyonori Kobayashi
- Research and Development Center for New Medical Frontiers Kitasato University School of Medicine Kanagawa Japan
| | - Shinji Tanaka
- Department of Endoscopy Hiroshima University Hospital Hiroshima Japan
| | | | - Hideki Ishikawa
- Department of Molecular-Targeting Cancer Prevention, Graduate School of Medical Science Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Kyoto Japan
| | - Miwa Sada
- Department of Gastroenterology Kitasato University School of Medicine Kanagawa Japan
| | - Shiro Oka
- Department of Endoscopy Hiroshima University Hospital Hiroshima Japan
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan
| | - Hiroyasu Iishi
- Department of Gastroenterology Itami City Hospital Osaka Japan
| | - Shin-Ei Kudo
- Digestive Disease Center Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital Kanagawa Japan
| | - Hiroaki Ikematsu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan
| | - Masahiro Igarashi
- Department of Endoscopy Cancer Institute Ariake Hospital Tokyo Japan
| | - Yusuke Saitoh
- Digestive Disease Center Asahikawa City Hospital Hokkaido Japan
| | - Yuji Inoue
- Institute of Gastroenterology Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan
| | - Takashi Hisabe
- Department of Gastroenterology Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital Fukuoka Japan
| | - Osamu Tsuruta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine Kurume University School of Medicine Fukuoka Japan
| | - Yasushi Sano
- Gastrointestinal Center Sano Hospital Hyogo Japan
| | - Hiroo Yamano
- Department of Gastroenterology Akita Red Cross Hospital Akita Japan
| | - Seiji Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterology JR West Osaka Railway Hospital Osaka Japan
| | - Naohisa Yahagi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital and Cancer Center Keio University Tokyo Japan
| | - Keiji Matsuda
- Department of Surgery Teikyo University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
| | - Hisashi Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterology Akasaka Endoscopic Clinic Tokyo Japan
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Takezawa T, Hayashi Y, Shinozaki S, Sagara Y, Okada M, Kobayashi Y, Sakamoto H, Miura Y, Sunada K, Lefor AK, Yamamoto H. The pocket-creation method facilitates colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89:1045-1053. [PMID: 30716306 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is more difficult than rectal ESD because of poor maneuverability of the endoscope due to physiologic flexion, peristalsis, and respiratory movements. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of the pocket-creation method (PCM) for colonic ESD compared with the conventional method (CM) regardless of lesion shape or location. METHODS A total of 887 colorectal lesions were treated by ESD. Of 887 lesions, 271 rectal lesions, 72 lesions smaller than 20 mm in diameter, and 1 non-neoplastic lesion were excluded. This is a retrospective chart review of the remaining 543 colon lesions in 512 patients. We divided them into the PCM group (n = 280) and the CM group (n = 263). The primary outcome was the en bloc resection rate. Secondary outcomes were R0 resection (en bloc resection with negative margin), adverse events, dissection time (in minutes), and dissection speed (in mm2/min). RESULTS The PCM group achieved a significantly higher en bloc resection rate (PCM, 100% [280/280], vs CM, 96% [253/263]; P < .001) and R0 resection rate (91% [255/280] vs 85% [224/263], respectively; P = .033) than the CM group. Dissection time was similar (69.5 ± 44.4 vs 78.7 ± 62.6 minutes, P = .676). Dissection speed was significantly faster with the PCM than with the CM (23.5 ± 11.6 vs 20.9 ± 13.6 mm2/min, P < .001). The incidence of adverse events was similar (perforation, 2% vs 4% [P = .152], and delayed bleeding, 2% vs 1% [P = .361]). CONCLUSIONS Colonic ESD using the PCM significantly improves the rates of en bloc resection and R0 resection and facilitates rapid dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahito Takezawa
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Hayashi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Satoshi Shinozaki
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan; Shinozaki Medical Clinic, Utsunomiya, Japan
| | - Yuichi Sagara
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Masahiro Okada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Yasutoshi Kobayashi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Sakamoto
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Yoshimasa Miura
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Keijiro Sunada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | | | - Hironori Yamamoto
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Castro R, Libânio D, Pita I, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Solutions for submucosal injection: What to choose and how to do it. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:777-788. [PMID: 30809079 PMCID: PMC6385015 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i7.777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Revised: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
During the past decades, endoscopic resection techniques have gradually improved and gained more importance for the management of premalignant lesions and early cancers. These endoscopic resection techniques can be divided in 3 major groups: snare polipectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The use of submucosal injection is essential for the majority of EMR techniques and is an integral part of ESD, whereas during polipectomy it is not crucial in most cases except to prevent bleeding in large polyps and/or those with large stalks as an alternative to mechanical methods. Injection provides a lifting up effect of the lesion separating it from the muscular layer, thereby reducing thermal injury and the risk of perforation and bleeding while also facilitating en-bloc resection by improving technical feasibility. With this work, we aim to review the most common endoscopic resection techniques and the importance of submucosal injection in each one of them. For that, we present some of the most commonly used submucosal injection solutions, taking into account their advantages and disadvantages. We also discuss, based on current recommendations and our own experience, how and when to preform submucosal injection, depending on lesions features and endoscopic resection technique that´s being used, to assure complete resection and to prevent associated adverse events. Finally, we also present and discuss some new proposed submucosal injection solutions, endoscopic resection techniques and devices that may have a major impact on the future of therapeutic endoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Castro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto 4450-590, Portugal
| | - Diogo Libânio
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto 4450-590, Portugal
| | - Inês Pita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto 4450-590, Portugal
| | - Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto 4450-590, Portugal
