Prior to the commencement of treatment, it is essential to establish an objective method for accurately predicting the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). In this study, we aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict the response of HCC patients to TACE based on CT images analysis.

Public dataset from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA), uploaded in August 2022, comprised a total of 105 cases, including 68 males and 37 females. The external testing dataset was collected from March 1, 2019 to July 1, 2022, consisting of total of 26 patients who underwent TACE treatment at our institution and were followed up for at least 3 months after TACE, including 22 males and 4 females. The public dataset was utilized for ResNet50 transfer learning and ML model construction, while the external testing dataset was used for model performance evaluation. All CT images with the largest lesions in axial, sagittal, and coronal orientations were selected to construct 2.5D images. Pre-trained ResNet50 weights were adapted through transfer learning to serve as a feature extractor to derive deep features for building ML models. Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, F1-Score, confusion matrix analysis, decision curves, and calibration curves.

The AUC values for the external testing dataset were 0.90, 0.90, 0.91, and 0.89 for random forest classifier (RFC), support vector classifier (SVC), logistic regression (LR), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB), respectively. The accuracy values for the external testing dataset were 0.79, 0.81, 0.80, and 0.80 for RFC, SVC, LR, and XGB, respectively. The F1-score values for the external testing dataset were 0.75, 0.77, 0.78, and 0.79 for RFC, SVC, LR, and XGB, respectively.

The ML model constructed using deep features from 2.5D images has the potential to be applied in predicting the prognosis of HCC patients following TACE treatment.

We aimed to develop and validate a prediction model to identify HCC in focal liver lesions (FLLs) ≤20 mm among patients at risk for HCC based on clinical and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features.

Between January 2022 and July 2023, 386 patients (mean age 58 ± 11 years; 277 male) at risk for HCC with FLLs ≤20 mm and clinical and preoperative CEUS data from three centers were retrospectively enrolled. Three prediction models based on clinical data (Cli-M), CEUS features (CEUS-M), and combined clinical and CEUS features (Com-M) were constructed using the training cohort (187 patients). Their predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) in the internal and external validation cohorts. All patients were reclassified using the American College of Radiology CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) and combined with the best-performing model (modified LI-RADS).

The AUCs of Com-M were 0.873-0.951 in the training, internal, and external validation cohorts, which were higher than those of Cli-M (0.749-0.795, all P < 0.05) and CEUS-M (0.848-0.899, all P < 0.05). The sensitivity of LR-5 of modified LI-RADS was significantly improved from 83.1 % to 88.9 % (p＜0.001) in the training, internal and external validation cohort while there was no statistical different on its specificity (82.6 %-94.7 % vs 95.7 %-97.6 %., p = 0.162-0.650).

The model based on clinical and CEUS features can help identify HCC in FLLs ≤ 20 mm in high-risk patients.

The most recent comparisons between liver resection (LR) and percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) reported similar efficacy and survival outcomes for primary and secondary liver tumors ≤ 3 cm in size. Nevertheless, LR still remains the most popular treatment strategy worldwide, and percutaneous ablation is usually reserved to patients who are not surgical candidates. However, in our opinion, the debate should no longer be what is the most effective treatment for patients with resectable small liver cancer who are not candidates for liver transplantation, but rather when LR or PTA are best suited to the individual patient. Subcapsular tumors or tumors closely adjacent to critical structures or vulnerable organs should undergo LR because ablation can often not achieve an adequate safety margin. Conversely, PTA should be considered the first choice to treat central tumors because it has lower complication rates, lower costs, and shorter hospital stay. Furthermore, recent technical improvements in tumor targeting and accurate assessment of the extent of the safety margin, such as stereotactic navigation, fusion imaging and software powered by Artificial Intelligence enabling the immediate comparison between the pre-procedure planned margins and the ablation area, are also changing the approach to tumors larger than 3 cm. The next trials should be aimed at investigating up to what tumor size PTA supported by these advanced technologies can achieve outcomes comparable to LR.

Locoregional therapies play a fundamental role in the treatment of patients with early and intermediate and locally advanced hepatocellular carcinomas. With encouraging recent advances in immunotherapy-based systemic therapies, locoregional therapies are being both promoted and challenged by new systemic therapy options. Combined locoregional and systemic therapies might enhance treatment outcomes compared with either option alone. This Series paper summarises the existing data on locoregional and systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma, and discusses evidence from studies investigating their combination with a focus on their synergistic efficacy and safety.

Solitary hepatocellular carcinoma measuring ≤3 cm represents approximately 30% of hepatocellular carcinoma cases, yet treatment guidelines lack robust evidence. This study compares oncologic outcomes after ablation, liver resection, and liver transplantation for solitary, small hepatocellular carcinoma.

We systematically searched databases up to 7 February 2022, for studies including adults with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma ≤3 cm treated by any ablation, liver resection, or liver transplantation. We excluded non-hepatocellular carcinoma cancers, recurrent/metastatic diseases, and alternative therapies. A frequentist network meta-analysis assessed 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival using only adjusted effect estimates while accounting for bias risk.

