Serum HBV RNA and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) levels have been proposed as useful biomarkers in the management of patients with HBV; however, their role in chronic hepatitis delta (CHD) is currently unknown.

Consecutive untreated patients with CHD were enrolled in a cross-sectional study in three EU centers. Clinical and virological characteristics were collected. Serum HBV RNA and HBcrAg levels were quantified by an automated real-time investigational assay (Cobas® 6800, Roche Diagnostics, Pleasanton, Ca, USA) and by LUMIPULSE® G HBcrAg assay (Fujirebio Europe), respectively. In 18 patients with available liver biopsies, intrahepatic analyses were performed.

Overall, 240 patients with HDV were enrolled: median age 46 years, 62% male, 53% with cirrhosis, 57% nucleos(t)ide analogue treated, median ALT 70 U/L, median HBsAg 3.8 log10 IU/ml, 88% HBeAg negative, and median HDV RNA 4.9 log10 IU/ml. HBV RNA was positive (>10 copies/ml) in only 8% of patients (median 40 [13-82,000] copies/ml), whereas HBcrAg was ≥3 log10 U/ml in 77% (median 4.2 [3.0-8.0] log10 U/ml). By combining these biomarkers, three categories were identified: 23% double negative (HBV RNA/HBcrAg), 9% double positive (HBV RNA/HBcrAg) and 68% HBV RNA negative/HBcrAg positive. HBV RNA levels positively correlated with male sex and detectable HBV DNA, while positive HBcrAg correlated with higher HBsAg levels. Double-positive patients were younger, non-European, with elevated ALT and HDV RNA levels and detectable HBV DNA. Intrahepatic HDV RNA and HBV RNA were positive in most samples, while intrahepatic levels of covalently closed circular DNA were low.

In untreated CHD, most patients had undetectable HBV RNA but quantifiable HBcrAg ("divergent pattern") in the absence of HBeAg. Additional studies aiming to unravel the molecular mechanisms underlying these findings are warranted.

Serum HBV RNA and HBcrAg (hepatitis B core-related antigen) are promising biomarkers of the transcriptional activity of covalently closed circular DNA in chronic HBV infection; however, their role in patients with HBV-HDV coinfection is unknown. At variance with what is commonly observed in HBV-monoinfected patients, HBV RNA was undetectable and HBcrAg detectable in the serum of most patients with HDV ("divergent pattern"). The understanding of the viral interplay between HBV and HDV is crucial to dissect the pathogenic mechanisms associated with the distinct phenotypes of patients with HDV.

Predicting clinical and virological outcomes in HBeAg-negative (HBeAg-neg) chronic infection often requires long-term monitoring. Our study explored whether a single measurement of quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg), HBV core-related antigen (HBcrAg), and circulating HBV RNA (cirB-RNA) can define the natural course of untreated HBeAg-neg chronic infection patients.

To this aim, we included 128 naïve HBeAg-neg chronic infection patients, stratified according to qHBsAg levels in: (1) 10-1000 IU/mL, (2) 1000-10 000 IU/mL, and (3) > 10 000 IU/mL.

HBcrAg and cirB-RNA were detected in 27% and 19% of patients with qHBsAg > 1000 IU/mL but rarely detected in patients with qHBsAg < 1000 IU/mL. After a median follow-up of 5.1 years, 9.4% of patients lost HBsAg, and 8.5% experienced an increase in HBV DNA > 2000 IU/mL. qHBsAg < 1000 IU/mL was the only factor independently associated with functional cure.

In untreated HBeAg-neg chronic infection patients, single-point cirB-RNA and HBcrAg do not offer additional predictive value over qHBsAg < 1000 IU/mL for spontaneous HBsAg loss.

Most studies have focused on mother-to-child transmission and postpartum hepatitis flares. We aimed to evaluate the expression profile of pregenomic RNA (pgRNA) and its associated factors in patients with chronic HBV infection (CHB) during pregnancy and postpartum.

A total of 134 pregnant and 100 postpartum CHB patients were enrolled, and serum pgRNA levels were quantified.

Significant differences in clinical characteristics were noted between pregnant and postpartum CHB patients, but there was no significant difference in pgRNA levels between the two groups. When HBV DNA and HBV antigen levels were low, the corresponding pgRNA detection rate decreased. pgRNA was positively correlated with DNA and HBV antigens in the pregnant and postpartum CHB patients. In the pregnant group, antiviral treatment was an independent risk factor for pgRNA levels. In the postpartum period, HBeAg levels and antiviral treatment were independent risk factors for pgRNA levels. Considering that patients receiving antiviral treatment often have a high DNA load or HBeAg positivity, the DNA level and HBeAg essentially affect pgRNA levels.

pgRNA levels differ between pregnant and postpartum patients, and this difference is of great significance for the diagnosis and management of these particular groups.

The RING finger protein 5 (RNF5), an E3 ubiquitin ligase, has demonstrated significant antiviral activity against various viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV). However, its role in hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication has not been previously studied. In this study, we demonstrate that RNF5 effectively inhibits HBV replication by promoting the degradation of the HBV Core protein through a Caspase-3-dependent pathway. We first show that RNF5 expression is upregulated in HBV-infected cells and patient samples, suggesting a role in the host's antiviral response. Subsequently, we investigate the mechanism by which RNF5 mediates its antiviral effect, finding that RNF5 targets the Core protein for degradation independently of its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. The degradation of Core protein is mediated through a Caspase-3-dependent mechanism rather than the proteasomal pathway. Interestingly, RNF5's antiviral function does not rely on ubiquitination, indicating an alternative pathway involving apoptosis-related processes. These findings highlight the multifunctional role of RNF5 and suggest that targeting RNF5 could serve as a novel therapeutic approach to control HBV replication, providing new insights into the development of antiviral therapies against HBV.

