S-1, an oral pyrimidine fluoride-derived agent, is effective against various cancers. Sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, was found to prolong the survival of various cancers and enhance the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents. We conducted a phase I dose escalation study to determine dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of S-1 when combined with sorafenib for refractory solid tumors. Eligible patients received escalating doses (30, 35, and 40 mg/m² bid) of S-1 Day 1 (D1)-D14 and continuous sorafenib 400 mg bid from cycle 1 D8 every 21 days in a standard 3 + 3 study design. Primary endpoint was MTD. Thirteen patients were enrolled between May 2010 and Feb 2012. DLT developed in two (one grade 3 erythema and one prolonged grade 2 hand-foot-skin reaction) of the 6 patients at 35 mg/m² dose level. One pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) patient achieved a durable partial response (27.9 months). Four colon cancer patients had stable disease and 3 of them had progression-free survival greater than 6 months. This study determined the recommended (MTD) S-1 dose of 30 mg/m² bid for this regimen. This result warrants further phase II studies for advanced pNET and colon cancer to evaluate the efficacy of this combination.

The management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is based on a multidisciplinary decision tree. Treatment includes loco-regional therapy, mainly transarterial chemoembolization, for intermediate-stage HCC and systemic therapy with oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for advanced HCC. Transarterial chemoembolization involves hepatic intra-arterial infusion with either conventional procedure or drug-eluting-beads. The aim of the loco-regional procedure is to deliver treatment as close as possible to the tumor both to embolize the tumor area and to enhance efficacy and minimize systemic toxicity of the anticancer drug. Pharmacokinetic studies applied to transarterial chemoembolization are rare and pharmacodynamic studies even rarer. However, all available studies lead to the same conclusions: use of the transarterial route lowers systemic exposure to the cytotoxic drug and leads to much higher tumor drug concentrations than does a similar dose via the intravenous route. However, reproducibility of the procedure remains a major problem, and no consensus exists regarding the choice of anticancer drug and its dosage. Systemic therapy with TKIs is based on sorafenib and lenvatinib as first-line treatment and regorafenib and cabozantinib as second-line treatment. Clinical use of TKIs is challenging because of their complex pharmacokinetics, with high liver metabolism yielding both active metabolites and their common toxicities. Changes in liver function over time with the progression of HCC adds further complexity to the use of TKIs. The challenges posed by TKIs and the HCC disease process means monitoring of TKIs is required to improve clinical management. To date, only partial data supporting sorafenib monitoring is available. Results from further pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies of these four TKIs are eagerly awaited and are expected to permit such monitoring and the development of consensus guidelines.

Zinc finger and BTB domain containing 7A (ZBTB7), a POZ/BTB and Krüppel erythroid myeloid oncogenic factor, is critical for the tumorigenicity and progression of various cancer types. ZBTB7 has been reported to promote the cell proliferation of colorectal cancers (CRC). However, the function of ZBTB7 to 5-fluorouracil (5‑FU) resistance has not yet been studied. In the current study, ZBTB7 expression and function in 5‑FU resistance in CRC were investigated using with multidisciplinary approaches, including western blot analysis, Transwell assay, CCK8 and a tumor xenograft model. Overexpression of ZBTB7 was increased the level of proteins associated with cell invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. ZBTB7 inhibition attenuated the invasion and enhanced the apoptosis of CRC cells. IC50 values and cell viability were significantly reduced in cells with short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-mediated ZBTB7 depletion compared with the control group. 5‑FU administration decreased viability to a greater extent in the ZBTB7-shRNA group compared with the control, which was dose- and time-dependent. Analysis of gene expression omnibus data demonstrated that ZBTB7 mediated 5‑FU resistance, potentially through nuclear factor (NF)-κB signaling. NF‑κB inhibitor SN50 reversed ZBTB7-induced resistance in CRC. Collectively, the findings demonstrated that ZBTB7 mediated 5‑FU resistance in CRC cells through NF‑κB signaling. Thus, targeting ZBTB7 and NF‑κB signaling may be an effective strategy to reverse 5‑FU resistance in CRC.

