Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Hepatol. Jul 27, 2022; 14(7): 1291-1306
Published online Jul 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i7.1291
Table 1 Characteristics of diabetes in patients with cirrhosis that favour a diagnosis of hepatogenous diabetes over type-2 diabetes mellitus
Following characteristics favour a diagnosis of HD
Occurrence after the onset of liver cirrhosis
Low prevalence of metabolic risk factors1 or a family history of DM
Normal fasting glycemia but abnormal oral glucose tolerance test
Low prevalence of microvascular complications, such as diabetic retinopathy
Associated with higher levels of hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, and an increased risk of hypoglycemia due to high glycemic variability
Higher association with the severity of liver cirrhosis and liver related complications
Remission after a liver transplantation
Table 2 Reported prevalence rates of hepatogenous diabetes in patients with liver cirrhosis
Ref.Patients (n)Diagnostic methodHD, n (%)IGT, n (%)
Holstein et al[31]35 OGTT 20 (57)13 (37)
Tietge et al[114]100 OGTT35 (35)138 (38)
Nishida et al[25]46 OGTT 21 (38)113 (23)
García-Compeán et al[30]130 OGTT28 (21.5)36 (38.5)
Jeon et al[29]195OGTT108 (55.4)169 (86.7)
Ramachandran et al[23]202 Clinical history259 (29.2)NS
Wang et al[22]207 Clinical history233 (15.97)NS
Vasepalli et al[28]121 OGTT 52 (42.9)58 (47.9)
Table 3 Studies depicting clinical impact of diabetes mellitus/hepatogenous diabetes in patients with liver cirrhosis
Ref.DesignnMain outcomes/remarks
Bianchi et al[112]Retro-prospective 3545 yr survival: 41% with DM and 56% without DM (P = 0.005)
Holstein et al[31]Prospective cohort 5251% of HD patients died within median of 5.7 yr after diagnosis of DM. Remark: No data on non-diabetic control
Moreau et al[136]Prospective cohort 75Survival in patients with and without DM: 18% and 58%, respectively
Sigal et al[97]Cross-sectional 65Incidence and severity of HE was higher in diabetics and DM was an independent risk factor for HE (P = 0.0008). Remark: study involved only HCV cirrhosis
Nishida et al[25]Prospective cohort 565 yr survival was 94%, 68% and 56%, with NGT, IGT and DM, respectively
Tietge et al[114]Case-control study100Pre-transplant IGT or DM was risk factor for post-LT DM. Remark: Only 31 patients were prospectively evaluated
Jeon et al[29]Prospective cohort 195HD correlated significantly with HVPG and VH. Post-prandial hyperglycemia correlation with risk of VH in 6 mo
García-Compeán et al[113]Prospective cohort 1005 yr cumulated survival was lower in IGT patients than NGT (31.7% vs 71.6%, P = 0.02)
Elkrief et al[106]Retrospective cohort 348DM was independently associated with ascites, infections, HE, HCC and mortality. Remarks: Only HCV cirrhosis studied
Yang et al[104]Prospective cohort 146DM was among independent predictors of VH (OR = 4.90)
Jepsen et al[98]Database analysis 863Diabetic patients had a higher episode of first-time overt HE and HE progression beyond grade 2 than non-diabetics. Remarks: Original trials used vaptan which could be a confounder
Khafaga et al[137]Prospective case-control 60Proportion of VH (46.4% vs 10%), HE (36% vs 10%) and mortality (16.6% vs 6.7%) was higher among diabetics compared to non-diabetic LC
Qi et al[105]Retrospective 145In-hospital mortality was 20.6% in diabetics and 4.3% in nondiabetics (P = 0.003)
Hoehn et al[116]Retrospective 12442Diabetic recipients had longer hospitalization (10 vs 9 d) and higher peri-transplant mortality (5% vs 4%)
Yang et al[110]Retrospective cohort 739DM increased the risk of HCC in non-HCV cirrhosis (HR = 2.1)
Routhu et al[100]Retrospective cohort 895DM was an independent predictor of HE
Ramachandran et al[23]Prospective cohort 222HD patients had higher incidence of gall stones (27% vs 13%) and urinary infection (28% vs 7%), compared to those without DM
Tergast et al[108]Prospective 475DM patients had an increased risk for SBP (HR = 1.51), especially when HbA1c values ≥ 6.4%
Wang et al[22]Retrospective 207Rebleeding rate following variceal endotherapy was higher (approximately 5 times) in diabetics, including HD, than non-diabetics at 1, 3, and 6 mo
Rosenblatt et al[109]Retrospective (National database)906559 Uncontrolled DM was associated with an increased risk of bacterial infection (OR = 1.33) and death (OR = 1.62)
Labenz et al[138]Prospective cohort s240 DM was independently associated with covert HE. The risk of HE and overt HE was more pronounced when HbA1c ≥ 6.5%
Table 4 Factors that might influence selection of antidiabetic medication for hepatogenous diabetes
ConditionAntidiabetic drug with pros and consPreferences
ObesityMetformin, SGLT2i, and GLP-1 agonists promote weight loss; DPP-4 inhibitors are weight neutral; Sulfonylureas, Pioglitazone, and Insulin promote weight gainShould be preferred; May be considered; Consider alternative
SarcopeniaMetformin and TZD appears to have favorable effect on muscles mass; SGLT2 inhibitors, SUs (especially glibenclamide and glinides) may increase the risk of sarcopeniaShould be preferred; Consider alternative
Hyperammonemia/Recurrent HEMetformin and AGIs cause reduction of blood ammonia levels and risk of HEMay be preferred
Renal impairmentInsulin and linagliptin appear to be safe; SGLT-2 inhibitors may be considered with dose modification. It has added diuretic advantage; Metformin increases the risk of lactic acidosis Should be preferred; May be considered; Should be avoided
HypoglycemiaInsulin in SU have high risk of hypoglycaemia; Metformin, PZD, DPP4i and SGLT2 inhibitors have low risk of hypoglycaemiaShould be avoided; May be considered
LC with dysplastic liver lesion/high serum AFPMetformin decreases the risk of HCC; DPP4 inhibitors and pioglitazone inhibit HCC development in experimental model; Insulin increases risk of HCCShould be preferred; May be consider; Should be avoided