Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease with significant morbidity and mortality if untreated. Current first-line treatment involves corticosteroids and azathioprine (AZA), which are effective but are associated with significant adverse effects and treatment intolerance. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an immunosuppressive agent with a potentially better safety profile, has emerged as an alternative. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of MMF compared to AZA in treatment-naïve AIH patients.

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Databases were searched for articles published up to May 2024. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan, employing a random-effects model.

Five studies involving 621 patients were included. MMF showed significantly higher rates of complete biochemical response compared to AZA (odds ratio [OR] 3.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.07-6.40, p < 0.00001) and lower non-response rates (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24-0.85, p = 0.01). Corticosteroid withdrawal rates were also higher in the MMF group (OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.69-4.94, p = 0.0001). Relapse rate and cumulative prednisolone dose were comparable between the two groups. MMF demonstrated a better safety profile, with significantly lower rates of gastrointestinal symptoms (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27-0.79, p = 0.005).

MMF shows superior efficacy and tolerability compared to AZA in treatment-naïve AIH patients and may serve as a preferred first-line therapy, offering improved patient adherence and clinical outcomes. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease of unknown aetiology which may affect any patient irrespective of age, sex, and ethnicity. At baseline, the clinical spectrum of the disease varies largely from asymptomatic cases to acute liver failure with massive hepatocyte necrosis. The aim of these EASL guidelines is to provide updated guidance on the diagnosis and management of AIH both in adults and children. Updated guidance on the management of patients with variants and specific forms of AIH is also provided, as is detailed guidance on the management of AIH-associated cirrhosis, including surveillance for portal hypertension and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as liver transplantation in decompensated cirrhosis.

To identify abdominal contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features associated with histopathological severity, and treatment response in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

AIH patients who had abdominal contrast MRI within 3 months of liver biopsy were retrospectively enrolled. Histopathological severity, liver volume, MRI features, laboratory tests, and treatment response were collected. MRI and serum models were constructed through stepwise univariate and multivariate logistic regression for diagnosing severe histopathology and predicting insufficient response (IR).

One hundred AIH patients were included (median age: 57.0 years, 79.0% female). For diagnosing severe portal inflammation, reticular fibrosis and volume ratio of segment V-VIII to total liver (SV-SVIII/TLV) achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.765 (95% CI 0.670-0.860). Severe confluent necrosis was modeled using hepatic fissure widening, reticular fibrosis, and volume ratio of segment I-III to segments IV-VIII, achieving an AUROC of 0.796 (95% CI 0.708-0.885). Severe histological activity was modeled using ascites, and SV-SVIII/TLV achieved an AUROC of 0.748 (95% CI 0.649-0.847). To diagnose cirrhosis, ascites, reticular fibrosis, and the volume ratio of segment I to the total liver were employed, yielding an AUROC of 0.833 (95% CI 0.716-0.949); IR (transaminases and/or immunoglobulin G remaining unnormal after 6 months of immunosuppressive treatment) was modeled using ascites, gallbladder wall edema, and transient hepatic attenuation difference, achieving an AUROC of 0.796 (95% CI 0.691-0.902).

The MRI models demonstrated relatively good performance in evaluating histopathological severity and treatment response. Combining MRI and serum models could enhance diagnostic and prognostic efficacy.

Question Abdominal contrast MRI may help clinicians better evaluate the histopathological severity and treatment response of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), but there is currently limited research. Findings Models based on MRI features perform well in diagnosing severe portal inflammation, confluent necrosis, histological activity, and cirrhosis, as well as predicting insufficient response. Clinical relevance Abdominal contrast MRI, combined with serological parameters, provides a new and stronger noninvasive method for clinically assessing AIH progression and treatment.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) occasionally complicates immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). The risk of AIH development after prednisolone (PSL) discontinuation and thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) initiation remains underrecognized.

We report two cases of AIH that developed or exacerbated after switching from PSL to TPO-RAs (avatrombopag and eltrombopag) for ITP treatment.

Case 1 developed AIH 8 months after PSL discontinuation and avatrombopag initiation. Case 2 experienced AIH exacerbation with acute decompensation of liver cirrhosis 2 months after PSL discontinuation while on eltrombopag. Both cases showed no improvement after TPO-RA discontinuation but responded well to PSL reintroduction.

PSL discontinuation likely unmasks underlying AIH in ITP patients, with TPO-RAs potentially modulating immune responses. Regular liver function monitoring is essential when transitioning ITP patients from PSL to TPO-RAs.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disorder driven by immune dysregulation, marked by reduced regulatory T cells (Tregs) and unchecked inflammation. Current therapies lack specificity and efficacy, necessitating novel approaches. This study explores gene therapy using exosome-associated adeno-associated virus (exo-AAV) to deliver the Foxp3 gene, aiming to restore Treg-mediated immune tolerance in AIH. We engineered exosomes expressing the CD4-targeting antibody on their surface, encapsulating AAV6/Foxp3, to enhance lymphoid cell specificity. In a ConA-induced murine AIH model, engineered exo-AAV administration significantly increased hepatic Treg proportions while reducing Th17 cells and inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-6), compared to control groups (unmodified exo-AAV or empty exosomes). Liver histopathology and serum ALT levels also improved in engineered exo-AAV treated mice. Mechanistically, engineered exo-AAV demonstrated superior targeting via CD4 binding, validated by immunofluorescence and nanoparticle tracking. Despite transient reductions in splenic Tregs, localized hepatic immune modulation underscored exo-AAV's efficacy. These findings highlight engineered exo-AAV as a promising strategy for precision gene therapy in AIH, overcoming limitations of traditional AAV delivery by enhancing lymphocyte-specific transduction and immune balance restoration. This approach presents a novel therapeutic avenue for systemic autoimmune diseases reliant on Treg reinforcement.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a relatively infrequent and complex liver disease characterized by acute or chronic inflammation, interface hepatitis in histology examination, elevation of immunoglobulin G (IgG), production of autoantibodies, and is often responsive to immunosuppression. The incidence of AIH has been increasing worldwide, affecting people of all ages and sexes. AIH represents a diagnostic challenge because of its heterogeneous presentation and the lack of pathognomonic findings. Even when treated, AIH can remain a progressive disease. In this review, we present recent data on the natural history of AIH and the developing evidence on the management of patients with AIH.