- CIDES/CINTESIS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto 4200-319, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Russo P, Barbeiro S, Awadie H, Libânio D, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Bourke M. Management of colorectal laterally spreading tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7:E239-E259. [PMID: 30705959 PMCID: PMC6353652 DOI: 10.1055/a-0732-487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective and study aims To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different endoscopic resection techniques for laterally spreading colorectal tumors (LST). Methods Relevant studies were identified in three electronic databases (PubMed, ISI and Cochrane Central Register). We considered all clinical studies in which colorectal LST were treated with endoscopic resection (endoscopic mucosal resection [EMR] and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection [ESD]) and/or transanal minimally invasive surgery (TEMS). Rates of en-bloc/piecemeal resection, complete endoscopic resection, R0 resection, curative resection, adverse events (AEs) or recurrence, were extracted. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and a meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Results Forty-nine studies were included. Complete resection was similar between techniques (EMR 99.5 % [95 % CI 98.6 %-100 %] vs. ESD 97.9 % [95 % CI 96.1 - 99.2 %]), being curative in 1685/1895 (13 studies, pooled curative resection 90 %, 95 % CI 86.6 - 92.9 %, I 2 = 79 %) with non-significantly higher curative resection rates with ESD (93.6 %, 95 % CI 91.3 - 95.5 %, vs. 84 % 95 % CI 78.1 - 89.3 % with EMR). ESD was also associated with a significantly higher perforation risk (pooled incidence 5.9 %, 95 % CI 4.3 - 7.9 %, vs. EMR 1.2 %, 95 % CI 0.5 - 2.3 %) while bleeding was significantly more frequent with EMR (9.6 %, 95 % CI 6.5 - 13.2 %; vs. ESD 2.8 %, 95 % CI 1.9 - 4.0 %). Procedure-related mortality was 0.1 %. Recurrence occurred in 5.5 %, more often with EMR (12.6 %, 95 % CI 9.1 - 16.6 % vs. ESD 1.1 %, 95 % CI 0.3 - 2.5 %), with most amenable to successful endoscopic treatment (87.7 %, 95 % CI 81.1 - 93.1 %). Surgery was limited to 2.7 % of the lesions, 0.5 % due to AEs. No data of TEMS were available for LST. Conclusions EMR and ESD are both effective and safe and are associated with a very low risk of procedure related mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Russo
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sandra Barbeiro
- Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
| | - Halim Awadie
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Diogo Libânio
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,CINTESIS/MEDCIDS, Porto Faculty of Medicine, Portugal
| | - Michael Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kim JY, Han SJ, Jung Y, Cho YS, Chung IK, Lee TH, Park SH, Cho HD, Kim SJ, Hwangbo Y. The relationship between local recurrence and positive lateral margin after en bloc resection of colorectal neoplasm. Scand J Gastroenterol 2018; 53:1541-1546. [PMID: 30600737 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1547419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The factors associated with recurrence of colonic neoplasm after endoscopic resection with a positive lateral margin are not well known. Thus, we evaluate the relationship between recurrence and positive lateral margin after endoscopic en bloc resection of colorectal neoplasm. METHODS A retrospective review of 9302 patients who underwent colonic endoscopic resection from January 2008 to January 2015. Of these, a total of 76 patients with positive lateral margins with clear evidence of the its location on endoscopic picture after endoscopic en bloc resection of colorectal neoplasm (>10 mm) were included. RESULTS Ten of 76 (13.2%) patients experienced recurrence during the follow-up period (mean f/u month, 21.7 ± 15.6). In cases with positive lateral margins, the 3- and 5-year local recurrence rate of colorectal neoplasm was 28.1% and 40.1%, respectively. The histological features of the recurrence group were as follows: one case of adenocarcinoma [from low-grade adenoma (LGA)]; two cases of high-grade adenoma (HGA) (one from HGA and one from LGA); and seven cases of LGA (four from adenocarcinoma, two from LGA, and one from HGA). The mean age of patients, locations of the lesions, and histologic type were not significantly associated with local recurrence. In multivariate Poisson regression analyses, total length of lateral margin involvement ≥8 mm (relative risk 12.51; 95% CI 1.11-140.34, p = .040) was a significant predictor of local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Positive lateral margins ≥8 mm may be a reliable predictor of local recurrence after endoscopic en bloc resection of colorectal neoplasm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Yun Kim
- a Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine , Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan Hospital , Cheonan , Republic of Korea
| | - Su Jung Han
- a Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine , Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan Hospital , Cheonan , Republic of Korea
| | - Yunho Jung
- a Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine , Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan Hospital , Cheonan , Republic of Korea
| | - Young Sin Cho
- a Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine , Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan Hospital , Cheonan , Republic of Korea
| | - Il-Kwun Chung
- a Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine , Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan Hospital , Cheonan , Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Hoon Lee
- a Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine , Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan Hospital , Cheonan , Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Heum Park
- a Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine , Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan Hospital , Cheonan , Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Deuk Cho
- b Department of Pathology , Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan Hospital , Cheonan , Republic of Korea
| | - Sun-Joo Kim
- a Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine , Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan Hospital , Cheonan , Republic of Korea
| | - Young Hwangbo
- c Department of Preventive Medicine , Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan Hospital , Cheonan , Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nagai K, Hayashi Y, Honma K, Sakatani A, Yoshii S, Fujinaga T, Maekawa A, Tsujii Y, Hiyama S, Shinzaki S, Watabe K, Iijima H, Tsujii M, Mizushima T, Morii E, Takehara T. Adenoma of colorectal laterally spreading tumor nongranular type with biological phenotypic features similar to cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 33:1853-1863. [PMID: 29767452 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2017] [Revised: 04/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) are morphologically subdivided into granular (LST-G) and nongranular (LST-NG) categories. We aimed to elucidate the differences in oncogenic characteristics between the two types. METHODS Laterally spreading tumors resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery from March 2009 to May 2017 were examined for p53 positivity, Ki-67 labeling index (LI), microvessel density, degree of fibrosis, intensities of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and nitrotyrosine (NT), and expression of acid mucins. We compared these factors between adenomas, noninvasive cancers, and invasive cancers, both LST-G and LST-NG. RESULTS Ninety-three LST-G (53 adenomas [LST-GA] and 40 cancers [LST-GC]) and 55 LST-NG (24 adenomas [LST-NGA] and 31 cancers [LST-NGC]) were evaluated. Although p53 positivity was lower in LST-GA than in LST-NGA (P < 0.001), there was no difference between LST-GC and LST-NGC. Ki-67 LI was higher in LST-NGA than in LST-GA (P < 0.001) and higher in LST-NGC than in LST-GC of noninvasive cancers (P < 0.001). Microvessel density and degree of fibrosis were higher in LST-NGA than in LST-GA (P < 0.001), and intensities of iNOS and NT were also higher in LST-NGA than in LST-GA (P < 0.001). Expression of acid mucins was lower in LST-NGA than in LST-GA (P < 0.001). Although there were significant differences in p53 positivity, Ki-67 LI, microvessel density, degree of fibrosis, intensities of iNOS and NT, and expression of acid mucins between LST-GA and LST-NGA, these factors were only slightly different between LST-GC and LST-NGC of invasive cancers. CONCLUSIONS Unlike LST-GA, LST-NGA possessed phenotypic features similar to cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kengo Nagai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshito Hayashi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Honma
- Department of Pathology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akihiko Sakatani
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Yoshii
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tetsuji Fujinaga
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akira Maekawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshiki Tsujii
