Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Hepatol. Jul 27, 2020; 12(7): 389-398
Published online Jul 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i7.389
Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in systematic review, n (%)
Bresci et al[19]Vilar Gomez et al[18]Hayashi et al[20]Takuma et al[17]
CountryItalyCubaJapanJapan
Number of participants901004079
%male (control group)23181340
%male (intervention group)332210
Age (control group)4956.6 (8.4)65.1 (11.3)66.5 (7.4)
Age (intervention group)5158.5 (8.9)66.0 (9.9)66.5 (5.7)
Inclusion criteriaCirrhosis (any aetiology) with encephalopathyDecompensated HCV cirrhosisCirrhosis of any aetiologyCirrhosis (any aetiology) with encephalopathy
MELD (control group)N/A13.3 (4.7)N/A11.8 (3.2)
MELD (intervention group)N/A12.5 (3.7)N/A11.8 (3.2)
Control group treatmentPlaceboPlaceboBCAAsBCAAs
Intervention group treatmentZinc acetateViusidZinc sulfate + BCAAsPolaprezinc + BCAAs
Zinc preparation and dosageZinc acetate 600 mg/dViusid 3 tablets/dZinc sulfate 200-600 mg/dPolaprezinc
Elemental Zinc dosage (mg Zn/d)2143.445-13651
Duration of intervention6 mo96 wk5-6 mo6 mo
Primary OutcomeHepatic encephalopathy assessmentsOverall survival rateChange in biochemistryHepatic encephalopathy assessments
ResultsNo significant improvement in hepatic encephalopathy assessmentsSignificant improvement in overall survival, time to disease progression and cumulative incidence of HCVSignificant improvement in blood ammonia levelsSignificant improvement in the physical component scale, but not the mental component scale
Duration of follow up1 yr96 wk5-6 mo6 mo