This review outlines the clinical presentation, risk factors linked to poorer clinical outcomes, the diagnostic algorithm, and the current management strategies for individuals living with AIH.

AIH remains a clinical challenge, and new tools for better diagnosis and stratification of risk are needed. In addition, better treatments are needed as a complete response is achieved in less than 60% of cases, and intolerance to first-line treatment is frequent. The use of biological treatment in AIH seems to improve the response rate and minimize the risk of side effects of current medication in this increasingly prevalent disease.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease which, if untreated, often leads to cirrhosis, liver failure and death. The last British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guideline for the management of AIH was published in 2011. Since then, our understanding of AIH has advanced in many areas. This update to the previous guideline was commissioned by the BSG and developed by a multidisciplinary group. The aim of this guideline is to review and summarise the current evidence, in order to inform and guide diagnosis and management of patients with AIH and its variant syndromes. The main focus is on AIH in adults, but the guidelines should also be relevant to older children and adolescents.

Uncertainties persist regarding the optimal management of acute onset of autoimmune hepatitis, including the use of corticosteroids. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of rapid versus slow corticosteroid tapering in acute onset of AIH.

A multicenter study involving patients with acute AIH was conducted. We defined acute AIH as an acute presentation (<30 days) with AIH and exhibiting no evidence of pre-existing liver diseases. Initially, corticosteroid treatment and overall outcomes were reported. Subsequently, the role of corticosteroid tapering rate in modifying outcomes across subgroups was investigated. For patients with an initial corticosteroid dose of 20 mg/day or higher, we further classified patients into rapid tapering group (duration until dose of prednisone <20 mg/day <3 weeks) and slow tapering group (duration until dose of prednisone <20 mg/day ≥3 weeks). Adverse events were defined as any of the following events, progression (e.g., acute icteric AIH progression to AS-AIH or AIH-ALF, AS-AIH progression to AIH-ALF, non-cirrhotic progression to cirrhosis, compensated cirrhosis progression to decompensation), LT, and liver-related death.

This retrospective cohort study enrolled 237 patients, with 109 presenting acute icteric AIH, 97 with acute-severe AIH (AS-AIH), and 31 with AIH-acute liver failure (ALF). Among patients with acute icteric AIH, slow tapering significantly improved adverse outcome-free survival compared to rapid tapering (99 % vs. 71 %, P < 0.0001). Similarly, in AS-AIH patients, slow tapering resulted in notably higher adverse outcome-free survival rates compared to rapid tapering (92 % vs. 54 %, P < 0.001). Slow tapering independently predicted fewer adverse events (OR 0.144; 95 % CI 0.037-0.562; P = 0.005). However, in AIH-acute liver failure (ALF) patients, tapering rate did not significantly affect adverse outcome-free survival (38 % vs. 50 %, P = 0.590). Overall, there were no significant differences in osteoporosis or infection occurrence between tapering groups in the entire acute AIH cohort.

A slow corticosteroid tapering reduced adverse outcomes in acute exacerbation of AIH patients, particularly in acute icteric AIH and AS-AIH.

Background/Objectives:Catha edulis, also known as Khat, is a stimulant with hepatotoxic properties. Studies reporting laboratory patterns are scarce. The aim was to assess the patterns associated with hepatic dysfunction due to Khat usage. Methods: Patients with liver injury and self-reported Khat consumption presenting to the gastroenterology department at the King Fahad Central Hospital in Jazan between January 2017-May 2024 were retrospectively included in the study. Patients with any signs of cirrhosis or viral hepatitis were excluded to have a more homogenous inclusion. Normal distribution was not assumed; data were presented as the median (IQR or %). Results: Sixty-three patients (of which 62 (98.4%) were male) aged 35 (29-41) years were included in the study. An IgG > 20 g/L was present in 41 (61.5%) patients, and the majority (n = 48, 76.2%) had a hepatocellular injury pattern based on an R-factor > 5. Over half of the patients had at least one positive autoantibody(ANA 47.6%; SMA 55.6% and AMA 4.8%), while 57 (90.5%) patients received immunosuppressive therapy. Conclusions: Khat-induced liver injury seems to be predominantly AIH-like in nature, given the IgG elevation, hepatocellular injury pattern, and relatively high rate of autoantibody positivity.

The liver, as the largest metabolic and detoxification organ in mammals, metabolizes approximately 80-90% of drugs. However, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is common and driven by factors such as individual variability, differences in liver metabolism, and improper drug use. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), with their self-renewal and multipotent differentiation capabilities, offer therapeutic potential, but face challenges such as limited proliferation and increased apoptosis during in vitro expansion. Although MSCs exhibit low immunogenicity, they are often cleared by the host immune system, which limits their survival and engraftment. Glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPX3) is a key antioxidant enzyme that reduces reactive oxygen species (ROS), protecting cells from oxidative damage. CD47, also known as integrin-associated protein (IAP), helps cells evade immune clearance by binding to signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) on the immune cells. Here, we used an acetaminophen (APAP)-induced DILI mouse model to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of intravenously infused MSCs overexpressing GPX3 and CD47. Compared to unmodified MSCs, modified MSCs showed improved survival, reduced liver inflammation, and alleviated oxidative damage, offering enhanced protection against APAP-induced DILI.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic, progressive inflammatory liver disease caused by autoimmune reactions, with an unknown etiology. If left untreated, it can progress to cirrhosis, liver failure, or even death. While most patients respond well to first-line treatments, a significant number experience poor responses or intolerance, requiring the use of second- or third-line therapies. Ongoing research into the pathogenesis of AIH is leading to the development of novel therapeutic approaches. This review summarized recent advancements in the treatment of AIH both domestically and internationally.