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Satoshi Hiyama
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Shinzaki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kenji Watabe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideki Iijima
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masahiko Tsujii
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tsunekazu Mizushima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Eiichi Morii
- Department of Pathology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Takehara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yamamoto K, Shimoda R, Ogata S, Hara M, Ito Y, Tominaga N, Nakayama A, Sakata Y, Tsuruoka N, Iwakiri R, Fujimoto K. Perforation and Postoperative Bleeding Associated with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Colorectal Tumors: An Analysis of 398 Lesions Treated in Saga, Japan. Intern Med 2018; 57:2115-2122. [PMID: 29607956 PMCID: PMC6120842 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9186-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to clarify the safety of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) during the era of health insurance coverage starting from April 2012 in Japan. Methods Between April 2012 and May 2016, ESD was applied to 398 lesions in 373 patients. Risk factors for serious complications of colorectal ESD, perforation and post-ESD bleeding, were evaluated focusing on the resected specimen size, location, growth pattern, invasion depth, histopathology, postoperative clipping, and procedure time. In addition, the relationship between serious complications and patients' background characteristics was analyzed. Results Among 373 patients, perforation occurred in 12 patients and post-ESD bleeding in 19 patients. A univariate analysis showed that the risk factors for perforation were the lesion size, the resected specimen size, and a long operation time. A multivariate analysis showed that a long operation time was a risk factor for perforation during colorectal ESD. A univariate analysis indicated that significant risk factors for postoperative bleeding were a long operation time, rectal lesion, and cancer. All patients with serious complications were treated by an endoscopic procedure without blood transfusion or the need to convert to open surgery. Conclusion The present study suggests that colorectal ESD may be accepted with relative safety in Japan as a common therapeutic approach for early colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Yamamoto
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga Medical School, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saga Prefectural Medical Center, Japan
| | - Ryo Shimoda
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga Medical School, Japan
| | - Shinichi Ogata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saga Prefectural Medical Center, Japan
| | - Megumi Hara
- Departments of Preventive Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga Medical School, Japan
| | - Yoichiro Ito
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga Medical School, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saga Prefectural Medical Center, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Tominaga
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saga Prefectural Medical Center, Japan
| | - Atsushi Nakayama
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga Medical School, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saga Prefectural Medical Center, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Sakata
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga Medical School, Japan
| | - Nanae Tsuruoka
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga Medical School, Japan
| | - Ryuichi Iwakiri
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga Medical School, Japan
| | - Kazuma Fujimoto
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga Medical School, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lubner MG, Menias CO, Johnson RJ, Gaballah AH, Shaaban A, Elsayes KM. Villous Gastrointestinal Tumors: Multimodality Imaging with Histopathologic Correlation. Radiographics 2018; 38:1370-1384. [PMID: 30059275 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Villous lesions are advanced adenomas that manifest most commonly in the colon; however, they can develop throughout the gastrointestinal tract. The duodenum is the most common small-bowel site of these lesions. Although in most cases these are isolated lesions that occur sporadically, patients with certain specific colorectal cancer syndromes, including familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, may develop multiple advanced adenomas. Villous lesions are important because although they are histologically benign, they may harbor dysplasia and have potential for malignancy. These characteristics make them a primary target for colorectal cancer screening with optical and virtual colonoscopy. However, these lesions can also be symptomatic and detected at diagnostic imaging when patients present for examination. They have characteristic features at a variety of imaging examinations, including barium fluoroscopy, CT, MRI, and endoscopic US. It is important for radiologists to be aware of these lesions, their potential morphologies, and their typical appearances at multimodality imaging. Although villous tumors can be detected at imaging and confirmed with biopsy, owing to limitations in identifying dysplasia and foci of malignancy with the above modalities alone and the potential for malignancy, referral for surgical resection of these lesions ultimately is required. ©RSNA, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan G Lubner
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Sciences Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792 (M.G.L.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Ariz (C.O.M.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (R.J.J.); Department of Radiology, University of Missouri Healthcare, Columbia, Mo (A.H.G.); Department of Radiology, Health Sciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (A.S.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.)
| | - Christine O Menias
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Sciences Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792 (M.G.L.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Ariz (C.O.M.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (R.J.J.); Department of Radiology, University of Missouri Healthcare, Columbia, Mo (A.H.G.); Department of Radiology, Health Sciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (A.S.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.)
| | - Rashad J Johnson
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Sciences Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792 (M.G.L.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Ariz (C.O.M.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (R.J.J.); Department of Radiology, University of Missouri Healthcare, Columbia, Mo (A.H.G.); Department of Radiology, Health Sciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (A.S.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.)
| | - Ayman H Gaballah
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Sciences Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792 (M.G.L.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Ariz (C.O.M.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (R.J.J.); Department of Radiology, University of Missouri Healthcare, Columbia, Mo (A.H.G.); Department of Radiology, Health Sciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (A.S.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.)
| | - Akram Shaaban
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Sciences Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792 (M.G.L.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Ariz (C.O.M.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (R.J.J.); Department of Radiology, University of Missouri Healthcare, Columbia, Mo (A.H.G.); Department of Radiology, Health Sciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (A.S.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.)
