Bemnifosbuvir (BEM), the orally available hemisulfate salt of the double prodrug of a guanosine nucleotide analog, is a potent, selective, and pan-genotypic inhibitor of HCV nonstructural protein 5B, an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase necessary for viral replication. Similarly, ruzasvir (RZR) is an orally available, highly potent, selective, and pan-genotypic inhibitor of HCV nonstructural protein 5A, an essential component of the viral replication complex. The antiviral effects of the combination of these two complementary direct-acting antivirals were determined in HCV GT1b Huh-7 replicon cells. Two independent in vitro evaluations suggested that BEM and RZR act synergistically to inhibit HCV replication without accompanying cytotoxicity. Additionally, the toxicity and toxicokinetic properties of BEM and RZR administered individually or in combination were investigated in rats given daily oral doses at 500 mg/kg of each drug for 13 weeks, with an interim analysis at 4 weeks. All doses were well tolerated with no test article-related adverse effects identified in either the separate or combined dose groups. Moreover, toxicokinetic analyses conducted on dose days 1, 28 and 84 indicated minimal pharmacokinetic interactions between the two drugs in rats, with AUC values for AT-511 (free base form of BEM), its major circulating metabolites, and RZR being similar, regardless of separate or co-administration.

No direct-acting antiviral is currently approved for acute HCV infection, delaying treatment. We investigated the effectiveness and safety of 8-week glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) in patients with acute HCV infection.

This noninterventional, single-arm, retrospective chart review was designed to enroll adults/adolescents with acute HCV infection. Analyses were conducted on a full analysis set (FAS; all enrolled) and modified FAS (FAS excluding nonvirologic failures). The primary end point (modified FAS) was sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12) with superiority to 92.6% threshold determined by historic chronic HCV G/P SVR12 rates. Secondary end points (FAS) included SVR12, on-treatment virologic failure, posttreatment relapse, and reinfection. Adverse events and safety laboratory values were assessed.Overall, 202 adults were enrolled; in the modified FAS, 150/151 (99.3%; 95% CI: 96.3-99.9) achieved SVR12, demonstrating superiority to efficacy threshold. In the FAS, the SVR12 rate was 74.3% and the on-treatment virologic failure rate was 0%. Relapse and reinfection rates after the final treatment visit (FAS) were 0.5% and 3%, respectively; 39 patients had missing SVR12 data. No on-treatment alanine aminotransferase elevations > 3 × upper limit of normal with total bilirubin > 2 × upper limit of normal were reported. All 53 patients with alanine aminotransferase Grade ≥ 2 at baseline improved to Grade 0/1 on treatment. No adverse eventss of hepatic decompensation/failure or leading to G/P discontinuation occurred. Two patients had serious adverse events unrelated to G/P.

Eight-week G/P therapy was effective and well-tolerated in patients with acute HCV infection. Data support further investigation of G/P in acute HCV to shorten care cascades, reduce transmission, and support HCV elimination.

The advent of short-course, curative treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAA) has given promise for the global elimination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections by 2030. Virological failure occurs in 2%-12% of persons receiving curative DAA treatment and may be presaged by pre-existing polymorphisms or result from selection of drug resistant variants during therapy.

We conducted a systematic review to assess the prevalence of HCV resistance associated substitutions (RAS) among individuals with chronic hepatitis C infection who had virological failure following initial or re-treatment with pan-genotypic DAA regimens. We included 34 and 22 studies assessing RAS in people with virological failure published between January 2014 and July 2023. Pooled RAS prevalence was estimated using random-effects meta-analysis.

The pooled prevalence of RAS in people with virological failure following initial DAA treatment was 78.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.0-92.0) for sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, 81.0% (95% CI: 67.0-93.0) for sofosbuvir/daclatasvir, and 79.0% (95% CI: 70.0-87.0) for glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, with a high prevalence of resistance to the NS5A inhibitors. Among those with virological failure following re-treatment regimens, RAS were present in 93.0% (95% CI: 83.0-99.0) for sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilepravir and in 100% (95% CI: 92.0-100) for glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, with resistance driven by RAS to NS5A inhibitors.

At least 1 RAS is present in a high proportion of the few individuals with virological failure following initial or re-treatment with pan-genotypic DAA regimens. There is a need for ongoing surveillance for DAA-associated resistance, to assess risk factors for their development and clinical impact to inform best practice strategies for re-treatment.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) represents a significant advancement, offering hope for eliminating the virus in diverse patient populations. But real-world data on its effectiveness and safety remains scarce for patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in China, especially those with HCV GT3b, cirrhosis, hepato-cellular carcinoma (HCC), or HCV/hepatitis B (HBV), HCV/HIV, or HCV/HBV/HIV coinfection.