Relapse after immunosuppression (IS) treatment withdrawal is frequent in patients with Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH), and non-invasive biomarkers predictive of this risk are lacking. We assessed the frequency of circulating T cell subsets as potential biomarkers of disease activity and predictor of the risk of relapse after IS withdrawal. Serum levels of the cytokine B-cell Activating Factor (BAFF) were also investigated. Blood samples from 58 patients with active AIH, 56 AIH patients in remission, and 31 patients with NASH were analyzed. The frequency of activated CD4+ T peripheral helper (TPH) cells (CD4+CD45RA-CXCR5-PD1+CD38+) and of activated CD8+ T cells (CD8+CD45RA-PD1+CD38+) were assessed by flow cytometry. BAFF levels were determined by ELISA. Activated TPH and CD8+ T cell frequencies were significantly increased in patients with active AIH compared to remission AIH or NASH (TPH: 0.88% of total CD3+ vs. 0.42% and 0.39% respectively, p < 0.0001; CD8+ subset: 1.42% vs. 0.09% and 0.11% p < 0.0001). Among patients in remission undergoing treatment withdrawal (n = 18), those with increased frequencies of activated TPH (> 0.5% of total CD3+) and/or activated CD8+ T cells (> 0.18% total CD3+) had a higher risk of relapse (80% vs. 15% after 2 years, p = 0.0071). High BAFF serum concentration (> 213pg/ml) was also associated to a higher risk of relapse (57% vs. 11%, p = 0.0452). In conclusion, high frequency of activated TPH and of activated CD8+, as well as high levels of BAFF, before IS discontinuation, were significantly associated to a greater risk of relapse during the first two years. Thus, they represent promising biomarkers to provide personalized clinical follow-up for patients with AIH.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a serious liver disease characterized by immune disorders, particularly effector T-cell overactivation. This study aimed to explore the therapeutic effect and underlying mechanism of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle (MSC-EV) treatment on CD4+ T-cell overactivation and liver injury in AIH.

The metabolic changes of CD4+ T cells were assayed in human AIH and mouse hepatitis models. The liver protective effect of MSC-EVs was evaluated by transaminase levels, liver histopathology and inflammation. The effect of MSC-EVs on the metabolic state of CD4+ T cells was also explored.

Enhanced glycolysis (eg, ~1.5-fold increase in hexokinase 2 levels) was detected in the CD4+ T cells of AIH patient samples and mouse hepatitis models, whereas the inhibition of glycolysis decreased CD4+ T-cell activation (~1.8-fold decrease in CD69 levels) and AIH liver injury (~6-fold decrease in aminotransferase levels). MSC-EV treatment reduced CD4+ T-cell activation (~1.5-fold decrease in CD69 levels) and cytokine release (~5-fold decrease in IFN-γ levels) by reducing glycolysis (~3-fold decrease) while enhancing mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (~2-fold increase in maximal respiration) in such cells. The degree of liver damage in AIH mice was ameliorated after MSC-EV treatment (~5-fold decrease in aminotransferase levels). MSC-EVs carried abundant mitochondrial proteins and might transfer them to metabolically reprogram CD4+ T cells, whereas disrupting mitochondrial transfer impaired the therapeutic potency of MSC-EVs in activated CD4+ T cells.

Disordered glucose metabolism promotes CD4+ T-cell activation and associated inflammatory liver injury in AIH models, which can be reversed by MSC-EV therapy, and this effect is at least partially dependent on EV-mediated mitochondrial protein transfer between cells. This study highlights that MSC-EV therapy may represent a new avenue for treating autoimmune diseases such as AIH.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare disease with a complex and not fully understood pathogenesis. Prognostic factors that might influence treatment response, relapse rates, and transplant-free survival are not well established. This study investigates clinical and biochemical markers associated with response to immunosuppression in patients with AIH.

This retrospective cohort study included 102 patients with AIH treated with immunosuppressants and followed at the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil, from 1990 to 2018. Pretreatment data such as clinical profiles, laboratory, and histological exams were analyzed regarding biochemical response at one year, histological remission, relapse, and death/transplantation rates.

Cirrhosis was present in 59 % of cases at diagnosis. One-year biochemical remission was observed in 55.7 % of the patients and was found to be a protective factor for liver transplant. Overall survival was 89 %. Patients with ascites at disease onset showed a higher aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/ alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio and elevated Model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. The presence of ascites was significantly associated with a 20-fold increase in mortality rate.

AIH has a severe clinical phenotype in Brazilians, with high rates of cirrhosis and low remission rates. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential for achieving remission and reducing complications. The presence of ascites is significantly associated with mortality, emphasizing the importance of monitoring and prompt intervention. This study also stresses the need for further research on AIH in Latin America.

The characteristics of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in Asia mostly remain elusive.

A cohort study of liver biopsy-proven AIH patients was conducted in a tertiary care cancer of Taiwan.

