This study assesses the efficacy and safety of Portal Vein Recanalization with Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (PVR-TIPS) in non-cirrhotic patients with chronic portal vein occlusion (CPVO), cavernomatous transformation, and symptomatic portal hypertension (PH) and/or portal vein thrombotic progression.

Medical records of 21 non-cirrhotic patients with CPVO and portal cavernoma undergoing PVR-TIPS were analyzed. Hemodynamic (intraprocedural reduction in portosystemic pressure gradient), clinical (data on gastrointestinal bleeding, abdominal pain, ascites, and presence of esophageal varices from imaging exams) and technical success (PVR-TIPS) assessed efficacy. Safety was determined through complications classified according to the CIRSE Classification System.

PVR-TIPS was successfully performed in all patients, resulting in a significant reduction in portal pressure gradient by 10 mmHg (21.475 ± 9.7 mmHg - 11.454 ± 5,4 mmHg, p < 0.001), alleviating portal hypertension symptoms without thrombotic progression. Clinical success included resolution or reduction of ascites (p = 0.016), gastroesophageal varices (p = 0.004), abdominal pain (p = 0.0021), and cessation of gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.021). Complications occurred in 33% of patients, including six grade III events (1 perioperative liver bleeding, 5 delayed stent occlusions) and one grade VI event resulting in death (4.8%). Primary patency rate was 76% (21.3 months, range:0.2-82), secondary patency 100% (4 months, range:3.8-40.8). Survival at follow-up was 90.4%, with one unrelated death. One patient underwent liver transplantation, three became eligible post-recanalization.

PVR-TIPS proves effective and safe in reducing portal pressure gradient, thereby alleviating PH symptoms without evidence of portal thrombosis progression in non-cirrhotic patients with CPVO and portal cavernoma. It expands therapeutic options, including liver transplantation.

Despite decreasing the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), it is still a major health care challenge. Current antiviral regimens aim to suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) activity to prevent the risk of hepatic decompensation, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Currently, pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and nucleos(t)ide analogs (NA) are the first-line choices of drugs. Peg-IFN is now discontinued due to its mode of application and side effects. NA is used once daily to suppress HBV DNA activity but has little effect on covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), so continuous long-term therapy is required to suppress HBV DNA. Due to this effect, disease remission, relapse, and even clinical flare are common phenomena after the end of treatment (EOT). This review aimed to analyze the current regimens for treating chronic hepatitis B. Their mode of action, duration of treatment, and events after stopping therapy. The review was performed using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. A search was undertaken in PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. Screening of articles was carried out to find relevant and appropriate articles. Articles were then quality-checked before inclusion. Our analysis showed that long-term finite therapy with nucleoside analogs could improve clinical outcomes and suppress viral DNA activity. However, a functional cure, loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), is rarely achieved. The decision to end treatment depends on quantitative HBsAg level (qHBsAg), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), HBV DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid), hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), and fibrosis assessment. It is concluded that patients with HBeAg negative without cirrhosis can be easily withdrawn from treatment if they have long-term viral remission and a high HBsAg loss rate. However, patients with positive HBeAg should continue treatment because there is a high chance of disease relapse and even acute flare. To predict whether patients will benefit from EOT, some immunomodulatory markers are studied, including interleukin (IL-20, IL-8), fas ligand (FASGL), and IFN gamma. Although these factors are reliable, none pose an independent effect on disease remission. Combination therapy (IFN alpha + oral nucleoside analogs) is promising but has clinical shortcomings.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a major cause of viral hepatitis globally. There is growing concern about transfusion-transmitted HEV (TT-HEV) as an emerging global health problem. HEV can potentially result in chronic infection in immunocompromised patients, leading to a higher risk of liver cirrhosis and even death. Between 0.0013% and 0.281% of asymptomatic blood donors around the world have HEV viremia, and 0.27% to 60.5% have anti-HEV immunoglobulin G. HEV is infectious even at very low blood concentrations of the virus. Immunosuppressed patients who develop persistent hepatitis E infection should have their immunosuppressant regimen reduced; ribavirin may be considered as treatment. Pegylated interferon can be considered in those who are refractory or intolerant to ribavirin. Sofosbuvir, a nucleotide analog, showed modest antiviral activity in some clinical studies but sustained viral response was not achieved. Therefore, rescue treatment remains an unmet need. The need for HEV screening of all blood donations remains controversial. Universal screening has been adopted in some countries after consideration of risk and resource availability. Various pathogen reduction methods have also been proposed to reduce the risk of TT-HEV. Future studies are needed to define the incidence of transmission through transfusion, their clinical features, outcomes and prognosis.

New hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections are decreasing owing to improved antiviral therapy and increased HBV vaccination worldwide; however, the number of HBV infections remains a major cause of liver carcinogenesis. HBV triggers cytotoxic immunity to eliminate HBV-infected cells. Therefore, the HBV pathophysiology changes in persistently infected individuals depending on host immune responses and HBV DNA proliferation state. To prevent liver cirrhosis and carcinogenesis caused by HBV, it is important to treat HBV infection at an early stage. Active treatment is recommended for the immunoactive hepatitis B surface-antigen-positive and -negative phase, but not during the immune-inactive phase or immune-tolerant phase; instead, follow-up is recommended. However, these patients should be monitored through regular blood tests to accurately diagnose the immune-inactive or -tolerant phases. The treatment regimen should be determined based on the age, sex, family history of liver cancer, and liver fibrosis status of patients. Early treatment is often recommended due to various problems during the immune-tolerant phase. This review compares the four major international practice guidelines, including those from the Japanese Society of Hepatology, and discusses strategies for chronic hepatitis B treatment during the immune-tolerant, immune-inactive, and resolved phases. Finally, recommended hepatitis B antiviral therapy and follow-up protocols are discussed.

RO7049389, an inhibitor of hepatitis B virus (HBV) capsid assembly, is being developed for the treatment of patients with chronic HBV infection. The objectives of this first-in-human study are to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), food effect, inhibitory effect on CYP3A, and effect on QT of RO7049389 in healthy participants. Five components, single-ascending-dose (SAD) cohorts, multiple-ascending-dose (MAD) cohorts, food effect assessment, drug-drug interaction assessment, and concentration-QT analysis were integrated in one study (five-in-one). Participants randomly received a single dose of 150 to 2,500 mg RO7049389 or placebo in SAD cohorts (n = 41), or multiple doses of 200 to 800 mg RO7049389 or placebo in MAD cohorts (n = 42). A single doses of 450 mg RO7049389 was administered under fasted and fed condition. The microdose of midazolam was administered before and after multiple dosing of RO7049389. Safety and tolerability were monitored throughout the study. Serial blood and urine samples were collected for the PK analysis. RO7049389 was safe and well tolerated in healthy participants. Absorption and elimination of RO7049389 occurred rapidly in plasma with minimal recovery in urine. Greater than dose-proportional increases in plasma exposure were observed. Exposure of RO7049389 (450 mg) increased by ∼2-fold when administered with a high-fat meal. The inhibition effect of RO7049389 on CYP3A was weak (<20%). No effect on QT interval was observed at up to a single dose of 2,500 mg. RO7049389 displayed a favorable safety, tolerability and PK profile suitable for further clinical development. (This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT02952924.).

The past 2 decades have seen a revolution in our approach to therapeutic immunosuppression. We have moved from relying on broadly active traditional medications, such as prednisolone or methotrexate, toward more specific agents that often target a single receptor, cytokine, or cell type, using monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins, or targeted small molecules. This change has transformed the treatment of many conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, cancers, asthma, and inflammatory bowel disease, but along with the benefits have come risks. Contrary to the hope that these more specific agents would have minimal and predictable infectious sequelae, infectious complications have emerged as a major stumbling block for many of these agents. Furthermore, the growing number and complexity of available biologic agents makes it difficult for clinicians to maintain current knowledge, and most review articles focus on a particular target disease or class of agent. In this article, we review the current state of knowledge about infectious complications of biologic and small molecule immunomodulatory agents, aiming to create a single resource relevant to a broad range of clinicians and researchers. For each of 19 classes of agent, we discuss the mechanism of action, the risk and types of infectious complications, and recommendations for prevention of infection.

Capsid assembly is a critical step in the hepatitis B virus (HBV) life cycle, mediated by the core protein. Core is a potential target for new antiviral therapies, the capsid assembly modulators (CAMs). JNJ-56136379 (JNJ-6379) is a novel and potent CAM currently in phase II trials. We evaluated the mechanisms of action (MOAs) and antiviral properties of JNJ-6379 in vitro Size exclusion chromatography and electron microscopy studies demonstrated that JNJ-6379 induced the formation of morphologically intact viral capsids devoid of genomic material (primary MOA). JNJ-6379 accelerated the rate and extent of HBV capsid assembly in vitro JNJ-6379 specifically and potently inhibited HBV replication; its median 50% effective concentration (EC50) was 54 nM (HepG2.117 cells). In HBV-infected primary human hepatocytes (PHHs), JNJ-6379, when added with the viral inoculum, dose-dependently reduced extracellular HBV DNA levels (median EC50 of 93 nM) and prevented covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) formation, leading to a dose-dependent reduction of intracellular HBV RNA levels (median EC50 of 876 nM) and reduced antigen levels (secondary MOA). Adding JNJ-6379 to PHHs 4 or 5 days postinfection reduced extracellular HBV DNA and did not prevent cccDNA formation. Time-of-addition PHH studies revealed that JNJ-6379 most likely interfered with postentry processes. Collectively, these data demonstrate that JNJ-6379 has dual MOAs in the early and late steps of the HBV life cycle, which is different from the MOA of nucleos(t)ide analogues. JNJ-6379 is in development for chronic hepatitis B treatment and may translate into higher HBV functional cure rates.

