Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a type of liver cancer, ranks as the sixth most prevalent cancer globally and represents the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Approximately half of HCC patients miss the opportunity for curative treatment and are then limited to undergoing systemic therapies. Currently, systemic therapy has entered the era of immunotherapy, particularly with the advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which have significantly enhanced outcomes for patients with advanced HCC. Neoadjuvant treatment for HCC has become a possibility-findings from the IMbrave 050 trial indicated that ICIs offer the benefit of recurrence-free survival for high-risk HCC patients post-resection or local ablation. However, only a small fraction of individuals benefit from systemic therapy. Consequently, there is an urgent need to identify predictive biomarkers for treatment response and outcome assessment. This study reviewed the historical progression of systemic therapy for HCC, highlighting notable therapeutic advancements. This study examined the development of systemic therapies involving conventional drugs and clinical trials utilized in HCC treatment, as well as potential predictive biomarkers for advanced and/or locally advanced HCC. Various studies have revealed potential biomarkers in the context of HCC treatment. These include the association of dendritic cells (DCs) with a favorable response to neoadjuvant therapy, the presence of enriched T effector cells and tertiary lymphoid structures, the identification of CD138+ plasma cells, and distinct spatial arrangements of B cells in close proximity to T cells among responders with locally advanced HCC receiving neoadjuvant cabozantinib and nivolumab treatment. Furthermore, pathological response has been associated with intratumoral cellular triads consisting of progenitor CD8+ T cells and CXCL13+ CD4+ T helper cells surrounding mature DCs in patients receiving neoadjuvant cemiplimab for resectable HCC. Despite no widely recognized predictive biomarkers for HCC individualized treatment, we believe neoadjuvant trials hold the most promise in identifying and validating them. This is because they can collect multiple samples from resectable HCC patients across stages, especially with multi-omics, bridging preclinical and clinical gaps.

Primary liver cancer is a common and lethal malignancy in China. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is globally recognized as the preferred treatment modality for the non-surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI) is another effective interventional treatment for HCC. In recent years, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has gained increasing attention as an application-regulated modality for TAI. Owing to the current debate in the medical community regarding the use of HAIC and TACE for the treatment of HCC, the application of both approaches should be considered at a higher level, with a broader perspective and a more normative aspect. Accordingly, we aimed to define the rational combination of liver cancer TAI/HAIC with TACE as infusion transcatheter chemoembolization (iTACE), which suggests that the two interventions are not superior but lead to a mutually beneficial situation. In this review, we sought to discuss the development, specification, application, challenge and innovation, debate, and union of TAI/HAIC and TACE, and the clinical application and latest research on iTACE. We aimed to introduce new concepts of iTACE and expect new breakthroughs in the treatment of liver cancer owing to the combined use of the two major interventional tools.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common neoplasia which represents the second leading cause of cancer related death. Most cases occur in developing countries, but its incidence is rising in Western countries due to hepatitis C. Although hepatitis therapies have evolved and the HCC screening has increased in several areas, 40% present with advanced disease which is only amenable for palliative systemic treatment. HCC continues posing a challenge, in part due to the inherent chemoresistance of this neoplasia, the pharmacologic challenges due to an ill liver, difficulty in assessing radiological responses accurately, etc. Traditional chemotherapy have shown some responses without clear survival benefit, however, sorafenib demonstrated advantages in survival in advanced HCC when liver function is kept and recently immunotherapy seems to be a promising approach for some patients. This article will briefly expose the most relevant systemic treatment modalities to offer a general view from the past to the future.

This review update has been managed by both the Childhood Cancer and Cochrane Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan Cancer Groups.The use of anthracycline chemotherapy is limited by the occurrence of cardiotoxicity. To prevent this cardiotoxicity, different anthracycline dosage schedules have been studied.

To determine the occurrence of cardiotoxicity with the use of different anthracycline dosage schedules (that is peak doses and infusion durations) in people with cancer.

We searched the databases of the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library, Issue 11, 2015), MEDLINE (1966 to December 2015), and EMBASE (1980 to December 2015). We also searched reference lists of relevant articles, conference proceedings, experts in the field, and ongoing trials databases.

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which different anthracycline dosage schedules were compared in people with cancer (children and adults).

Two review authors independently performed the study selection, the 'Risk of bias' assessment, and data extraction. We performed analyses according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

We identified 11 studies: 7 evaluated different infusion durations (803 participants), and 4 evaluated different peak doses (5280 participants). Seven studies were RCTs addressing different anthracycline infusion durations; we identified long-term follow-up data for one of the trials in this update. The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant lower rate of clinical heart failure with an infusion duration of six hours or longer as compared to a shorter infusion duration (risk ratio (RR) 0.27; 95% confidence interval 0.09 to 0.81; 5 studies; 557 participants). The majority of participants included in these studies were adults with different solid tumours. For different anthracycline peak doses, we identified two RCTs addressing a doxorubicin peak dose of less than 60 mg/m(2) versus 60 mg/m(2) or more, one RCT addressing a liposomal doxorubicin peak dose of 25 mg/m(2) versus 50 mg/m(2), and one RCT addressing an epirubicin peak dose of 83 mg/m(2) versus 110 mg/m(2). A significant difference in the occurrence of clinical heart failure was identified in none of the studies. The participants included in these studies were adults with different solid tumours. High or unclear 'Risk of bias' issues were present in all studies.