From 1999 to 2022, of 13,766 patients who underwent liver biopsy, 150 patients with AIH were enrolled. The female-to-male ratio was 2.26. At baseline, the mean age was 51.09 years, mean alanine aminotransferase level was 494.11 U/L, and 17 (11.3%) had cirrhosis. All except one patient had AIH type 1. The females were older and had higher baseline cirrhosis rates than did the males. The 23-year cumulative incidences of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), mortality/liver transplantation, autoimmune diseases and extrahepatic cancer were 64.2%, 13.3%, 23.4%, 30.7% and 21.2%, respectively. The 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year and 20-year postimmunosuppressive therapy relapse rates were 60%, 78.2%, 81.8%, 89.1%, 94.5% and 100%, respectively. Baseline associations were as follows: alkaline phosphatase (Alk-p) levels with postimmunosuppressive therapy flare [hazard ratio (HR): 1.003; 95% CI HR: 1.000-1.005]; age with HCC (1.072; 1.010-1.138) and all-cause cancer (1.041;1.005-1.079); cirrhosis with mortality/liver transplantation (11.933;1.984-71.787); and antinuclear antibody (ANA) titers with mortality/liver transplantation (1.001;1.000-1.003), cirrhosis (1.001;1.000-1.002), and autoimmune diseases (1.001; 1.000-1.002).

In an Asian country endemic for viral hepatitis, the female-to-male and baseline cirrhosis rates of AIH patients were lower than expected, while over 60% of the patients eventually developed cirrhosis. The high posttherapy relapse rate warrants cautious monitoring, particularly for patients with high baseline Alk-p levels. Baseline age, cirrhosis status and ANA titers are crucial for outcomes.

Changes in plasma protein glycosylation are known to functionally affect proteins and to associate with liver diseases, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a liver disease characterized by liver inflammation and raised serum levels of IgG, and is difficult to distinguish from other liver diseases. The aim of this study was to examine plasma and IgG-specific N-glycosylation in AIH and compare it with healthy controls and other liver diseases.

In this cross-sectional cohort study, total plasma N-glycosylation and IgG Fc glycosylation analysis was performed by mass spectrometry for 66 AIH patients, 60 age- and sex-matched healthy controls, 31 primary biliary cholangitis patients, 10 primary sclerosing cholangitis patients, 30 non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients and 74 patients with viral or alcoholic hepatitis. A total of 121 glycans were quantified per individual. Associations between glycosylation traits and AIH were investigated as compared to healthy controls and other liver diseases.

Glycan traits bisection (OR: 3.78 [1.88-9.35], p-value: 5.88 × 10- 3), tetraantennary sialylation per galactose (A4GS) (OR: 2.88 [1.75-5.16], p-value: 1.63 × 10- 3), IgG1 galactosylation (OR: 0.35 [0.2-0.58], p-value: 3.47 × 10- 5) and hybrid type glycans (OR: 2.73 [1.67-4.89], p-value: 2.31 × 10- 3) were found as discriminators between AIH and healthy controls. High A4GS differentiated AIH from other liver diseases, while bisection associated with cirrhosis severity.

Compared to other liver diseases, AIH shows distinctively high A4GS levels in plasma, with potential implications on glycoprotein function and clearance. Plasma-derived glycosylation has potential to be used as a diagnostic marker for AIH in the future. This may alleviate the need for a liver biopsy at diagnosis. Glycosidic changes should be investigated further in longitudinal studies and may be used for diagnostic and monitoring purposes in the future.

The primary therapy of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) has been established for over three decades. This review focuses on updates in the evaluation and management of patients with AIH.

The evaluation of patients has recently been updated to include more definitive screening for other autoimmune diseases, including thyroid disease and celiac disease. Antibody detection by ELISA, an easier and more commonly available method, has been incorporated into the latest iteration of the AIH scoring system. Corticosteroids and AZA remain the backbone of AIH treatment, but there is growing evidence for mycophenolate mofetil as both first-line and second-line therapy, and growing inquiry into calcineurin inhibitors. Noninvasive markers of liver disease have now been validated in AIH, with the strongest evidence for VCTE in patients with minimal hepatic inflammation.

Recent research of alternative immunosuppressant therapies, noninvasive markers of fibrosis, and updated society guidelines, have improved our ability to evaluate, treat, and follow patients with AIH.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare yet potentially life-threatening disease. Besides intrinsic DILI, which is mainly caused by paracetamol overdosing and which is dose-dependent and predictable, there is idiosyncratic DILI-an unpredictable and dose-independent injury of the liver caused by certain medications that only occurs in a minority of patients taking this drug. The reason why some patients react with DILI towards a specific drug is still unknown. However, the immune system plays a central role, which is underlined by the association of certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) polymorphisms and DILI caused by specific drug classes. Due to the immunological processes that lead to the liver injury in DILI, there are great overlaps regarding laboratory and histological parameters between DILI and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Differentiating DILI and AIH can therefore be challenging, especially at the time of presentation. In addition, there are other immunologically mediated DILI phenotypes, in particular the newly defined drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH) and liver injuries caused by checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). DI-ALH is characterized by autoimmune features and good responses towards corticosteroids, with the difference that DI-ALH mostly does not relapse after discontinuation of corticosteroids. CPI-induced liver injury has become more frequent with the rising use of those drugs and is characterized by a distinct histopathological pattern with granulomatous hepatitis and infiltration dominated by cytotoxic T cells. Similarly, the recently recognized liver injury following vaccinations also shows an autoimmune phenotype; however, in contrast to AIH, cytotoxic T cells seem to dominate the inflammatory infiltrates in the liver.

Patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) almost invariably require lifelong immunosuppressive treatment. There is genuine concern about the efficacy and tolerability of the current standard combination therapy of prednisolone and azathioprine. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as an alternative option. The aim of this study was to compare MMF to azathioprine as induction therapy for AIH.

In this 24-week, prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre superiority trial, 70 patients with treatment-naive AIH received either MMF or azathioprine, both in combination with prednisolone. The primary endpoint was biochemical remission defined as normalisation of serum levels of alanine aminotransferase and IgG after 24 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability.