In this real-world prospective observational study, we recruited patients from the West China Hospital and Public Health Clinical Center of Chengdu in China. Patients included adults with with CHC and any genotype (GT), with or without cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), HCV/HBV, HCV/HIV, or HCV/HBV/HIV coinfection. Patients were administered SOF/VEL (400/100 mg) ± ribavirin (RBV) once daily for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virological response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12). Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated during treatment.

The study included 483 patients with HCV genotypes 1, 2, 3, 6 and uncertain ones. Among them, 35.4 % (171/483, ITT) and 36.7 % (166/452, mITT) received SOF/VEL + RBV. At the end of treatment , 99.2 % (ITT, 479/483) and 99.1 % (mITT, 448/452) of patients had undetectable HCV RNA. SVR12 rates were 92.8 % [intention to treat (ITT), 448/483] and 99.1 % [modified ITT (mITT), 448/452]. In the mITT analysis, SVR12 for patients with HCV GT3b, those with cirrhosis or HCC, and those coinfected with HBV/HIV was 99.2 % (130/131), 99.4 % (168/169), and 97.6 % (40/41), respectively. The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) (-3.01 vs. -3.18 P < 0.001), Fibrosis-4 (FIB4) Index (2.53 vs. 1.88, P = 0.004) and AST to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) (0.99 vs. 0.44, P < 0.001) scores showed a significant decrease from baseline to SVR12. No patients experienced grade 3-5 AEs.

Although a high proportion of patients included in this study had HCV GT3b, cirrhosis, HCC, or HCV/HBV, HCV/HIV, or HCV/HBV/HIV coinfection, SOF/VEL ± RBV was highly effective and well tolerated in Chinese patients with CHC.

Several clinical trials, including the recently published the GRAND PLAN study from Vancouver Infectious Diseases Center (VIDC), have demonstrated the efficacy of hepatitis C (HCV) therapy among active drug users, including those facing significant addiction-related and social challenges. In the GRAND PLAN, we documented sustained virological response post-treatment Week12 (SVR12) in 108/117 (92.3 %) individuals (108/111 (mITT) or 97.3 % of those reaching the SVR12 timepoint) receiving an 8-week course of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P), with almost all using fentanyl and over half being unstably housed. Data on the maintenance of this favorable outcome in the long-term in such a population with a significant risk of reinfection is limited. We hypothesized that the offer of ongoing multidisciplinary care (including addiction care) after SVR12 was achieved would reduce the likelihood of loss to follow up, HCV reinfection or death and consolidate the gains achieved by initial engagement in care to diagnose and treat HCV infection.

The inception cohort for this analysis was the 108 individuals achieving a cure of HCV infection within the GRAND PLAN study. All were offered the opportunity to continue to receive care at the VIDC. This is a multidisciplinary model of care to address medical, mental health, social and addiction-related concerns on an ongoing basis. This included, if necessary, opiate agonist and safer supply therapy, usually provided by the pharmacy adjacent to our inner-city campus. Among those choosing to be retained in care, the endpoint of this analysis was loss to follow up, mortality and HCV reinfection and their correlates. Reinfection was ascertained by repeat HCV RNA testing every 6 months, more frequently if clinically indicated.

Of the 108 individuals making up the inception cohort for this analysis, all chose to remain in care at the VIDC. We note a median age of 47 (22-75) years, 28 % female, 21.3 % identifying as indigenous, the majority with mild fibrosis (90.8 % F0-F2), slightly more than half with unstable housing. It is of note that we recorded a 20 % decrease in fentanyl users among those who were cured compared to the baseline evaluation of the overall study cohort (73.5 % vs 94.9 %, p < 0.000001). Among the cured individuals, 104 (96.3 %) remained alive, while 4 individuals died of opioid overdoses. Out of the 104 , 99 (95.2 %) remained HCV-free, while 5 (4.8 %) were re-infected. All five have recently initiated repeat HCV therapy at VIDC, 2 of whom are already documented to be cured.

Among a population of vulnerable inner-city residents cured of HCV infection within a multidisciplinary program of care at the VIDC, all individuals accepted the offer to remain in long-term follow up, with a statistically significant reduction in fentanyl use over time. In the setting of an ongoing opioid crisis where 3 deaths/day are recorded in the neighborhood where the study population resides, we documented 4 deaths. Reinfections occurred at a very modest rate, with maintenance in care allowing prompt re-treatment, with a cure already being documented in 2/5 cases, with the other 3 individuals remaining on HCV therapy at the VIDC.