An anthracycline infusion duration of six hours or longer reduces the risk of clinical heart failure, and it seems to reduce the risk of subclinical cardiac damage. Since there is only a small amount of data for children and data obtained in adults cannot be extrapolated to children, different anthracycline infusion durations should be evaluated further in children.We identified no significant difference in the occurrence of clinical heart failure in participants treated with a doxorubicin peak dose of less than 60 mg/m(2) or 60 mg/m(2) or more. Only one RCT was available for the other identified peak doses, so we can make no definitive conclusions about the occurrence of cardiotoxicity. More high-quality research is needed, both in children and adults and in leukaemias and solid tumours.

In clinical therapy, the poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is mainly attributed to the failure of chemotherapeutical agents to accumulate in tumor as well as their serious systemic toxicity. In this work, we developed actively tumor-targeting trilayer micelles with microenvironment-sensitive cross-links as a novel nanocarrier for HCC therapy. These micelles comprised biodegradable PEG-pLys-pPhe polymers, in which pLys could react with a disulfide-containing agent to form redox-responsive cross-links. In vitro drug release and pharmacokinetics studies showed that these cross-links were stable in physiological condition whereas cleaved once internalized into cells due to the high level of glutathione, resulting in facilitated intracellular doxorubicin release. In addition, dehydroascorbic acid (DHAA) was decorated on the surface of micelles for specific recognition of tumor cells via GLUT1, a member of glucose transporter family overexpressed on hepatocarcinoma cells. Moreover, DHAA exhibited a "one-way" continuous accumulation within tumor cells. Cellular uptake and in vivo imaging studies proved that these micelles had remarkable targeting property toward hepatocarcinoma cells and tumor. Enhanced anti-HCC efficacy of the micelles was also confirmed both in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, this micellar system may be a potential platform of chemotherapeutics delivery for HCC therapy.

Currently, only one drug, sorafenib, is FDA approved for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), achieving modest objective response rates while still conferring an overall survival benefit. Unlike other solid tumors, no oncogenic addiction loops have been validated as clinically actionable targets in HCC. Outcomes of HCC could potentially be improved if critical molecular subclasses with distinct therapeutic vulnerabilities can be identified, biomarkers that predict recurrence or progression early can be determined and key epigenetic, genetic or microenvironment drivers that determine best response to a specific targeting treatment can be uncovered. Our group and others have examined the molecular heterogeneity of hepatocellular carcinoma. We have developed a panel of patient derived xenograft models to enable focused pre-clinical drug development of rationally designed therapies in specific molecular subgroups. We observed unique patterns, including synergies, of drug activity across our molecularly diverse HCC xenografts, pointing to specific therapeutic vulnerabilities for individual tumors. These efforts inform clinical trial designs and catalyze therapeutic development. It also argues for efficient strategic allocation of patients into appropriate enriched clinical trials. Here, we will discuss some of the recent important therapeutic studies in advanced HCC and also some of the potential strategies to optimize clinical therapeutic development moving forward.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the commonest cancers worldwide, as well as a common cause of cancer-related death. HCC frequently occurs in the setting of a diseased cirrhotic liver and many patients present at an advanced stage of disease. Together with a poor functional status, this often precludes the use of systemic therapy, especially conventional cytotoxic drugs. Moreover, HCC is known to be a relatively chemo-refractory tumor. There have been many targeted drugs that have shown potential in the treatment of HCC. Many clinical trials have been carried out with many more in progress. They include trials evaluating a single targeted therapy alone, two or more targeted therapy in tandem or a combination of targeted therapy and conventional chemotherapy. In this article, we seek to review some of the more important trials examining the use of targeted therapy in HCC and to look into what the future holds in terms of targeted treatment of HCC.

It has been demonstrated that the Hericium erinaceus (HE) mushroom, which primarily consists of polysaccharides, possesses anti-tumor activities. However, the mechanisms by which HE inhibits human hepatocellular carcinoma growth remain unknown. Our study demonstrates that HE acts as an enhancer to sensitize doxorubicin (Dox)-mediated apoptotic signaling, and this sensitization can be achieved by reducing c-FLIP expression via JNK activation and enhancing intracellular Dox accumulation via the inhibition of NF-κB activity. These findings suggest that HE in combination with Dox serves as an effective tool for treating drug-resistant human hepatocellular carcinoma.

Although approximately 80% of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases occur in developing countries, the incidence of HCC in Western countries is on the rise due to the impact of hepatitis C. Challenges in developing effective therapies include the inherent chemoresistance of HCC, the pharmacologic challenges presented by a diseased liver, the presentation of most patients at advanced stages, and the difficulty in adequately measuring radiological response. While responses to traditional chemotherapeutic agents have been documented, significant survival benefit is debatable.

The authors review the results of published clinical trials of systemic therapy and immunotherapy that have impacted the present treatment of HCC.

With recent progress in the elucidation of HCC molecular pathways, targeted agents show promise. The multikinase inhibitor sorafenib has provided survival benefit in patients with advanced HCC and well-preserved liver function. Sunitinib, bevacizumab, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have shown activity in small patient cohorts. Immunotherapy appears to be a promising approach that can result in the regression of bulky, invasive cancer in some patients.

New agents with a variety of mechanisms of activity offer promising therapeutic options for patients with advanced HCC.

The use of anthracycline chemotherapy is limited by the occurrence of cardiotoxicity. To prevent this cardiotoxicity, different anthracycline dosage schedules have been studied.

To determine the occurrence of cardiotoxicity with the use of different anthracycline dosage schedules (i.e. peak doses and infusion durations) in cancer patients.

We searched the databases of The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2008) and EMBASE (1980 to November 2008). Also, we searched reference lists of relevant articles, conference proceedings and ongoing trials databases.

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which different anthracycline dosage schedules were compared in cancer patients (children and adults).

