Globally, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is recognized as a major risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma, and HBV-induced liver failure is one of the leading indications for liver transplantation. Until about two decades ago, liver transplantation in patients with chronic HBV infection was a relative contraindication, due to high risk of viral replication with the use of immunosuppressants which could result in graft infection. In the 1990s, hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) use significantly reduced the risk of graft infection, improving outcomes of liver transplant in patients with chronic HBV infection. However, very high costs, especially with the need for long-term use, became a major concern. With the advent of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs), there was less need for high-dose, long-term HBIg use to prevent HBV recurrence. Lamivudine was initially used but resistance soon became a major issue. This was followed by more potent NAs, such as entecavir and tenofovir, emerging as the more preferred agents. Additionally, the use of these antiviral agents (HBIg and/or NAs) have made it possible to use the grafts from donors with positivity for hepatitis B core antibody, allowing for expansion of the donor pool. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on management protocols, which vary significantly amongst centers. In this review, we appraise studies on management strategies used and the role of active vaccination in the prevention of HBV recurrence in post-liver transplant patients.

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a major global health problem affecting an estimated 350 million people with more than 786000 individuals dying annually due to complications, such as cirrhosis, liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Liver transplantation (LT) is considered gold standard for treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver failure and HCC. However, post-transplant viral reactivation can be detrimental to allograft function, leading to poor survival. Prophylaxis with high-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and anti-viral drugs have achieved remarkable progress in LT by suppressing viral replication and improving long-term survival. The combination of lamivudine (LAM) plus HBIG has been for many years the most widely used. However, life-long HBIG use is both cumbersome and costly, whereas long-term use of LAM results in resistant virus. Recently, in an effort to develop HBIG-free protocols, high potency nucleos(t)ide analogues, such as Entecavir or Tenofovir, have been tried either as monotherapy or in combination with low-dose HBIG with excellent results. Current focus is on novel antiviral targets, especially for covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), in an effort to eradicate HBV infection instead of viral suppression. However, there are several other molecular mechanisms through which HBV may reactivate and need equal attention. The purpose of this review is to address post-LT HBV reactivation, its risk factors, underlying molecular mechanisms, and recent advancements and future of anti-viral therapy.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a public health problem in developing countries. HBV genotypes play major role in the evolution of infection since they were involved in different clinical presentations and response to treatment.

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficiency of restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis for HBV genotyping.

We investigated 98 samples collected from patients chronically infected with HBV. HBV genotypes were determined by analysis of patterns obtained after amplification in Pre-S region and digestion of the amplicon by two endonucleases AvaII and DpnII. Obtained results were confirmed by partial sequencing in the same region.

Two different HBV genotypes were detected in this study, Genotype D (in 95. 9%) and Genotype A (in 4.1%). Seventy-four samples (75.5%) were successfully genotyped with RFLP analysis and all classified as genotype D. The remaining 24 samples (24.5%) which were un-genotyped by RFLP analysis, were classified by partial sequencing of the pre-S region as HBV genotype D (20 samples, 20.4%) and genotype A (4 samples, 4.1%). Atypical profiles were significantly associated with advanced liver disease (P = 0.001) as well as older age (P < 0.05).

Several previous studies used PCR-RFLP to genotype HBV; however, we showed the high risk to obtain atypical profiles, especially in advanced stages of chronic infection, with as results difficulties to genotype the virus. These profiles resulted from the accumulation of mutations during natural course of infection resulting in a modification in restriction sites for enzymes. So, we recommended completing the investigation by partial sequencing to confirm obtained results.

The management of hepatitis B in liver transplantation has evolved significantly over the past 2 decades. Introduction of hepatitis B immune globulin and subsequently nucleos(t)ide analogues has revolutionized transplantation for hepatitis B virus (HBV), increasing survival for patients transplanted for this indication. With the availability of new and potent antivirals for HBV, the need for liver transplant should continue to decrease in the coming years. Moreover, the newer antivirals with high resistance barriers will allow effective long-term viral prophylaxis and therefore, prevention of recurrence.

The hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been classified into eight genotypes (A-H) based on intergenotypic divergence of at least 8% in the complete nucleotide sequence or more than 4% in the S gene. To facilitate the investigation of the relationship between the efficacy of drug treatment and the mutation with specific genotype of HBV, we have established a new genotyping strategy based on a fragment of the HBV DNA polymerase gene. Pairwise sequence and phylogenetic analyses were performed using CLUSTAL V (DNASTAR) on the eight (A-H) standard full-length nucleotide sequences of HBV DNA from GenBank (NCBI) and the corresponding semi-nested PCR products from the HBV DNA polymerase gene. The differences in the semi-nested PCR fragments of the polymerase genes among genotypes A through F were greater than 4%, which is consistent with the intergenotypic divergence of at least 4% in HBV DNA S gene sequences. Genotyping using the semi-nested PCR products of the DNA polymerase genes revealed that only genotypes B, C, and D were present in the 50 cases, from Shenyang, China, with a distribution of 11 cases (22%), 25 cases (50%), and 14 cases (28%) respectively. These results demonstrate that our new genotyping method utilizing a fragment of the HBV DNA polymerase gene is valid and can be employed as a general genotyping strategy in areas with prevalent HBV genotypes A through F. In Shenyang, China, genotypes C, B, and D were identified with this new genotyping method, and genotype C was demonstrated to be the dominant genotype.

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection remains a major global problem but the recent advances in molecular methods have revolutionized the diagnosis and management of CHB. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA quantitation is the most useful molecular marker for the diagnosis and management of CHB. There is increasing evidence that the clinical outcome and efficacy of antiviral therapy for CHB could vary with the infecting HBV genotype, core promoter and precore mutations. Early identification of drug resistance is imperative in the management of CHB. The molecular methods for HBV DNA quantitation, HBV genotyping, the identification of mutants, genotypic and phenotypic methods for monitoring drug resistance and their utility and limitations for use in the diagnosis and monitoring of CHB are discussed in this article.

Emerging data suggest that the hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype and the precore and core promoter variants impact the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatitis B. The aim of this study was to determine if there is a correlation between HBV genotype, precore and core promoter variants, and pre- and post-OLT outcomes. Serum samples from patients participating in the National Institutes of Health HBV-OLT study were tested for HBV genotype and precore and core promoter variants. A total of 123 patients were studied: 43% were Asians, 46% were Caucasians, and 8% were African Americans. HBV genotypes A (35%) and C (35%) were the most prevalent, followed by genotypes D and B. Precore and core promoter variants were detectable in 44% and 90% of patients. Patients with genotype C were more likely to have hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at listing (P < 0.001). Waitlist mortality was highest among patients with genotype D, while posttransplant mortality was highest among patients with genotype C. Precore or core promoter variants did not correlate with pre- or post-OLT survival. In conclusion, in this US patient population, patients with genotype C were more likely to have HCC at the time of transplant listing and to die after transplant than patients with non-C genotypes. Patients with genotype D had the highest posttransplant survival, but this was offset by higher waitlist mortality. Our study suggests that HBV genotypes but not precore or core promoter variants may have an impact on pre- and post-OLT outcomes of hepatitis B patients.

High-dose intravenous hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) may prevent recurrent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, but the cost has limited its widespread use in countries with endemic HBV infection. We report on long-term safety and efficacy of an alternative strategy of very low doses (400-800 IU/month) of intramuscular (IM) HBIG plus lamivudine.

Australian and New Zealand patients who received low-dose HBIG plus lamivudine following liver transplantation for HBV-related end-stage liver disease were studied. Prior to transplantation, patients with detectable serum HBV DNA received lamivudine 100 mg daily. Posttransplantation, all patients received lamivudine 100 mg daily plus IM HBIG 400 or 800 IU daily for 1 week then monthly thereafter. Serum HBV DNA levels were measured prior to lamivudine, at transplantation, and at 12 months posttransplantation. Serum titers of antibody to HBV surface antigen were measured at 1, 3, and 12 months posttransplantation.

Between February 1996 and October 2004, 147 patients received low-dose HBIG plus lamivudine. Thirty-one percent were hepatitis B e antigen positive, and 85% were HBV DNA+ prior to transplantation. The median duration of pretransplantation lamivudine was 92 days (range, 1-1775). Median follow-up posttransplantation was 1860 days. Kaplan-Meier patient survival was 92% at 1 year and 88% at 5 years. The actuarial risk of HBV recurrence was 1% at 1 year and 4% at 5 years. Baseline HBV DNA titer was associated with HBV recurrence.

Low-dose IM HBIG plus lamivudine provides safe and effective long-term prophylaxis against recurrent HBV at <10% the cost of the high-dose regimen.