| | - Khaled M Elsayes
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Sciences Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792 (M.G.L.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Ariz (C.O.M.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (R.J.J.); Department of Radiology, University of Missouri Healthcare, Columbia, Mo (A.H.G.); Department of Radiology, Health Sciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (A.S.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (K.M.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dekker E, Rex DK. Advances in CRC Prevention: Screening and Surveillance. Gastroenterology 2018; 154:1970-1984. [PMID: 29454795 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2017] [Revised: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most commonly diagnosed cancers and causes of death from cancer across the world. CRC can, however, be detected in asymptomatic patients at a curable stage, and several studies have shown lower mortality among patients who undergo screening compared with those who do not. Using colonoscopy in CRC screening also results in the detection of precancerous polyps that can be directly removed during the procedure, thereby reducing the incidence of cancer. In the past decade, convincing evidence has appeared that the effectiveness of colonoscopy as CRC prevention tool is associated with the quality of the procedure. This review aims to provide an up-to-date overview of recent efforts to improve colonoscopy effectiveness by enhancing detection and improving the completeness and safety of resection of colorectal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
PUPRPOSE Benign polyps that are technically challenging and unsafe to remove via polypectomy are known as complex polyps. Concerns regarding safety and completeness of resection dictate they undergo advanced endoscopic techniques, such as endoscopic mucosal resection or surgery. We provide a comprehensive overview of complex polyps and current treatment options. METHODS A review of the English literature was conducted to identifyarticles describing the management of complex polyps of the colon and rectum. RESULTS Endoscopic mucosal resection is the standard of care for the majority of complex polyps. Only polyps that fail endoscopic mucosal resection or are highly suspicious of invasive cancer but which cannot be removed endoscopically warrant surgery. CONCLUSION Several factors influence the treatment of a complex polyp; therefore, there cannot be a "one-size-fitsall" approach. Treatment should be tailored to the lesion's characteristics, the risk of adverse events, and the resources available to the treating physician.
Collapse
|
35
|
Ohata K, Muramoto T, Minato Y, Chiba H, Sakai E, Matsuhashi N. Usefulness of a multifunctional snare designed for colorectal hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Endosc Int Open 2018; 6:E249-E253. [PMID: 29423435 PMCID: PMC5803000 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-124364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Accepted: 11/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Since colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) remains technically difficult, hybrid ESD was developed as an alternative therapeutic option to achieve en bloc resection of relatively large lesions. In this feasibility study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of hybrid colorectal ESD using a newly developed multifunctional snare. From June to August 2016, we prospectively enrolled 10 consecutive patients with non-pedunculated intramucosal colorectal tumors 20 - 30 mm in diameter. All of the hybrid ESD steps were performed using the "SOUTEN" snare. The knob-shaped tip attached to the loop top helps to stabilize the needle-knife, making it less likely to slip during circumferential incision and enables partial submucosal dissection. All of the lesions were curatively resected by hybrid ESD, with a short mean procedure time (16.1 ± 4.8 minutes). The mean diameters of the resected specimens and tumors were 30.5 ± 4.9 and 26.0 ± 3.5 mm, respectively. No perforations occurred, while delayed bleeding occurred in 1 patient. In conclusion, hybrid ESD using a multifunctional snare enables easy, safe, and cost-effective resection of relatively large colorectal tumors to be achieved. STUDY REGISTRATION UMIN000022545.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Ohata
- Department of Gastroenterology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan,Corresponding author Ken Ohata, MD Division of GastroenterologyNTT Medical Center Tokyo5-9-22 Higashi-GotandaShinagawa-kuTokyo141-8625Japan+81-3-34486541
| | - Takashi Muramoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yohei Minato
- Department of Gastroenterology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Chiba
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiji Sakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kobayashi R, Hirasawa K, Ikeda R, de Fukuchi T, Ishii Y, Kaneko H, Makazu M, Sato C, Maeda S. The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5:E1242-E1250. [PMID: 29218316 PMCID: PMC5718910 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-118003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2017] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is used to treat superficial colorectal tumors. Previous studies have reported the efficacy of ESD for treating residual or local recurrent colorectal tumors. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of ESD in treating these lesions and to assess factors that prevent successful ESD. METHODS This retrospective study assessed 25 cases of residual or local recurrent lesions that were previously treated using EMR (18 lesions), TEM (5 lesions), ESD (1 lesion) or surgery (1 lesion), and 459 primary lesions treated using ESD between April 2008 and September 2015. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment outcome and adverse events were compared between groups with or without scar tissue. Factors related to perforation and a prolonged treatment time, which indicate the likelihood of technical difficulties, were identified using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS In residual or local recurrent lesions groups, patients experienced more perforations (32 % vs 4 %, P < 0.001) and required a longer treatment time (117 min vs 61 min, P < 0.001) compared with the primary lesions group. Both groups showed a similar curative resection rate. Emergency surgery was not needed in any case. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that tumor location and therapeutic scar tissue were high risk factors for perforation, and that large tumor size and therapeutic scar tissue were high risk factors for prolonged treatment time. CONCLUSIONS ESD for residual or local recurrent colorectal tumors is a technically challenging, but effective and minimally invasive treatment. When performed carefully with sufficient proficiency, it is a useful treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryosuke Kobayashi
- Yokohama City University Medical Center – Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kingo Hirasawa
- Yokohama City University Medical Center – Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan,Corresponding author Kingo Hirasawa Yokohama City UniversityDivision of Endoscopy4-57 Urafune-choMinami-ku YokohamaYokohama 232-0024Japan+81-45-261-5656+81-45-253-5382
| | - Ryosuke Ikeda
- Yokohama City University Medical Center – Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Takeh de Fukuchi
- Yokohama City University Medical Center – Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yasuaki Ishii
- Yokohama City University Medical Center – Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Kaneko
- Yokohama City University Medical Center – Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Makomo Makazu
- Yokohama City University Medical Center – Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Chiko Sato
- Yokohama City University Medical Center – Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shin Maeda