Seventy patients (mean 57.9 years [SD 14.0]; 72.9% female) were randomly assigned to the MMF plus prednisolone (n = 39) or azathioprine plus prednisolone (n = 31) group. The primary endpoint was met in 56.4% and 29.0% of patients assigned to the MMF group and the azathioprine group, respectively (difference, 27.4 percentage points; 95% CI 4.0 to 46.7; p = 0.022). The MMF group exhibited higher complete biochemical response rates at 6 months (72.2% vs. 32.3%; p = 0.004). No serious adverse events occurred in patients who received MMF (0%) but serious adverse events were reported in four patients who received azathioprine (12.9%) (p = 0.034). Two patients in the MMF group (5.1%) and eight patients in the azathioprine group (25.8%) discontinued treatment owing to adverse events or serious adverse events (p = 0.018).

In patients with treatment-naive AIH, MMF with prednisolone led to a significantly higher rate of biochemical remission at 24 weeks compared to azathioprine combined with prednisolone. Azathioprine use was associated with more (serious) adverse events leading to cessation of treatment, suggesting superior tolerability of MMF.

This randomised-controlled trial directly compares azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil, both in combination with prednisolone, for the induction of biochemical remission in treatment-naive patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Achieving complete remission is desirable to prevent disease progression. Patients assigned to the mycophenolate mofetil group reached biochemical remission more often and experienced fewer adverse events. The findings in this trial may contribute to the re-evaluation of international guidelines for the standard of care in treatment-naive patients with autoimmune hepatitis.

#NCT02900443.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare autoimmune inflammation of the liver mostly with a chronic course, which can also be acutely manifested up to acute liver failure. It affects women 3-4 times more frequently than men and can be diagnosed in all age groups. In one third of the patients a liver cirrhosis is present at the time of diagnosis. It is characterized by a hepatic inflammation pattern, a polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia of immunoglobulin G and the detection of autoantibodies. A liver biopsy is necessary to make the diagnosis. The AIH is histologically characterized in particular by a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate in the portal fields. In cases with a relevant disease activity, AIH is typically treated by immunosuppression. The immunosuppressive treatment is associated with a prevention of disease progression to liver cirrhosis and a better survival. The success of treatment is measured by achieving biochemical remission, i.e., normalization of the transaminase and immunoglobulin G levels as a good noninvasive predictor of a histological remission. Another treatment target is an improvement of the symptoms of the patient. The first-line treatment consists of a glucocorticoid, mostly prednisolone or in cases without advanced fibrosis budesonide, and azothioprine. For reduction of steroid-specific treatment side effects the maintenance treatment should be carried out steroid-free whenever possible. In cases of insufficient response to azothioprine or side effects a treatment attempt using antimetabolites, such as 6‑mercaptopurine or mycophenolate mofetil is primarily carried out as second-line treatment. For patients who do not achieve biochemical remission through first-line or second-line treatment, a variety of medications are available for third-line treatment, e.g., rituximab, calcineurin inhibitors or antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) antibodies. Third-line treatment should be carried out in expert centers and registered in the European Reference Network for Rare Liver Diseases in order to improve the currently sparse database for these forms of treatment in the future.

The first-line treatment for autoimmune hepatitis involves the use of prednisone or prednisolone either as monotherapy or in combination with azathioprine (AZA). Budesonide has shown promise in inducing a complete biochemical response (CBR) with fewer adverse effects and is considered an optional first-line treatment, particularly for patients without cirrhosis; however, it is worth noting that the design of that study favored budesonide. A recent real-life study revealed higher CBR rates with prednisone when equivalent initial doses were administered. Current guidelines recommend mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for patients who are intolerant to AZA. It is important to mention that the evidence supporting this recommendation is weak, primarily consisting of case series. Nevertheless, MMF has demonstrated superiority to AZA in the context of renal transplant. Recent comparative studies have shown higher CBR rates, lower therapeutic failure rates, and reduced intolerance in the MMF group. These findings may influence future guidelines, potentially leading to a significant modification in the first-line treatment of autoimmune hepatitis. Until recently, the only alternative to corticosteroids was lifelong maintenance treatment with AZA, which comes with notable risks, such as skin cancer and lymphoma. Prospective trials are essential for a more comprehensive assessment of treatment suspension strategies, whether relying on histological criteria, strict biochemical criteria, or a combination of both. Single-center studies using chloroquine diphosphate have shown promising results in significantly reducing relapse rates compared to placebo. However, these interesting findings have yet to be replicated by other research groups. Additionally, second-line drugs, such as tacrolimus, rituximab, and infliximab, should be subjected to controlled trials for further evaluation.

Pediatric autoimmune hepatitis (PAIH) is a rare necro-inflammatory disease of the liver of unknown etiology thought to derive from the dysregulation of the immune response upon exposure to environmental triggers in genetically predisposed individuals [...].

Pulse steroid therapy occasionally causes drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-ALH), but the long-term outcome of treated patients is not well known. In this study, we investigated the long-term outcomes of DI-ALH due to pulse steroid therapy.

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 405 patients treated with pulse high-dose methylprednisolone in Kurashiki Central Hospital. The frequency and clinicopathological characteristics of acute liver injury that occurred within 3 months after the therapy were analyzed. The diagnosis of DI-ALH was made according to the revised international autoimmune hepatitis group criteria.

Among the 405 patients treated with methylprednisolone, 61 (15.1%) had acute liver injury after the pulse steroid therapy, and DI-ALH was diagnosed in five patients (1.2%). Absence of oral prednisolone tapering after the pulse steroid therapy was a significant risk factor for the subsequent development of DI-ALH (odds ratio 11.9; p = 0.017). One patient was treated with 3 days of intravenous methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisolone. Two patients were treated with glycyrrhizin followed by oral prednisolone due to ineffectiveness of glycyrrhizin. Remission was achieved with glycyrrhizin alone, and spontaneous remission without drug therapy occurred in one patient each. During the median follow-up period of 34 months, no relapse was evident in all the patients without maintenance therapy.