HBsAg can be derived from intrahepatic cccDNA and integrated HBV DNA (iDNA). We examined the iDNA from liver tissues of 24 HBeAg(+) and 32 HBeAg(-) treatment-naive CHB participants.

Liver tissues were obtained from the North American Hepatitis B Research Network (HBRN). For cccDNA analysis, DNA was heat-denatured and digested by plasmid-safe ATP-dependent DNase to remove rcDNA and iDNA prior to qPCR. For iDNA detection, total DNA was subjected to HBV hybridization-targeted next generation sequencing (HBV-NGS) assay. The HBV-host junction sequences were identified by ChimericSeq. Comparison of HBV cccDNA and iDNA with serum and intrahepatic virological parameters were assessed.

Intrahepatic cccDNA, serum HBV DNA, HBV RNA, HBcrAg and qHBsAg were higher among the HBeAg(+) participants. Among the HBeAg(+) samples, 87% had positive intrahepatic HBcAg staining compared to 13% of HBeAg(-) samples (p<0.0001). HBsAg staining, in contrast, was present in over 85% of both HBeAg(+) and (-) livers. 23 (95.8%) HBeAg(+) participants had ≤50% iDNA of total HBV DNA whereas 25 (78.1%) HBeAg(-) participants had >50% iDNA in their livers. The iDNA junction-breakpoint distributions for the HBeAg(+) group were random with 15.9% localized to the DR2-DR1 region. In contrast, 52.4% of the iDNA were clustered at DR2-DR1 region among the HBeAg(-) participants. Microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) patterns of dslDNA HBV integration was more frequent in HBeAg (+) livers.

Serum RNA and HBcrAg reflect the intrahepatic cccDNA concentrations. HBeAg(-) CHB participants had high levels of intrahepatic iDNA and HBsAg despite lower cccDNA levels suggesting that iDNA is the primary source of HBsAg in HBeAg(-) CHB.

Chronic hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection can cause severe liver disease. With new treatment options available, it is important to identify patients at risk for liver-related complications. We aimed to investigate kinetics and predictive values of novel virological and immunological markers in the natural course of chronic HDV infection.

HBcrAg, HBV RNA and quantitative anti-HBc were analysed in samples from HDV-infected patients at three consecutive time points. Results were linked to clinical outcome by univariable and multivariable analyses. Primary endpoint was the composite endpoint of any liver-related event.

Samples from 190 individual patients were analysed with a median clinical follow-up time of 2.69 (IQR 1.13-6.51) years. The majority of patients had cirrhosis (98/190, 52%), and the primary endpoint occurred in 33% (62/190). In univariable analysis, age, cirrhosis, lower quantitative anti-HBc, higher ratio of HBcrAg/anti-HBc and detectable HDV RNA were associated with the primary endpoint. In multivariable analysis, only the presence of liver cirrhosis (HR 7.74, p < 0.001) and age (1.06, p < 0.001) remained independently associated with the primary endpoint. Kinetics of virological parameters during follow-up were similar between the groups. Quantitative anti-HBc was significantly lower in patients with liver cirrhosis (687 (IQR 188-3388) IU/ml vs. 309 (IQR 82-924) IU/ml, p < 0.0004), and lower levels were independently associated with the development of the primary endpoint (HR 1.0, p = 0.014).

In chronic HDV infection, neither baseline values nor kinetics of HBV RNA, HBcrAg and anti-HBc were independently associated with clinical outcome, while stage of liver disease and age were predictors of liver-related events.

Serum HBV-RNA is proposed to be a circulating marker of cccDNA transcriptional activity in hepatocytes. The combination of tenofovir-disoproxil-fumarate (TDF) and pegylated-interferon-alpha-2a (pegIFN) with nucleic-acid polymer (NAP) treatment was associated with a relatively high rate of functional cure (FC) 48 weeks after discontinuation of all therapy. We aim to characterize HBV RNA kinetics under TDF and pegIFN ± NAP combination therapies. Forty participants with chronic HBV in the REP401 phase-II clinical trial received 48 weeks of triple combination therapy with NAPs, pegIFN, and TDF. For 20 participants, triple combination therapy (TDF + pegIFN + NAPs) followed 24 weeks of TDF. For 20 other participants, triple combination therapy followed 24 weeks of TDF monotherapy and 24 weeks of dual therapy (TDF + pegIFN). The Abbott RUO assay for HBV RNA (LLoQ = 1.65 logU/mL) was performed every 4 weeks. Previously unrecognized HBV RNA kinetic patterns were identified with dual/triple therapy including (i) no change (ii) an increase followed by a new elevated plateau (only under dual therapy) and (iii) a transient increase followed by a spontaneous decline. All participants establishing a new elevated HBV RNA plateau level experienced a subsequent monophasic decline following the introduction of NAPs. Failure to reach HBV RNA LLoQ by 16 weeks of triple therapy had a negative predictive value of 100% for FC. The median HBV RNA half-life for participants in the virological-rebound group was significantly (p = 0.01) longer than in the partial and FC groups (5.7 vs 2.7 weeks, respectively). Achieving partial/functional cure is associated with a shorter HBV RNA half-life, which could reflect faster inactivation of cccDNA transcriptional activity.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a global health concern. The current sequential endpoints for the treatment of HBV infection include viral suppression, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion, functional cure, and covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) clearance. Serum hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) is an emerging HBV marker comprising three components: HBeAg, hepatitis B core antigen, and p22cr. It responds well to the transcriptional activity of cccDNA in the patient's liver and is a promising alternative marker for serological testing. There is a strong correlation, and a decrease in its level corresponds to sustained viral suppression. In patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), serum HBcrAg levels are good predictors of HBeAg seroconversion (both spontaneous and after antiviral therapy), particularly in HBeAg-positive patients. Both low baseline HBcrAg levels and decreasing levels early in antiviral therapy favored HBsAg seroconversion, which may serve as a good surrogate option for treatment endpoints. In this review, we summarize the role of serum HBcrAg in the treatment of CHB. Therefore, long-term continuous monitoring of serum HBcrAg levels contributes to the clinical management of patients with CHB and optimizes the choice of treatment regimen, making it a promising marker for monitoring HBV cure.