We identified 80 studies (4 randomized controlled trials, 72 retrospectives, and 4 prospective cohorts) with 28,211 patients. In the network meta-analysis for 5-year overall survival (26 studies), liver transplantation was associated with the lowest mortality hazard (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.73, referenced to liver resection), followed by liver resection (reference), whereas ablation had the greatest mortality hazard (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.49, referenced to liver resection). For 5-year recurrence-free survival (19 studies), liver transplantation had the best outcome (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.63, referenced to liver transplantation), followed by liver resection (reference), with ablation showing the least favorable outcome (hazard ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-1.93, referenced to liver resection).

This network meta-analysis provides the evidence for comparing treatment modality outcomes for solitary, small (≤3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma. LT emerges as the superior choice for achieving a better 5-year OS, followed by liver resection, then ablation. When feasible to preserve liver function, liver resection can be prioritized. Ablation with close surveillance should be reserved for individuals unfit for surgery.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary liver cancer. Photon radiotherapy shows efficacy in treating HCC but carries risks of high exit dose and radiation-induced liver disease. Additionally, HCCs with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) have a poor prognosis and are associated with higher risk of death. In recent years, proton beam therapy (PBT) has emerged as a novel treatment with the ability to downstage HCC for liver transplant (LT).

This review will provide an overview of dosimetric benefits of PBT, efficacy of PBT in treating HCC, downstaging HCC-PVTT for LT, and a comparison of PBT with other non-surgical techniques. A search of PubMed until 3 September 2024 was conducted using free search and the following keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, proton beam therapy, portal vein tumor thrombosis, local ablative therapy, trans-arterial chemoembolization, stereotactic body radiotherapy, Y-90 radioembolization.

Various clinical trials using PBT have shown promising tumor local control and overall survival rates. PBT is mostly safe and efficacious for downstaging HCC-PVTT for LT. PBT has also been shown to be non-inferior to various other treatment modalities. Future research should focus on combinations of PBT with other modalities.

This article compared the efficacy and safety of repeat hepatectomy (RH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) from multiple perspectives.

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CNKI from January 2008 to December 2023. We collected all relevant articles and assessed the quality of the data. We analyzed the data for the primary outcomes of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and secondary outcomes of postoperative complications, recurrence rate, and survival benefit. Subgroup analyses were performed for tumor diameter, patient origin, and publication date.

A total of 38 studies were included, comprising 5,339 patients. OS was similar in both groups (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.84-1.00, P=0.04, Z=2.02), whereas DFS was better in the RH compared with the RFA group (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.75-0.86, P<0.00001, Z=6.15). The incidence of major complications was lower in the RFA compared with the RH group (OR: 5.06, 95% CI: 3.29-7.81, P<0.00001, Z=7.35), but the postoperative recurrence rate was better in the RH compared with the RFA group. There was no significant difference in postoperative mortality between the two groups, but hospital stay was longer in the RH compared with the RFA group. In subgroup analyses, both OS and DFS were superior in the RH compared with the RFA group among patients with tumors ≤3 cm diameter with no significant difference in the >3 cm-diameter group. There was no significant difference in OS between the two groups among Chinese or non-Chinse patients; however, DFS was higher in the RH compared with the RFA group among Chinese and non-Chinese patients. There was no significant difference in OS between the two groups in studies published pre-2015 or post-2015 group; however, DFS was superior in the RH compared with the RFA group for both pre-2015 and post-2015 studies.

RH may be the first-choice treatment considering the long-term prognosis of patients with RHCC; RFA may be a better alternative in terms of postoperative and economic factors. RH is associated with a better prognosis in patients with tumors ≤3 cm in diameter.

Few studies have compared survival outcomes between liver resection (LR) and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treating solitary 3-5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to clarify this issue.

Patients with Child-Pugh class A liver disease and a solitary HCC of 3-5 cm without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis who underwent LR or percutaneous RFA between 2011 and 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study; 310 patients underwent LR and 114 patients underwent percutaneous RFA. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline variables, including age, sex, alpha-fetoprotein level, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, between the two groups.

Before PSM, 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were significantly lower in the percutaneous RFA group than in the LR group (both p < 0.001). After PSM, 5-year OS was comparable between the two modalities (p = 0.367); however, 5-year RFS was significantly lower in the RFA group than in the LR group (p = 0.001). The two modalities did not differ in severe post-treatment complications (p = 1.000).

Five-year OS did not differ between treatment modalities for patients with a solitary HCC of 3-5 cm; however, the LR group's 5-year RFS was superior. LR should be recommended as the first-line treatment for these patients.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly immunogenic tumor and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide with an increasing incidence. Therefore, the combination of immunotherapy with other approaches, such as anti-angiogenic agents and local area therapy, has become a new strategy for HCC treatment.

