|
1
|
Kolbe EW, Buciunas M, Krieg S, Loosen SH, Roderburg C, Krieg A, Kostev K. Minimally invasive versus open surgery for colonic diverticular disease: a nationwide analysis of German hospital data. Tech Coloproctol 2025; 29:46. [PMID: 39821452 PMCID: PMC11739223 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-03092-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2024] [Accepted: 12/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/19/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to evaluate the current rates and outcomes of minimally invasive versus open surgery for colonic diverticular disease in Germany, using a nationwide dataset. METHODS We analyzed data from 36 hospitals, encompassing approximately 1.25 million hospitalizations from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2023. Patients aged 18 years and older with colonic diverticular disease (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10): K57.2 and K57.3) who underwent surgical treatment were included. Surgeries were classified as open or minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robotic). Outcomes such as in-hospital mortality, complications, and length of stay were assessed using multivariable logistic and linear regression models. RESULTS Out of 1670 patients who underwent surgery for colonic diverticular disease, 63.2% had perforation and abscess. The rate of minimally invasive surgery increased from 34.6% in 2019 to 52.9% in 2023 for complicated cases and from 67.8% to 86.2% for uncomplicated cases. Open surgery was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR): 7.41; 95% CI: 2.86-19.21) and complications compared with minimally invasive surgery. The length of hospital stay was significantly longer for open surgery patients, with an increase of 4.6 days for those with perforation and abscess and 5.0 days for those without. CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive surgery for colonic diverticular disease is increasingly preferred in Germany, especially for uncomplicated cases. However, open surgery remains common for complicated cases, but is associated with higher mortality, more complications, and longer hospital stays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E W Kolbe
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Thoracic Surgery and Proctology, Medical Campus OWL, University Hospital Herford, Ruhr University Bochum, Schwarzenmoorstr. 70, 32049, Herford, Germany
| | - M Buciunas
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Thoracic Surgery and Proctology, Medical Campus OWL, University Hospital Herford, Ruhr University Bochum, Schwarzenmoorstr. 70, 32049, Herford, Germany
| | - S Krieg
- Department of Inclusive Medicine, University Hospital Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Bielefeld University, 33617, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - S H Loosen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - C Roderburg
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - A Krieg
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Thoracic Surgery and Proctology, Medical Campus OWL, University Hospital Herford, Ruhr University Bochum, Schwarzenmoorstr. 70, 32049, Herford, Germany.
| | - K Kostev
- Epidemiology, IQVIA, 60549, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Macovei Oprescu AM, Dumitriu B, Stefan MA, Oprescu C, Venter DP, Mircea V, Valcea S. Open Versus Laparoscopic Oncological Resections for Colon Cancer: An Experience at an Average-Volume Center. Cureus 2024; 16:e70535. [PMID: 39479117 PMCID: PMC11524431 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 11/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Although laparoscopy has some limitations related to tumor size or location along the colon, it has been demonstrated that the oncological results are just as good as for open surgery. One can also add to the benefits faster recovery and start of chemotherapy, with lower rates of complications. Our study aimed to compare open surgery to laparoscopy for non-complicated colon tumors operated in an average case-load center and appreciate its feasibility with regards to the T stage, lymph node yield and conversions. The study is retrospective and expanded over four years (January 2020-January 2024). One hundred sixty-two patients were included in the study. We observed that female patients were frequently operated through laparoscopy (p=0.003). T1 and T2 tumors represented the majority of the tumors in the laparoscopy group (p=0.004). No statistical difference existed in terms of lymph node yield. Laparoscopy was avoided for tumors of the splenic angle (p=0.006). Concluding our results, minimally invasive surgery for non-complicated colon cancer is non-inferior to open surgery. Considerable expertise is required to take on more complex cases such as difficult-to-access tumors or large, invasive cancers. It can and should be offered to patients as an alternative to open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Dana Paula Venter
- Pediatric Surgery, Grigore Alexandrescu Emergency Pediatric Hospital, Bucharest, ROU
| | - Venter Mircea
- Surgery, Bucharest Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, ROU