The study aimed to explore the coexisting patterns and assess the significance of serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA and traditional virological biomarkers in patients with antiviral treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

Serum HBV RNA, HBV DNA, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg) levels were measured and compared in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. The HBV RNA levels were determined using a simultaneous amplification and testing assay.

In the HBeAg-negative (HBeAg [-]) patients, the serum HBV RNA detectable (HBV RNA [+]) rate (33.33%, 14/42) was significantly lower than the serum HBV DNA detectable (HBV DNA [+]) rate (95.24%, 40/42; p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the HBeAg-positive (HBeAg [+]) patients (p > 0.05). The HBV RNA (+) rate (33.33%, 14/42) was lower in the HBeAg-negative patients than in the HBeAg-positive patients (100%, 17/17, p < 0.001), while the HBV DNA (+) rate (95.24%, 40/42 vs. 94.12%, 16/17) showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). The HBV RNA (+) rates showed a significant difference (p < 0.001) among the different HBsAg levels (10.00, 65.00, 84.21%, p < 0.001), while the HBV DNA (+) rate showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). In all patients, serum HBV RNA correlated well with HBV DNA (r = 0.72, p < 0.001), HBeAg (r = 0.68, p < 0.001), and HBsAg (r = 0.66, p < 0.001). However, the correlations between HBV RNA and other biomarkers varied across the different HBsAg and HBeAg levels.

The coexisting patterns of serum HBV RNA and HBV DNA varied with the levels of HBeAg and HBsAg in the patients with treatment-naïve chronic HBV infection. This further suggests that serum HBV RNA should be included in the key index panel to accurately evaluate the natural history of HBV infection and the effects of antiviral treatment.

This study aimed to explore serum HBV pre-genomic RNA (pgRNA) levels and its associated factors among HBV-infected patients in the real world.

This retrospective cohort study was conducted from May 10, 2023, to January 15, 2024. Univariate logistic analysis for positive serum HBV pgRNA was performed first, and variables with statistical significance were included in a multivariate logistic model. A decreasing trend of serum HBV pgRNA and HBV DNA levels was also detected first by univariate logistic regression and then by multivariate logistic regression.

482 patients were included in our analysis at baseline, and 191 patients were followed up. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that positive HBV DNA (AOR: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.46-4.75, P=0.001), ≥1000 hBsAg (AOR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.08-4.89, P=0.03), positive HBeAg (AOR: 28.26, 95% CI: 15.2-52.55, P<0.001), and ALP (AOR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.001-1.02, P=0.03) were positively correlated with positive HBV pgRNA at baseline. Two independent multivariate logistic regression models were constructed for the decreasing trend of serum HBV pgRNA and HBV DNA for the 191 follow-up patients. Results showed that the decreasing trend of HBV pgRNA was positively correlated with positive baseline HBV DNA (AOR: 4.60, 95% CI: 1.84-11.51, P=0.001), baseline HBsAg ≥1000 IU/mL (AOR: 8.74, 95% CI: 1.09-70.10, P=0.04), and HDL (AOR: 5.01, 95% CI: 1.28-19.66, P=0.02). The decreasing trend of HBV DNA was positively correlated with positive baseline HBV pgRNA (AOR: 3.80, 95% CI: 2.00-8.83, P<0.001) and AST (AOR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.08, P<0.001).

Our study revealed that HBV DNA, HBsAg, HBeAg, and ALP were significantly correlated with positive HBV pgRNA at baseline. The baseline HBV DNA, HBsAg, and HDL were significantly correlated with decreasing levels of HBV pgRNA. A decreasing trend of HBV DNA significantly correlated with patients' baseline HBV pgRNA and AST.

Pregnant women with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) exhibit unique clinical features in terms of postpartum immune system reconstitution and recovery from pregnancy-related changes. However, current studies focus primarily on the outcomes of maternal-infant transmission and postpartum hepatitis flares. We aimed to evaluate the profiles of hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) and pregenomic RNA (pgRNA) in pregnant women with CHB.

This retrospective analysis included treatment-naïve pregnant women with CHB who were followed up regularly in an outpatient clinic from 2014 to 2021. Baseline HBcrAg and pgRNA levels were compared in patients with different disease phases. Changes in these parameters were examined in a subset of patients receiving antiviral prophylaxis. HBcrAg and pgRNA levels were measured before treatment, at 32 weeks of gestation, and postpartum.