We searched PubMed and Web of Science and extracted publications relating to the radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and immunotherapy. The search terms were: "radiofrequency ablation", "immunotherapy" and "hepatocellular carcinoma", and manual searches of eligible articles from literature reference lists were performed. We then thoroughly reviewed the literature on ablation combined with immunotherapy for HCC, analyzed the relevant mechanism, and explored the safety and effectiveness of this form of combination therapy.

RFA combined with immunotherapy in HCC is reported to have good efficacy and controllable safety. On the one hand, RFA can induce the immunogenic substances including Ficolin-3, IL-1 and heat shock protein and regulate the immune cells by mediating the Th1/Th2 ratio, increasing Th17 cells, etc. On the other hand, RFA treatment can lead to tumor immune microenvironment reconstruction, increasing the proportion of functional T cells and upregulate PD-1 in T cells in distant tumors without RFA. This combined strategy has the ability to enhance the anti-tumor immune response through synergies, significantly reduce the risk of recurrence and improve survival.

RFA combined with immunotherapy yields a good synergistic effect: it can further strengthen anti-tumor response, delay distant tumor growth, reduce tumor recurrence and metastasis, providing new options for HCC systemic treatment.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with advanced stages posing significant treatment challenges. Although hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has emerged as a promising modality for treating advanced HCC, particularly in Asian clinical practice, its adoption in Western medicine remains limited due to a lack of large-scale randomized controlled trials. This editorial reviews and comments on the meta-analysis conducted by Zhou et al, which evaluates the efficacy and safety of HAIC and its combination strategies for advanced HCC. The authors performed a comprehensive meta-analysis of various clinical trials and cohort studies comparing HAIC and its combinations to other first-line treatments, such as sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). In this work, HAIC showed significantly better results regarding overall survival and progression-free survival compared to sorafenib or TACE alone and their combination. HAIC in combination with lenvatinib, ablation, programmed cell death 1 inhibitors, and radiotherapy further enhanced patient outcomes, indicating a synergistic effect. This editorial focuses on the critical role of multimodal treatment strategies in managing advanced HCC. It advocates for a paradigm shift towards integrated treatment approaches to enhance survival rates and improve the quality of life in patients with advanced HCC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Excision repair cross-complement 3 (ERCC3), a key functional gene in the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway, is commonly mutated or overexpressed in cancers and is thought to be a key gene contributing to the development of HCC. The characteristics of immune cell infiltration in the global tumor microenvironment (TME) mediated by ERCC3 and its related key genes in HCC are still unclear. The aim of this study was to integrate the role of ERCC3-related key genes in assessing the TME cell infiltration characteristics, immunotherapy efficacy, and prognosis of HCC patients. This study provides a theoretical basis for the study of immunological mechanisms and prognosis prediction in HCC.

The HCC cohort from the TCGA database included 50 normal samples and 374 tumor samples to compare the differences in ERCC3-related gene expression and prognosis between liver tumor tissues and normal liver tissues and to analyze the extent to which different genes infiltrated TME cells by quantifying the relative abundance of 24 cells through single-sample genome enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). A risk score associated with the ERCC3 gene was constructed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model.

The expression of 11 ERCC3-related genes was significantly upregulated in HCC tumor tissues compared to normal liver tissues, and high expression of these genes was significantly associated with poor prognosis in HCC patients. The key genes (11 ERCC3-related genes) were closely associated with the nucleic acid reduction signaling pathway in nucleic acid metabolism and the viral oncogenic pathway, suggesting that these key genes may play a role in tumor cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, as well as in the pathogenesis of virus-associated HCC. In addition, the infiltration characteristics of TME immune cells in normal and tumor tissues were different. Immune and mesenchymal activity was significantly lower in tumor tissues than in healthy liver tissues. This study revealed that key genes were significantly positively correlated with CTLA4 and enriched in central memory CD4 T cells, effector memory CD4 T cells, activated CD4 T cells, and type 2 T helper cells. The prognostic model constructed by regression analysis could better distinguish patients into high-risk and low-risk groups, and the survival analysis showed that the survival time of patients with high-risk score subtypes was significantly lower than that of patients with low-risk scores and that the high-risk group contained higher levels of immune-suppressive cells, which may be a mediator of immune escape. Moreover, multivariate analyses showed that the risk score profile is a reliable and unbiased biomarker for assessing the prognosis of HCC patients, and its value in predicting the outcome of immunotherapy was also confirmed.

This study revealed a novel genetic signature that is significantly associated with TME cell infiltration and prognosis in HCC patients. It demonstrated that the combined action of multiple key genes associated with ERCC3 plays a crucial role in shaping the diversity and complexity of TME cell infiltrates. Evaluating the combined characteristics of multiple key genes associated with ERCC3 can help predict the outcome of immunotherapy in patients and provide new potential targets for immuno-individualized therapeutic studies on HCC.