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Gall TMH, Malhotra G, Elliott JA, Conneely JB, Fong Y, Jiao LR. The Atlantic divide: contrasting surgical robotics training in the USA, UK and Ireland. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:117-123. [PMID: 35366194 PMCID: PMC9939491 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01399-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The uptake of robotic surgery is rapidly increasing worldwide across surgical specialties. However, there is currently a much higher use of robotic surgery in the United States of America (USA) compared to the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland. Reduced exposure to robotic surgery in training may lead to longer learning curves and worse patient outcomes. We aimed to identify whether any difference exists in exposure to robotic surgery during general surgical training between trainees in the USA, UK and Ireland. Over a 15-week period from September 2021, a survey was distributed through the professional networks of the research team. Participants were USA, UK or Irish trainees who were part of a formal general surgical training curriculum. 116 survey responses were received. US trainees (n = 34) had all had robotic simulator experience, compared to only 37.93% of UK (n = 58) and 75.00% of Irish (n = 24) trainees (p < 0.00001). 91.18% of US trainees had performed 15 or more cases as the console surgeon, compared to only 3.44% of UK and 16.67% of Irish trainees (p < 0.00001). Fifty UK trainees (86.21%) and 22 Irish trainees (91.67%) compared to 12 US trainees (35.29%) do not think they have had adequate robotics training (p < 0.00001). Surgical trainees in the USA have had significantly more exposure to training in robotic surgery than their UK and Irish counterparts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara M. H. Gall
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, UK ,Department of Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gautam Malhotra
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
| | - Jessie A. Elliott
- Department of Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John B. Conneely
- Department of Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Yuman Fong
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
| | - Long R. Jiao
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, UK ,Department of Academic Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Ebrahimian S, Verma A, Sakowitz S, Olmedo MO, Chervu N, Khan A, Hawkins A, Benharash P, Lee H. Association of hospital volume with conversion to open from minimally invasive colectomy in patients with diverticulitis: A national analysis. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0284729. [PMID: 37115767 PMCID: PMC10146460 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the known advantages of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for diverticular disease, the impact of conversions to open (CtO) colectomy remains understudied. The present study used a nationally representative database to characterize risk factors and outcomes associated with CtO in patients with diverticular disease. METHODS All elective adult hospitalizations entailing colectomy for diverticulitis were identified in the 2017-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Annual institutional caseloads of MIS and open colectomy were independently tabulated. Restricted cubic splines were utilized to non-linearly estimate the risk-adjusted association between hospital volumes and CtO. Additional regression models were developed to evaluate the association of CtO with outcomes of interest. RESULTS Of an estimated 110,281 patients with diverticulitis who met study criteria, 39.3% underwent planned open colectomy, 53.3% completed MIS, and 7.4% had a CtO. Following adjustment, an inverse relationship between hospital MIS volume and risk of CtO was observed. In contrast, increasing hospital open volume was positively associated with greater risk of CtO. On multivariable analysis, CtO was associated with lower odds of mortality (AOR 0.3, p = 0.001) when compared to open approach, and similar risk of mortality when compared to completed MIS (AOR 0.7, p = 0.436). CONCLUSION In the present study, institutional MIS volume exhibited inverse correlation with adjusted rates of CtO, independent of open colectomy volume. CtO was associated with decreased rates of mortality compared to planned open approach but equivalence risk relative to completed MIS. Our findings highlight the importance of MIS experience and suggest that MIS may be safely pursued as the initial surgical approach among diverticulitis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shayan Ebrahimian
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Arjun Verma
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Sara Sakowitz
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Manuel Orellana Olmedo
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, United States of America
| | - Nikhil Chervu
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Aimal Khan
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Alexander Hawkins
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Peyman Benharash
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Hanjoo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Bayat Z, Guidolin K, Elsolh B, De Castro C, Kennedy E, Govindarajan A. Impact of surgeon and hospital factors on length of stay after colorectal surgery systematic review. BJS Open 2022; 6:6704875. [PMID: 36124901 PMCID: PMC9487584 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although length of stay (LOS) after colorectal surgery (CRS) is associated with worse patient and system level outcomes, the impact of surgeon and hospital-level factors on LOS after CRS has not been well investigated. The aim of this study was to synthesize the evidence for the impact of surgeon and hospital-level factors on LOS after CRS. Methods A comprehensive database search was conducted using terms related to LOS and CRS. Studies were included if they reported the effect of surgeon or hospital factors on LOS after elective CRS. The evidence for the effect of each surgeon and hospital factor on LOS was synthesized using vote counting by direction of effect, taking risk of bias into consideration. Results A total of 13 