Direct-acting antivirals (DAA) are effective in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, but there is little information about real-world effectiveness in people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLH). The aim of this study was to determinate the effectiveness of DAA to achieve sustained virologic response at week 12 post-treatment (SVR12) in PLH with HCV coinfection and in people with HCV-monoinfection. We conducted a prospective cohort. The full analysis set (FAS) included all subjects enrolled in the study; the modified analysis set (MAS) excluded cases with missing data to evaluate SVR12. A total of 278 people were included, 130 (46.7%) with HCV/HIV-coinfection and 148 (53.2%) with HCV-monoinfection. In the HCV/HIV-coinfection group, 82 (63%) received GLE/PIB for 8 weeks, 45 (34.6%) received SOF/VEL for 12 weeks, and 3 (2.3%) were treated with SOF/VEL + RBV for 12 weeks. In the HCV-monoinfection group, 62 (41.8%) received GLE/PIB for 8 weeks, 28 (18.9%) received SOF/VEL for 12 weeks, and 58 (39.1%) participants were treated with SOF/VEL + RBV for 12 weeks. In the FAS analysis, SVR12 was 81.6% in the HCV/HIV-coinfection group and 86.4% in the HCV-monoinfection group (p = 0.128). In the MAS analysis, both groups achieved 100% of SVR12. In this cohort, the effectiveness of DAA to achieve SVR12 was similar between HCV/HIV-coinfection and HCV-monoinfection cases, regardless of advanced liver disease with no differences between treatment regimens.

This was an open-label, randomized, single-dose, 2-period, crossover clinical trial with an adaptive design to evaluate the bioequivalence and comparative pharmacokinetics of generic glecaprevir/pibrentasvir versus the brand name product in healthy White male and female volunteers under fed conditions. Safety profiles were also assessed. A total of 56 healthy adult volunteers were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single dose of either the generic or reference formulation. After a 7-day washout period, subjects received the alternate product. Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time points up to 48 hours post-dosing. Plasma concentrations of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The geometric mean ratios of the test to the reference formulation for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from drug administration to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t) fell within the predefined bioequivalence range of 80%-125%. Both formulations demonstrated comparable pharmacokinetic profiles for glecaprevir and pibrentasvir, and can be considered bioequivalent. No adverse events were reported, and both formulations were well tolerated by all participants.

Pharmacotherapy against hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has tremendously improved since the advent of interferon (IFN)-free direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). Additionally, fixed-dose pangenotypic DAAs, which are safe, potent, easy for use, and can cover a wide spectrum of patients, have been recommended by professional guidelines for DAA-naïve and DAA-experienced patients with HCV.

We review the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of fixed-dose pangenotypic DAA regimens, including glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX). Additionally, we summarize the efficacy and safety of these regimens in clinical trials as well as real-world studies for treating different populations. Lastly, we discuss unmet medical needs in managing HCV in the era of fixed-dose pangenotypic DAAs.

Protease inhibitors (PIs), including GLE and VOX, are prone to have more frequent DDIs, compared to the non-structural (NS) 5A and 5B inhibitors. These regimens are generally well tolerated and can be applied to different populations, except for the contraindicated use of PI-containing DAA regimens in decompensated cirrhosis. Using the first-line GLE/PIB and SOF/VEL can eradicate HCV in more than 95% of DAA-naïve patients across different populations. The viral cure usually exceeds 95% when using the rescue SOF/VEL/VOX regimen for prior DAA failures.

After the introduction of direct-acting antivirals, parallel significant clinical progress has been achieved in the assessment of liver fibrosis progression/regression before treatment and during the follow-up of the cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The evolution of chronic hepatitis C into liver cirrhosis is correlated with an extensive accumulation of the extracellular matrix, leading to the formation of large amounts of fibrotic tissues that, initially, are concentrated in periportal areas and, in the later stages, surround the nodules of regenerating hepatocytes. The progressive increase in the fibrotic matrix contributes to vascular disturbances (favoring the development of portal hypertension) and to microenvironmental changes. The four clinical stages of liver cirrhosis are predictors for different clinical scenarios. The wide-ranging functions of the liver require different methods for their assessment. The non-invasive evaluation using transient elastography is useful in determining the longitudinal modifications of fibrosis during and after treatment with direct-acting antivirals. The liver stiffness evaluation, known to have a wide range of values in cirrhotic patients, can offer different prognostic implications after sustained virological response. This review discusses the different time points of liver stiffness evaluation that appear to show a more well-defined propensity to identify adequate monitoring schedules for these patients.

Sofosbuvir, velpatasvir and voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) is the recommended rescue therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C infection who fail direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). Data are limited on the effectiveness of this treatment after the current first-line therapies. Our aim was to analyse the effectiveness and safety of SOF/VEL/VOX among patients failing sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB).

Retrospective multicentre study (26 Spanish hospitals), including chronic hepatitis C patients unsuccessfully treated with SOF/VEL or GLE/PIB, and retreated with SOF/VEL/VOX ± ribavirin for 12 weeks between December 2017 and December 2022.