The management of early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents significant challenges. While radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has shown safety and effectiveness in treating HCC, with lower mortality rates and shorter hospital stays, its high recurrence rate remains a significant impediment. Consequently, achieving improved survival solely through RFA is challenging, particularly in retrospective studies with inherent biases. Ultrasound is commonly used for guiding percutaneous RFA, but its low contrast can lead to missed tumors and the risk of HCC recurrence. To enhance the efficiency of ultrasound-guided percutaneous RFA, various techniques such as artificial ascites and contrast-enhanced ultrasound have been developed to facilitate complete tumor ablation. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) offers advantages over open surgery and has gained traction in various surgical fields. Recent studies suggest that laparoscopic intraoperative RFA (IORFA) may be more effective than percutaneous RFA in terms of survival for HCC patients unsuitable for surgery, highlighting its significance. Therefore, combining MIS-IORFA with these enhanced percutaneous RFA techniques may hold greater significance for HCC treatment using the MIS-IORFA approach. This article reviews liver resection and RFA in HCC treatment, comparing their merits and proposing a trajectory involving their combination in future therapy.

We aimed to develop a preoperative model to predict overall survival (OS) in patients with hepatoma undergoing liver resection (LR).

Patients who underwent LR for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0, A, or B hepatoma were enrolled. Tumor burden score (TBS) scores were determined using the following equation: TBS (Pinna et al., 2018) 2 = (largest tumor size [in cm])(Pinna et al., 2018) 2 ​+ ​(tumor number) (Pinna et al., 2018) 22. The cutoff values for radiographic TBS were based on our recently published paper: low, <2.6; medium, 2.6-7.9; high, >7.9.

Multivariate analysis showed that radiographic TBS (low: referent; medium: HR ​= ​2.89; 95 ​% CI: 1.60-5.21; p ​< ​0.001; high, HR ​= ​7.60; 95 ​% CI: 3.80-15.2; p ​< ​0.001), AFP (<400 ​ng/mL: referent; ≧400 ​ng/mL: HR ​= ​1.67, 95 ​% CI: 1.11-2.52, p ​= ​0.014), and cirrhosis (absence: referent; presence: HR ​= ​1.88, 95 ​% CI: 1.30-2.72, p ​< ​0.001) were associated with OS. A simplified risk score was superior to BCLC system in concordance index (0.688 vs. 0.623).

We have developed a preoperative model that performs better in predicting OS than the BCLC system.

Liver resection and percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) are considered curative option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to compare short- and long-term outcomes between open liver resection (OLR), laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), and PTA in elderly patients with single HCC and to define a liver map for therapeutic strategy according to HCC location and size.

A multicenter retrospective study was conducted in 10 European Hospital Center, including 239 consecutive liver resection (OLR and LLR) and PTA in elderly patients ≥ 70 years old with single HCC ≤ 30 mm. Perioperative data and long-term oncological outcomes were collected and compared between groups before and after propensity score matching.

A total of 239 patients were enrolled, distributed as follows: 61 in the ORL group, 88 in the LLR group, and 90 in the PTA group. The hospital stay was longer in OLR and LLR groups compared to the PTA group (6, 5 and 3 days, respectively, p < 0.05). Morbidity was lower in the PTA group compared to the OLR group (11 vs. 26%, respectively, p < 0.05). Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was significantly higher in the OLR and LLR groups compared to the PTA group (82, 81, and 34%, respectively, p < 0.001). Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was also significantly higher in the ORL and LLR groups compared to the PTA group (66, 50 and 20%, respectively, p < 0.001). These results were also confirmed after a propensity score matching analysis between surgery group (OLR and LLR) and the PTA group. PTA was the most used treatment for subcapsular and deep HCC not in contact with vascular structures compared to OLR and LLR.

PTA in elderly patients ensures a shorter hospital stay and lower morbidity but worst survival compared to liver resection.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), a form of thermal ablation, employs localized heat to induce protein denaturation in tissue cells, resulting in cell death. It has emerged as a viable treatment option for patients who are ineligible for surgery in various diseases, particularly liver cancer and other tumor-related conditions. In addition to directly eliminating tumor cells, RFA also induces alterations in the infiltrating cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME), which can significantly impact treatment outcomes. Moreover, incomplete RFA (iRFA) may lead to tumor recurrence and metastasis. The current challenge is to enhance the efficacy of RFA by elucidating its underlying mechanisms. This review discusses the clinical applications of RFA in treating various diseases and the mechanisms that contribute to the survival and invasion of tumor cells following iRFA, including the roles of heat shock proteins, hypoxia, and autophagy. Additionally, we analyze‌ the changes occurring in infiltrating cells within the TME after iRFA. Finally, we provide a comprehensive summary of clinical trials involving RFA in conjunction with other treatment modalities in the field of cancer therapy, aiming to offer novel insights and references for improving the effectiveness of RFA.

This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and clinical implications of bile duct changes following multibipolar radiofrequency ablation (mbpRFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Radiological, clinical, and biological data from consecutive cirrhotic patients who underwent first-line mbpRFA between 2007 and 2014 for uninodular HCC ≤ 5 cm were retrospectively collected. Follow-up imaging was reviewed to identify bile duct changes and factors associated with biliary changes were assessed using multivariable analysis. Baseline and 6-month liver function tests were compared in patients with and without bile duct changes. Complications, cirrhosis decompensation, and survival rates were compared in both groups.