946 unique titles and abstracts were screened, and 69 studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies were retrospective and assessed a total of eight factors. Surgeon factors such as increasing surgeon volume, colorectal surgical specialty, and progression along a learning curve were significantly associated with decreased LOS (effect seen in 87.5 per cent, 100 per cent, and 93.3 per cent of studies respectively). In contrast, hospital factors such as hospital volume and teaching hospital status were not significantly associated with LOS. Conclusion Provider-related factors were found to be significantly associated with LOS after elective CRS. In particular, surgeon-related factors related to experience specifically impacted LOS, whereas hospital-related factors did not. Understanding the mechanisms underlying these relationships may allow for tailoring of interventions to reduce LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zubair Bayat
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
- Sinai Health System , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
| | - Keegan Guidolin
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
| | - Basheer Elsolh
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
| | | | - Erin Kennedy
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
- Sinai Health System , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
| | - Anand Govindarajan
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
- Sinai Health System , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Burghgraef TA, Sikkenk DJ, Verheijen PM, Moumni ME, Hompes R, Consten ECJ. The learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:6337-6360. [PMID: 35697853 PMCID: PMC9402498 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09087-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard treatment of rectal carcinoma is surgical resection according to the total mesorectal excision principle, either by open, laparoscopic, robot-assisted or transanal technique. No clear consensus exists regarding the length of the learning curve for the minimal invasive techniques. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the current literature regarding the learning curve of minimal invasive TME. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for studies with the primary or secondary aim to assess the learning curve of either laparoscopic, robot-assisted or transanal TME for rectal cancer. The primary outcome was length of the learning curve per minimal invasive technique. Descriptive statistics were used to present results and the MINORS tool was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS 45 studies, with 7562 patients, were included in this systematic review. Length of the learning curve based on intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, pathological outcomes, or a composite endpoint using a risk-adjusted CUSUM analysis was 50 procedures for the laparoscopic technique, 32-75 procedures for the robot-assisted technique and 36-54 procedures for the transanal technique. Due to the low quality of studies and a high level of heterogeneity a meta-analysis could not be performed. Heterogeneity was caused by patient-related factors, surgeon-related factors and differences in statistical methods. CONCLUSION Current high-quality literature regarding length of the learning curve of minimal invasive TME techniques is scarce. Available literature suggests equal lengths of the learning curves of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal TME. Well-designed studies, using adequate statistical methods are required to properly assess the learning curve, while taking into account patient-related and surgeon-related factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs A Burghgraef
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Daan J Sikkenk
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Paul M Verheijen
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Mostafa El Moumni
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Roel Hompes
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Amsterdam, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Perivoliotis K, Baloyiannis I, Mamaloudis I, Volakakis G, Valaroutsos A, Tzovaras G. Change point analysis validation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Experience from a non-structured training setting. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14:387-401. [PMID: 35978712 PMCID: PMC9265254 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i6.387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of minimal invasive principles in colorectal surgery was a major breakthrough, resulting in multiple clinical benefits, at the cost, though, of a notably steep learning process. The development of structured nation-wide training programs led to the easier completion of the learning curve; however, these programs are not yet universally available, thus prohibiting the wider adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
AIM To display our experience in the learning curve status of laparoscopic colorectal surgery under a non-structured training setting.
METHODS We analyzed all laparoscopic colorectal procedures performed in the 2012-2019 period under a non-structured training setting. Cumulative sum analysis and change-point analysis (CPA) were introduced.
RESULTS Overall, 214 patients were included. In terms of operative time, CPA identified the 110th case as the first turning point. A plateau was reached after the 145th case. Subgroup analysis estimated the 58th for colon and 52nd case for rectum operations as the respective turning points. A learning curve pattern was confirmed for pathology outcomes, but not in the conversion to open surgery and morbidity endpoints.