Pulse steroid therapy can cause DI-ALH, especially when subsequent prednisolone is not tapered. Prednisolone is effective for DI-ALH due to pulse steroid therapy, and can be safely withdrawn once remission is achieved.

Assessment of liver inflammation plays a vital role in the management of patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). We aimed to establish and validate a nomogram to predict severe liver inflammation in AIH patients.

AIH patients who underwent liver biopsy were included and randomly divided into a training set and a validation set. Independent predictors of severe liver inflammation were selected by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression from the training set and used to conduct a nomogram. Receiver characteristic curves (ROC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were adopted to evaluate the performance of nomogram.

Of the 213 patients, female patients accounted for 83.1% and the median age was 53.0 years. The albumin, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, total bilirubin, red cell distribution width, prothrombin time, and platelets were independent predictors of severe inflammation. An online AIHI-nomogram was established and was available at https://ndth-zzy.shinyapps.io/AIHI-nomogram/. The calibration curve revealed that the AIHI-nomogram had a good agreement with actual observation in the training and validation sets. The area under the ROCs of AIHI-nomogram were 0.795 in the training set and 0.759 in the validation set, showing significantly better performance than alanine aminotransferase and immunoglobulin G in the training and validation sets, as well in AIH patients with normal ALT in the training set. DCA indicated that the AIHI-nomogram was clinically useful.

This novel AIHI-nomogram provided an excellent prediction of severe liver inflammation in AIH patients and could be used for the better management of AIH.

Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the liver of unknown aetiology characterized by polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia and circulating autoantibodies. Objective of the study is to find out the prevalence of autoimmune hepatitis and its causative autoantibody (Anti-nuclear, anti-smooth muscle, anti-liver kidney microsomes-1) following comprehensive diagnostic criteria given by International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group.

250 patients with raised aminotransferase but, negative for the commonest three clinical conditions viz, viral hepatitis, drug induced liver injury and alcohol induced liver injury were suspected to be a case of autoimmune hepatitis. Recent IAIHG criteria was followed in making diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. We did the investigation for viral hepatitis (acute/chronic), drug induced liver injury and alcohol induced liver injury and then measured serum IgG. Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF) was done for Anti-nuclear antibody and was also done for anti-smooth muscle antibody and anti-liver kidney microsomes-1 antibody simultaneously.

As per IAIHG criteria, out of 250 patients, Ig "G" was elevated in 88 patients with significant titres for Anti-nuclear antibody (50 patients), anti-smooth muscle antibody (65 patients), anti-liver kidney microsomes-1 antibody (7 patients) and Anti-mitochondrial antibody (18 patients) were found. As per International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group Comprehensive scoring system, probable diagnosis was made in 83 patients (33.2%) and 12 were confirmed for autoimmune hepatitis (4.8%).

Female preponderance was observed and type 1 Autoimmune Hepatitis was most common whereas type 2 Autoimmune Hepatitis was found in few cases. Most patients had anti-smooth muscle antibody and anti-nuclear antibody positivity indicating the type, but no significant difference was seen in clinical symptoms or biochemical parameters between the different types. 162 patients couldn't be evaluated for autoimmune hepatitis because of serum IgG cut-off criteria >1500 ​mg/l.

Juvenile autoimmune hepatitis (JAIH) is severe immune-mediated necro-inflammatory disease of the liver with spontaneous progression to cirrhosis and liver failure if left untreated. The diagnosis is based on the combination of clinical, laboratory and histological findings. Prothrombin ratio is a useful prognostic factor to identify patients who will most likely require a liver transplant by adolescence or early adulthood. JAIH treatment consists of immune suppression and should be started promptly at diagnosis to halt inflammatory liver damage and ultimately prevent fibrosis and progression to end-stage liver disease. The risk of relapse is high especially in the setting of poor treatment compliance. Recent evidence however suggests that treatment discontinuation is possible after a prolonged period of normal aminotransferase activity without the need for liver biopsy prior to withdrawal.

The characteristics of liver dysfunction due to adult-onset Still's disease are not specific. Differentiating from autoimmune hepatitis is important in deciding whether to continue corticosteroid therapy, and also in terms of management of cirrhosis and surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver biopsy is thought to be the most important determinant for differential diagnosis.

In children with autoimmune hepatitis, uncertainties include outcomes associated with type 2 hepatitis, the possibility of and criteria for attempting withdrawal of treatment, and long-term outcomes. We report our experience on these issues.

From 1973 to 2002, 117 children with type 1 (n = 65) or type 2 (n = 52) hepatitis, excluding fulminant hepatitis, were treated, primarily with prednisone and azathioprine. Median follow-up was 20 years in survivors.

Normalisation of aminotransferases and prothrombin ratio were observed in 93% and 84% of children, respectively; sustained remission after treatment withdrawal was recorded in 24% of the entire population, with a median follow-up of 7 years. Sustained treatment-free remission was obtained in 11 of 24 children with follow-ups of 4-22 years based on durable normalisation of aminotransferases (without histological assessment). Gastrointestinal bleeding from varices and the emergence of extrahepatic autoimmune disorders occurred in 10 and 22 patients, respectively. Liver transplantation was performed in 23 patients at a median age of 21 years. The 30-year probabilities of overall and native liver survival were 81% and 61%, respectively. No differences were observed between type 1 and 2 hepatitis for any of the component parts of outcome. In the multivariate analysis, a persistent abnormal prothrombin ratio was associated with worse probabilities of overall and native liver survival.

In terms of liver outcome, type 2 hepatitis is not different from type 1. Withdrawal of treatment is possible without prior liver histology. A persistent abnormal prothrombin ratio identifies patients who will require liver transplantation in adolescence or early adulthood.