Two authors independently performed the study selection, the risk of bias assessment and the data-extraction.

We identified seven RCTs addressing different anthracycline infusion durations. The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant lower rate of clinical heart failure with an infusion duration of 6 hours or longer as compared to a shorter infusion duration (relative risk (RR) = 0.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09 to 0.81; 5 studies; 557 patients). The majority of patients included in these studies were adults with different solid tumours. For different anthracycline peak doses we identified two RCTs addressing a doxorubicin peak dose of less than 60 mg/m(2) versus 60 mg/m(2) or more, one RCT addressing a liposomal doxorubicin peak dose of 25 mg/m(2) versus 50 mg/m(2) and one RCT addressing an epirubicin peak dose of 83 mg/m(2) versus 110 mg/m(2). In none of the studies a significant difference in the occurrence of clinical heart failure was identified. All patients included in these studies were adults with different solid tumours.

An anthracycline infusion duration of six hours or longer reduces the risk of clinical heart failure and it seems to reduce the risk of subclinical cardiac damage. Since there is only a small amount of data for children and data obtained in adults cannot be extrapolated to children, different anthracycline infusion durations should be evaluated further in children.No significant difference in the occurrence of clinical heart failure was identified in patients treated with a doxorubicin peak dose of less than 60 mg/m(2) or 60 mg/m(2) or more. For the other identified peak doses only one RCT was available, so no definitive conclusions can be made about the occurrence of cardiotoxicity. More high quality research is needed, both in children and adults and in leukaemias and solid tumours.

A 25-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma developed severe muscular weakness and pain 15 days after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). The diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis was made based on myalgia localized in the bilateral upper extremities (bilateral trapezius, deltoid, biceps brachii, and teres major muscles) on magnetic resonance imaging and increased levels of muscle-derived serum enzymes. In this case, some drugs administered during the clinical course of TACE (diclofenac, famotidine, and cefotiam dihydrochloride) were suspected to be involved in the rhabdomyolysis, but the exact cause of rhabdomyolysis was not identified. The symptoms were completely improved by right trisegmentectomy of the liver following conservative treatment.

Genomic gain represents an important mechanism in the activation of proto-oncogenes. In many instances, induced oncogenes hold clinical implications both as prognostic markers and targets for therapeutic design. In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), although chromosomal gains are common, information on underlying oncogenes induced remains minimal. Here, we examined 7 causal sites of HCC for overexpressed genes by array-based transcriptional mapping. In 22 HCC cell lines and early passages of cultures studied, clusters of up-regulated genes were indicated, where TOP2A expression ranked the highest. Distinct TOP2A transcriptions were confirmed in an independent series of HCC tumors relative to adjacent non-tumoral liver (p=0.0018). By tissue microarray analysis of 172 HCC, we found TOP2A expressions correlated with advance histological grading (p<0.001), microvascular invasion (p=0.004) and an early age onset of the malignancy ( Collapse

Therapeutic options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are limited. Bendamustine, a bifunctional cytostatic agent with mainly alkylating effect may be an alternative.

Five HCC cell lines were incubated in vitro with five different concentrations of bendamustine. In addition, cell lines Huh-7 and HepG2 were tested in a chimeric mouse model.

In vitro treatment with bendamustine resulted in an IC( 50 )<6 microg/mL in two, <12 microg/mL in one, and 12-23 microg/mL in two cell lines. In vivo, bendamustine reduced significantly tumor volume in chimeric mice.

Bendamustine demonstrated significant tumor growth inhibition both in vitro and in vivo at concentrations that can be reached in the plasma. The potential role of bendamustine therapy for HCC and its tolerability in impaired liver function is currently subject of a phase II study.

Systemic treatments of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (AHCC) have offered marginal clinical benefits. Recently, Italian investigators reported that etoposide and epirubicin combination (EE) chemotherapy was highly active against AHCC, with a response rate of 39% and a median overall survival (OS) of 10 months. We report our efficacy and safety results of EE in clinical practice.

Between December 1999 and October 2005, 35 patients with AHCC and fitting the preset eligibility criteria were treated with EE. Twenty-eight patients (80%) had liver disease associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and 26 (74%) had a prior history of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) using cisplatin. The EE chemotherapy consisted of epirubicin 40 mg/m(2) on day 1 and etoposide 120 mg/m(2) on days 1, 3 and 5 every 4 weeks.

A total of 102 chemotherapy cycles were administered, with a median of two cycles per patient (range one to eight cycles). Two patients had a partial response and nine had stable disease, with a tumor control rate of 32% (95% CI 17-48). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.1 months (95% CI 1.8-2.4) and the median OS was 6.4 months (95% CI 4.4-8.5). There was a tendency toward improved PFS in patients seronegative for HBsAg and peritoneal seeding (P = 0.06 and P = 0.054, respectively). Overall survival was significantly better in patients without HBsAg and Cancer Liver Italian Program (CLIP) score 0-1 (P = 0.024 and P = 0.033, respectively). The main toxicities were hematological events, including grade 3/4 neutropenia in 29% and febrile neutropenia in 11% of patients.

Treatment with EE showed minimal antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity in HBV-associated AHCC, especially in patients pretreated with TACE.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the antitumor, survival, and adverse effects of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using epirubicin in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombosis.