In total, 142 patients included: 100 (70.4%) had failed SOF/VEL and 42 (29.6%) GLE/PIB. Patients were mainly men (84.5%), White (93.9%), with hepatitis C virus genotype (GT) 3 (49.6%) and 47.2% had liver cirrhosis. Sustained virological response (SVR) was evaluated in 132 patients who completed SOF/VEL/VOX and were followed 12 weeks after end of treatment; 117 (88.6%) achieved SVR. There were no significant differences in SVR rates according to initial DAA treatment (SOF/VEL 87.9% vs. GLE/PIB 90.2%, p = 0.8), cirrhosis (no cirrhosis 90% vs. cirrhosis 87.1%, p = 0.6) or GT3 infection (non-GT3 91.9% vs. GT3 85.5%, p = 0.3). However, when considering the concurrent presence of SOF/VEL treatment, cirrhosis and GT3 infection, SVR rates dropped to 82.8%. Ribavirin was added in 8 (6%) patients, all achieved SVR.

SOF/VEL/VOX is an effective rescue therapy for failures to SOF/VEL or GLE/PIB, with an SVR of 88.6%. Factors previously linked to lower SVR rates, such as GT3 infection, cirrhosis and first-line therapy with SOF/VEL were not associated with lower SVRs.

Hepatitis C virus still represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In Peru, two national practice guidelines for the management of this infection were published more than 5 years ago; however, the latest breakthroughs in the treatment make it necessary to update these guidelines. We reviewed the most recent recommendations of the international guidelines and compared them with the current Peruvian guidelines. We found major differences, such as the use of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir as a first-line therapy, which is contemplated in the World Health Organization guideline, and recommended by American and European guidelines, but is not considered in the Peruvian guidelines. Another crucial difference lies in the management of patients with chronic kidney disease, who are treated nowadays with a variety of direct-acting antivirals, with no restrictions on the use of Sofosbuvir-based regimens in first-world countries, an approach that has not been adopted in Peru. We believe that standardization of the recommendations of the Peruvian guidelines is imperative, including the new therapeutic strategies that have emerged in recent years. We also suggest conducting a cost effectiveness analysis in the Peruvian context to allow for the implementation of new antivirals, and to achieve a better control of hepatitis C in the country.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains a significant global health challenge. Approximately 50 million people were living with chronic hepatitis C based on the World Health Organization as of 2024, contributing extensively to global morbidity and mortality. The advent and approval of several direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens significantly improved HCV treatment, offering potentially high rates of cure for chronic hepatitis C. However, the promising aim of eventual HCV eradication remains challenging. Key challenges include the variability in DAA access across different regions, slightly variable response rates to DAAs across diverse patient populations and HCV genotypes/subtypes, and the emergence of resistance-associated substitutions (RASs), potentially conferring resistance to DAAs. Therefore, periodic reassessment of current HCV knowledge is needed. An up-to-date review on HCV is also necessitated based on the observed shifts in HCV epidemiological trends, continuous development and approval of therapeutic strategies, and changes in public health policies. Thus, the current comprehensive review aimed to integrate the latest knowledge on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic approaches, treatment options and preventive strategies for HCV, with a particular focus on the current challenges associated with RASs and ongoing efforts in vaccine development. This review sought to provide healthcare professionals, researchers, and policymakers with the necessary insights to address the HCV burden more effectively. We aimed to highlight the progress made in managing and preventing HCV infection and to highlight the persistent barriers challenging the prevention of HCV infection. The overarching goal was to align with global health objectives towards reducing the burden of chronic hepatitis, aiming for its eventual elimination as a public health threat by 2030.

Information about pan-genotypic treatments for hepatitis in Portugal is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of glecaprevir plus pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in real-world clinical practice.

An observational prospective study was implemented in six hospitals with 121 adult HCV patients who initiated treatment with GLE/PIB between October 2018 and April 2019, according to clinical practice. Eligible patients had confirmed HCV infection genotype (GT) 1 to 6 and were either treatment-naïve or had experience with interferon-, ribavirin- or sofosbuvir-based regimens, with or without compensated cirrhosis. Baseline sociodemographic and safety data are described for the total population (N = 115). Effectiveness [sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12)] and patient-reported outcomes are presented for the core population with sufficient follow-up data (n = 97).

Most patients were male (83.5%), aged < 65 years (94.8%), with current or former alcohol consumption (77.3%), illicit drug use (72.6%), and HCV acquisition through intravenous drug use (62.0%). HIV co-infection occurred in 22.6% of patients. The prevalence of each GT was: GT1 51.3%, GT2 1.7%, GT3 30.4%, GT4 16.5%, and GT5.6 0%. Most patients were non-cirrhotic (80.9%) and treatment-naïve (93.8%). The SVR12 rates were 97.9% (95% CI: 92.8 - 99.4), and > 95% across cirrhosis status, GT, illicit drug use, alcohol consumption, and HCV treatment experience. The adverse event rate was 2.6%, and no patient discontinued treatment due to adverse events related to GLE/PIB.