The aim of this study was to examine the genetic variability of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) and its significance. HBV genotypes, core promoter and precore mutants were characterized in 109 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven HBV chronic hepatitis. Genotypes A (26.6%), B (12.8%), C (18.3%), D (18.3%), and E (14.7%) indicate a wide genotypic distribution. Patients were from Asia (30.3%), Europe (28.4%), Sub Saharan Africa (23.9%), the Caribbean (10.1%), North Africa (5.5%), and Madagascar (1.8%). HBV genotypes A and D (HBV/A and /D) infected all subgroups except Asian patients. HBV/B or /C were found in 97% of Asian patients, whereas HBV/E only infected sub-Saharan African and Caribbean patients. Differences according to genotypes were: an increased prevalence of anti-HBe antibodies in patients infected with HBV/D (P = 0.003), higher serum transaminases in patients infected with HBV/A and/D (P = 0.043), more severe liver fibrosis in patients infected with HBV/A, /C and/D (P = 0.02). Precore and core promoter mutants were found in 87% of anti-HBe positive patients, and were associated with HBV/D (P = 0.04) and severe liver fibrosis (P = 0.002). It is concluded that HBV genotypes A, B, C, D, and E circulate in the Seine Saint Denis District, reflecting the geographical origin of patients. HBV/A, /C and/D seem to be associated with more severe hepatic disease.

Oligonuleotides (oligo) microarray is a promising method for virus genotyping. In this study, we developed an oligo microarray used for genotyping hepatitis B virus (HBV). It consists of 15 probes targeting HBV genotypes A-G and two genotypes of apes, and one conserved probe selected from the HBV pre-S region. To test a clinical sample, the gene targets of clinical samples were amplified and labelled with Cy5-dCTP in a PCR reaction using primers covering the flanking region of the HBV pre-S gene. Following purification, the labelled PCR products were hybridized to the microarray. In an analysis of 96 HBV patients' serum samples using our developed microarray, we identified 34 genotype B, 60 genotype C and 2 genotypes B/C coinfection samples. Sequencing results of 24 randomly selected samples agreed 100% with microarray data. Geographic distribution of genotypes C and B was also divergent, 95.7% (44/46) of genotype C and 64.0% (32/50) of genotype B samples were collected from Northern and Southern China, respectively. The accuracy of genotyping was confirmed by analyzing DNA sequences of 24 samples. It is demonstrated that low-density oligo microarray can serve as a reliable and time-saving method to HBV genotyping from patient's sera.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a global health problem. In addition to the implementation of universal hepatitis B vaccination, effective and individualized treatment of chronic hepatitis B to prevent progression into end-stage liver diseases and hepatocellular carcinoma is still needed. HBV has been designated eight genotypes (A-H) based on genome sequence divergence. The epidemiology of HBV genotypes and their implications on the responses to antiviral therapy have become increasingly recognized in both Asian and Western countries.

Published data are thus reviewed.

Each genotype has its distinct geographical and ethnic distribution. Genotypes A and D occur frequently in Africa, Europe, and India, while genotypes B and C are prevalent in Asia. Genotype E is restricted to West Africa, and genotype F is found in Central and South America. The distribution of genotypes G and H is less clear. Accumulating evidence indicates a better sustained response to conventional interferon in patients with genotype B than those with C, and in patients with genotype A than those with D. In contrast, conflicting results exist regarding the response to pegylated interferon. On the other hand, the therapeutic responses to nucleoside/nucleotide analogues are comparable among patients with different HBV genotypes. The impact of HBV subgenotypes, mixed genotype infections, and recombinants of different genotypes on the response to antiviral treatments awaits further examinations.

Remarkable clinical and pathogenic differences do exist among HBV genotypes; however, researches on molecular and virologic mechanisms underlying the clinical phenotypes of different HBV genotypes are urgently needed.