The study population comprised 45 consecutive patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma associated with tumor thrombosis in the main and/or first portal vein. A dose of 50-60 mg/m(2) epirubicin was administered from the proper, right, or left hepatic artery. Treatment was repeated every 4-12 weeks if there was no evidence of tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Of the 45 treated patients, 4 (9%) achieved a partial response, 12 (27%) had no change, and 29 (64%) showed progressive disease. The median survival time, 1-year survival rate and median time to progression were 6.0 months, 20.0%, and 1.1 months for all patients, respectively. The main grade 3 and 4 toxicities were leukopenia (27%), neutropenia (47%), thrombocytopenia (9%), and elevation of aspartate (36%) and alanine aminotransferases (13%). Febrile neutropenia was observed in 2 patients (4%).

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with epirubicin is well tolerated, but appears to have little activity as a single agent in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombosis.

Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) has been recognized as an effective palliative treatment option for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, no effective alternative treatments for TAE-refractory HCC have yet been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy using an epirubicin-Lipiodol emulsion in patients with TAE-refractory HCC.

Patients with TAE-refractory HCC were enrolled. A dose of 60 mg/m(2) epirubicin emulsified in Lipiodol and contrast medium was administered from the feeding artery of the HCC. Treatment was repeated every 4 to 12 weeks if there was no evidence of tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Twenty patients were enrolled in this trial. The median number of treatment courses was 1 (range 1-4). Among the enrolled patients, one (5%) achieved a partial response, and three (15%) showed a minor response. Five (25%) patients had no change and 11 (55%) showed progressive disease. The median survival time, 1-year survival rate and median progression-free survival time for the patients as a whole were 12.4 months, 52.6%, and 1.1 months, respectively. The main grade 3 and 4 toxicities were leukocytopenia (35%), neutropenia (65%), thrombocytopenia (30%), and elevations of the aspartate aminotransferase (45%) and alanine aminotransferase (35%) levels. These toxicities were generally brief and reversible.

Transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy with an epirubicin-Lipiodol emulsion appears to have only modest activity with moderate toxicity for treatment of patients with TAE-refractory HCC. These findings do not support its use in practice, and further studies with the same regimen in patients with TAE-refractory HCC are not recommended.

The use of anthracycline chemotherapy is limited by the occurrence of cardiotoxicity. In an effort to prevent this cardiotoxicity, different anthracycline dosage schedules (i.e. peak doses and infusion durations) have been studied.

The primary objective was to determine the occurrence of cardiotoxicity with the use of different anthracycline dosage schedules in cancer patients.

We searched the databases of The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2004) and EMBASE (1980 to June 2004). In addition, we searched reference lists of relevant articles, conference proceedings and ongoing trials databases.

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which different anthracycline dosage schedules were compared in cancer patients (children and adults).

Two authors independently performed the study selection, quality assessment and data-extraction including adverse effects.

We identified six RCTs of varying quality addressing different anthracycline infusion durations (625 patients). The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant lower rate of clinical heart failure with an infusion duration of 6 hours or longer as compared to a shorter infusion duration, i.e. maximal duration of 1 hour (RR = 0.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09 to 0.81; 5 studies; 557 patients). In individual studies the infusion duration of 6 hours or longer also seemed to reduce the risk of subclinical cardiac damage. No statistically significant difference in response rate was found (RR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.45 to 1.54; 2 studies; 292 patients). No statistically significant difference in overall survival was found (HR = 1,42; 95% CI 0.61 to 3.30; 2 studies; 322 patients), but there was unexplained heterogeneity (I(2)=75%). No conclusions can be made regarding adverse effects. It should be emphasised that the majority of patients included in these studies were adults with different solid tumours. Children with leukaemia could not be included in the performed meta-analyses, but they were included in the descriptive results of non-pooled studies. No RCTs addressing different anthracycline peak doses with the same cumulative anthracycline dose in both treatment groups were identified.

An anthracycline infusion duration of six hours or longer reduces the risk of clinical heart failure, and it seems to reduce the risk of subclinical cardiac damage. There is no evidence which suggests a difference in response rate and survival between both treatment groups. Since there is only a small amount of data for children and also because data obtained in adults cannot be extrapolated to children, different anthracycline infusion durations should be evaluated further in children. For different anthracycline peak doses no high quality evidence was available and therefore, no definitive conclusions can be made about the occurrence of cardiotoxicity in patients treated with different anthracycline peak doses.

Worldwide, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the third most common cause of cancer-related death. In the U.S., 18,510 new cancers of the liver and intrahepatic bile duct are expected in 2006, with an estimated 16,200 deaths. The incidence rates for HCC in the U.S. continued to rise steadily through 1998 and doubled during the period 1975-1995. Unresectable or metastatic HCC carries a poor prognosis, and systemic therapy with cytotoxic agents provides marginal benefit. A majority of HCC patients (>80%) presents with advanced or unresectable disease. Even for those with resected disease, the recurrence rate can be as high as 50% at 2 years. Because of the poor track record of systemic therapy in HCC, there has been a sense of nihilism for this disease in the oncology community for decades. However, with the arrival of newly developed molecularly targeted agents and the success of some of these agents in other traditionally challenging cancers, like renal cell carcinoma, there has recently been renewed interest in developing systemic therapy for HCC. This review attempts to concisely summarize the historical perspective and the current status of systemic therapy development in HCC.

For hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that has advanced to the point that it is no longer amenable to local therapies, systemic therapy can be considered in select patients who have a good performance status. No systemic therapy has been clearly shown to improve overall survival compared with supportive care alone, although cancer-related symptoms can sometimes be palliated with therapy and some objective responses are seen. Systemic therapies for HCC include chemotherapy, both intravenous and infused via the hepatic artery, as well as hormonal therapy, immunotherapy, and targeted biologic agents. Colorectal, pancreatic, breast, and lung cancer are some of the most common tumors that metastasize to the liver. Response rates and effect on overall survival as a result of systemic therapy for liver metastases vary widely depending on primary tumor site. Targeted biologic agents are being integrated into standard treatment regimens for all of these cancer types, with variable effects on survival and other outcomes for all affected patients including those with liver metastases.