The final analysis included a total of 121 patients, 100 of whom were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive (96 and 4 in the immune-tolerant and -indeterminate phases, respectively) and 21 of whom were HBeAg-negative (6 and 15 in the immune-active and -inactive carrier phases, respectively). The HBeAg-negative group vs the HBeAg-positive group had lower levels of baseline HBcrAg (median [interquartile range {IQR}], 3.7 [3.0-5.9] vs 8.6 [8.4-8.7] log10 U/mL; P < .01) and pgRNA (median [IQR], 0.0 [0.0-2.5] vs 7.8 [7.6-8.1] log10 copies/mL; P < .01). The serum levels of HBcrAg and pgRNA were highest in immune-tolerant carriers and lowest in immune-inactive carriers. In HBeAg-positive patients, the correlation coefficients of HBcrAg and pgRNA with hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA were 0.40 and 0.43, respectively; in HBeAg-negative patients, they were 0.53 and 0.51, respectively (all P < .05). The correlation coefficients with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) were 0.55 and 0.52 (P < .05) in HBeAg-positive patients, respectively, while in HBeAg-negative patients they were 0.42 and 0.37, respectively (P > .05). Among 96 patients receiving antiviral prophylaxis, we detected a rapid decrease in HBV DNA to an undetectable level during treatment but relatively stable levels of pgRNA and HBcrAg.

HBcrAg and pgRNA levels are lower in HBeAg-negative patients than in HBeAg-positive patients. These 2 markers are significantly associated with HBV DNA irrespective of HBeAg status, while they are significantly associated with HBsAg only in HBeAg-positive patients.

There are estimated 300 million people afflicted with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) worldwide. The risk of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) increases considerably with chronic hepatitis B infection. While current therapeutics are effective in controlling hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and disease progression, a cure for HBV infection remains unattainable due to an intranuclear replicative intermediate known as covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA). It has recently been shown that serum HBV RNA is a non-invasive biomarker that reflects cccDNA transcriptional activity. This review provides a comprehensive overview and the latest updates on the molecular characteristics and clinical significance of serum HBV RNA, such as species of serum HBV RNA, forms of serum HBV RNA carriers and predictive value for relapses in CHB patients after nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) discontinuation and development of liver fibrosis and HCC. Furthermore, we summarize standardized assays for testing serum HBV RNA, the dynamic changes of serum HBV RNA levels in treatment-naïve CHB patients and those under NAs therapy, as well as the host and viral influencing factors of serum HBV RNA levels. Finally, we discuss the future perspectives in studies of serum HBV RNA.

Currently, hepatitis B virus (HBV) core antibody (anti-HBc antibody) and HBV core-related antigen (HBcrAg) are widely used as serum markers for diagnosis based on the HBV core region. This review focused on anti-HBc antibodies and HBcrAg and aimed to summarize the clinical significance of currently used assay systems and the issues involved. While anti-HBc is very significant for clinical diagnosis, the clinical significance of quantitative assay of anti-HBc antibody has been reevaluated with improvements in diagnostic performance, including its association with clinical stage and prediction of carcinogenesis and reactivation. In addition, concerning the new HBcrAg, a high-sensitivity assay method has recently been established, and its diagnostic significance, including the prediction of reactivation, is being reevaluated. On the other hand, the quantitative level of anti-HBc antibody expressed in different units among assay systems complicates the interpretation of the results. However, it is difficult to standardize assay systems as they vary in advantages, and caution is needed in interpreting the assay results. In conclusion, with the development of highly sensitive HBcrAg and anti-HBc antibody, a rapid and sensitive detection assay system has been developed and used in clinical practice. In the future, it is hoped that a global standard will be created based on the many clinical findings.

HBV RNA is a novel serum biomarker that reflects intrahepatic HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) transcription activity. Serum HBV RNA levels among treatment-naïve adults during the natural history of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and distinct liver histopathology statuses remain elusive. In our study, we include a total of 411 treatment-naïve CHB patients, among which 43 patients were HBeAg-positive immune-tolerant [IT(e+)], 84 patients were HBeAg-positive immune active [IA(e+)], 65 patients in HBeAg-negative immune active phases [IA(e-)], 149 patients were HBeAg-negative inactive phases [IC(e-)], and 70 patients were in Gray Zone (GZ). HBV RNA was measured in this cohort and its potential correlation with traditional serological markers and liver histopathology were analyzed. Our data showed that HBV RNA was strongly correlated with HBV DNA, HBeAg, HBsAg and ALT. Further subgroup analysis revealed a close correlation between HBV RNA and HBV DNA in patients in the IA (e+) and IA (e-) phases, but neither in IT(e+) nor IC(e-) phase. HBV RNA levels were consistently increased with the advanced degrees of hepatic inflammation, but not hepatic fibrosis. Of note, HBV RNA from HBeAg-positive patients negatively correlated with liver fibrosis, whereas HBV RNA from HBeAg-negative patients was weakly associated with liver inflammation. To sum up, serum HBV RNA shows a distinct profile among CHB patients in different immune statuses and hepatic histopathology stages/grades. Simultaneous testing of HBV RNA and traditional indicators might provide a comprehensive clinical assessment of CHB patients.

Predicting changes in disease activity and serological endpoints is necessary for the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We examined whether HBV RNA and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), two specialized virological markers proposed to reflect the activity of covalently closed circular DNA, may improve the ability to predict not sustained inactive carrier phase, spontaneous alanine aminotransferase (ALT) flare, HBeAg loss, and HBsAg loss.

Among eligible participants enrolled in the North American Hepatitis B Research Network Adult Cohort Study, we evaluated demographic, clinical, and virologic characteristics, including HBV RNA and HBcrAg, to predict not sustained inactive carrier phase, ALT flare, HBeAg loss, and HBsAg loss through a series of Cox proportional hazard or logistic regression models, controlling for antiviral therapy use. Among the study population, 54/103 participants experienced not sustained inactive carrier phase, 41/1006 had a spontaneous ALT flare, 83/250 lost HBeAg, and 54/1127 lost HBsAg. HBV RNA or HBcrAg were predictive of all 4 events. However, their addition to models of the readily available host (age, sex, race/ethnicity), clinical (ALT, use of antiviral therapy), and viral factors (HBV DNA), which had acceptable-excellent accuracy (e.g., AUC = 0.72 for ALT flare, 0.92 for HBeAg loss, and 0.91 for HBsAg loss), provided only small improvements in predictive ability.