A total of 231 patients (mean age 68 years [39-85], 187 men) underwent 266 mbpRFA sessions for uninodular HCC (mean size 26 mm). Of these, 76 (33%) developed bile duct changes (upstream bile duct dilatations and/or bilomas) with a mean onset time of 3 months. Identified risk factors for these changes were the infiltrative aspect of the tumor (p = 0.035) and its location in segment VIII (p < 0.01). The average increase in bilirubin at 6 months was higher in the group with biliary changes (+2.9 vs. +0.4 µg/mL; p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in terms of complications, cirrhosis decompensation at 1 year (p = 0.95), local and distant tumor progression (p = 0.91 and 0.14 respectively), and overall survival (p = 0.4) between the two groups.

Bile duct changes are common after mbpRFA for HCC, especially in tumors with an infiltrative aspect or those located in segment VIII. These changes do not appear to negatively impact the course of cirrhosis at 1 year or overall survival.

Bile duct changes following mbpRFA for HCC are relatively common. Nevertheless, they do not raise clinical concerns in terms of complications, deterioration in liver function, or survival rates. Consequently, specific monitoring or interventions for these bile duct changes are not warranted.

• Bile duct changes are frequently observed after multibipolar radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma, occurring in 33% of cases in our study. • Patients with bile duct changes exhibited a higher increase in bilirubin levels at 6 months but no more cirrhosis decompensation or liver abscesses. • Biliary changes following multibipolar radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma are not alarming and do not necessitate any specific monitoring or intervention.

No study has analysed the temporal trends of the long-term results and clinical characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated using radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Therefore, we examined temporal trends of characteristics of patients and treatment-naïve HCCs within the Milan criteria treated by RFA over 20 years. We retrospectively analysed 1099 patients with HCC within the Milan criteria treated with percutaneous RFA from January 2000 to December 2019. The overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and factors affecting survival and local tumor progression were analysed using the Kaplan‒Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. A trend test was performed to analyse the changing trends in participants and treatment outcomes. The overall and RFS of patients improved during the later period. In addition, viral hepatitis-related HCC incidence decreased, whereas that of alcohol- or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-related HCC increased from the earlier to the later period (P for trend < 0.001). HBV antiviral therapy was increased and improved OS and RFS in patients treated using RFA. The outcomes after RFA over a 20-year period improved due to changes over time in target tumors and patients. The results could be useful for selecting patients who will benefit from RFA.

Primary liver cancer (PLC) has placed an increasing economic and resource burden on the health care system of the United States. We attempted to quantify its epidemiology and associated costs using a national inpatient database.

Hospital discharge and insurance claims data from the National Inpatient Sample were used to conduct this analysis. Patients diagnosed with PLC (hepatocellular carcinoma or cholangiocarcinoma) were included in the study population, which was then stratified using patient demographics, comorbidities, degree of cancer spread, liver disease complications, and other descriptors. Trends were analyzed via regression curves for each of these strata from the years 2016 to 2019, with special attention to patterns in hospitalization incidence, inpatient mortality rate, total costs, and average per-capita costs. The resulting curves were evaluated using goodness-of-fit statistics and P -values.

Aggregate hospitalization incidence, inpatient mortality rates, and total costs were found to significantly increase throughout the study period ( P =0.002, 0.002, and 0.02, respectively). Relative to their demographic counterparts, males, White Americans, and those older than 65 years of age contributed the largest proportions of total costs. These population segments also experienced significant increases in total expenditure ( P =0.04, 0.03, and 0.02, respectively). Admissions deemed to have multiple comorbidities were associated with progressively higher total costs throughout the study period ( P =0.01). Of the categorized underlying liver diseases, only admissions diagnosed with alcoholic liver disease or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease saw significantly increasing total costs ( P =0.006 and 0.01), although hepatitis C was found to be the largest contributor to total expenses.

From 2016 to 2019, total costs, admission incidence, and inpatient mortality rates associated with PLC hospitalization increased. Strata-specific findings may be reflective of demographic shifts in the PLC patient populations, as well as changes in underlying chronic liver disease etiologies.