CONCLUSION The learning curves in our setting validate the comparability of the results, despite the absence of National or Surgical Society driven training programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ioannis Baloyiannis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41110, Greece
| | - Ioannis Mamaloudis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41110, Greece
| | - Georgios Volakakis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41110, Greece
| | - Alex Valaroutsos
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41110, Greece
| | - George Tzovaras
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa 41110, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Belotto M, Coutinho L, Pacheco-Jr AM, Mitre AI, Fonseca EAD. INFLUENCE OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE LAPAROSCOPIC EXPERIENCE SKILLS ON ROBOTIC SURGERY DEXTERITY. ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA 2022; 34:e1604. [PMID: 35019119 PMCID: PMC8735341 DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020210003e1604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background:
It is unclear if there is a natural transition from laparoscopic to robotic surgery with transfer of abilities.
Aim: To measure the performance and learning of basic robotic tasks in a simulator of individuals with different surgical background.
Methods:
Three groups were tested for robotic dexterity: a) experts in laparoscopic surgery (n=6); b) experts in open surgery (n=6); and c) non-medical subjects (n=4). All individuals were aged between 40-50 years. Five repetitions of four different simulated tasks were performed: spatial vision, bimanual coordination, hand-foot-eye coordination and motor skill.
Results:
Experts in laparoscopic surgery performed similar to non-medical individuals and better than experts in open surgery in three out of four tasks. All groups improved performance with repetition.
Conclusion:
Experts in laparoscopic surgery performed better than other groups but almost equally to non-medical individuals. Experts in open surgery had worst results. All groups improved performance with repetition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcos Belotto
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Division, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Sirio-Libanes Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Adhemar M Pacheco-Jr
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Division, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Does the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System improve patients' outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? A multicentre, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19:53. [PMID: 33608034 PMCID: PMC7893747 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02155-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate the short-term and oncological impact of the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery on the operator performing laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was based on medical records from a multicentre database. A total of 417 patients diagnosed with stage II/III colon and rectosigmoid cancer treated with curative resection were divided into two groups according to whether they were operated on by qualified surgeons (Q group, n=352) or not (NQ group, n=65). Through strict propensity score matching, 98 cases (49 in each group) were assessed. RESULTS Operative time was significantly longer in the NQ group than in the Q group (199 vs. 168 min, p=0.029). The amount of blood loss, post-operative complications, and duration of hospitalisation were similar between both groups. No mortality was observed. One conversion case was seen in the NQ group. The 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 86.6% in the NQ group and 88.2% in the Q group, which was not statistically significant (log-rank p=0.966). CONCLUSION Direct operation by ESSQS-qualified surgeons contributed to a shortened operation time. Under an organised educational environment, almost equivalent safety and oncological outcomes are expected regardless of the surgeon's qualifications.