Failure in cancer drug development exacts heavy burdens on patients and research systems. To investigate inefficiencies and burdens in targeted drug development in cancer, we conducted a systematic review of all prelicensure trials for the anticancer drug, sorafenib (Bayer/Onyx Pharmaceuticals). We searched Embase and MEDLINE databases on October 14, 2014, for prelicensure clinical trials testing sorafenib against cancers. We measured risk by serious adverse event rates, benefit by objective response rates and survival, and trial success by prespecified primary endpoint attainment with acceptable toxicity. The first two clinically useful applications of sorafenib were discovered in the first 2 efficacy trials, after five drug-related deaths (4.6% of 108 total) and 93 total patient-years of involvement (2.4% of 3,928 total). Thereafter, sorafenib was tested in 26 indications and 67 drug combinations, leading to one additional licensure. Drug developers tested 5 indications in over 5 trials each, comprising 56 drug-related deaths (51.8% of 108 total) and 1,155 patient-years (29.4% of 3,928 total) of burden in unsuccessful attempts to discover utility against these malignancies. Overall, 32 Phase II trials (26% of Phase II activity) were duplicative, lacked appropriate follow-up, or were uninformative because of accrual failure, constituting 1,773 patients (15.6% of 11,355 total) participating in prelicensure sorafenib trials. The clinical utility of sorafenib was established early in development, with low burden on patients and resources. However, these early successes were followed by rapid and exhaustive testing against various malignancies and combination regimens, leading to excess patient burden. Our evaluation of sorafenib development suggests many opportunities for reducing costs and unnecessary patient burden in cancer drug development.

We aimed to investigate the clinical significance of GPx3 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to characterize its tumor suppressive role.

HCC patients (113) who underwent hepatectomy were recruited to examine the clinical relevance of GPx3. The tumor suppressive role of GPx3 was studied by administration of recombinant GPx3 (rGPx3) or over-expression of GPx3 in HCC cells in vitro and in vivo. The therapeutic value of GPx3 for HCC was further investigated using human induced pluripotent stem cell derived mesenchymal stem cells (hiPSC-MSCs) as its delivery vehicle.

Down-regulation of GPx3 significantly correlated with advanced tumor stage (P = 0.024), venous infiltration (P = 0.043) and poor overall survival (P = 0.007) after hepatectomy. Lower plasma GPx3 in HCC patients was significantly associated with larger tumor size (P = 0.011), more tumor nodules (P = 0.032) and higher recurrence (P = 0.016). Over-expression of GPx3 or administration of rGPx3 significantly inhibited proliferation and invasiveness of HCC cells in vitro and in vivo. Tumor suppressive activity of GPx3 was mediated through Erk-NFκB-SIP1 pathway. GPx3 could be delivered by hiPSC-MSCs into the tumor and exhibited tumor suppressive activity in vivo.

GPx3 is a tumor suppressor gene in HCC and may possess prognostic and therapeutic value for HCC patients.

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing, and it is currently the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Potentially curative treatment options for HCC include resection, transplantation, and percutaneous ablation, whereas palliative treatments include trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), radioembolization, and systemic treatments. Due to the diversity of available treatment options and patients' presentations, a multidisciplinary team should decide clinical management of HCC, according to tumor characteristics and stage of liver disease. Potentially curative treatments are suitable for very-early- and early-stage HCC. However, the vast majority of HCC patients are diagnosed in later stages, where the tumor characteristics or progress of liver disease prevent curative interventions. For patients with intermediate-stage HCC, TACE and radioembolization improve survival and are being evaluated in addition to potentially curative therapies or with systemic targeted therapy. There is currently no effective systemic chemotherapy, immunologic, or hormonal therapy for HCC, and sorafenib is the only approved molecular-targeted treatment for advanced HCC. Other targeted agents are under investigation; trials comparing new agents in combination with sorafenib are ongoing. Combinations of systemic targeted therapies with local treatments are being evaluated for further improvements in HCC patient outcomes. This article provides an updated and comprehensive overview of the current standards and trends in the treatment of HCC.