Consistent with other real-world studies and clinical trials, treatment with GLE/PIB showed high effectiveness and tolerability overall and in difficult-to-treat subgroups (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03303599).

With the introduction of highly effective and safe therapies with next-generation direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), that act without interferon, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains the only treatable chronic infectious disease.

The review aims to provide an overview of the therapy revolution with a description of specific DAAs, their mechanisms of action, a summary of the safety and efficacy of specific regimens, and a discussion of populations requiring special therapeutic approaches.

DAAs are highly effective, safe, and easy to use. However, challenges such as access to health services and loss of patients from the cascade of care, especially in groups disproportionately affected by HCV infection, such as substance abusers, make it difficult to achieve the WHO's goal of HCV elimination. The proposed strategy to combat these difficulties involves a one-step approach to diagnosing and treating the infection, the availability of long-lasting forms of medication, and the development of an effective vaccine. The aforementioned opportunities are all the more important as the world is facing an opioid epidemic that is translating into an increase in HCV prevalence. This phenomenon is of greatest concern in women of childbearing age and in those already pregnant due to treatment limitations.

Prevalence of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among pregnant people is increasing in the US. HCV is transmitted vertically in 7% to 8% of births. Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy was recently approved for children with HCV who are 3 years or older. The clinical and economic impacts of early DAA therapy for young children with HCV, compared with treating at older ages, are unknown.

To develop a state-transition model to project clinical and economic outcomes for children with perinatally acquired HCV to investigate the cost-effectiveness of treating at various ages.

The study team modeled the natural history of perinatally acquired HCV to simulate disease progression and costs of a simulated a cohort of 1000 US children with HCV from 3 years old through death. Added data were analyzed January 5, 2021, through July 1, 2022.

The study compared strategies offering 8 weeks of DAA therapy at 3, 6, 12, or 18 years old, as well as a comparator of never treating HCV.

Outcomes of interest include life expectancy from 3 years and average lifetime per-person health care costs. Other clinical outcomes include cases of cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

The study team projected that treating HCV at 3 years old was associated with lower mean lifetime per-person health care costs ($148 162) than deferring treatment until 6 years old ($164 292), 12 years old ($171 909), or 18 years old ($195 374). Projected life expectancy was longest when treating at 3 years old (78.36 life years [LYs]) and decreased with treatment deferral until 6 years old (76.10 LYs), 12 years old (75.99 LYs), and 18 years old (75.46 LYs). In a cohort of 1000 children with perinatally acquired HCV, treating at 3 years old prevented 89 projected cases of cirrhosis, 27 cases of HCC, and 74 liver-related deaths compared with deferring treatment until 6 years old. In sensitivity analyses, increasing loss to follow-up led to even greater clinical benefits and cost savings with earlier treatment.

These study results showed that DAA therapy for 3-year-old children was projected to reduce health care costs and increase survival compared with deferral until age 6 years or older. Measures to increase DAA access for young children will be important to realizing these benefits.

In patients with chronic hepatitis C, 8 weeks of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) treatment for chronic hepatitis (non-cirrhosis) and 12 weeks for cirrhosis have been approved in Japan. However, whether 8 weeks of treatment for cirrhosis may reduce treatment efficacy has not been adequately investigated.

This prospective, nationwide, multicenter cohort study enrolled 1275 patients with chronic hepatitis C who received GLE/PIB therapy. The effect of liver fibrosis and treatment periods on the efficiency of GLE/PIB therapy was investigated. The primary endpoint was the sustained virological response (SVR) rate in patients with chronic hepatitis (non-cirrhosis) and cirrhosis. The association between treatment periods and liver fibrosis on the SVR after 12 weeks of treatment rate was investigated.

The SVR rates in patients with chronic hepatitis with 8 weeks of treatment, chronic hepatitis with 12 weeks of treatment, cirrhosis with 8 weeks of treatment, and cirrhosis with 12 weeks of treatment were 98.9% (800/809), 100% (87/87), 100% (166/166), and 99.1% (211/213), respectively, and were was not different among these groups (P = 0.4).

GLE/PIB therapy for chronic hepatitis C had high efficacy regardless of liver fibrosis status and treatment periods. Periods of GLE/PIB therapy could be chosen with available modalities, and high SVR rates could be achieved regardless of the decision.