For the minority of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), surgical or locally ablative therapies may offer the prospect of cure. However, the majority of patients present with advanced disease such that treatment with curative intent is no longer possible. For some of these patients, with good hepatic reserve and a patent portal venous system, chemoembolisation may afford a modest survival benefit. The remainder of patients are frequently treated with systemic therapies with palliative intent. This review aims to summarise the current systemic treatment approaches for HCC in the adjuvant and palliative setting before reviewing the evidence for novel therapies emerging in this field. At present there are a number of interesting therapeutic agents with potential activity in HCC. The challenge now is the design of clinical trials to optimally evaluate these agents.

Single-agent doxorubicin has been widely used to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the response rate is low (< 20%) and there is no convincing evidence for improved survival. Cisplatin, interferon, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (PIAF) used in combination, by contrast, has shown promise in a phase II study. We compared doxorubicin to PIAF in patients with unresectable HCC in a phase III trial.

Patients with histologically confirmed unresectable HCC were randomly assigned to receive either doxorubicin or PIAF every 3 weeks, for up to six cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints were response rate and toxicity. Survival differences were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment groups were compared for differences in the incidence of adverse events using chi-square tests. All statistical tests were two-sided.

The median survival of the doxorubicin and PIAF groups was 6.83 months (95% confidence [CI] = 4.80 to 9.56) and 8.67 months (95% CI = 6.36 to 12.00), respectively (P = 0.83). The hazard ratio for death from any cause in the PIAF compared with the doxorubicin groups was 0.97 (95% CI = 0.71 to 1.32). Eighty-six of the 94 patients receiving doxorubicin and 91 of the 94 receiving PIAF were assessable for response. The overall response rates in the doxorubicin and PIAF groups were 10.5% (95% CI = 3.9% to 16.9%) and 20.9% (95% CI = 12.5% to 29.2%), respectively. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hypokalemia were statistically significantly more common in patients treated with PIAF than in patients treated with doxorubicin.

Although patients on PIAF had a higher overall response rate and better survival than patients on doxorubicin, the differences were not statistically significant. PIAF was also associated with increased treatment-related toxicity. The prognosis of patients with unresectable HCC remains poor.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Because HCC usually presents as an advanced disease and occurs in the background of liver cirrhosis, most patients are not suitable for treatment with curative intent, thus effective systemic chemotherapy is required. However, the outcome of systemic chemotherapy has been disappointing in advanced HCC. This study was conducted to test the efficacy and toxicity of the combined regimen of epirubicin, cisplatin, and UFT moderated by leucovorin in advanced or recurrent HCC.

All 53 patients received epirubicin (50 mg/m2 i.v.) on day 1 and cisplatin (60 mg/m2 i.v.) after epirubicin administration. Oral UFT 400-600 mg/day, determined by body surface area, and leucovorin 75 mg/day were administered for 21 consecutive days, followed by a 7-day drug free interval.

Nine had a partial response, representing 16.9% of response rate (95% confidence interval rate; 7.0-26.8%) with median response duration of 17.1 weeks (95% CI; 5.0-29.3 weeks, range; 7.1-51.7 weeks). Fifteen patients had stable disease and the disease progressed in 26 patients. The median overall survival for the patients was 24.6 weeks (95% CI; 17.3-31.9 weeks, range; 3.0-131.3 weeks). The main toxicities were hematologic toxicities including neutropenia, which reached grade 3/4 in 17 patients (38.5%), and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia in five patients (9.4%).

The combination of epirubicin, cisplatin, and UFT moderated by leucovorin showed modest anti-tumor activity with relatively tolerable toxicities. However, a randomized phase III trial based on this regimen is warranted to clarify its survival benefit in patients with advanced HCC.

The median survival time for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is <6 months, and no effective standard systemic chemotherapy is available. Both epirubicin (Ellence); Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY, http://www.pfizer.com) and thalidomide (Thalomid); Celgene Corporation, Warren, NJ, http://www.celgene.com) have reported activity for HCC as single agents, and they have different mechanisms of action and nonoverlapping toxicities. Therefore, we performed a phase II study using the combination of epirubicin and thalidomide in patients with unresectable and metastatic HCC.

Nineteen patients with measurable, unresectable, or metastatic HCC were enrolled. All patients were required to have adequate major organ function and performance status. The treatment consisted of weekly epirubicin at a dose of 20 mg/m(2) administered i.v. and daily thalidomide at a dose of 200 mg orally given as a 3-weeks-on/1-week-off schedule. Intrapatient dose escalation of thalidomide was allowed every 2 weeks up to 800 mg daily as long as tolerated. Physical examinations, toxicity assessments, and serum chemistry analyses were performed weekly, and tumor measurements were conducted every 8 weeks.

All 19 patients enrolled into the study were evaluable for toxicity assessment and 17 patients were evaluable for response assessment. A total of 71 cycles of chemotherapy was administered, with a median of two cycles administered to each patient (range 1-14). No complete or partial responses were observed. Seven patients (41%) had stable disease, with a median duration of 6 months (range 5-14). The median survival time for all 19 patients was 196 days (95% confidence interval 93-302). The treatment was generally well tolerated. Treatment-related toxicities included constipation (grade 3, 5%; grade 2, 37%; grade 1, 21%), fatigue (grade 3, 5%; grade 2, 42%), and sensory neuropathy (grade 2, 5%; grade 1, 32%). Four patients required dose reductions of thalidomide due to treatment-related toxicities, and the median tolerated dose of thalidomide was 200 mg daily.

