ERCP performed through previously placed enteral stents is an uncommon procedure without a significant amount of supporting literature and with a wide reported range of technical success. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and better define the technical feasibility and safety of performing ERCP through enteral stents in patients with combined malignant biliary and gastric outlet obstruction.

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study on 71 patients with combined gastric outlet and biliary obstruction who underwent ERCP through a previously placed enteral stent at 2 tertiary care centers. Outcomes included but were not limited to technical success, clinical success, need for repeat ERCP, adverse events, and survival time.

Overall technical success was achieved in 60 of 71 patients (85%), with technical success of 40 of 46 (87%) in type I obstructions (gastric outlet obstruction above the ampulla), 16 of 21 (76%) in type II obstructions (gastric outlet obstruction at the level of the ampulla), and 4 of 4 (100%) in type III obstructions (gastric outlet obstruction distal to the ampulla). In general, patients who achieved technical success also achieved clinical success. Adverse events occurred in 3 patients (3/71): 2 patients with acute cholangitis and 1 patient with perforation. Average survival time after the procedure was 4.6 months overall.

ERCP performed through enteral stents is safe, with a high technical and clinical success rate, but may be more technically challenging in the setting of type II obstructions. This procedure could be considered first line in the unique setting that a patient requires ERCP through a previously placed enteral stent for malignant gastric outlet and biliary obstruction.

Endoscopic biliary and duodenal stenting (DS; double stenting) is widely accepted as a palliation therapy for malignant bilioduodenal obstruction. The aim of the current study was to investigate the patency and adverse events of duodenal and biliary stents in patients with DS.

Patients who underwent DS from April 2004 to March 2017 were analyzed retrospectively with regard to clinical outcomes and predictive factors of recurrent biliary and duodenal obstruction (recurrent biliary obstruction [RBO] and recurrent duodenal obstruction [RDO]).

A total of 109 consecutive patients was enrolled. Technical success of DS was achieved in 108 patients (99.1%). Symptoms due to biliary and duodenal obstruction were improved in 89 patients (81.7%). RBO occurred in 25 patients (22.9%) and RDO in 13 (11.9%). The median times to RBO and RDO from DS were 87 and 76 days, respectively. Placement of a duodenal uncovered self-expandable metal stent (U-SEMS) was significantly associated with RBO in the multivariable analysis (P = 0.007). Time to RBO was significantly longer in the duodenal covered self-expandable metal stent group than in the U-SEMS group (P = 0.003). No predictive factors of RDO were detected, and duodenal stent type was not associated with the time to RDO (P = 0.724).

Double stenting was safe and effective for malignant bilioduodenal obstruction. Duodenal U-SEMS is a risk factor for RBO. The covered self-expandable metal stent is the preferred type of duodenal SEMS in patients with DS (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000027606).

Endoscopic stenting for combined malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction is technically demanding. However, this procedure can be facilitated when there is guidance from previously inserted stent or PTBD tube. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical success rate of endoscopic placement of biliary self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) through duodenal SEMS in patients with combined biliary and duodenal obstruction due to inoperable or metastatic periampullary malignancy.

A total of 12 patients with combined malignant biliary and duodenal stricture underwent insertion of biliary SEMS through the mesh of specialized duodenal SEMS from July 2012 to October 2016. Technical and clinical success rate, adverse events and survival after completion of SEMS insertion were evaluated.

The duodenal strictures were located in the first portion of the duodenum in four patients (Type I), in the second portion in three patients (Type II), and in the third portion in five patients (Type III). Technical success rate of combined metallic stenting was 91.7%. Insertion of biliary SEMS was guided by previously inserted biliary SEMS in nine patients, plastic stent in one patient, and PTBD in two patients. Clinical success rate was 90.9%. There were no early adverse events after the procedure. Mean survival period after combined metallic stenting was 91.9 days (range: 15-245 days).

Endoscopic placement of biliary SEMS through duodenal SEMS is feasible with high success rates and relatively easy when there is guidance. This method can be a good alternative for palliation in patients with combined biliary and duodenal obstruction.

Patients with periampullary cancer or gastric cancer often develop malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) and gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), and combined MBO and GOO is not rare in these patients. Combined MBO and GOO is classified by its location and sequence, and treatment strategy can be affected by this classification. Historically, palliative surgery, hepaticojejunostomy and gastrojejunostomy were carried out, but the current standard treatment is combined transpapillary stent and duodenal stent placement. Although a high technical success rate is reported, the procedure can be technically difficult and duodenobiliary reflux with subsequent cholangitis is common after double stenting. Recent development of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided procedures enables the management of MBO as well as GOO under EUS guidance. EUS-guided biliary drainage is now increasingly reported as an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and GOO is one of the major reasons for failed ERCP. In addition to EUS-guided biliary drainage, the feasibility of EUS-guided double-balloon-occluded gastrojejunostomy bypass for MBO was recently reported, and EUS-guided double stenting can potentially become the treatment of choice in the future. However, as each procedure has its advantages and disadvantages, treatment strategy should be selected based on the type of obstruction and the prognosis and performance status of the patient.

The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate endoscopic double stenting by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage (ERCP-BD) and by endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) for the treatment of non-resectable malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction.

Medical records of 11 patients that underwent endoscopic double stenting from January 2008 to September 2012 were analyzed retrospectively.