Given the high predictive ability of readily available markers, HBcrAg and HBV RNA have a limited role in improving the prediction of key serologic and clinical events in patients with CHB.

Chronic infection with Hepatitis B is a common, incurable, and deadly infection. Despite inexpensive laboratory tests for diagnosis and management that have been established for decades, the worldwide rate of diagnosis is only ∼10%, and ∼5% of people are under treatment. Novel assays have been developed to improve linkage to care by providing more flexible approaches to determine a patient's health status. Other assays have been established to better investigate intrahepatic host-virus interactions to support clinical trials for cure research. This review outlines the clinical and scientific challenges still to be solved and the upcoming methods used to address them.

The current requirement for biomarkers to detect hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is polarized. One is a fully-automated and highly sensitive measurement system; the other is a simple system for point-of-care testing (POCT) in resource-limited areas. Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) reflects intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA and serum HBV DNA. Even in patients with undetectable serum HBV DNA or HBsAg loss, HBcrAg may remain detectable. Decreased HBcrAg levels are associated with reduction of the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in chronic hepatitis B. Recently, a fully-automated, novel high-sensitivity HBcrAg assay (iTACT-HBcrAg, cut-off value: 2.1 logIU/mL) has been developed. This attractive assay has been released in Japan very recently. iTACT-HBcrAg can be useful for monitoring HBV reactivation and prediction of HCC occurrence, as an alternative to HBV DNA. Moreover, monitoring HBcrAg may be suitable for determining the therapeutic effectiveness of approved drugs and novel drugs under development. Presently, international guidelines recommend anti-HBV prophylaxis for pregnant women with high viral loads to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HBV. However, >95% of HBV-infected individuals live in countries where HBV DNA quantification is not available. Worldwide elimination of HBV needs the scaling-up of examination and medication services in resource-limited areas. Based on this situation, a rapid and easy HBcrAg assay as a POCT is valuable. This review provides the latest information regarding the clinical use of a new surrogate marker, HBcrAg, in HBV management, based on iTACT-HBcrAg or POCT, and introduces novel agents targeting HBV RNA/protein.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), reflecting transcriptional activity of covalently closed circular DNA, are gaining traction as important markers to assess viral activity. Whether their expression differs under viral suppression by HIV co-infection status is unknown. Among adults with chronic HBV on antiviral therapy, we sought to determine if the expression of HBV markers (specialized and well-established) differs between HBV-HIV co-infection vs. HBV mono-infection. We compared HBV marker levels among 105 participants in the Hepatitis B Research Network (HBRN) HBV-HIV Ancillary Study and 105 participants in the HBRN mono-infected Cohort Study, matched for HBeAg status and HBV DNA suppression on therapy. Among HBeAg+ participants (N = 58 per group), after adjusting for age, sex, race, ALT and HBV DNA, viral markers were higher (p < .05) in the HBV-HIV versus the HBV-only sample (HBeAg: 1.05 vs. 0.51 log10 IU/mL; HBsAg: 3.85 vs. 3.17 log10 IU/mL; HBV RNA: 5.60 vs. 3.70 log10 U/mL; HBcrAg: 6.59 vs. 5.51 log10 U/mL). Conversely, among HBeAg(-) participants (N = 47 per group), HBsAg (2.00 vs. 3.04 log10 IU/mL) and HBV RNA (1.87 vs. 2.66 log10 U/mL) were lower (p < .05) in HBV-HIV vs. HBV-only; HBcrAg levels were similar (4.14 vs. 3.64 log10 U/mL; p = .27). Among adults with chronic HBV with suppressed viremia on antiviral therapy, viral markers tracked with HIV co-infection status and associations differed inversely by HBeAg status. The greater sensitivity and specificity of HBV RNA compared to HBcrAg allows for better discrimination of transcriptional activity regardless of HBeAg status.

In chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance are important milestones toward immune control.1 A drop in HBV DNA is an established correlate of both HBeAg and HBsAg clearance.2 We evaluated changes in HBV RNA and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) levels, markers of transcriptional activity of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA),3,4 with HBeAg and HBsAg clearance, and compared them with changes in HBV DNA level among adult participants in the Hepatitis B Research Network (HBRN).

Patients with hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis and low-level viremia represent a special group that might benefit from treatment because of their higher risk of complications. Evidence for the benefit of treatment in this population is lacking. The current study, which analyzed data of a historical cohort of 627 patients from a single Korean center with hepatitis B virus-related compensated cirrhosis, reported a 2.4-fold increased hepatocellular carcinoma risk among patients with low-level viremia compared with those with undetectable viremia provides indirect evidence in support of treatment for this population. The study underscores the importance of treating patients before the development of cirrhosis and the need for finite duration curative therapy.

The aim of the study was to find an ideal index reflecting inflammation and fibrosis for patients after antiviral treatment, and compare it with imaging examination (liver stiffness measurement - LSM) and traditional liver fibrosis models (APRI and FIB-4).

A total of 77 chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) after entecavir (ETV) treatment were included, and the changes of various clinical indicators before and after treatment were compared.

After 78 weeks of ETV treatment, WBC and PLT of 77 patients were significantly increased, while ALT, AST and total bilirubin were significantly decreased (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in serum creatinine (Cr) or blood urea nitrogen (BUN) compared to the values before treatment (p > 0.05). The three non-invasive liver fibrosis indexes, namely, LSM, APRI and FIB-4, were significantly decreased in 77 patients compared to the values before treatment (p < 0.001).

Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) have a high consistency with the grading of liver fibrosis, and can be used to evaluate the severity of liver fibrosis. Among them, ARFI has good diagnostic value for the classification of different degrees of liver fibrosis and the best diagnostic accuracy.

Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) is a new biomarker for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) whose performance has not been critically or systematically appraised. Herein, we performed a systematic review to determine its clinical utility.

We evaluated the biological pathway of HBcrAg and performed a systematic review of PubMed for clinical trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies that evaluated the clinical utility of HBcrAg. The effectiveness of HBcrAg in predicting HBV-specific clinical events (e.g. HBeAg seroconversion, phases of CHB, HBsAg loss, treatment response, and relapse after stopping therapy) was examined using receiver-operating characteristic curves. The correlation coefficients of HBcrAg with HBV DNA, quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg), HBV RNA, and cccDNA were summarised from published studies. Median values were used as estimates.

HBcrAg consists of three precore/core protein products: HBcAg, HBeAg, and a 22 kDa precore protein. HBcrAg assays have been associated with false-positive rates of 9.3% and false-negative rates of between 12-35% for CHB. The new iTACT-HBcrAg is more sensitive but does not reduce the false-positive rate. A PubMed search found 248 papers on HBcrAg, of which 59 were suitable for analysis. The clinical performance of HBcrAg was evaluated using AUROC analyses, with median AUROCs of 0.860 for HBeAg seroconversion, 0.867 for predicting HBeAg(-) hepatitis, 0.645 for HBsAg loss, 0.757 for treatment response, and 0.688 for relapse after stopping therapy. The median correlation coefficient (r) was 0.630 with HBV DNA, 0.414 with qHBsAg, 0.619 with HBV RNA and 0.550 with cccDNA. Correlation decreased during antiviral therapy, but combined biomarkers improved performance.

HBcrAg has a mixed performance and has a poor correlation with HBsAg loss and antiviral therapy, hence HBcrAg results should be interpreted with caution.

Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) has been used to assess management of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) without a systematic and critical Sreview of its performance. Our finding that HBcrAg had a false-positive rate of 9% and a false-negative rate of 12-35% raises concerns, although larger studies are needed for validation. A systematic review showed that the performance of HBcrAg was variable depending on the CHB endpoint; it was excellent at predicting HBeAg seroconversion and HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis (vs. chronic infection), which should be its main use, but it was poor for relapse after stopping antiviral therapy and for HBsAg loss. HBcrAg results should be interpreted with considerable caution, particularly by physicians, researchers, guideline committees and agencies that approve diagnostic tests.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major public health problem, with an estimated 296 million people chronically infected and 820 000 deaths worldwide in 2019. Diagnosis of HBV infection requires serological testing for HBsAg and for acute infection additional testing for IgM hepatitis B core antibody (IgM anti-HBc, for the window period when neither HBsAg nor anti-HBs is detected). Assessment of HBV replication status to guide treatment decisions involves testing for HBV DNA, whereas assessment of liver disease activity and staging is mainly based on aminotransferases, platelet count, and elastography. Universal infant immunisation, including birth dose vaccination is the most effective means to prevent chronic HBV infection. Two vaccines with improved immunogenicity have recently been approved for adults in the USA and EU, with availability expected to expand. Current therapies, pegylated interferon, and nucleos(t)ide analogues can prevent development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, but do not eradicate the virus and rarely clear HBsAg. Treatment is recommended for patients with cirrhosis or with high HBV DNA levels and active or advanced liver disease. New antiviral and immunomodulatory therapies aiming to achieve functional cure (ie, clearance of HBsAg) are in clinical development. Improved vaccination coverage, increased screening, diagnosis and linkage to care, development of curative therapies, and removal of stigma are important in achieving WHO's goal of eliminating HBV infection by 2030.

In the era of antiviral therapy, the main goal of treatment has shifted from the persistent inhibition of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication to the pursuit of serological clearance of HBs surface antigen (HBsAg). Based on the life cycle of HBV, HBsAg originates from covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) and integrated HBV DNA, thus reflecting their transcriptional activity. Complete HBsAg loss may mean elimination or persistent inactivity of the HBV genome including cccDNA and integrated HBV DNA. HBsAg loss improves the recovery of abnormal immune function, which in turn, may further promote the clearance of residual viruses. Combined with functional cure and the great improvement of clinical outcomes, the continuous seroclearance of high-sensitivity quantitative HBsAg may represent the complete cure of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). For many other risk factors besides HBV itself, patients with HBsAg loss still need regular monitoring. In this review, we summarized the evolution of CHB treatment, the origin of serum HBsAg, the pattern of HBsAg seroclearance, and the effect of HBsAg loss on immune function and disease outcomes. In addition, we discuss the significance of high-sensitivity HBsAg detection and its possibility as a surrogate of complete cure.

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, namely, the functional cure, can be achieved through the pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)-based therapy. However, it is an unignorable fact that a small proportion of patients who achieved functional cure develop HBsAg reversion (HRV) and the related factors are not well described.

A total of 112 patients who achieved PEG-IFN-induced HBsAg loss were recruited. HBV biomarkers and biochemical parameters were examined dynamically. HBV RNA levels were assessed in the cross-sectional analysis. The primary endpoint was HRV, defined as the reappearance of HBsAg after PEG-IFN discontinuation.

HRV occurred in 17 patients during the follow-up period. Univariable analysis indicated that hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status, different levels of hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs), and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) at the end of PEG-IFN treatment (EOT) were significantly associated with the incidence of HRV through using the log-rank test. Additionally, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the anti-HBs was superior to anti-HBc in predictive power for the incidence of HRV during the follow-up period. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis found that anti-HBs ≥1.3 log₁₀IU/L (hazard ratio (HR), 0.148; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.044-0.502) and HBeAg negativity (HR, 0.183; 95% CI, 0.052-0.639) at EOT were independently associated with lower incidence of HRV. Cross-sectional analysis indicated that the HBV RNA levels were significantly correlated with the HBsAg levels in patients with HRV (r=0.86, p=0.003).