Currently, despite the use of a preventive vaccine for several decades as well as the use of effective and well-tolerated viral suppressive medications since 1998, approximately 250 million people remain infected with the virus that causes hepatitis B worldwide. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) are the leading causes of liver cancer and overall mortality globally, surpassing malaria and tuberculosis. Linkage to care is estimated to be very poor both in developing countries and in high-income countries, such as the United States, countries in Western Europe, and Japan. In the United States, by CDC estimates, only one-third of HBV-infected patients or less are aware of their infection. Some reasons for these low rates of surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment include the asymptomatic nature of chronic hepatitis B until the very late stages, a lack of curative therapy with a finite treatment duration, a complex natural history, and a lack of knowledge about the disease by both care providers and patients. In the last 5 years, more attention has been focused on the important topics of HBV screening, diagnosis of HBV infection, and appropriate linkage to care. There have also been rapid clinical developments toward a functional cure of HBV infection, with novel compounds currently being in various phases of progress. Despite this knowledge, many of the professional organizations provide guidelines focused only on specific questions related to the treatment of HBV infection. This focus leaves a gap for care providers on the other HBV-related issues, which include HBV's epidemiological profile, its natural history, how it interacts with other viral hepatitis diseases, treatments, and the areas that still need to be addressed in order to achieve HBV elimination by 2030. Thus, to fill these gaps and provide a more comprehensive and relevant document to regions worldwide, we have taken a global approach by using the findings of global experts on HBV as well as citing major guidelines and their various approaches to addressing HBV and its disease burden.

We aimed to study the aberrant DNA methylation profile associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and, to identify key genes and pathways associated with the HBV infection stage. A total of 54 antiviral treatment-naïve HBV-infected patients and six healthy controls were included. Genome-wide methylated DNA immunoprecipitation analysis was performed, as previously described, after which the chip data were preprocessed. Subsequently, Cytoscape software was used for the construction of a protein-protein interaction network, and a database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery software was used to conduct functional enrichment analysis. A total of 711 794 CpGs were obtained after data quality control, among which 152 780, 113 814, 90 747, and 175 868 CpGs showed differential methylation in acute hepatitis B (AHB) vs control, total-C vs control, CH1 vs CA1, and AHB vs total-C, respectively. Furthermore, RIPK3, PRDM10, JUN, and SNAI1 were at the center of the four associated networks, respectively. Differential methylated genes differentially methylated in these four comparisons were significantly enriched with olfactory transduction; positive regulation of transport; negative regulation of protein amino acid phosphorylation (eg, JUN), phosphorylation, phosphorus metabolic process, and phosphate metabolic process; and programmed cell death, respectively. RIPK3, PRDM10, JUN, and SNAI1 as well as olfactory transduction, positive regulation of transport, negative regulation of phosphorylation, and programmed cell death are important for the transformation associated with HBV infection stage. Moreover, JUN may be involved in HBV infection, mainly via the negative regulation of amino acid phosphorylation.

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) had been involved in liver fibrogenesis. We aimed to explore the antifibrotic activities of sorafenib and its derivative SC-1 (devoid of Raf kinase inhibition activity) both in vivo and in vitro with special focus on the STAT3 pathway in hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). The clinical role of STAT3 in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) was also investigated. Experimental fibrosis mouse models were established by thioacetamide injection and bile duct ligation in Balb/C mice and treated with sorafenib and SC-1. Rat and human HSCs were used for mechanistic investigations. Forty CHB patients were enrolled to quantify the hepatic phospho-STAT3 (p-STAT3) levels and correlated with liver fibrosis. Both sorafenib and SC-1 ameliorated liver fibrosis in vivo and promoted HSC apoptosis in vitro. p-STAT3 and downstream signals were down-regulated after sorafenib and SC-1 treatment in HSC. STAT3 overexpression in HSC enhanced cell proliferation and undermined the apoptotic effects of sorafenib and SC-1, whereas STAT3-specific inhibition promoted HSC apoptosis. Sorafenib and SC-1 activated Src-homology protein tyrosine phosphatase-1 (SHP-1) and STAT3 inhibition followed. Of particular interest, in CHB patients with advanced liver fibrosis, p-STAT3 in HSC was significantly overexpressed and positively correlated with the severity of liver fibrosis and plasma IL-6 levels. In conclusion, sorafenib and SC-1 ameliorate liver fibrosis through STAT3 inhibition in HSC and STAT3 may potentially serve as a promising fibrotic biomarker and target in liver fibrosis. SHP-1 phosphatase-directed STAT3 inhibition may represent a previously unidentified strategy for antifibrotic drug discovery.