The combination of epirubicin and thalidomide was well tolerated when administered in the schedule used in this study. This regimen has limited activity in HCC, with some patients achieving stable disease and clinical benefit. There is a need for defining more effective systemic therapies for HCC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Whilst local treatments are useful in selected patients, they are not suitable for many with advanced disease. Here, we review phase II and III trials for systemic therapy of advanced disease, finding no strong evidence that any chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or immunotherapy regimen trialled to date benefits survival in this setting. Many trials were inadequately powered, single centre, and enrolled highly selected patients. From this review, we cannot recommend any therapeutic approach in these patients outside of a clinical trial setting. Including an untreated control arm in clinical trials in HCC is still justified. Every effort should be made to enroll these patients into adequately powered trials, and promising phase II results must be tested in a multicentre phase III setting, preferably against a placebo control arm. Prevention of hepatitis B and C remains vital to decrease deaths from HCC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fifth most common malignant disorder and causes nearly 1 million deaths a year worldwide. A background of cirrhosis is the major risk factor, and in Asia and subSaharan Africa, cirrhosis is attributable mainly to endemic hepatitis B infection. In Europe and the USA the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma is increasing as a result of the high prevalence of hepatitis C. The only curative treatments are surgical resection or liver transplantation, but only a few patients are eligible for these procedures. Local ablative treatments such as ethanol injection can lengthen survival in selected patients, and radiofrequency ablation also shows promise. Unfortunately, most patients are suitable only for palliative treatment because of the extent of their tumour or background liver disease or both. For these patients, a wide range of therapeutic interventions have been assessed, including transarterial embolisation (with or without chemotherapy), hormone therapy with antioestrogens and androgens, octreotide, interferon, and both arterial and systemic chemotherapy, of which only chemoembolisation improves survival over symptomatic care. Tamoxifen is ineffective, and there are insufficient randomised data to show the benefit of any other intervention. In this review, we focus on two ends of the therapeutic spectrum--transplantation, which is highly effective but applicable to only a few patients, and systemic chemotherapy, which is of uncertain benefit but widely applicable.

The prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma remains poor. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and transcatheter arterial Lipiodol chemoembolization for treatment of advanced tumor. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty-seven patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and unresectable tumors were enrolled. In the hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy group (n = 16), cisplatin (10 mg/person, on days 1-5) and subsequent 5-fluorouracil (250 mg/person, on days 1-5) were administered for four serial courses. In the transcatheter arterial Lipiodol chemoembolization group (n = 21), an emulsion of Epirubicin (20-30 mg/person) and Lipiodol was administered every 3-4 weeks.

The tumor response rates (complete response plus partial response for all cases) of the hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy and transcatheter arterial Lipiodol chemoembolization groups were 56.3% and 23.8%, respectively, showing the significantly higher rate in the former than in the latter group. The cumulative survival rates between the two groups were not significantly different; whereas in those patients whose tumors were classified as TNM stage IV or as having the maximal tumor size of greater than 5 cm, patients tended to have higher survival rates in the hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy group than in the transcatheter arterial Lipiodol chemoembolization group. Univariate analysis identified the serum aspartate aminotransferase value as solely significant. Patients' adverse reactions were successfully managed by treatment of symptoms. Adverse events, such as obstructions of the catheter or hepatic artery or infection around the catheter, rarely occurred.

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy had a better antitumor effect than transcatheter arterial Lipiodol chemoembolization and may be a useful therapeutic option for more advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a very prevalent malignancy worldwide, with increasing incidence in the United States. Despite many available treatment options, the prognosis remains poor. Surgical resection or liver transplantation still represents the only potentially curative treatments for HCC. Until more effective systemic therapies are available, different localized treatment approaches will continue to be applied in the management of this disease. Although systemic chemotherapy has been disappointing, increased understanding of the tumor biology in HCC coupled with new drug development may lead to newer agents with novel mechanisms of action that are more efficacious. The poor treatment outcome and dismal prognosis make prevention of HCC an important strategy in controlling this aggressive type of malignancy. Vaccine programs for HBV are ongoing. Efforts are underway to develop a vaccine for HCV. Interferon therapy appears to decrease the risk of developing HCC in patients with hepatitis, especially those with HCV. A number of other approaches for decreasing risk in these patients as well as in those with alcoholic-related cirrhosis are currently being evaluated.

The prognosis of patients with HCC remains dismal. Even in the subgroups of patients who have the most favorable characteristics and are eligible for surgical resection, the 5-year survival rate is less than 25%. For patients with more advanced disease, the median survival time is less than 1 year. The good news in HCC research is that the disease can be prevented. In Taiwan, the rate of HCC in children aged 6 to 9 years decreased from 5.2 per million population before the neonatal vaccination program began in 1984 to 1.3 per million population in the first vaccinated cohort. Treatment of viral hepatitis with IFN may decrease the rates of long-term development of HCC. Other agents that may prevent second primary tumors following resection of HCC, such as polyprenoic acid and acylic retinoid, are also being investigated.

Given the poor prognosis of HCC and the therapeutic challenge posed by underlying liver cirrhosis, efforts and resources must be directed towards preventive strategies. Return on the investment in such research is likely to be greater than can be expected from treatment of advanced disease.

Surgical resection is generally accepted as the first choice of treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, due to its multifocal nature, association with chronic liver disease, and frequent postresectional recurrence, nonresectional therapies are important in the management of a significant proportion of patients with HCC.