The efficacy of anti-viral intravenous immunogobulins (anti-HBs Ig and anti-CMV Ig) in preventing acute rejection after liver transplantation was assessed in a retrospective analysis, and correlated to their effects on immune cells in vitro. HBs Ag-positive liver graft recipients (n = 40) treated prophylactically with anti-HBs Ig had a significantly lower incidence of acute rejection compared with recipients without viral hepatitis (n = 147) (12% vs. 34%; p = 0.012), while the incidence of rejection in HCV-positive recipients (n = 29) was similar to that in the control group. Treatment with anti-CMV Ig (n = 18) did not protect against rejection. In vitro, anti-HBs Ig suppressed functional maturation of and cytokine production by human blood-derived dendritic cells (DC) at concentrations similar to the serum concentrations reached during anti-HBs Ig treatment of liver graft recipients. In addition, anti-HBs Ig inhibited allo-antigen- and lectin-stimulated proliferation of peripheral T cells. Anti-CMV Ig suppressed functional DC-maturation and alloantigen-stimulated T-cell proliferation, but not lectin-driven T-cell proliferation. In conclusion, anti-HBs Ig protects against acute rejection after liver transplantation, probably by functional inhibition of the two principal immune cells involved in allograft rejection, DC and T cells.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype influences chronic hepatitis B disease profile but its relevance in liver transplantation (LTx) is not known. HBV genotype was identified by direct sequencing from pre-transplant sera of 119 patients who underwent LTx using lamivudine prophylaxis (genotype A,1; B,43; C,74; D,1). The baseline characteristics and outcome of 43 genotype B and 74 genotype C patients were compared. Genotype B patients had significantly more pre-transplant acute flare, worse liver functions and higher model for end-stage liver disease score. Fewer genotype B patients had HBeAg (13% vs. 32%; p=0.017), but HBV DNA seropositivity (by bDNA assay) was comparable (26% vs. 23%; p=0.727). The 3-year graft survival was 83% for genotype B and 89% for genotype C (p=0.2). The rate of HBsAg clearance or seroreversion was the same. The cumulative rate of viral breakthrough due to lamivudine-resistant mutants at 3 years was 4% for genotype B and 21% for genotype C (p=0.017). Liver biopsy after viral breakthrough showed recurrent hepatitis B in 7 of 10 genotype C patients, including 2 with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, and no histologic recurrence in 2 genotype B patients. In conclusion, HBV genotypes B and C are associated with different patterns of end-stage liver diseases that required transplantation, and genotype C may carry a greater risk and severity of recurrence due to lamivudine-resistant mutants.

To investigate the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes in Spanish hepatitis B carriers, and to study the differences in epidemiological characteristics, e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion, serum DNA viral levels (VL) and liver function alterations.

This study included 108 patients. Genotyping was carried out in 84 with the INNO-LiPA HBV genotyping assay (Innogenetics).

There were 41 women and 67 men, with a mean age of 44.1 years. The source of transmission was family contact in 26 patients (24.1%); transfusions in 10 (9.3%); sexual promiscuity in 9 (8.3%), intravenous drug use in 3 (2.8%), health care accident in 2 (1.8%); and unknown causes in 58 (53.7%). Forty patients had chronic hepatitis and 68 (63%) were healthy carriers. The time of evolution of the infection was known in only in 45 patients, and was over 10 years in 42 of them. One hundred patients (92.6%) were HbeAg-negative and 90 (83.3%) had detectable viral DNA. Genotype A was present in 46 (54.8%), D in 20 (23.8%), F in 2 (2,4%), C in 1 (1.2%), A-G coinfection in 7 (8.3%), A-D in 4 (4.8%), D-G in 2 (2,4%), A-C in 1 (1.2%), and A-D-G in 1 (1.2%). There were no significant differences between genotypes. A trend towards an association was found between VL <or= 10(5) copies/mL and the presence of chronic hepatitis in genotype A (28.9%) as opposed to genotype D (7.7%) (p non significant).

HBV genotypes A and D, and coinfections with G are predominant in our area. Genotype A showed a tendency to produce greater inflammatory activity when VL was <or= 10(5) copies/mL.

The genetic variability of hepatitis B virus (HBV) represents a challenge for the sensitivity of immunologic and molecular based assays. Based on sequence divergence in the entire genome of >8%, HBV genomes have been classified into eight groups designated A to H. The genotypes of HBV have distinct geographical distributions. Although preliminary clinical studies seem to indicate that there is an association between HBV genotype and natural history of infection and response to antiviral therapy, further evaluations on larger collectives of patients are necessary to give a clearer picture of the subject. The analytical sensitivity of HBsAg and anti-HBs assays may be dependent on HBV genotype or subtype. The influence of genotypic variability on the sensitivity of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAT) has so far been poorly investigated. Preliminary results show that new real-time NAT detect genotypes A to G with an equal sensitivity. Different mechanisms intervening at the translational or post-translational level, including conformational changes, hydrophobic changes, insertion of basic residues and reduced synthesis or secretion of HBsAg may account solely or in conjunction for escape mutations to the immune response and to detection in HBsAg immunassays. The clinical significance of S-gene mutants, needs in analogy to that of HBV genotypes, to be further investigated. HBV mutants are stable over time and can be transmitted horizontally or vertically. The sensitivity of HBsAg assays for mutant detection is continuously improved. Immunoassays based on polyclonal capture antibody show the highest sensitivity for the recognition of recombinant mutants or serum samples harboring mutant forms of HBsAg. However, they do not guarantee full sensitivity. Detection of HBsAg needs to be improved by the introduction of new HBsAg assays able to recognize so far described S-gene mutants and with a lower detection threshold than current immunoassays in order to detect smallest amounts of HBsAg in low level carriers. There is also a need for more complete epidemiological data on the prevalence of HBsAg mutants and strategies for the (differential) screening of mutants need to be developed and evaluated.