Technical success rate was 100%, clinical success rate was 100%, early complication rate was 0% and late complication rate was 27.3% (cholangitis: two, perforation: one). Mean survival time from double stenting was 76.5 ± 67.8 days, mean patent period of the duodenal stent was 73.5 ± 69.7 days, and mean patent period of the biliary stent was 62.6 ± 60.4 days. Three (27.3%) patients were discharged (mean duration of hospitalization, 21.3 days). All patients could take food orally, and mean Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System score after double stenting was 2.2 ± 0.9 points. ERCP-BD and EUS-BD were done in three and eight patients, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between ERCP-BD and EUS-BD in terms of success rate and complication rate.

Our study revealed that endoscopic double stenting appears to be feasible and useful for the treatment of non-resectable malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction. In terms of selection criteria of ERCP-BD patients and EUS-BD patients, further prospective studies are mandatory.

To report treatment outcomes and complications of uncovered self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) as a first-line therapy for inoperable malignant duodenal obstructions in our hospital.

A retrospective analysis was performed in patients who had undergone placement of uncovered SEMS as a first-line therapy for inoperable malignant duodenal obstruction from August 2001 to July 2011. Treatment outcomes and complications of the procedures were investigated.

In total, 47 patients (25 men; mean age 65 years) underwent the procedure. The technical and clinical success rates were 93.6% and 83.0%, respectively. Early complications occurred in 8 patients, including two guidewire-induced micro-perforations and six pancreatitis. All these 8 patients recovered with conservative treatment. Six late complications requiring additional procedures consisted of five stent occlusions due to tumor ingrowth and one stent migration. Four stent occlusions and one migration were treated by the placement of an additional covered stent and the remaining case was treated by balloon dilatation. The median primary stent patency period and median survival period after primary stent placement were 103 days and 131 days, respectively.

Uncovered SEMS placement is effective as a first-line palliative therapy for inoperable malignant duodenal obstruction. Complications such as stent occlusion or migration can be easily managed with additional covered SEMS.

Endoscopic metallic stenting is a safe, effective treatment for malignant biliary obstructions, but can be technically difficult when combined malignant biliary and duodenal obstructions exist. Available duodenal metallic stents feature a tight mesh unsuitable for transpapillary biliary stenting. We evaluated the feasibility and usefulness of new endoscopic procedures for endoscopic double-stent placement in managing such obstructions.

The through-the-scope duodenal metallic stent has a central cross-wired, unfixed structure that allows insertion of the biliary stent through the mesh wall of a duodenal stent. Transpapillary endoscopic placement of a biliary stent was performed through the lumen of this duodenal stent. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage was performed successfully through the duodenal bulb after puncturing with a 19G needle. Biliary metallic stenting through the choledochoduodenal tract and effective drainage were achieved.

Use of a combined endoscopic biliary and duodenal stent inserted through the mesh of the new duodenal metallic stent is feasible and effective in managing the aforementioned obstructions. EUS-guided biliary metal stenting is a therapeutic option for endoscopic management when a failed transpapillary approach through the lumen of the duodenal stent occurs. The continued development of endoscopic procedures and devices should resolve issues associated with complicated strictures.

Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are an effective palliative treatment for malignant biliary or duodenal strictures, but endoscopic stenting for combined malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction remains technically difficult.

To evaluate the feasibility and clinical success rate of endoscopic double stent-in-stent placement by using a new duodenal metallic stent for the management of malignant biliary and duodenal obstructions.

Prospective, observational clinical feasibility study.

Tertiary referral center.

Technical and clinical success, complications, midterm outcome.

Eight patients with inoperable malignant biliary and duodenal strictures were enrolled. Endoscopic placement of a biliary SEMS was performed through the mesh of the duodenal stent.

The duodenal strictures were in the first part of the duodenum in 3 patients (type 1) and in the second part in 5 patients (type 2). Duodenal stents were successfully deployed in all patients. Endoscopic placement of a biliary SEMS through the mesh of the duodenal stent was successful in 7 (87.5%) of 8 patients. In 2 of 3 patients with type 2 duodenal strictures with failed bile duct cannulation, biliary stenting was successful by using the rendezvous procedure. Early complications occurred in 1 patient. The overall median survival after combined stenting was 91 days (range 36-314 days).

Small number of patients and no comparison with other enteral stents.

Biliary stenting through the new duodenal metallic stent is technically feasible and has a high success rate. Combined endoscopic biliary and duodenal stent-in-stent placement is a promising solution for the palliation of malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction.

The aim of this work was to evaluate the feasibility of endoscopic insertion of biliary stents in patients with duodenal stents who develop secondary malignant obstructive jaundice.

The study population included 133 patients with unresectable malignant duodenal obstruction. In 106 patients a biliary stent was inserted before or at the same time as the duodenal stent. Malignant biliary obstruction appeared secondarily in 18 patients; fifteen of these patients already had a biliary stent. We present our experience of biliary stent insertion in these 18 patients with metallic duodenal stents.

Biliary obstruction was successfully alleviated in 17 out of 18 patients (94%) without complication. Insertion of a new biliary stent failed in one patient because the mesh of the duodenal stent passed over the metallic biliary stent already in place. Mean duration of endoscopic insertion was 95 minutes (range: 60 - 180). All patients remained free of biliary complications to death (57 days, range: 30 - 120).

Our report shows that endoscopic insertion of a biliary stent is feasible in patients who have metallic duodenal stents. Technical difficulties exist especially if the mesh of the duodenal stent passes over the papilla.