A literature review was performed on the current status of different nonresectional treatment modalities commonly employed for HCC. They include direct ablation methods, systemic chemotherapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, external and targeting radiotherapy, hormonal therapy, and immunotherapy. Multidisciplinary therapy resulting in preoperative cytoreduction has also been reported with improvement of therapeutic results.

Nonresectional therapies play an essential role in the treatment of inoperable HCC as they lead to satisfactory survival. Percutaneous ethanol injection and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization are the most frequently employed modalities, and they result in a 3-year survival rate of 55% to 70% and about 20%, respectively. Multidisciplinary therapy appears to be the current trend of management and improved survival is achieved especially when unresectable tumors are converted to resectable ones.

A specific, sensitive and fully automated coupled-column LC method for the determination of the anthracycline cytostatic epirubicin and four metabolites in the biological materials human plasma, liver homogenate and liver tumour homogenate has been developed. System-integrated sample processing was achieved using a new restricted access silica precolumn packing. This porous Alkyl-Diol Silica (ADS) was specially designed for the direct and repetitive injection of proteinaceous samples. It consists of a hydrophilic and electroneutral external particle surface (glyceryl-residues) and a hydrophobic reversed-phase internal surface (butyryl-, octanoyl- or octadecyl-residues). These bimodal chromatographic properties allow retention of low molecular analytes by classical RP-chromatography exclusively at the lipophilic pore surface. Macromolecular constituents of the sample matrix (e.g. proteins) are size-excluded by 5 nm pores and quantitatively eliminated in the interstitial void volume. On-line analysis was performed by coupling a C4-Alkyl-Diol precolumn (20 x 4 mm i.d., particle size 25 microns) and LiChrospher RP Select B analytical column (250 x 4 mm i.d., particle size 5 microns) via an electrically driven six-port valve. Separation of the parent compound and its metabolites was achieved with a mobile phase consisting of water (0.1% triethylamine, v/v, pH 2.0 adjusted with trichloroacetic acid)-acetonitrile (70:30, v/v) at a flow rate of 1 ml min-1. The analytes were detected using their natural fluorescence (excitation 445 nm, emission 560 nm). The method described is used for the determination of pharmacokinetics of epirubicin and its metabolites in order to evaluate and optimize treatment regimen of liver cancer chemoembolization therapy.

The pharmacokinetics and clinical activity of epirubicin were investigated in 16 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received epirubicin at 75 mg/m2; the drug was given intravenously to 7 patients and via the hepatic artery to 9 patients (7 of whom also underwent embolisation). Lignocaine (1 mg/kg) was also given intravenously to 15 patients, and the metabolite monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) was measured as an indicator of liver function. Epirubicin clearance correlated with serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), albumin and bilirubin values in patients treated intravenously or intraarterially. Although the route of administration did not affect the median total plasma clearance of epirubicin, early- and intermediate-phase clearance was higher following intraarterial administration. MEGX levels correlated with serum bilirubin levels but there was no correlation with albumin or AST values or epirubicin clearance. The rate of response to epirubicin was 3/13 (23%; 95% confidence interval, 8%-50%). Intravenous epirubicin was tolerated well, but intraarterial treatment was associated with significant morbidity. These data confirm that although current recommended dose adjustments are based primarily on serum bilirubin levels, altered epirubicin pharmacokinetics correlate more strongly with AST and albumin values than with serum bilirubin concentrations. However, at this dose and schedule, epirubicin has only modest activity against HCC.

Epirubicin is the 4' epimer of the anthracycline antibiotic doxorubicin, and has been used alone or in combination with other cytotoxic agents in the treatment of a variety of malignancies. Comparative and noncomparative clinical trials have demonstrated that regimens containing conventional doses of epirubicin achieved equivalent objective response rates and overall median survival as similar doxorubicin-containing regimens in the treatment of advanced and early breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, ovarian cancer, gastric cancer and nonresectable primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Recently, dose-intensive regimens of epirubicin have achieved high response rates in a number of malignancies including early and advanced breast cancer and lung cancer. The major acute dose-limiting toxicity of anthracyclines is myelosuppression. In vitro and clinical studies have shown that, at equimolar doses, epirubicin is less myelotoxic than doxorubicin. The lower haematological toxicity of epirubicin, as well as the recent introduction of supportive measures such as colony-stimulating factors, has allowed dose-intensification of epirubicin-containing regimens, which is particularly significant because of the definite dose-response relationship of anthracyclines. Cardiotoxicity, which is manifested clinically as irreversible congestive heart failure and/or cardiomyopathy, is the most important chronic cumulative dose-limiting toxicity of anthracyclines. Epirubicin has a lower propensity to produce cardiotoxic effects than doxorubicin, and its recommended maximum cumulative dose is almost double that of doxorubicin, thus allowing for more treatment cycles and/or higher doses of epirubicin. In summary, dose-intensive epirubicin-containing regimens, which are feasible due to its lower myelosuppression and cardiotoxicity, have produced high response rates in early breast cancer, a potentially curable malignancy, as well as advanced breast, and lung cancers. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that improved response rates can improve quality of life in some clinical settings, but whether this leads to prolonged survival has not yet been determined. Recently implemented supportive measures such as colony-stimulating factors, prophylactic antimicrobials and peripheral blood stem cell support may help achieve other potential advantages of dose-intensive epirubicin-containing regimens such as reductions in morbidity and length of hospital admissions.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common tumors affecting man. It is the general feeling that only hepatectomy can give a chance for cure. However, less than 20% of patients can be resected, and other treatment modalities are required. Systemic (chemotherapy, hormonotherapy, immunotherapy) and loco-regional (intratumoral injection of alcohol, intra-arterial chemotherapy embolization, internal radiotherapy) approaches have been developed. In view of the small number of patients, tumor and patient heterogeneity, and difficulties in assessing tumor response, the real place of these treatments is difficult to evaluate. A review of the literature suggests that embolization with Gelfoam, even when given without chemotherapy, has an effect on response rate and on survival, and could be considered, at the present time, as the most attractive treatment in non-operable HCC. Chemotherapy seems effective only if combined with embolization. When administered alone by the systemic or the intra-arterial hepatic route, no clinically significant activity can be found. Unexpectedly, Lipiodol by itself seems inactive, and the co-administration of chemotherapy does not improve activity. Other approaches such as intratumoral injection of alcohol, immunotherapy, hormonotherapy, and radioimmunotherapy are still experimental, and well-designed studies are needed to identify their role.