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Gall TMH, Alrawashdeh W, Soomro N, White S, Jiao LR. Shortening surgical training through robotics: randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus robotic surgical learning curves. BJS Open 2020; 4:1100-1108. [PMID: 33052038 PMCID: PMC7709379 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery is the standard technique for many operations. Laparoscopic training has a long learning curve. Robotic solutions may shorten the training pathway. The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic with robotic training in surgical trainees and medical students. METHODS Surgical trainees (ST group) were randomized to receive 6 h of robotic or laparoscopic simulation training. They then performed three surgical tasks in cadaveric specimens. Medical students (MS group) had 2 h of robotic or laparoscopic simulation training followed by one surgical task. The Global Rating Scale (GRS) score (maximum 30), number of suture errors, and time to complete each procedure were recorded. RESULTS The median GRS score for the ST group was better for each procedure after robotic training compared with laparoscopic training (total GRS score: 27·00 (i.q.r. 22·25-28·33) versus 18·00 (16·50-19·04) respectively, P < 0·001; 10 participants in each arm). The ST group made fewer errors in robotic than in laparoscopic tasks, for both continuous (7·00 (4·75-9·63) versus 22·25 (20·75-25·25); P < 0·001) and interrupted (8·25 (6·38-10·13) versus 29·50 (23·75-31·50); P < 0·001) sutures. For the MS group, the robotic group completed 8·67 interrupted sutures with 15·50 errors in 40 min, compared with only 3·50 sutures with 40·00 errors in the laparoscopic group (P < 0·001) (10 participants in each arm). Fatigue and physical comfort levels were better after robotic compared with laparoscopic operating for both groups (P < 0·001). CONCLUSION The acquisition of surgical skills in surgical trainees and the surgically naive takes less time with a robotic compared with a laparoscopic platform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T. M. H. Gall
- The Academic Surgical UnitThe Royal Marsden Hospital, Imperial CollegeLondonUK
| | - W. Alrawashdeh
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical UnitNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - N. Soomro
- Department of UrologyThe Freeman HospitalNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - S. White
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical UnitNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - L. R. Jiao
- The Academic Surgical UnitThe Royal Marsden Hospital, Imperial CollegeLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Operative outcome of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in a regional hospital in a developing country: A propensity score-matched comparative analysis. Asian J Surg 2020; 44:329-333. [PMID: 32873471 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Laparoscopic surgery is an alternative procedure for colorectal cancers. However, high-level supporting evidence has been derived from high-volume centers in developed countries. During the early phase of applying the laparoscopic approach, we evaluated the procedure's short-term outcomes in our regional middle-volume hospital in a developing country. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data for a cohort of 223 colorectal cancer patients who underwent elective surgery from October 2017 to September 2019. We compared 165 patients undergoing open surgery (OS group) with 58 undergoing laparoscopic surgery (LS group) using a propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS After matching, each group contained 58 patients for evaluating outcomes. The LS group had more harvested mesenteric lymph nodes (5.0 nodes, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.8-8.1; p-value: <0.01) with comparable blood loss (p-value: 0.54) and margin status (p-value: 0.66). However, LS was more time-consuming (68.8 min longer; 95% CI: 53.0-84.7; p-value: <0.01). Morbidity and mortality rates were equivalent (odds ratio (OR): 1.3, 95% CI: 0.25-2.73, p-value: 0.74, and OR: 2, 95% CI: 0.18-22.1, p-value: 0.57, respectively). The LS group experienced fewer days to begin normal eating (-0.5 days, 95% CI: -0.9 to -0.1, p-value: 0.04) and shorter hospital stay (-1.5 days, 95% CI: -2.7 to -0.4, p-value: <0.01). The conversion rate was 3.5%. CONCLUSION The laparoscopic approach was applicable even in a regional middle-volume hospital in a developing country. However, longer surgical time was a drawback.
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Nakanishi R, Fukunaga Y, Mukai T, Nagasaki T, Yamaguchi T, Akiyoshi T, Konishi T, Nagayama S, Ueno M. Educational system for acquiring appropriate laparoscopic colorectal surgical skills: analysis in a Japanese high-volume cancer center. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:2660-2666. [PMID: 32556761 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07686-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acquiring appropriate laparoscopic technique is necessary to safely perform laparoscopic surgery. The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System of the Japanese Society of Endoscopic Surgery, which was established to improve the quality of laparoscopic surgery in Japan, provides training to become an expert laparoscopic surgeon. In this study, we describe our educational system, in a Japanese highest volume cancer center, and evaluate the system according to the pass rate for the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System examination. METHODS We assessed 14 residents who trained for more than 2 years from 2012 to 2018 in our department. All teaching surgeons, qualified by the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System, participated in all surgeries as supervisors. For the first 3 months, trainees learned as the scopist, then as the first assistant for 3 months, and then by performing laparoscopic surgery as an operator during ileocecal resection or sigmoidectomy. Trainees apply for this training in their second year of residency or later. All laparoscopic procedures in our department are standardized in detail. RESULTS The cumulative pass rate was 75% (12/16), and 87% (12/14) of the trainees eventually passed, while the general pass rate was approximately 30%. On average, those who passed in their second or third year had experienced 94 procedures as the surgeon, 177 as the first assistant, and 199 as the scopist. The number of laparoscopic procedures and the learning curves did not differ between successful and failed applicants. CONCLUSIONS Through our educational system, residents successfully acquired laparoscopic skills with a much higher pass rate in the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System examination than the general standard. Laparoscopic practice under supervision by experienced surgeons with standardized procedures and accurate understanding of the relevant anatomy is very helpful to achieving appropriate laparoscopic technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryota Nakanishi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 31-8-3, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Yosuke Fukunaga
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 31-8-3, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
| | - Toshiki Mukai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 31-8-3, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Toshiya Nagasaki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 31-8-3, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 31-8-3, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Takashi Akiyoshi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 31-8-3, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Konishi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 31-8-3, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nagayama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 31-8-3, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Masashi Ueno
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 31-8-3, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
The MicroHand S robotic-assisted versus Da Vinci robotic-assisted radical resection for patients with sigmoid colon cancer: a single-center retrospective study. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:3368-3374. [PMID: 31482355 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07107-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sigmoid colon cancer is a lethal disease and has a strong indication for surgery. Robotic-assisted surgery is one of the promising alternative treatment for this disease. Nowadays, the MicroHand S surgical system and the Da Vinci surgical system have been assembled in China. However, there is still no report to study the therapeutic effects of the two robotic-assisted surgical systems. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare clinical and economic outcomes of patients with sigmoid colon cancer undergoing robot-assisted radical surgery via The MicroHand S or Da Vinci surgical system. METHODS The clinical data of 45 patients with sigmoid colon cancer undergoing the MicroHand S or Da Vinci robotic-assisted surgery at The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2017 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS Twenty-one patients received MicroHand S robotic-assisted radical surgery and 24 patients received Da Vinci robot-assisted radical surgery. No significant differences were observed in terms of operation time, number of lymph node harvested, blood loss, intestinal exhaust time, time of oral feeding resumption, volume of abdominal cavity 24-h drainage, hospital stay, complication and rate of conversion, removal time of drainage tube and catheter between MicroHand S and Da Vinci group. However, the MicroHand S group had significantly lower hospitalization costs (P = 0.002) and shorter time to get out of bed after surgery (P = 0.04). In addition, no recurrence and metastases were observed in both groups during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS In patients with sigmoid colon cancer, the Da Vinci surgical system did not show obvious clinical advantages compared to the MicroHand S surgical system in surgical outcomes. However, the MicroHand S surgical platform showed advantages in terms of the hospitalization costs and length of postoperative bedtime. The outcome of this study will probably result in a shift to the MicroHand S surgical system as treatment preference in China.