In children with autoimmune hepatitis, there are conflicting reports on the differences in outcome between type 1 and type 2 hepatitis, and on the possibility of treatment withdrawal, before which liver histology is required; data concerning >10-year overall and native liver survival rates are limited. In this study, we found no differences in outcomes between type 1 and 2 hepatitis; a durable treatment-free state was achieved in 19% of all patients throughout childhood and early adulthood, and in 45% of children for whom treatment withdrawal was attempted without prior liver histology; prothrombin was found to be predictive of 30-year overall and native liver survival. The results allow for a less-strict approach to treatment withdrawal in children, avoiding the risks of a liver biopsy, and they provide a tool to help anticipate the need for liver transplantation before complications occur.

While some articles describe outcome of pregnancy in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), there are less data evaluating influence of AIH control on maternal and perinatal outcomes. This study analysed outcomes of pregnancy and related possible risk factors in AIH.

A retrospective multicentre cohort study on pregnancy in AIH was performed in 11 hospitals in the Netherlands. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were collected from records and completed by interview. Risk factors-including incomplete response, relapse and cirrhosis-for adverse outcomes were identified using logistic regression analysis.

Ninety-seven pregnancies in 50 women resulted in 70 deliveries (72%) with a live birth rate of 98.5%. AIH relapse occurred in 6% during pregnancy, and in 27% of post-partum episodes. Absence of complete biochemical response at conception was identified as risk factor for the occurrence of gestational and post-partum relapses. Relapse of AIH in the year before conception was a risk factor for the occurrence of both gestational relapses and post-partum relapses. No complete biochemical response increased the risk for hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). Cirrhosis was found to be a risk factor for miscarriages, but not for other outcomes.

Pregnancy in AIH is related to an increased incidence of maternal and fetal/neonatal complications; in most cases, outcome is good. Incomplete biochemical response at conception or relapse in the year before conception are risk factors for gestational and post-partum relapses, for hypertensive disorders and for ICP. Cirrhosis was a risk factor for miscarriages.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare autoimmune disease of the liver with many open questions as regards its etiopathogenesis, natural history and clinical management. The classical picture of AIH is chronic hepatitis with fluctuating elevation of serum transaminases and Immunoglobulin G levels, the presence of circulating autoantibodies and typical histological features. However, atypical presentations do occur and are not well captured by current diagnostic scores, with important consequences in terms of missed diagnoses and delayed treatments. AIH is treated with corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs but up to 40% of patients do not achieve full biochemical response and are at risk of progressing to cirrhosis and liver failure. Moreover, standard therapies are associated by significant side-effects which may impair the quality of life of patients living with AIH. However, advances in the understanding of the underlying immunology of AIH is raising the prospect of novel therapies and optimization of existing therapeutic approaches to reduce side-effect burdens and potentially restore immunological tolerance. In this review we outlined the clinical characteristics, etiopathogenesis and management of AIH and current challenges in the diagnosis and management of AIH and provided evidence underlying the evolution of diagnostic and clinical management protocols.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease, characterized by elevated levels of transaminases, immunoglobulin G, and positive autoantibodies. The disease course is dynamic and presents heterogeneous disease manifestations at diagnosis. This review summarizes the issues regarding the treatment and monitoring of AIH in adult patients. Glucocorticoids and azathioprine are the first line of treatment. Alternative first-line treatments include budesonide or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Although no randomized controlled trials have been performed, MMF, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, 6-mercaptopurine, 6-thioguanine, allopurinol, sirolimus, everolimus, infliximab, or rituximab have been attempted in patients not responding to or intolerant to first-line treatments. Most patients require life-long special monitoring, with or without maintenance treatment.