- Yokohama City University, School of Medicine – Gastroenterology Division, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Liu W, Wang M, Zhao L, Wang M, Wang X, Fan Z, Liu L. Thermo-sensitive isopentane aerification for mucosal lift during endoscopic resection in animal models (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86:1168-1175.e3. [PMID: 28288842 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2016] [Accepted: 02/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Mucosal lift is critical for successful endoscopic treatment. Normal saline (NS) solution is widely used as the submucosal filler, but its short persistency restricts clinical endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). In this study, thermo-sensitive isopentane was introduced for submucosal injection. With a boiling point at 27.8°C, liquid isopentane can be easily applied, and gasification inflation can provide great support for submucosal lifting at body temperature. The feasibility and efficiency of isopentane were evaluated in this study. METHODS Porcine stomachs were used for in vitro evaluation. A 37°C water bath was used to mimic body temperature. Compared with NS, isopentane was studied for its lifting performance, including injection dosage, persistence of lifting strength, and efficacy for assisting submucosal dissection. The changes in submucosal tissue were also compared. For in vivo evaluation, rats were used to further compare the differences between isopentane and NS, including lifting efficacy, pathologic effect, and safety. RESULTS Compared with NS, the maximum lifting height was achieved with less isopentane (2% NS volume). Longer persistency and faster operation for submucosal dissection were also recorded for isopentane during the in vitro study. Aerification resulted in vacuolization of submucosal connective tissue, which facilitates EMR and postoperative recovery. The same results were confirmed in the rat model. With the same dosage, isopentane produced better mucosal elevation and larger range than NS. According to the histologic examination, no tissue injury was observed with isopentane application. CONCLUSIONS As a submucosal injection agent, the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of isopentane has been demonstrated. Thermo-sensitive aerification may be a promising approach to facilitate ESD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjie Liu
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Min Wang
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Lili Zhao
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Min Wang
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Xiang Wang
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Zhining Fan
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Li Liu
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Seo M, Song EM, Kim GU, Hwang SW, Park SH, Yang DH, Kim KJ, Ye BD, Myung SJ, Yang SK, Byeon JS. Local recurrence and subsequent endoscopic treatment after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection with or without precutting in the colorectum. Intest Res 2017; 15:502-510. [PMID: 29142518 PMCID: PMC5683981 DOI: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2016] [Revised: 03/20/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Precutting before endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) may increase colorectal polyp resection effectiveness. We aimed to identify risk factors for recurrence after conventional EPMR (CEPMR) and precut EPMR (PEPMR) and investigated endoscopic treatment outcomes for recurrent cases. Methods The medical records of patients with colorectal polyps treated by EPMR were analyzed. Patients without follow-up surveillance colonoscopies were excluded. Results Among 359 lesions, the local recurrence rate on the first surveillance colonoscopy was 5.8% (18/312) and 6.4% (3/47) after CEPMR and PEPMR, respectively. Among lesions without recurrence at the first surveillance colonoscopy, the rates of late recurrence on subsequent surveillance colonoscopy were 3.9% (6/152) and 0% after CEPMR and PEPMR, respectively. Larger tumor size was the only independent risk factor for recurrence (odds ratio, 7.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.95–32.30; P<0.001). Endoscopic treatment was performed for all 27 recurrences. A combination of ≥2 endoscopic treatment modalities was used in 19 of 27 recurrences (70.4%). Surveillance colonoscopies were performed in 20 of 27 recurrences after endoscopic treatment. One (5.0%) had a re-recurrence and was treated by surgical resection because recurrence occurred at the appendiceal orifice. Nineteen of 20 lesions (95.0%) could be cured endoscopically, although 3 of the 19 showed second or third recurrences and were treated by repeat endoscopic resection. Conclusions The local recurrence rates after CEPMR and PEPMR were similar. Larger tumor size was an independent risk factor for local recurrence after EPMR. Endoscopic treatment of recurrences resulted in high cure rates, although combination methods were necessary in many cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myeongsook Seo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Mi Song
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gwang Un Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Wook Hwang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Hyoung Park
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong-Hoon Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung-Jo Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byong Duk Ye
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Jae Myung
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Suk-Kyun Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong-Sik Byeon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Vleugels JLA, Hazewinkel Y, Dekker E. Morphological classifications of gastrointestinal lesions. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2017; 31:359-367. [PMID: 28842045 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2017.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Accepted: 05/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
In the era of spreading adoption of gastrointestinal endoscopy screening worldwide, endoscopists encounter an increasing number of complex lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. For decision-making on optimal treatment, precise lesion characterization is crucial. Especially the assessment of potential submucosal invasion is of utmost importance as this determines whether endoscopic removal is an option and which technique should be used. To describe a lesion and stratify for the risk of submucosal invasion, several morphological classification systems have been developed. In this manuscript, we thoroughly discuss a systematic approach for the endoscopic assessment of a lesion, which include location, size, Paris classification, lateral spreading tumor classification if applicable and evaluation of the surface pattern with advanced endoscopic imaging techniques. The use of advanced imaging techniques improves the characterization of mucosal surface patterns and helps to determine whether lesions are amenable to endoscopic resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper L A Vleugels