Because of the poor prognosis of unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma there is a need for effective systemic therapy. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) combined with sorafenib, as first-line therapy, followed by sorafenib as maintenance therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

In this open-label, multicenter, single-group, prospective study, eligible patients with advanced HCC received oral sorafenib 400 mg twice daily, gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) on day 1 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 2 every 14 days for up to six cycles. Patients without disease progression were then treated further with sorafenib as maintenance therapy until disease progression.

All forty-nine patients completed six cycles of combined GEMOX and sorafenib therapy. The objective response was 26.5 %. The median time to progression was 10.3 months (95 % CI: 8.7-11.9 months) and median overall survival was 15.7 months (95 % CI: 13.0-18.4 months). During the combination therapy, the most common grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (22.4 %, 11/49 patients) and thrombocytopenia (14.3 %, 7/49 patients); grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity was fatigue (22.4 %, 11/49 patients) and appetite loss (18.4 %, 9/49 patients). During the maintenance therapy, grade 3/4 adverse events were nonhematologic toxicity, for example fatigue (16.0 %, 4/25 patients) and appetite loss (16.0 %, 4/25 patients).

GEMOX combined with sorafenib as first-line therapy followed by sorafenib as maintenance therapy was effective with manageable toxicity for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the results should be further validated in controlled phase II trials.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Sorafenib, a molecular-targeted drug, is a multi-target oral anti-neoplastic drug that is used as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced Human HCC. An increase in the expression of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) protein and sequential production of prostaglandin (PG) E2 were previously shown to significantly enhance carcinogenesis. Although the synergistic and/or additive effects of various COX inhibitors have been demonstrated in HCC, those of a combination of sorafenib and COX inhibitors remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to examine the antitumor effects of a combination of sorafenib and COX inhibitors on HCC HepG2 cells. Various COX inhibitors suppressed HepG2 cell survival, and exhibited a combined effect with sorafenib. However, COX-2 selectivity had little relevance. The co-administration of COX inhibitors and sorafenib increased the frequency of apoptosis. Moreover, the combination of sorafenib and diclofenac significantly increased Bax protein expression levels. The results of the present study indicate that COX inhibitors can be administered in combination with sorafenib for HCC therapy.

Sorafenib is the approved systemic drug of choice for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but has demonstrated limited benefits because of drug resistance. 2-Methoxyestradiol (2ME2) has been shown to be a promising anticancer drug against various types of cancers and acts by dysregulating hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1. Hypoxic cancer cells are extremely resistant to therapies since they elicit strong survival ability due to the cellular adaptive response to hypoxia, which is controlled by HIF-1 and HIF-2. The present study has demonstrated that sorafenib downregulated the expression of HIF-1α, making the hypoxic response switch from HIF-1α- to HIF-2α-dependent pathways, resulting in upregulation of HIF-2α, which contributes to the insensitivity of hypoxic HCC cells to sorafenib. HIF-2α played a dominant role in regulating VEGF, thus sorafenib in turn increased the expression of VEGF (a downstream molecule of both HIF-1 and HIF-2) and cyclin D1 (a downstream molecule of HIF-2), but reduced the expression of LDHA (a downstream molecule of HIF-1), in hypoxic HCC cells. 2ME2 significantly reduced the expression of both HIF-1α and HIF-2α, and their downstream molecules, VEGF, LDHA and cyclin D1, rendering hypoxic HCC cells to increased sensitivity to 2ME2. 2ME2 also inhibited the nuclear translocation of HIF-1α and HIF-2α proteins, but had no effect on their mRNA expression. 2M2 synergized with sorafenib to suppress the proliferation and induction of apoptosis of HCC cells in vitro and in vivo, and inhibited tumoral angiogenesis. These results indicate that 2ME2 given in combination with sorafenib acts synergistically for treating HCC.