Autoimmune hepatitis is an inflammatory disease of the liver of unknown cause that may progress to liver cirrhosis and end stage liver failure if diagnosis is overlooked and treatment delayed. The clinical presentation is often that of acute hepatitis, sometimes very severe; less frequently, it can be insidious or completely asymptomatic. The disease can affect people of any age and is more common in women; its incidence and prevalence seem to be on the rise worldwide. An abnormal immune response targeting liver autoantigens and inducing persistent and self-perpetuating liver inflammation is the pathogenic mechanism of the disease. A specific set of autoantibodies, increased IgG concentrations, and histological demonstration of interface hepatitis and periportal necrosis are the diagnostic hallmarks of autoimmune hepatitis. Prompt response to treatment with corticosteroids and other immunomodulatory drugs is almost universal and supports the diagnosis. The aims of treatment are to induce and maintain long term remission of liver inflammation. Treatment can often even reverse liver fibrosis, thus preventing progression to advanced cirrhosis and its complications. Most patients need lifelong maintenance therapy, and repeated follow-up in experienced hands improves the quality of care and quality of life for affected patients.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory liver disease, characterized by hypergammaglobulinemia, the presence of specific autoantibodies, and typical abnormalities in liver histology. Prompt diagnosis and initiation of immunosuppressive treatment are necessary for both chronic and acute onset AIH to prevent progression to end-stage liver disease or fatal liver failure. However, the diagnosis of AIH is challenging mainly because of its heterogeneous clinical, serological and pathological features. Although portal lymphoplasmacytosis and interface hepatitis are the most typical histological features of AIH, many other histological features can be observed in AIH, including emperipolesis, hepatocyte rosettes, and Kupffer cell hyaline globules. Recent studies have questioned emperipolesis and hepatocyte rosette formation as typical features of AIH, and atypical clinical and histological presentations have also been recognized. This led an international working group to propose the modified AIH diagnostic criteria. However, it is well recognized that there are no pathognomonic characteristics that can be used to diagnose AIH and careful clinicopathological correlation is required to arrive at the correct diagnosis. The aim of this review is to summarize the histological features of AIH, its varied histopathologic spectrum, recent updates and major differential diagnoses in routine clinical practice.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has had a significant impact on the healthcare field that resulted in changes to the way safe and effective medical care is delivered. The effects range from service disruption including ambulatory clinic closure due to both patient and provider concerns, to lack of capacity in hospital services. In rheumatology, there were other effects including viral infection-related autoantibody production, concerns about the use of systemic immunosuppression in the presence of an infectious pandemic and even concerns for viral infection-induced flares of rheumatic disease. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) led to the rapid adoption of innovative technologies that permitted the introduction and increased use of telemedicine via a number of platforms. Rapid discoveries and innovations led to the development of diagnostic and therapeutic agents in the management of COVID-19. Scientific advancement and discoveries around COVID-19 infection, symptoms, autoantibody production, chronic sequela and the repurposing of rheumatic immunosuppressive agents led to improved survival and an expanded role for the rheumatologist. Rheumatologists may sometimes be involved in the diagnosis and management of the hospitalized COVID-19 patient. In the ambulatory clinic, a rheumatologist also helps to differentiate between symptoms of long COVID and those of systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD). Rheumatologists must also grapple with the concerns related to immunosuppressive therapy and the risk of COVID-19 infections. In addition, there are concerns around vaccine effectiveness in people with SARD and those on immunosuppressive medications. Although the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the effects on healthcare resulted in difficulties, both patients and providers have risen to the challenge. The long-term outcome of COVID-19 for the medical system and rheumatologists in particular is not yet fully understood and will need further study. This review concentrates on the changing role of the rheumatologists, improved understanding of rheumatic disease and immunosuppressive therapies in the wake of the pandemic and how this has led to an improvement in the care of patients with COVID-19.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare disease of unclear etiology characterized by loss of self-tolerance that can lead to liver injury, cirrhosis, and acute liver failure. First-line treatment consists of systemic corticosteroids, or budesonide, and azathioprine, to which most patients are initially responsive, although predictors of response are lacking. Relapses are very common, correlate with histological activity despite normal serum transaminases, and increase hepatic fibrosis. Furthermore, current regimens lead to adverse effects and reduced quality of life, whereas medication titration is imprecise. Biomarkers that can predict the clinical course of disease, identify patients at elevated risk for relapse, and improve monitoring and medication dosing beyond current practice would have high clinical value. Herein, we review novel candidate biomarkers in adult and pediatric AIH based on prespecified criteria, including gene expression profiles, proteins, metabolites, and immune cell phenotypes in different stages of AIH. We also discuss biomarkers relevant to AIH from other immune diseases. We conclude with proposed future directions in which biomarker implementation into clinical practice could lead to advances in personalized therapeutic management of AIH.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in pregnancy has many unique considerations. Evidence provided from single center studies with patient level data and nationwide population studies provide valuable insight into this complex situation. Because a planned pregnancy is a safer pregnancy, preconception counseling is a crucial opportunity to optimize care and risk stratify women with AIH. Women with chronic liver disease who receive preconception advice and counseling are more likely to achieve stable liver disease at conception and undergo appropriate variceal surveillance. Loss of biochemical response in pregnancy is associated with adverse outcomes in unstable disease. New onset AIH in pregnancy should be managed with classical treatment regimens. The continued use of immunosuppression in pregnancy, with the exception of mycophenolate mofetil, has not shown to adversely affect the rates of stillbirth or congenital malformation. Previously adopted immunosuppression withdrawal paradigms in pregnancy should no longer be considered advantageous, because remission loss postdelivery is likely (12%-86%). Population studies, report improved outcomes with preterm birth rates falling from 20% to 9%-13% in AIH pregnancies over a 20-year period. Newer data have also demonstrated an increased risk of gestational diabetes and hypertensive complications in AIH pregnancy, which has implications for management and preeclampsia prevention with aspirin use. This review aims to provide the framework to guide and manage pregnancy in AIH outlining pearls and pitfalls to ensure optimal outcomes for mother, baby and to reduce variation in practice.

Nitrofurantoin, minocycline, methyldopa and infliximab, have been found to induce autoimmune-like hepatitis (DI-AILH). Evidence for other drugs and herbal and dietary supplements (HDS) is unclear. The aims of the study were to establish criteria to define and review the published evidence of suspected DI-AILH. Search was undertaken in Pubmed using search terms "drug-induced liver injury," "autoimmune hepatitis," and "drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis." DI-AILH was defined as (1) drug as a potential trigger of liver injury with autoimmune features and histological findings compatible with AIH; (2) no or incomplete recovery or worsening of liver tests after discontinuation of the drug; (3) corticosteroids requirement or spontaneous recovery; (4) follow-up without immunosuppression (IS) and no relapse of AIH at least 6 months after discontinuation of IS; and (5) drugs potentially inducing AILH with a chronic course. Cases fulfilling the first four criteria were considered probable DI-AILH with three possible DI-AILH. A total of 186 case reports were identified for conventional drugs (n = 148; females 79%; latency 2.6 months) and HDS (n = 38; females 50%). The most commonly reported agents of DI-AILH were interferons (n = 37), statins (n = 24), methylprednisolone (MPS) (n = 16), adalimumab (n = 10), imatinib (n = 8), and diclofenac (n = 7). Tinospora cordifolia and Khat were the only HDS with probable DI-AILH cases. No relapses of AIH were observed when IS was stopped after interferons, imatinib, diclofenac, and methylprednisolone. Conclusion: Beyond well-recognized nitrofurantoin, methyldopa, hydralazine, minocycline, and infliximab as causes of DI-AILH, interferons, imatinib, adalimumab, and MPS were the best-documented agents leading to probable DI-AILH. Khat and Tinospora cordifolia were the only HDS found to be able to induce DI-AILH. Long-term immunosuppression appears to be rarely required in patients with DI-AILH due to these drugs.