EOT HBeAg negativity and anti-HBs ≥1.3 log₁₀IU/L identify the low risk of HRV after PEG-IFN discontinuation.

Over 240 million people worldwide are chronically infected with Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), a hepatotropic DNA virus with an evolutionary root of over 400 million years. Persistent HBV infection exhibits distinct and diverse phases of disease, from minimal liver pathology to fulminant Hepatitis, that vary in duration and severity among individuals. Although huge progress has been made in HBV research which has yielded an effective prophylactic vaccine and potent antiviral therapy, our understanding of its virology and immunobiology is still far from complete. For example, the recent re-discovery of serum HBV RNA in chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) patients has led to the proposal of noncanonical viral particles such as RNA virion and capsid-derived immune complex (Capsid-Antibody-Complexes, CACs) that contradict long-established basic theory. Furthermore, the existence of capsid-derived immune complex may hint at novel mechanism of HBV-induced liver disease. Here, we summarize the past and recent literature on HBV-induced immune complex. We propose that the release of capsid-derived particles by HBV has its deep evolutionary origin, and the associated complement activation serves as an indispensable trigger for intrahepatic damage and a catalyst for further cell-mediated immunopathology.

Bulevirtide (BLV) has recently been conditionally approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis delta (CHD) in Europe, but its effectiveness and safety in patients with compensated cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) are unknown.

Consecutive patients with HDV-related compensated cirrhosis and CSPH who started BLV 2 mg/day were enrolled in this single-center study. Clinical/virological characteristics were collected at baseline, weeks 4, 8 and every 8 weeks thereafter. HDV RNA was quantified by Robogene 2.0 (lower limit of detection 6 IU/ml).

Eighteen Caucasian patients with compensated cirrhosis and CSPH under nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment were enrolled: median (IQR) age was 48 (29-77) years, and 67% were male. Median (IQR) platelet count was 70 (37-227) x103/μl, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) 16.4 (7.8-57.8) kPa, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 106 (32-222) U/L, HBsAg 3.7 (2.5-4.3) log IU/ml, HDV RNA 4.9 (3.3-6.6) log IU/ml. During 48 weeks of BLV monotherapy, HDV RNA declined by 3.1 (0.2-4.3) log IU/ml (p <0.001 vs. baseline), becoming undetectable in 5 patients (23%). A virological response was observed in 14 (78%) patients while a non-response was observed in 2 (11%). ALT decreased to 35 (15-86) U/L (p <0.001 vs. baseline), normalizing in 83% of patients. A combined response was observed in 67% of patients. Aspartate aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyltransferase levels significantly improved. Concerning liver function parameters, albumin values significantly increased and bilirubin remained stable. LSM significantly improved in patients with virological response, while platelet count was unchanged. None of the patients developed decompensating events or hepatocellular carcinoma. BLV was well tolerated, no patient discontinued treatment and the increase in bile acids was fully asymptomatic.

A 48-week course of BLV 2 mg/day monotherapy is safe and effective even for difficult-to treat patients with HDV-related compensated cirrhosis and CSPH.

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) is associated with the most severe form of viral hepatitis. A new treatment for HDV called bulevirtide has recently received conditional approval for patients with chronic HDV infection. However, its safety and effectiveness in patients with more advanced liver disease is not known. Herein, we show that it is safe and effective in patients with HDV-related cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension.

Chronic HBV infection can hardly be cured due to the persistence of an intrahepatic pool of viral covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) transcription template, which is refractory to current antivirals. The direct analyses of cccDNA quantity and transcriptional activity require an invasive biopsy. Recently, circulating HBV RNA has been identified as a promising noninvasive surrogate marker of cccDNA and can be used for monitoring disease progression and predicting prognosis of patients with chronic HBV infection. To better understand this surrogate biomarker of cccDNA, we reviewed the current knowledge about the molecular characteristics and potential clinical applications of circulating HBV RNA. Specifically, we summarized the reported species and existing forms of circulating HBV RNA and discussed their biogenesis and the capacity of de novo infection by RNA virions. Moreover, we described the potential applications of circulating HBV RNA in different clinical scenarios, such as classifying the phases of chronic HBV infection, analyzing sustained on-treatment and off-treatment outcomes of treated patients, as well as predicting HCC development. Perspectives on future research of circulating HBV RNA were also proposed in this review.

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) can be divided into immune tolerance (IT), immune clearance (IC), hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative inactive/quiescent carrier (ENQ), and HBeAg-negative hepatitis (ENH) phases. The conventional biomarkers used to distinguish these phases have limitations. We examined the clinical significance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) as novel biomarkers.

One hundred eighty-nine patients without treatment currently were categorized by CHB phase (IT = 46, IC = 45, ENQ = 49, ENH = 49). The associations of HBV RNA and HBcrAg with HBV DNA and alanine transaminase (ALT) were analyzed. The decision tree model was used to distinguish the four phases in the natural course of CHB.

The concentrations of HBV RNA and HBcrAg were highest in the IT and IC phases (P < 0.01). Serum HBV RNA was similar to HBcrAg in treatment-naïve patients. HBV RNA and HBcrAg correlated with HBV DNA in the HBeAg⁺ and HBeAg^- status (HBV RNA: e⁺ r = 0.51, e^- r = 0.62; HBcrAg: e⁺ r = 0.51, e^- r = 0.71), but their association with HBV DNA differed among phases. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of HBcrAg with ALT in distinguishing the CHB phases were 95.65%, 95.83%, and 95.55%, respectively.