The approval of sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor targeting primarily Raf kinase and the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, in 2007 for treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has generated considerable enthusiasm in drug development for this difficult-to-treat disease. However, because several randomized Phase III studies testing new multikinase inhibitors failed, sorafenib remains the standard of first-line systemic therapy for patients with advanced HCC. Field practice studies worldwide have suggested that in daily practice, physicians are adopting either a preemptive dose modification or a ramp-up strategy to improve the compliance of their patients. In addition, accumulating data have suggested that patients with Child-Pugh class B liver function can tolerate sorafenib as well as patients with Child-Pugh class A liver function, although the actual benefit of sorafenib in patients with Child-Pugh class B liver function has yet to be confirmed. Whether sorafenib can be used as an adjunctive therapy to improve the outcomes of intermediate-stage HCC patients treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization or early-stage HCC patients after curative therapies is being investigated in several ongoing randomized Phase III studies. An increasing number of studies have reported that sorafenib exerts "off-target" effects, including the modulation of signaling pathways other than Raf/MEK/ERK pathway, nonapoptotic cell death mechanisms, and even immune modulation. Finally, although sorafenib in combination with chemotherapy or other targeted therapies has the potential to improve therapeutic efficacy in treating HCC, it also increases toxicity. Additional clinical studies are warranted to determine useful sorafenib-based combinations for the treatment of advanced HCC.

Sorafenib is the sole molecular-targeted agent showing a survival benefit in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We evaluated the tolerability and effectiveness of a combination of S-1 with sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC.

S-1 was administered during days 1-14 and sorafenib was administered every day. This treatment was repeated every 21 days. In phase I, we determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The dose of each drug was planned as follows: cohort 1: S-1 48 mg/m(2)/day and sorafenib 400 mg/day, cohort 2a: S-1 48 mg/m(2)/day and sorafenib 800 mg/day, cohort 2b: S-1 64 mg/m(2)/day and sorafenib 400 mg/day, cohort 3: S-1 64 mg/m(2)/day and sorafenib 800 mg/day, and cohort 4: S-1 80 mg/m(2)/day and sorafenib 800 mg/day. In phase II, the patients were treated at the MTD to evaluate safety and efficacy.

Nineteen patients were enrolled in phase I. One of the six patients in cohort 1 and one of the six patients in cohort 3 experienced DLT. None of the three patients in cohort 2a experienced DLT and three of the four patients in cohort 4 experienced DLT. Therefore, cohort 3 was considered the MTD. Subsequently, 26 patients were enrolled in phase II. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were an increase of aspartate aminotransferase (38.5 %), thrombocytopenia (23.1 %), neutropenia (19.2 %), hyperbilirubinemia (15.4 %), an increase of alanine aminotransferase (15.4 %), hyponatremia (11.5 %), rash (11.5 %), and hypophosphatemia (11.5 %). Sudden death occurred in one patient (3.8 %). A patient (3.8 %) had a partial response, 15 (57.7 %) had stable disease, and 10 (38.5 %) had progressive disease. The median times to progression and overall survival were 2.4 and 10.5 months, respectively.

The MTD of S-1 and sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC was 64 mg/m(2)/day and 800 mg/day, respectively. This dose/regimen demonstrated substantial clinical activity among patients with advanced HCC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third most common cause of cancer mortality. Advanced HCC is a distinct disease entity with limited approved treatment options and grave prognosis. So, we will explore in this systematic review the value of using sorafenib-based combination in this poor prognosis subset of HCC.

PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Library, trip database and Google Scholar were searched using the terms "Hepatocellular carcinoma" OR "Hepatoma" or "Liver cancer" AND "systemic anticancer therapy" AND "Sorafenib" and specifying only English literature. Outcomes of interest included progression free survival and overall survival (PFS and OS), tumor response, and toxicities.

A total of 17 potentially relevant trials was identified, of which 9 studies were excluded. Hence, eight trials involving 272 patients were included. Median PFS was reported in 6 out of the 8 trials ranging from 3.7 to 7.5 months. Median OS was reported in 6 out of the 8 studies ranging from 7.4 to 40.1 months. The DCR was reported in the 8 studies, ranging from 48.7% to 76%. Frequently reported Grade 3/4 toxicities were increased AST/ALT, fatigue, hypertension, hand foot skin reaction and diarrhea. However, some chemotherapy-specific side effects were noted in some studies.

The current evidence from the available clinical trials suggests that sorafenib-based combination with some anticancer agents (especially mTOR inhibitors) could be a more effective and tolerable treatment for advanced HCC in the future. However, such sorafenib-based combination cannot be recommended outside the setting of clinical trials.