GRAND PLAN is a prospective, open-label, phase 4 study. Based at a single center and with a single arm, GRAND PLAN evaluated the safety and efficacy of an 8-week course of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) among active drug users with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in a population enriched for factors that may reduce treatment uptake and success, such as disengagement from health care and unstable housing.

Participants were ≥19 years old and actively using drugs and were confirmed viremic, noncirrhotic, and HCV treatment naive. All participants provided informed consent before any study procedures. They received G/P for 8 weeks within a multidisciplinary model of care, with daily, weekly, or monthly dispensing of medications to optimize adherence.

We identified 117 eligible patients with a median age of 46 years (range, 22-75): 27% were female, 21.4% were Indigenous, 48.7% were unstably housed, and 95.7% were active drug users (94.9% fentanyl). One patient did not start treatment, and 4 underwent <1 week of treatment, leaving 112 completed treatments with 94.6% picking up medications weekly. HCV RNA was undetectable at the end of treatment in all 112 patients. One died of unknown causes shortly after treatment. A cure was demonstrated in 108 of 111 (97.3%) cases at the SVR12 time point (sustained virologic response at ≥12 weeks); the other 3 experienced virologic relapse. Considering the entire cohort, the intent-to-treat success rate was 92.3% (108/117). HCV reinfection was documented at SVR24 in 5 cases, 2 of which were successfully retreated.

GRAND PLAN demonstrates that administration of an 8-week course of G/P to inner-city residents with HCV infection leads to a cure >95%. With a short course of treatment, G/P is an attractive option for this population in helping us achieve the World Health Organization's HCV objectives by 2030.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) management in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is uncertain. The ECCO guidelines 2021 recommended HCV treatment but warn about the risk of IBD reactivation. We aimed to evaluate 1) the effectiveness and safety of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in IBD; 2) the interaction of DAAs with IBD drugs.

Multicentre study of IBD patients and HCV treated with DAAs. Variables related to liver diseases and IBD, as well as adverse events (AEs) and drug interactions, were recorded. McNemar's test was used to assess differences in the proportion of active IBD during the study period.

We included 79 patients with IBD and HCV treated with DAAs from 25,998 IBD patients of the ENEIDA registry. Thirty-one (39.2 %) received immunomodulators/biologics. There were no significant differences in the percentage of active IBD at the beginning (n = 11, 13.9 %) or at the 12-week follow-up after DAAs (n = 15, 19 %) (p = 0.424). Sustained viral response occurred in 96.2 % (n = 76). A total of 8 (10.1 %) AEs occurred and these were unrelated to activity, type of IBD, liver fibrosis, immunosuppressants/biologics, and DAAs.

We demonstrate a high efficacy and safety of DAAs in patients with IBD and HCV irrespective of activity and treatment of IBD.

In 2019, an 8-week regimen of glecaprevir/ pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) was FDA-approved for treatment of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) in patients with cirrhosis. We used data from the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study (CHeCS) to evaluate treatment response and adverse events among patients with HCV and cirrhosis under routine clinical care.

Using an intention-to-treat (ITT)/modified ITT (mITT) approach, endpoints were (1) sustained virological response (SVR) at 12 weeks (SVR12) post-treatment; and (2) adverse events (AEs)/serious AEs during treatment. Patients with cirrhosis from two CHeCS sites were included if they were prescribed GLE/PIB from August 2017 to June 2020. Detailed treatment and clinical data were collected. Patient baseline characteristics were described with mean/standard deviation (std) for continuous variables, and proportions for categorical variables. Analyses were propensity score adjusted. The final model retained variables that were significant with p value < 0.05.

The ITT sample included 166 patients, with 43, 116, and 7 patients in the 8-week, 12-week, and > 12-week planned treatment groups. Among them, 159 had confirmed SVR (95.8%, LCL 93.2%). The mITT analysis included 160 patients after excluding 6 with unknown HCV RNA results; 159 achieved SVR (99.4%, LCL 98.3%). There were no significant differences in rates of SVR between the 8-week and 12-week regimens in either analysis, nor any association with patient characteristics. SAEs were experienced by 1 patient (2%) in the 8-week group, 7 (5%) in the 12-week group (including one death), and 2 (29%) in the > 12-week group; 4 patients (from the 12-week group) experienced serious AEs or hepatic events that were "likely attributable" to GLE/PIB treatment.

An 8-week regimen of GLE/PIB is well tolerated and highly effective among US patients with HCV and cirrhosis receiving routine clinical care.

Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have revolutionized the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, resulting in a high sustained virologic response (SVR) rate. However, the published data from the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia are limited to small patient groups and specific DAAs used for patients with genotype-4.(GT-4). This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of DAAs for treating HCV infection in Saudi Arabia in a real-life setting.