BACKGROUND. Differences in survival and morbidity among treatment options (ablation, surgical resection, and transplant) for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been well studied. Additional understanding of the costs of such care would help to identify drivers of high costs and potential barriers to care delivery. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to quantify total and patient out-of-pocket costs for ablation, surgical resection, and transplant in the management of early-stage HCC and to identify factors predictive of these costs. METHODS. This retrospective U.S. population-based study used the SEER-Medicare linked dataset to identify a sample of 1067 Medicare beneficiaries (mean age, 73 years; 674 men, 393 women) diagnosed with early-stage HCC (size ≤ 5 cm) treated with ablation (n = 623), resection (n = 201), or transplant (n = 243) between January 2009 and December 2016. Total costs and patient out-of-pocket costs for the index procedure as well as for any care within 30 and 90 days after the procedure were identified and stratified by treatment modality. Additional comparisons were performed among propensity score-matched subgroups of patients treated by ablation or resection (each n = 172). Multivariable linear regression models were used to identify factors predictive of total costs and out-of-pocket costs for index procedures as well as for 30- and 90-day post-procedure periods. RESULTS. For ablation, resection, and transplant, median index-procedure total cost was US$6689, US$25,614, and US$66,034; index-procedure out-of-pocket cost was US$1235, US$1650, and US$1317; 30-day total cost was US$9456, US$29,754, and US$69,856; 30-day out-of-pocket cost was US$1646, US$2208, and US$3198; 90-day total cost was US$14,572, US$34,984, and US$88,103; and 90-day out-of-pocket cost was US$2138, US$2462, and US$3876, respectively (all p < .001). In propensity score-matched subgroups, ablation and resection had median index-procedure, 30-day, and 90-day total costs of US$6690 and US$25,716, US$9995 and US$30,365, and US$15,851 and US$34,455, respectively. In multivariable analysis adjusting for socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, and liver-disease prognostic indicators, surgical treatment (resection or transplant) was predictive of significantly greater costs compared with ablation at all time points. CONCLUSION. Total and out-of-pocket costs for index procedures as well as for 30-day and 90-day postprocedure periods were lowest for ablation, followed by resection and then transplant. CLINICAL IMPACT. This comprehensive cost analysis could help inform future cost-effectiveness analyses.

Interventional radiology (IR) is a unique specialty that incorporates a diverse set of skills ranging from imaging, procedures, consultation, and patient management. Understanding how IR generates value to the healthcare system is important to review from various perspectives. IR specialists need to understand how to meet demands from various stakeholders to expand their practice improving patient care. Thus, this review discusses the domains of value contributed to medical systems and outlines the parameters of success. IR benefits five distinct parties: patients, practitioners, payers, employers, and innovators. Value to patients and providers is delivered through a wide set of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Payers and hospital systems financially benefit from the reduced cost in medical management secondary to fast patient recovery, outpatient procedures, fewer complications, and the prestige of offering diverse expertise for complex patients. Lastly, IR is a field of rapid innovation implementing new procedural technology and techniques. Overall, IR must actively advocate for further growth and influence in the medical field as their value continues to expand in multiple domains. Despite being a nascent specialty, IR has become indispensable to modern medical practice.

Deaths from the majority of cancers are falling globally, but the incidence and mortality from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in the United Kingdom and in other Western countries. HCC is a highly fatal cancer, often diagnosed late, with an incidence to mortality ratio that approaches 1. Despite there being a number of treatment options, including those associated with good medium to long-term survival, 5-year survival from HCC in the UK remains below 20%. Sex, ethnicity and deprivation are important demographics for the incidence of, and/or survival from, HCC. These clinical practice guidelines will provide evidence-based advice for the assessment and management of patients with HCC. The clinical and scientific data underpinning the recommendations we make are summarised in detail. Much of the content will have broad relevance, but the treatment algorithms are based on therapies that are available in the UK and have regulatory approval for use in the National Health Service.

Percutaneous image-guided tumor ablation of liver malignancies has become an indispensable therapeutic procedure. The aim of this evaluation of the prospectively managed multinational registry of the voluntary German Society for Interventional Radiology and Minimally Invasive Therapy (DeGIR) was to analyze its use, technical success, and complications in clinical practice.

All liver tumor ablations from 2018 to 2022 were included. Technical success was defined as complete ablation of the tumor with an ablative margin.

A total of 7228 liver tumor ablations from 136 centers in Germany and Austria were analyzed. In total, 31.4% (2268/7228) of patients were female. Median age was 67 years (IQR 58-74 years). Microwave ablation (MWA) was performed in 65.1% (4703/7228), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in 32.7% (2361/7228). Of 5229 cases with reported tumor etiology, 60.3% (3152/5229) of ablations were performed for liver metastases and 37.3% (1950/5229) for hepatocellular carcinoma. The median lesion diameter was 19 mm (IQR 12-27 mm). In total, 91.8% (6636/7228) of ablations were technically successful. The rate of technically successful ablations was significantly higher in MWA (93.9%, 4417/4703) than in RFA (87.3%, 2061/2361) (p < 0.0001). The total complication rate was 3.0% (214/7228) and was significantly higher in MWA (4.0%, 189/4703) than in RFA (0.9%, 21/2361, p < 0.0001). Additional needle track ablation did not increase the rate of major complications significantly (24.8% (33/133) vs. 28.4% (23/81), p = 0.56)).

MWA is the most frequent ablation method. Percutaneous image-guided liver tumor ablations have a high technical success rate, which is higher for MWA than RFA. The complication rate is generally low but is higher for MWA than RFA.