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Fujii S, Akagi T, Inomata M, Katayama H, Mizusawa J, Ota M, Saito S, Kinugasa Y, Yamaguchi S, Sato T, Kitano S, The Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Transitional impact of short- and long-term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer from Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0404. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2019; 3:301-309. [PMID: 31131359 PMCID: PMC6524094 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Revised: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The JCOG0404 randomized controlled trial conducted to compare laparoscopic surgery (LAP) with open surgery (OP) for stage II/III colon cancer showed better short-term outcomes and equal long-term outcomes of LAP versus OP. Technical instrumentation of surgery and anticancer agents given during the registration period might have affected the outcomes. AIM To evaluate outcomes according to the registration periods. METHODS The overall registration period was divided into three periods (first: 2004-2005, second: 2006-2007 and third: 2008-2009). Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared between registration periods. RESULTS In total, 1057 patients were registered. Numbers of patients undergoing each approach for each of the three periods (1st/2nd/3rd) were 528 for OP (106/244/178) and 529 for LAP (106/246/177). Operation time (minutes) did not change between the periods for OP (160/156/161) or LAP (205/211/219). Blood loss (mL) gradually decreased in the latter two periods: (119/80/75) for OP and (35/28/25) for LAP. Incidence of complications (%) decreased in the latter periods for OP (27.6/20.3/21.3), whereas that for LAP remained consistently low (14.3/14.8/13.6). There was no particular trend in 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival depending on the period regardless of treatment. D3 dissection rates were 95% or more for all periods in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Operation time and survival rates did not change over time, whereas blood loss in OP improved in the latter periods. Quality control applied in this trial might have been effective in producing such safe endpoints. (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00147134, UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, number C000000105.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoichi Fujii
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Tomonori Akagi
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric SurgeryOita UniversityOitaJapan
| | - Masafumi Inomata
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric SurgeryOita UniversityOitaJapan
| | - Hiroshi Katayama
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations OfficeNational Cancer CenterTokyoJapan
| | - Junki Mizusawa
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations OfficeNational Cancer CenterTokyoJapan
| | - Mitsuyoshi Ota
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryYokohama City University Medical CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Shuji Saito
- Division of Colon and Rectal SurgeryShizuoka Cancer CenterShizuokaJapan
| | - Yusuke Kinugasa
- Division of Colon and Rectal SurgeryShizuoka Cancer CenterShizuokaJapan
| | - Shigeki Yamaguchi
- Division of Colon and Rectal SurgeryShizuoka Cancer CenterShizuokaJapan
| | - Takeo Sato
- Department of SurgeryKitasato University HospitalSagamiharaJapan
| | - Seigo Kitano
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric SurgeryOita UniversityOitaJapan
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Unguryan VM, Babich AI, Pobedintseva YA, Kudlachev VA, Kruglov EA. Implementation of laparoscopic approach in colorectal cancer surgery — a single center’s experience. COLORECTAL ONCOLOGY 2018. [DOI: 10.17650/2220-3478-2018-8-4-60-64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
|
16
|
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) in a single-surgeon setting: refinements of the technique during the learning phase. Tech Coloproctol 2018; 22:433-443. [PMID: 29956003 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1812-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2017] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) is a safe and effective technique. We have progressively developed a systematic approach in the single-surgeon setting. The aim of this study was to compare our early vs late single-surgeon taTME experience as well as present the technical and logistical modifications that were crucial to achieve successful implementation of a taTME program. METHODS Review of prospectively collected data on 27 patients who had taTME in June 2015-September 2016 (early cohort) was included and compared with 43 patients who underwent taTME in October 2016-September 2017 (late cohort). Procedures were performed by a single-surgeon team at Health Sciences North (Sudbury, Ontario, Canada). Inclusion criteria were T1-3 or downstaged T4 mid- and low-rectal lesions. Cases of non-neoplastic disease were excluded. Outcomes assessed included mesorectal integrity, margin status, operative time, complications, morbidity, length of stay and 30-day readmission. RESULTS A total of 70 cases were included. Patients were divided into early (27 patients, 14 males; mean age 60.74 ± 9.77 years) and late (43 patients, 29 males; mean age 63.48 ± 10.85 years) cohorts. During the early phase, procedural modifications including regular takedown of the splenic flexure, intra-corporeal division of the mesentery, liberal use of a Pfannenstiel incision for extraction, abundant washing of the surgical field and regular use of the ICG technology were progressively introduced. There was no mortality nor statistically significant difference between the early and late cohort in terms of morbidity (33.3 vs 39.4% p = 0.727), anastomotic leak (14.8 vs 4.6% p = 0.19), operating time (5.05 ± 1.26 vs 4.96 ± 1.14 h p = 0.755), length of stay (4.0 ± 2.54 vs 4.81 ± 3.63 days p = 0.394) and CRM negative margin (96.3 vs. 97.7% p = 0.999), and no incomplete specimens were obtained on either cohort. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms the safety and effectiveness of single-surgeon implementation of taTME technique. Technical challenges experienced in this setting were not obstacles for further refinement and to establish a tendency towards better outcomes. Overcoming technical challenges is possible, familiarity with taTME is slow yet progressive, and improvement tends to occur with experience.