The role of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes in the outcome of acute HBV infection is unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical and virological features of patients with hepatitis B-related acute liver failure (HBV-ALF) in the US. Clinical and laboratory features of consecutive patients with HBV-ALF from the US ALF Study Group were analysed. Prevalence of HBV genotypes, precore stop (G1896A) and core promoter dual (T1762A, A1764T) variants among patients with HBV-ALF were compared with a cohort of 530 patients with chronic HBV infection. Thirty-four HBV-ALF patients were studied: mean age 41 years, 56% men, 25 had detectable HBV-DNA. HBV genotypes A, B, C and D were found in 36, 24, 8 and 32% patients, respectively. Precore stop and core promoter dual variants were detected in 32 and 44% of patients, respectively. Twenty-three (68%) patients survived: 14 after liver transplant, nine without transplant. Older age was the only independent factor associated with poor outcome. Compared with patients with chronic HBV infection, patients with ALF were more likely to be non-Asians (88% vs 44%, P = 0.005) and to have genotype D (32% vs 10%, P < 0.01). A higher prevalence of HBV genotype D persisted even after matching for race and HBeAg status (32% vs 16%, P = 0.007). We concluded that HBV genotype D was more frequently found in patients with HBV-ALF than those with chronic HBV infection in the US. Further studies are needed to determine if HBV genotypes play a role in the outcome of acute HBV infection.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes have been associated with specific patterns of disease and response to antiviral therapy. We investigated the effect of HBV genotype on HBV recurrence and mortality after liver transplantation (LT). Pretransplant sera of 45 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive adults were submitted for HBV genotyping by a reverse-phase hybridization line probe assay with genotype-specific probes. Data were correlated with clinical outcomes after transplantation. Genotype A (n =15), D (n = 13) and A/D (n = 12) accounted for 89% of all genotypes. Coinfection with two HBV genotypes was encountered in 14 (31.1%) patients. Eighteen patients (40 %) developed HBV recurrence at a median of 10 months posttransplant (range, 1-53) and 10 patients (22 %) died at a median of 24 months (range, 3-63). Genotype D patients were more likely to develop HBV recurrence or die compared with genotype A patients, although this did not reach statistical significance. Dual infection with genotype A/D resulted in mortality similar to that of genotype A but recurrence similar to that of genotype D. Active viral replication at time of transplantation was the only independent factor (P = 0.03) that predicted HBV recurrence. In conclusion, HBV genotype A and D did not have a significant impact on clinical outcomes of LT for HBV-related liver disease in patients of European origin. These data do not support routine HBV genotyping in liver transplantation.

Advances in liver transplantation continue to evolve but are hampered by continued increasing shortages in donor organs. This has resulted in a high incidence of patients dying while on the United Network for Organ Sharing waiting list. Indeed, we continue to assess ways of expanding the donor pool by using marginal donors, living donor liver transplantation, split liver transplantation, domino transplantation, and hepatic support systems to prolong survival long enough for the patient to undergo liver transplantation. Changes in the liver allocation policy to reduce the number of people dying while waiting for an organ are discussed. Implementation of the model for end-stage liver disease allocation system should help alleviate the problem of increasing deaths of patients while on the waiting list. Recurrent disease, particularly recurrent hepatitis C, continues to be a major problem, and effective therapy is needed to prevent both progression of hepatitis C and recurrence in the graft and avoid retransplantation. The use of pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin holds promise for improving the success in overcoming recurrent hepatitis C. Finally, advances in immunosuppression have reduced the incidence of acute cellular rejection and chronic rejection. However, these therapies have been fraught with metabolic complications that are now affecting quality of life and long-term survival. Tailoring immunosuppressive regimens to the individual patient is discussed.