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Yark Hazewinkel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Yoshida N, Naito Y, Murakami T, Hirose R, Ogiso K, Inada Y, Dohi O, Kamada K, Uchiyama K, Handa O, Konishi H, Siah KTH, Yagi N, Fujita Y, Kishimoto M, Yanagisawa A, Itoh Y. Linked color imaging improves the visibility of colorectal polyps: a video study. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5:E518-E525. [PMID: 28596985 PMCID: PMC5462607 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-105495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2016] [Accepted: 02/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/STUDY AIM Linked color imaging (LCI) by a laser endoscope (Fujifilm Co, Tokyo, Japan) is a novel narrow band light observation. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether LCI could improve the visibility of colorectal polyps using endoscopic videos. PATIENTS AND METHODS We prospectively recorded videos of consecutive polyps 2 - 20 mm in size diagnosed as neoplastic polyps. Three videos, white light (WL), blue laser imaging (BLI)-bright, and LCI, were recorded for each polyp by one expert. After excluding inappropriate videos, all videos were evaluated in random order by two experts and two non-experts according to a published polyp visibility score from four (excellent visibility) to one (poor visibility). Additionally, the relationship between polyp visibility scores in LCI and various clinical characteristics including location, size, histology, morphology, and preparation were analyzed compared to WL and BLI-bright. RESULTS We analyzed 101 colorectal polyps (94 neoplastic) in 66 patients (303 videos). The mean polyp size was 9.0 ± 8.1 mm and 54 polyps were non-polypoid. The mean polyp visibility scores for LCI (2.86 ± 1.08) were significantly higher than for WL and BLI-bright (2.53 ± 1.15, P < 0.001; 2.73 ± 1.47, P < 0.041). The ratio of poor visibility (score 1 and 2) was significantly lower in LCI for experts and non-experts (35.6 %, 33.6 %) compared with WL (49.6 %, P = 0.015, 50.5 %, P = 0.046). The polyp visibility scores for LCI were significantly higher than those for WL for all of the factors. With respect to the comparison between BLI-bright and WL, the polyp visibility scores for BLI-bright were not higher than WL for right-sided location, < 10 mm size, sessile serrated adenoma and polyp histology, and poor preparation. For those characteristics, LCI improved the lesions with right-sided location, SSA/P histology, and poor preparation significantly better than BLI. CONCLUSIONS LCI improved polyp visibility compared to WL for both expert and non-expert endoscopists. It is useful for improving polyp visibility in any location, any size, any morphology, any histology, and any preparation level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naohisa Yoshida
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuji Naito
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takaaki Murakami
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ryohei Hirose
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Ogiso
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yutaka Inada
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Osamu Dohi
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Kamada
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Uchiyama
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Osamu Handa
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Konishi
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kewin Tien Ho Siah
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medicine Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Nobuaki Yagi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Murakami Memorial Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Yasuko Fujita
- Department of Pathology and Cell Regulation, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mitsuo Kishimoto
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Akio Yanagisawa
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshito Itoh
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Analysis of molecular alterations in laterally spreading tumors of the colorectum. J Gastroenterol 2017; 52:715-723. [PMID: 27704264 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-016-1269-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2015] [Accepted: 09/19/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) are classified into LST-Gs and LST-NGs, according to macroscopic findings. In the present study, we determined the genetic and epigenetic alterations within colorectal LSTs and protruding adenomas. METHODS A crypt isolation method was used to isolate DNA from tumors and normal glands of 73 macroscopically verified colorectal LSTs (histologically defined adenomas; 38 LST-Gs and 35 LST-NGs) and 36 protruding adenomas. The DNA was processed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) microsatellite assays, single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) assays, and pyrosequencing to detect chromosomal allelic imbalance (AI), mutations in APC, KRAS, and TP53, and the methylation of MLH1, MGMT, CDKN2A, HPP1, RASSF2A, SFRP1, DKK1, ZFP64, and SALL4 genes. In addition, methylation status was examined using the following set of markers: MIN1, MINT2, MINT31, MLH1, and CDKN2A (with classification of negative/low and high). Microsatellite instability (MSI) was also examined. RESULTS 5q AI and methylation of the SFRP1 and SALL4 genes were common molecular events in both LST-Gs and LST-NGs. Neither MSI nor mutations in BRAF ware observed in the LSTs. TP53 mutations were rarely found in LSTs. The frequencies of KRAS and APC mutations and the methylation levels of ZFP64, RASSF2A, and HPP1 genes were significantly higher in LST-Gs than in LST-NGs. Protruding adenomas showed alterations common to LST-Gs. Negative/low methylation status was common among the three types of tumors. CONCLUSION Combined genetic and epigenetic data suggested that the molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis were different between LST-Gs and LST-NGs.
Collapse
|
42
|
Okamoto K, Muguruma N, Kagemoto K, Mitsui Y, Fujimoto D, Kitamura S, Kimura T, Sogabe M, Miyamoto H, Takayama T. Efficacy of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a rescue treatment in difficult colorectal ESD cases. Dig Endosc 2017; 29 Suppl 2:45-52. [PMID: 28425649 DOI: 10.1111/den.12863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2016] [Accepted: 03/07/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), which provides a higher en bloc resection rate than conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), is considered to be a useful treatment option for large colorectal tumors. However, colorectal ESD is not widely used because of its technical difficulty, risk of complications and time required. To overcome these drawbacks, a simpler modified technique, ESD with snaring (hybrid ESD), has been developed. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively compare the safety and efficacy of hybrid ESD and conventional ESD for colorectal tumors. METHODS Between September 2008 and June 2016, ESD was carried out on 137 lesions and hybrid ESD on 27 lesions. All hybrid ESD cases were carried out as a rescue treatment in difficult ESD cases. We retrospectively investigated procedure time, and the rates of en bloc resection, perforation, bleeding, and local recurrence. RESULTS In the hybrid ESD group, procedure time was shorter compared with the ESD group (108 ± 59.5 min vs 122 ± 72.2 min), but the en bloc resection rate was lower (66.7% vs 94.2%). However, there were no significant differences in procedure time, or in rates of en bloc resection, perforation and bleeding between the two groups. Local recurrence did not develop in any of our cases. CONCLUSIONS Hybrid ESD as a rescue treatment in difficult ESD cases may be less effective for en bloc resection of large colorectal tumors. Indication for hybrid ESD may be limited to scheduled treatment from the outset and emergency cases with patients who present unstable vital signs during ESD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koichi Okamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Naoki Muguruma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Kaizo Kagemoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Mitsui
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Daisaku Fujimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Shinji Kitamura
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Kimura
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Masahiro Sogabe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Miyamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Tetsuji Takayama
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Yoshida N, Naito Y, Murakami T, Hirose R, Ogiso K, Inada Y, Abdul Rani R, Kishimoto M, Nakanishi M, Itoh Y. Tips for safety in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2017; 5:185. [PMID: 28616400 PMCID: PMC5464937 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Accepted: 02/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