Collapse
|
|
17
|
Is right colectomy a complete learning procedure for a robotic surgical program? J Robot Surg 2017; 12:147-155. [PMID: 28500580 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0711-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2017] [Accepted: 04/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
This study analyses the utility of right colectomy as a learning procedure at the beginning of a robotic surgical program. The hypothesis is that right colectomy contains all the technical steps necessary to acquire basic abilities in robotics surgery. The first 23 consecutive robotic right colectomy performed at the beginning of a robotic program were analysed. All surgical times were recorded in the operating room and second checked on a dedicated video-database. Specific robotic times were analysed using CUSUM method to evaluate the learning curve. CUSUM-derived learning phases were compared. Fourteen males and nine females with a mean age of 68.7 (46-84) underwent robotic right colectomy. The mean overall time was 265.3 min (180-320 min), docking time was 7 min (5-12 min), console time was 205.9 min (145-260 min), and anastomotic time was 43.6 (25-60 min). CUSUM analyses identified two learning phases: "starting phase" and "consolidation phase". Interphase comparison confirmed the significant (p < 0.05) differences between the two phases. Robotic technology facilitates the training process in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. At the beginning of the learning curve, right colectomy could represent a complete procedure to be proficient in robotic colorectal surgery.
Collapse
|
|
18
|
Bayar R, Mzoughi Z, Djebbi A, Halek G, Khalfallah MT. [Laparoscopic colectomy versus colectomy performed via laparotomy in the treatment of non-metastatic colic adenocarcinomas]. Pan Afr Med J 2016; 25:165. [PMID: 28292127 PMCID: PMC5326039 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2016.25.165.10071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2016] [Accepted: 09/26/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic colectomy is considered with increasing frequency the gold standard treatment for colorectal cancer. Our study aims to show that short-term results and the oncological safety of laparoscopy are at least equivalent to those of laparotomy in the treatment of non-metastatic colic adenocarcinomas. We also highlight the impact of the learning curve on outcomes after laparoscopy in patients with these cancers. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of all patients undergoing surgery for resectable colic adenocarcinomas over a period of 6 years. The study population was divided into 2 groups based on the surgical procedure used initially. The group "OC" included 35 patients who underwent midline laparotomy and the group "LAC" included 30 patients who underwent laparoscopy. All data were analyzed using SPSS software version 19.0. RESULTS Our study showed that there was no significant difference in short-term outcomes between the 2 groups, namely intraoperative morbidity, hospital stay, intensive care unit stay as well as postoperative morbidity and mortality. Regarding the long-term outcomes, there was also no significant difference in the incidence of late complications, type of recurrence, overall survival and disease-free survival. Oncological safety based on the limits of resection and the number of lymph nodes removed was not significantly different between the two groups. Operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (p <0.001). Convertion rate was 33%. It went from 67% in the first 2 years of the study to 13% in the last 2 years. The conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy had no significant impact neither on early postoperative outcomes nor on overall survival and disease-free survival. CONCLUSION Laparoscopy is a surgical procedure resulting in at least equivalent short and long term outcomes as laparotomy. The learning curve representing a "prerequisite" has no negative impact on the outcomes of laparoscopic treatment of non-metastatic colic cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rached Bayar
- Université de Tunis El Manar, Faculté de Medecine de Tunis, 1007, Tunis, Tunisie; Service de Chirurgie Viscérale CHU Mongi Slim, Sidi Daoued La Marsa, Tunisie
| | - Zeineb Mzoughi
- Université de Tunis El Manar, Faculté de Medecine de Tunis, 1007, Tunis, Tunisie; Service de Chirurgie Viscérale CHU Mongi Slim, Sidi Daoued La Marsa, Tunisie
| | - Achref Djebbi
- Université de Tunis El Manar, Faculté de Medecine de Tunis, 1007, Tunis, Tunisie; Service de Chirurgie Viscérale CHU Mongi Slim, Sidi Daoued La Marsa, Tunisie
| | - Ghassen Halek
- Université de Tunis El Manar, Faculté de Medecine de Tunis, 1007, Tunis, Tunisie; Service de Chirurgie Viscérale CHU Mongi Slim, Sidi Daoued La Marsa, Tunisie
| | - Mohamed Taher Khalfallah
- Université de Tunis El Manar, Faculté de Medecine de Tunis, 1007, Tunis, Tunisie; Service de Chirurgie Viscérale CHU Mongi Slim, Sidi Daoued La Marsa, Tunisie
| |
Collapse
|