Percutaneous image-guided liver ablation using microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation are effective therapeutic procedures with low complication rates for the treatment of primary and secondary liver malignancies.

• Percutaneous image-guided liver tumor ablations have a high technical success rate, which is higher for microwave ablation than radiofrequency ablation. • Microwave ablation is the most frequent ablation method ahead of radiofrequency ablation. • The complication rate is generally low but is higher for microwave ablation than radiofrequency ablation.

Carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) is a treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that results in better outcomes with fewer side effects despite its high cost. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CIRT for HCC from medical and economic perspectives by comparing CIRT and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with localized HCC who were ineligible for surgery or radiofrequency ablation.

This study included 34 patients with HCC who underwent either CIRT or TACE at Gunma University between 2007 and 2016. Patient characteristics were employed to select each treatment group using the propensity score matching method. Life years were used as the outcome indicator. The CIRT technical fee was ¥3,140,000; however, a second CIRT treatment on the same organ within 2 years was performed for free.

Our study showed that CIRT was dominant over TACE, as the CIRT group had a higher life year (point estimate, 2.75 vs 2.41) and lower total cost (mean, ¥4,974,278 vs ¥5,284,524). We conducted a sensitivity analysis to validate the results because of the higher variance in medical costs in the TACE group, which demonstrated that CIRT maintained its cost effectiveness with a high acceptability rate.

CIRT is a cost-effective treatment option for localized HCC cases unsuitable for surgical resection.

Thermal ablative techniques such as radiofrequency and microwave ablation are minimally invasive and cost-effective approaches that are currently being adopted as alternatives to surgical resection for primary and metastatic liver malignancies. However, they are considered to be relatively contraindicated for tumors in high-risk locations due to technical difficulties and a perceived increased risk of perioperative complications. Several techniques, including artificial ascites, non-touch multibipolar ablation, and laparoscopically assisted ablation, can be used to improve the outcomes of ablation for high-risk tumors. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the techniques currently used to improve thermal ablation outcomes for high-risk liver tumors.

Liver cancer is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) makes up the majority of liver cancer cases. Despite the stabilization of incidence rates in recent years due to effective viral hepatitis treatments, as well as improved outcomes from early detection and treatment advances, the burden of HCC is anticipated to rise again due to increasing rates of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and alcohol-related liver disease. The treatment landscape is evolving and requires a multidisciplinary approach, often involving multi-modal treatments that include surgical resection, transplantation, local regional therapies, and systemic treatments. The optimal approach to the care of the HCC patient requires a multidisciplinary team involving hepatology, medical oncology, diagnostic and interventional radiology, radiation oncology, and surgery. In order to determine which approach is best, an individualized treatment plan should consider the patient's liver function, functional status, comorbidities, cancer stage, and preferences. In this review, we provide an overview of the current treatment options and key trials that have revolutionized the management of HCC. We also discuss evolving treatment paradigms for the future.

The primary objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of ablation margin quantification using a standardized scanning protocol during thermal ablation (TA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and a rigid registration algorithm. Secondary objectives were to determine the inter- and intra-observer variability of tumor segmentation and quantification of the minimal ablation margin (MAM).

Twenty patients who underwent thermal ablation for HCC were included. There were thirteen men and seven women with a mean age of 67.1 ± 10.8 (standard deviation [SD]) years (age range: 49.1-81.1 years). All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography examination under general anesthesia directly before and after TA, with preoxygenated breath hold. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography examinations were analyzed by radiologists using rigid registration software. Registration was deemed feasible when accurate rigid co-registration could be obtained. Inter- and intra-observer rates of tumor segmentation and MAM quantification were calculated. MAM values were correlated with local tumor progression (LTP) after one year of follow-up.

Co-registration of pre- and post-ablation images was feasible in 16 out of 20 patients (80%) and 26 out of 31 tumors (84%). Mean Dice similarity coefficient for inter- and intra-observer variability of tumor segmentation were 0.815 and 0.830, respectively. Mean MAM was 0.63 ± 3.589 (SD) mm (range: -6.26-6.65 mm). LTP occurred in four out of 20 patients (20%). The mean MAM value for patients who developed LTP was -4.00 mm, as compared to 0.727 mm for patients who did not develop LTP.

Ablation margin quantification is feasible using a standardized contrast-enhanced computed tomography protocol. Interpretation of MAM was hampered by the occurrence of tissue shrinkage during TA. Further validation in a larger cohort should lead to meaningful cut-off values for technical success of TA.

Worldwide, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death. The remarkable improvements in treating HCC achieved in the last years have increased the complexity of HCC management. Following the need to have updated guidelines on the multidisciplinary treatment management of HCC, the Italian Scientific Societies involved in the management of this cancer have promoted the drafting of a new dedicated document. This document was drawn up according to the GRADE methodology needed to produce guidelines based on evidence. Here is presented the first part of guidelines, focused on the multidisciplinary tumor board of experts and surgical treatments of HCC.