In Japan, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) becomes one of standard therapies for large colorectal tumors. Recently, the efficacy of ESD has been reported all over the world. However, it is still difficult even for Japanese experts in some situations. Right-sided location, large tumor size, high degree of fibrosis, difficult manipulation is related with the difficulty. However, improvements on ESD devices, suitable strategies, and increase of operators' experiences enable us to solve these problems. In this chapter, we introduce recent topics about various difficult factors of colorectal ESD and the tips such as strategy, devices, injection, and traction method [Pocket-creation method (PCM) etc.].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naohisa Yoshida
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuji Naito
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takaaki Murakami
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ryohei Hirose
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Ogiso
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yutaka Inada
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Rafiz Abdul Rani
- Gastroenterology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Mitsuo Kishimoto
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Nakanishi
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshito Itoh
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abdelaziz M, Sayed M. Colonic Laterally Spreading Tumor Diagnosed as an Early Cancer and Treated with Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Middle East J Dig Dis 2017; 9:49-54. [PMID: 28316766 PMCID: PMC5308134 DOI: 10.15171/mejdd.2016.51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) are generally defined as superficial lesions ≥10 mm in diameter that typically extend laterally rather than vertically along the colonic wall. Such lesions are now increasingly reported because of increased awareness and the introduction of chromo and magnifying colonoscopy. Although the clinicopathological characteristics and the efficacy of endoscopic management of LSTs have been defined in Japanese cohorts, reports from the Middle East are lacking where surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment. We report a case with an LST about 20 cm from anal verge removed by endoscopic mucosal resection. After histopathological evaluation of the removed specimen, we categorized the patient as having high risk early colon cancer. The intensive follow-up as an additional treatment strategy was chosen for the patient. This review addresses the management of early carcinoma in colorectal polyp with reference to proper preoperative assessment, treatment selection with special attention to role of biomarkers, the need for additional treatment on the basis of the presence of risk factors and endoscopic follow-up after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Abdelaziz
- Department of Tropical Medicine and Gastroenterology, University of Sohag, Egypt ; Mohamad Dossary Hospital, Saudi Arabia
| | - Motaz Sayed
- Mohamad Dossary Hospital, Saudi Arabia ; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ein Shams, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Longcroft-Wheaton G, Bhandari P. Management of early colonic neoplasia: where are we now and where are we heading? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 11:227-236. [PMID: 28052695 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2017.1279051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
There have been considerable advances in the endoscopic treatment of colorectal neoplasia. The development of endoscopic submucosal dissection and full thickness resection techniques is changing the way benign disease and early cancers are managed. This article reviews the evidence behind these new techniques and discusses where this field is likely to move in the future. Areas covered: A PubMed literature review of resection techniques for colonic neoplasia was performed. The clinical and cost effectiveness of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is examined. The development of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and knife assisted resection is described and issues around training reviewed. Efficacy is compared to both EMR and transanal endoscopic microsurgery. The future is considered, including full thickness resection techniques and robotic endoscopy. Expert commentary: The perceived barriers to ESD are falling, and views that such techniques are only possible in Japan are disappearing. The key barriers to uptake will be training, and the development of educational programmes should be seen as a priority. The debate between TEMS and ESD will continue, but ESD is more flexible and cheaper. This will become less significant as the number of endoscopists trained in ESD grows and some TEMS surgeons may shift across towards ESD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton
- a Department of Endoscopy , Queen Alexandra Hospital , Portsmouth , UK.,b Department of Pharmacy and Biomedical sciences , University of Portsmouth , Portsmouth , United Kingdom
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- a Department of Endoscopy , Queen Alexandra Hospital , Portsmouth , UK.,b Department of Pharmacy and Biomedical sciences , University of Portsmouth , Portsmouth , United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Igawa A, Oka S, Tanaka S, Otani I, Kunihara S, Chayama K. Evaluation for the Clinical Efficacy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy in the Detection of Laterally Spreading Tumors. Digestion 2017; 95:43-48. [PMID: 28052292 DOI: 10.1159/000452367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The manner in which colorectal lesions are being detected with PillCam COLON2 capsule endoscopy (CCE2) has markedly improved in recent days. However, limited data are available on CCE2 for detecting laterally spreading tumors (LSTs). The aim of this study was to compare CCE2 with optical colonoscopy (OC), which is currently the gold standard used in the detection of LSTs. METHODS We performed a prospective, single-academic center study comparing CCE2 with OC in patients with LSTs diagnosed using OC, which was performed during the 3-month period prior to CCE2. We focused on the sensitivity and specificity of CCE2 for detecting LSTs. LSTs were classified into the LST-granular type (LST-G) or the LST-non-granular type (LST-NG). RESULTS Thirty patients (mean age 59.5 years) were enrolled. Of them, 21 LSTs (7 LST-Gs and 14 LST-NGs) were evaluated in this study. The mean diameter of the LSTs was 27 ± 15 mm (range 10-60 mm). Histopathological diagnoses of the LSTs were as follows: tubular adenoma, 12 cases (57%); sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P), 4 cases (19%); Tis carcinoma, 1 case (5%); and T1 carcinoma, 4 cases (19 LSTs were found in the following locations: cecum, 1 case (5%); ascending colon, 6 cases (29%); transverse colon, 6 cases, (29%); descending colon, 1 case (5%); sigmoid colon, 3 cases (13%); and rectum, 4 cases (19%). The colon cleansing level was adequate in all cases. The sensitivity and specificity of CCE2 for detecting LSTs were 81 and 100% respectively. For detecting LST-Gs and LST-NGs, the sensitivity and specificity were 71 and 100%, and 86 and 100%, respectively. There were 4 false-negative cases (LST-G (18 mm), cecum; LST-G (20 mm), sigmoid colon; LST-NG (25 mm), transverse colon; LST-NG (20 mm), transverse colon). CONCLUSIONS The sensitivity for detecting LSTs is lower with CCE2 than it is with OC, especially for LSTs located on the right colon or for SSA/P.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Igawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Jung HC, Kim HJ, Ji SB, Cho JH, Kwak JH, Lee CM, Kim WS, Kim JJ, Lee JM, Lee SS. Pneumoretroperitoneum, Pneumomediastinum, Subcutaneous Emphysema After a Rectal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection. Ann Coloproctol 2017; 32:234-238. [PMID: 28119867 PMCID: PMC5256253 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2016.32.6.234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2016] [Accepted: 04/26/2016] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
An endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an effective and safe therapeutic technique for treating a patient with a laterally-spreading tumor (LST). Colonoscopic-procedure-related complications are noted to be about 2.8% worldwide, and a perforation is the most common. Most colon perforations cause pneumoperitoneum. However, a perforation within the retroperitoneal portion of the colon (rectum and some of sigmoid colon) may cause an extraperitoneal perforation, and the leaking free air may induce pneumoretroperitoneum, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema, depending on the amount of discharged air. Herein, we present the case of a patient with an extraperitoneal colon microperforation which manifested as pneumoretroperitoneum, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema after an EMR for a sigmoid LST, which was successfully treated with medical treatment and endoscopic clipping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hee Cheul Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Hyun Jin Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Sung Bok Ji
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Jun Hyeong Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Ji Hye Kwak
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Chang Min Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Wan Soo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Jin Ju Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Jae Min Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Sang Su Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Takamaru H, Saito Y, Yamada M, Tsuruki ES, Kinjo Y, Otake Y, Sakamoto T, Nakajima T, Matsuda T. Clinical impact of endoscopic clip closure of perforations during endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84:494-502.e1. [PMID: 26774353 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2015] [Accepted: 01/07/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Despite advances in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), perforation can still occur. The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical course and effectiveness of endoscopic closure in addition to the clinicopathologic features related to perforation. METHODS A total of 935 lesions in 900 consecutive patients between February 1998 and February 2013 underwent ESD for colorectal tumors at our institution. We studied the clinical course and histologic features of perforation through a matched case-control study that included 24 patients with intraprocedural perforation and 240 matched patients without perforation as a control group. Endoscopic closure by using through-the-scope endoclips was attempted in all cases of intraprocedural perforations immediately after perforation was recognized during the procedure. RESULTS Perforation occurred in 25 cases (2.7%), including 24 intraprocedural perforation and 1 delayed perforation. All but 1 patient with intraprocedural perforation was conservatively managed by endoscopic closure. One patient with unsuccessful endoscopic closure required emergency surgery. Analysis of clinical courses revealed statistically significant differences (P < .01) between the patients with perforation and the case-controlled, nonperforation patients in total procedure time, white blood cell count, and level of serum C-reactive protein on the day after the procedure, admission period, and fasting period. Both location (P = .027) and submucosal fibrosis (P = .04) of the lesion were significantly associated with perforation. Multivariate analysis revealed that fibrosis was a significant risk factor associated with perforation (odds ratio 2.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-7.90). CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic closure allows effective nonsurgical management in cases of intraprocedural perforation during ESD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Yamada
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eriko S Tsuruki
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuzuru Kinjo
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Otake
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taku Sakamoto
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Nakajima
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahisa Matsuda
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Appropriate endoscopic resection for colorectal polyps can present a challenge to endoscopists, as these lesions may harbor malignancy. With recent advances in endoscopy, however, we are now entering an exciting frontier of endoscopic therapy for gastrointestinal lesions. These techniques include endoluminal mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection, which may be utilized on several colonic lesions. This article will discuss these principle endoscopic techniques, their outcomes, and briefly highlight their influence on endoscopic interventions, including transanal endoscopic microsurgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine A Kelley
- Division of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - V Liana Tsikitis
- Division of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Tang XW, Ren YT, Zhou JQ, Wei ZJ, Chen ZY, Jiang B, Gong W. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading tumors in the rectum ≥40 mm. Tech Coloproctol 2016; 20:437-443. [PMID: 27053255 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-016-1459-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2015] [Accepted: 02/27/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been developed to allow en bloc resection of early neoplasia of the gastrointestinal tract, including colorectal tumors. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ESD for laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) in the rectum with diameters of 40 mm or more. METHODS Between January 2010 and October 2014, 35 patients with a total of 36 LSTs of the rectum measuring ≥40 mm were included in this study. Clinical and pathological characteristics and clinical outcomes were examined and analyzed. RESULTS The mean operating time was 125.8 ± 61.4 min, and the mean size of the tumors was 59.4 ± 19.8 mm. The rate of en bloc resection and en bloc R0 resection were 91.7 % (33/36) and 88.9 % (32/36), respectively. Perforation occurred in three patients (8.6 %) and was managed conservatively. Postoperative bleeding occurred in one patient (2.9 %) and was treated by endoscopic hemostasis. Excluding five patients, who either underwent additional surgery (n = 1) or were lost to follow-up (n = 4), two patients in our cohort (6.7 %) presented with recurrence of a small adenoma. The remaining patients (n = 28) were free of recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 18.7 ± 4.2 months (range 12-43 months). CONCLUSIONS Our results indicated that ESD is an effective and safe therapeutic option with high curative rates for LSTs in the rectum ≥40 mm. To prove its long-term efficacy, a large multicenter prospective study is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X W Tang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No.1838, Guangzhou North Ave, Guangzhou, 510515, China
- Departmemt of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital Medical Center, Tsinghua University, Dongxiaokou Town, Changping District, Beijing, China
| | - Y T Ren
- Departmemt of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital Medical Center, Tsinghua University, Dongxiaokou Town, Changping District, Beijing, China
| | - J Q Zhou
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No.1838, Guangzhou North Ave, Guangzhou, 510515, China
- Departmemt of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital Medical Center, Tsinghua University, Dongxiaokou Town, Changping District, Beijing, China
| | - Z J Wei
- Departmemt of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital Medical Center, Tsinghua University, Dongxiaokou Town, Changping District, Beijing, China
| | - Z Y Chen
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No.1838, Guangzhou North Ave, Guangzhou, 510515, China
| | - B Jiang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No.1838, Guangzhou North Ave, Guangzhou, 510515, China
- Departmemt of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital Medical Center, Tsinghua University, Dongxiaokou Town, Changping District, Beijing, China
| | - W Gong
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No.1838, Guangzhou North Ave, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
| |
Collapse
|