Data of all phase II studies of pirarubicin (THP-doxorubicin) have been analysed for toxicity or activity in breast cancer and compared with published reports on doxorubicin, epirubicin or mitoxantrone used as single drugs. A graph of the 95% confidence intervals for each event was used. The results suggest that pirarubicin is as effective as other intercalating drugs in breast cancer and grossly better tolerated than doxorubicin, especially alopecia and cumulative cardiotoxicity. The equimyelotoxic doses of each drug were also estimated. The methodology and the validity of such historical comparisons is discussed: they cannot replace prospective randomised phase III studies, and do not allow definitive conclusions. However, most comparative trials of anticancer drug analogues cannot answer the right questions because their objectives are not adequate (especially for equiefficacy). But early evaluation by historical comparisons can help the conception of phase III studies.

Between August 1986 and September 1990, 22 previously untreated non-cirrhotic patients with measurable unresectable primary liver cancer were treated every 4 weeks with a combination of epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil. The dose of epirubicin was escalated; the starting dose was 40 mg/m2, the second dose was 50 mg/m2 and thereafter 60 mg/m2 during subsequent cycles. The dose of 5-fluorouracil was always 800 mg/m2. Objective response rate was 14%. Most of the patients experienced only mild haematological toxicity, and no other dose limiting toxicity was observed. Nonetheless, increasing the dose would probably not have increased the response rate.

Liver tumours frequently present at a late stage and only a minority of patients are likely to benefit from resection or transplantation. Inoperable tumours carry a grave prognosis. External beam irradiation of the liver is dose-limited by the radiosensitivity of hepatocytes, particularly in the presence of cirrhosis, but internal radiation using radio-isotope sources can achieve more selective irradiation of the chosen field. Sealed sources are dose-limited by their effects on surrounding tissues, whereas with unsealed sources the dose of radio-isotope administered is limited by bone marrow suppression. Iridium-192 wires are most frequently employed as a sealed intracavitary source. They may be inserted surgically, transhepatically or endoscopically. Doses of up to 60 Gy can be delivered to a malignant biliary stricture without damage to the surrounding parenchyma. The incidence of cholangitis is low if treatment is administered after insertion of an endoprosthesis. Unsealed radio-isotope sources may be injected directly into the tumour, administered embolically via the hepatic artery in the form of microspheres or lipid droplets, or given via parenteral infusion attached to tumour-specific antibodies. Of these vehicles, the lipid agent Lipiodol appears to be the most effective and can deliver a potentially lethal dose of radiation to small tumours. Host reaction to the injected antibody remains a major drawback to the use of monoclonal antibodies as targeting agents. Iodine-131 is a beta- and gamma-emitter, producing a local tumoricidal effect and allowing accurate dosimetry by means of external scintigraphy. Yttrium-90 is a pure beta-emitter with a greater maximum beta energy and cytotoxic range; however, it is retained in bony tissues, resulting in a dose-related risk of marrow suppression. Bone absorption cannot be measured by external imaging owing to the absence of gamma emission. This lack of accurate dosimetry, coupled with the toxic side-effects of yttrium treatment, make iodine-131 the current isotope of choice.

Preoperative administration of 4'-epidoxorubicin (Epi-A) has been suggested as adjuvant therapy in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocarcinoma. To assess the influence of partial hepatectomy on the pharmacokinetics of Epi-A, an experimental study in rats was undertaken in which 5 mg/kg Epi-A was given i.v. 10 min prior to a 2/3 hepatic resection or sham operation. Epi-A levels in liver tissue and plasma were determined using a sensitive and specific HPLC method. A marked uptake of Epi-A in liver tissue was found at 10 min after injection. The partially hepatectomized rats showed a 2-fold increase in AUC between 4 and 72 h as compared with the sham-operated controls. The terminal half-life from 24 to 72 h was not significantly changed by the partial hepatectomy. The plasma binding of Epi-A was measured at 4 h post-surgery. The fraction of unbound Epi-A was 0.16 in partially hepatectomized animals and 0.20 in sham-operated rats. The results indicate that when Epi-A is given prior to liver resection, a dose reduction might be necessary to avoid increased side effects due to the rise in AUC.

The Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group performed a two-stage trial of alpha-2B interferon in 30 hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Two patients did not receive the treatment and are not considered in the analysis. Only two (7%) short-lived objective responses were observed and the median survival time was 22 weeks. Toxicity was, in general, acceptable. Fourteen severe toxic reactions were observed with fever, chills, malaise, and myalgia accounting for the majority. Our experience indicates that recombinant alpha-2B interferon does not have significant antitumor activity against hepatocellular carcinoma.