The liver is the most common site of metastasis from gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). We aimed to evaluate imatinib (IM) combined with hepatic resection (HR) or other local treatments such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), compared to IM monotherapy in long-term survival benefits in patients suffering from GIST liver metastases.

Our research encompassed 238 patients diagnosed with liver metastases of GISTs from January 2002 to April 2022 at the XXX Hospital of XXX University. The oncological outcomes of concern included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and liver-specific PFS.

Of all 238 patients, 126 were treated with IM alone (IM group), 81 with IM combined with HR (IM+HR group), and 31 with IM combined with RFA/TACE (IM+RFA/TACE group). The median follow-up time was 44.83 months. The median OS in the IM group was 132.60 months and was not reached in either the IM+HR group or the IM+RFA/TACE group. The 10-year OS rate in the IM+HR group was significantly superior to the IM group and the IM+RFA/TACE group (91.9% vs. 61.1% vs. 55.2%, respectively, P=0.015), and the liver-specific PFS (P=0.642) and PFS (P=0.369) in the three groups showed a beneficial trend in the combined treatment group. Multivariate analyses showed that age ≤60 years (HR 0.280, P<0.001) and IM+HR (HR 0.361, P=0.047) were independently associated with better OS. Achieving no evidence of disease (NED) through surgical intervention was independently correlated with enhanced OS (HR 0.099, P=0.034), liver-specific PFS (HR 0.388, P=0.014), and PFS (HR 0.402, P=0.004).

In patients with GIST liver metastases, IM combined with HR might improve OS in selected patients compared with IM alone and IM combined with RFA/TACE. Achieving NED status with surgical treatment of patients results in significant prolonging of OS, liver-specific PFS and PFS.

Recently, the efficacy of two low-invasive treatments, ablation, and radiotherapy, has been fully compared for the patients with the early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the comparison between radiotherapy plus ablation and ablation alone has been less frequently reported. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were searched for early-stage HCC patients treated with ablation plus radiotherapy or ablation alone. The outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias. We included 240 and 6619 patients in the radiotherapy plus ablation group and ablation group before the PSM. After PSM, 240 pairs of patients were included. The median OS (mOS) and median CSS (mCSS) of patients receiving ablation alone were longer than that of receiving radiotherapy plus ablation (mOS: 47 vs. 34 months, P = 0.019; mCSS: 77 vs. 40 months, P = 0.018, after PSM) before and after PSM. The multivariate analysis indicated that radiotherapy plus ablation independent risk factor for OS and CSS before PSM, but the significance disappeared after PSM. The detailed subgroup analyses indicated ablation alone brought more benefit in very early-stage HCC and older patients. In addition, we found different types of radiotherapy might lead to different outcomes when combined with ablation. In conclusion, ablation alone is noninferior to radiotherapy plus ablation in patients with early-stage HCC. The additional radiation prior to ablation may bring survival benefits in the patients with higher tumor stage. However, due to the risk of selection bias in that study, the results should be interpreted cautiously.

Liver lesions, including both benign and malignant tumors, pose significant challenges in interventional radiological treatment planning and prognostication. The emerging field of artificial intelligence (AI) and its integration with texture analysis techniques have shown promising potential in predicting treatment outcomes, enhancing precision, and aiding clinical decision-making. This comprehensive review aims to summarize the current state-of-the-art research on the application of AI and texture analysis in determining treatment response, recurrence rates, and overall survival outcomes for patients undergoing interventional radiological treatment for liver lesions. Furthermore, the review addresses the challenges associated with the implementation of AI and texture analysis in clinical practice, including data acquisition, standardization of imaging protocols, and model validation. Future directions and potential advancements in this field are discussed. Integration of multi-modal imaging data, incorporation of genomics and clinical data, and the development of predictive models with enhanced interpretability are proposed as potential avenues for further research. In conclusion, the application of AI and texture analysis in predicting outcomes of interventional radiological treatment for liver lesions shows great promise in augmenting clinical decision-making and improving patient care. By leveraging these technologies, clinicians can potentially enhance treatment planning, optimize intervention strategies, and ultimately improve patient outcomes in the management of liver lesions.

The optimal treatment approach in very-early and early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not precisely defined, and there is ambiguity in the literature around the comparative efficacy of surgical resection versus ablation as curative therapies for limited disease. We performed this real-world propensity-matched, multi-centre cohort study to assess for differences in survival outcomes between those undergoing resection and those receiving ablation. Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) 0/A HCC first diagnosed between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020 who received ablation or resection as initial treatment were included in the study. A total of 450 patients were included in the study from 10 major liver centres including two transplant centres. Following propensity score matching using key covariates, 156 patients were available for analysis with 78 in each group. Patients who underwent resection had significantly improved overall survival (log-rank test p = 0.023) and local recurrence-free survival (log rank test p = 0.027) compared to those who received ablation. Based on real-world data, our study supports the use of surgical resection in preference to ablation as first-line curative therapy in appropriately selected BCLC 0/A HCC patients.