This retrospective study from January 2015 to December 2019 included all HCV-infected patients who received DAAs at a tertiary university hospital in Saudi Arabia. Baseline characteristics and laboratory data were collected from health records, including HCV RNA level, genotype, and presence of liver cirrhosis or steatosis. The primary outcome was undetectable HCV RNA at 12 weeks posttreatment (SVR12). Results were stratified based on different DAAs and HCV genotypes. Treatment-related adverse events were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0.

Of the 117 patients included, 43.2% had advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, and the majority (90.6%) were treatment-naïve. The mean age was 50.1 ± 15.5 years, with 57.3% females. The most common genotype was GT-4 (44.4%), followed by GT-1 (40.2%). Most patients (64.3%) received sofosbuvir and daclatasvir ± ribavirin, while the remaining patients received various DAAs. Overall, 98.3% of the patients achieved SVR12. The therapy was well tolerated, with fatigue and headache being the most common side effects.

Treatment with DAAs is highly effective across different genotypes and various DDA regimens in the real world for treating HCV infection in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia, contributing to improved patient outcomes and the overall goal of HCV elimination.

Epidemiological data are crucial to monitoring progress towards the 2030 Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) elimination targets. Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of chronic HCV infection (cHCV) in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) countries in 2019.

Multi-parameter evidence synthesis (MPES) was used to produce national estimates of cHCV defined as: π = πrecρrec + πexρex + πnonρnon; πrec, πex, and πnon represent cHCV prevalence among recent people who inject drugs (PWID), ex-PWID, and non-PWID, respectively, while ρrec, ρex, and ρnon represent the proportions of these groups in the population. Information sources included the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) national operational contact points (NCPs) and prevalence database, the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction databases, and the published literature.

The cHCV prevalence in 29 of 30 EU/EEA countries in 2019 was 0.50% [95% Credible Interval (CrI): 0.46%, 0.55%]. The highest cHCV prevalence was observed in the eastern EU/EEA (0.88%; 95% CrI: 0.81%, 0.94%). At least 35.76% (95% CrI: 33.07%, 38.60%) of the overall cHCV prevalence in EU/EEA countries was associated with injecting drugs.

Using MPES and collaborating with ECDC NCPs, we estimated the prevalence of cHCV in the EU/EEA to be low. Some areas experience higher cHCV prevalence while a third of prevalent cHCV infections was attributed to PWID. Further efforts are needed to scale up prevention measures and the diagnosis and treatment of infected individuals, especially in the east of the EU/EEA and among PWID.

ECDC.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been a major global health concern, with a significant impact on public health. In recent years, there have been remarkable advancements in our understanding of HCV and the development of novel therapeutic agents. The Saudi Society for the Study of Liver Disease and Transplantation formed a working group to develop HCV practice guidelines in Saudi Arabia. The methodology used to create these guidelines involved a comprehensive review of available evidence, local data, and major international practice guidelines regarding HCV management. This updated guideline encompasses critical aspects of HCV care, including screening and diagnosis, assessing the severity of liver disease, and treatment strategies. The aim of this updated guideline is to assist healthcare providers in the management of HCV in Saudi Arabia. It summarizes the latest local studies on HCV epidemiology, significant changes in virus prevalence, and the importance of universal screening, particularly among high-risk populations. Moreover, it discusses the promising potential for HCV elimination as a public health threat by 2030, driven by effective treatment and comprehensive prevention strategies. This guideline also highlights evolving recommendations for advancing disease management, including the treatment of HCV patients with decompensated cirrhosis, treatment of those who have previously failed treatment with the newer medications, management in the context of liver transplantation and hepatocellular carcinoma, and treatment for special populations.

Effective direct-acting antiviral treatment against hepatitis C virus infection is available in many countries worldwide. Despite good treatment results, a proportion of patients does not respond to treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term prognosis and the outcome of salvage therapy, after an initial treatment failure, in a nation-wide real-life setting.

Data from all adult patients registered in the national Swedish hepatitis C treatment register who did not achieve sustained virological response after initial antiviral treatment, was retrieved from 2014 through 2018.

In total, 288 patients with primary treatment failure were included, of whom 236 underwent a second treatment course as salvage therapy after a median delay of 353 (IQR: 215-650) days. Fifteen patients received a third treatment course as second salvage treatment after a further median delay of 193 (IQR: 160-378) days. One-hundred-eleven out of 124 (90%) non-cirrhotic and 62/79 (78%) cirrhotic patients achieved sustained virological response following the first salvage treatment. Sustained virological response was achieved by 108/112 (96%) patients who received a triple antiviral regimen. In total 69 patients were lost to follow-up or died waiting for salvage treatment. Baseline cirrhosis was associated with poor long-term survival.

Our study indicates that salvage therapy was effective in most patients with primary treatment failure, in particular when a triple direct acting antiviral regimen was given. To avoid the risk of death or complications, patients with primary treatment failure should be offered salvage therapy with a triple regimen, as soon as possible.

Suboptimal rates of sustained virological response have been reported in patients infected with an "unusual," non-1a/1b HCV genotype 1 subtype. The objectives of this study were to assess the proportion of non-1a/1b genotype 1 subtypes in a population of HCV-infected patients who failed to achieve sustained virological response after first-line direct-acting antiviral treatment, to virologically characterize their failures and to assess their outcomes on retreatment.

Samples addressed between January 2015 and December 2021 to the French National Reference Center for Viral Hepatitis B, C, and D were prospectively analyzed by means of Sanger and deep sequencing. Among 640 failures, 47 (7.3%) occurred in patients infected with an "unusual" genotype 1 subtype. Samples were available in 43 of them; 92.5% of these patients were born in Africa. Our results show the presence at baseline and at treatment failure of NS3 protease and/or NS5A polymorphisms conferring inherent reduced susceptibility to direct-acting antivirals in these patients, together with the presence at failure of additional resistance-associated substitutions not naturally present as dominant species, but jointly selected by first-line therapy.

Patients infected with "unusual" HCV genotype 1 subtypes are over-represented among direct-acting antiviral treatment failures. Most of them were born and likely infected in sub-Saharan Africa. "Unusual" HCV genotype 1 subtypes naturally carry polymorphisms that confer reduced susceptibility to the drugs currently used to cure hepatitis C, in particular the NS5A inhibitors. Retreatment with sofosbuvir plus an NS3 protease and an NS5A inhibitor is generally efficacious.

The EXPEDITION-8 clinical trial has demonstrated that treatment-naïve patients with compensated cirrhosis (TN/CC) of HCV genotypes 1-6 can achieve a 98% intent-to-treat sustained virologic response rate 12 weeks post-treatment with an 8-week glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) regimen. Further real-world evidence is needed to support the effectiveness of 8-week G/P in a clinical practice setting and to consolidate these treatment recommendations. The aim of this study is to contribute real-world evidence for the effectiveness of an 8-week G/P treatment in TN/CC patients with HCV genotypes 1-6.

Retrospective real-world data from 494 TN/CC patients with HCV genotypes 1-6 were collected between August 2017 to December 2020 from the Symphony Health Solutions administrative claims database. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected at baseline. Patients were required to have a follow-up HCV ribonucleic acid level at least 8 weeks or more after the end of treatment. The percentage of patients achieving a sustained virologic response (SVR) is reported.

The majority of patients were male (58%) and Caucasian (40%), with a mean age of 58 years; 74%, 12%, 12%, and 1% of patients were HCV genotype 1, 2, 3, and 4-6 infected, respectively. SVR was achieved in 95.5% of all patients. Across patient subgroups, SVR was achieved in 95.6% of patients with HCV genotype 3 and in 93% of HCV patients with a recent diagnosis of illicit drug use or abuse (within 6 months prior to G/P initiation).

Early real-world evidence indicates high effectiveness of the 8-week G/P regimen in TN/CC patients of HCV genotypes 1-6 from a large US claims database.

Large-scale real-world data of the 8-week glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) therapy for treatment-naïve patients of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with compensated cirrhosis is scarce.

The TASL HCV Registry (TACR) is an ongoing nationwide registry program that aims to set up a database and biobank of patients with chronic HCV infection in Taiwan. In this study, data were analyzed as of 31 October 2021 for treatment-naïve HCV patients with compensated cirrhosis receiving 8-week GLE/PIB therapy. Effectiveness reported as sustained virologic response at off-therapy week 12 (SVR12) and safety profiles were assessed. Patient characteristics potentially related to SVR12 were also evaluated.

Of the 301 patients enrolled, 275 had available SVR12 data. The SVR12 rate was 98.2% (270/275) in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population and 89.7% (270/301) in the ITT population. For those mITT patients with genotype 3, FibroScan > 20 kPa, platelet < 150,000/µl, and FibroScan > 20 kPa and platelet < 150,000/µl, the SVR12 rates were 100% (6/6), 100% (12/12), 98.0% (144/147), 100% (7/7), respectively. Overall, 24.9% (75/301) patients experienced adverse events (AEs). The most frequent AEs (> 5%) included fatigue (9.0%) and pruritus (7.0%). Seven (2.3%) patients experienced serious AEs and two (0.7%) resulted in permanent drug discontinuation. None of them were considered as GLE/PIB-related.

In this large-scale real-world Taiwanese cohort, 8-week GLE/PIB therapy was efficacious and well tolerated for treatment-naïve compensated cirrhosis patients. SVR12 rates were similarly high as in the clinical trials, including those with characteristics of advanced liver disease.