Serum HBV RNA and HBcrAg may be useful to monitor CHB progression.

The focus of hepatitis B functional cure, defined as sustained loss of hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV DNA from blood, is on eliminating or silencing the intranuclear template for HBV replication, covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA). However, HBsAg also derives from HBV DNA integrated into the host genome (iDNA). Little is known about the contribution of iDNA to circulating HBsAg with current therapeutics. We applied a multiplex droplet digital PCR assay to demonstrate that iDNA is responsible for maintaining HBsAg quantities in some individuals. Using paired bulk liver tissue from 16 HIV/HBV-coinfected persons on nucleos(t)ide analog (NUC) therapy, we demonstrate that people with larger HBsAg declines between biopsies derive HBsAg from cccDNA, whereas people with stable HBsAg levels derive predominantly from iDNA. We applied our assay to individual hepatocytes in paired tissues from 3 people and demonstrated that the individual with significant HBsAg decline had a commensurate loss of infected cells with transcriptionally active cccDNA, while individuals without HBsAg decline had stable or increasing numbers of cells producing HBsAg from iDNA. We demonstrate that while NUC therapy may be effective at controlling cccDNA replication and transcription, innovative treatments are required to address iDNA transcription that sustains HBsAg production.

Chronic hepatitis B remains a global health problem with an estimated 296 million people affected worldwide. Individuals are at risk of serious complications such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and accurately predicting these clinical endpoints has proven difficult. However, several viral biomarkers have recently been developed, including quantitative HBV surface antigen (qHBsAg), hepatitis B RNA (HBV RNA) and core-related antigen (HBcrAg), and shown promise in a range of clinical settings.

To critically appraise these novel biomarkers, exploring their potential uses, availability of assays and areas for future development.

We performed a literature search of PubMed, identifying articles published in the field of hepatitis B biomarkers between 2010 and 2022.

Novel biomarkers such as HBcrAg, HBV RNA and qHBsAg may be useful in predicting treatment outcomes, stratifying the risk of future complications and estimating off-treatment viral reactivation. Furthermore, HBV RNA and HBcrAg titres may accurately reflect cccDNA transcriptional activity, and this is particularly informative in the context of nucleoside analogue therapy. On a cautionary note, most studies have been performed in Caucasian or Asian populations, and methods for detecting HBV RNA lack standardisation.

Novel viral biomarkers have the potential to provide additional insights into the natural history of infection and allow a more bespoke, cost-effective framework of care. However, access remains limited, and further efforts are needed to validate their use in ethnically diverse populations, confirm predictive cut-off values, and establish their role in the era of novel antiviral therapies.

Besides the prototypical hepatitis B virus (HBV) infectious particle, which contains a full-length double-stranded DNA (flDNA), additional circulating virus-like particles, which carry pregenomic RNA (pgRNA), spliced1RNA (sp1RNA) or spliced-derived DNA (defDNA) forms have been described. We aimed to determine the level of these four circulating forms in patients and to evaluate their impact on viral lifecycle.

Chronic HBV untreated patients (n = 162), included in the HEPATHER cohort, were investigated. Pangenomic qPCRs were set up to quantify the four circulating forms of HBV nucleic acids (HBV_naf). In vitro infection assays were performed to address the impact of HBV_naf.

Hierarchical clustering individualized two clusters of HBV_naf diversity among patients: (1) cluster 1 (C1) showing a predominance of flDNA; (2) cluster 2 (C2) showing various proportions of the different forms. HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis phase and higher viral load (7.0 ± 6.4 vs 6.6 ± 6.2 Log₁₀ copies/ml; p < 0.001) characterized C2 compared to C1 patients. Among the different HBV_naf, pgRNA was more prevalent in C1 patients with high vs low HBV viral load (22.1% ± 2.5% vs 4.1% ± 1.8% of HBV_naf, p < 0.0001) but remained highly prevalent in C2 patients, whatever the level of replication. C2 patients samples used in infection assays showed that: (1) HBV_naf secretion was independent of the viral strain; (2) the viral cycle efficiency differed according to the proportion of HBV_naf in the inoculum, independently of cccDNA formation. Inoculum enrichment before infection suggests that pgRNA-containing particles drive this impact on viral replication.

Besides the critical role of HBV replication in circulating HBV_naf diversity, our data highlight an impact of this diversity on the dynamics of viral cycle.

Patients were included from a prospective multicenter French national cohort (ANRS CO22 HEPATHER, NCT01953458).

Chronic infection with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) is one of the most common causes of liver disease worldwide. Chronic HBV infection is currently incurable because of the persistence of the viral template for the viral transcripts, covalently closed circular deoxyribonucleic acid (cccDNA). Detecting changes in cccDNA transcriptional activity is key to understanding fundamental virology, determining the efficacy of new therapies, and deciding the optimal clinical management of HBV patients. In this review, we summarize surrogate circulating biomarkers that have been used to infer cccDNA levels and activity in people with chronic hepatitis B. Moreover, we outline the current shortcomings of the current biomarkers and highlight the clinical importance in improving them and expanding their use.

Different serological and virological markers in chronic hepatitis B patients guide staging of viral infection, and initiation and response to therapy. Due to the persistence of intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in the hepatocyte nucleus, hepatitis B is not curable. Even after undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA levels, the persistence of hepatitis B surface antigen and novel markers such as hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) indicate the persistence of intrahepatic cccDNA. In this study, HBcrAg levels at baseline and after 24 and 48 wk of antiviral therapy predicted hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion. Due to the poor sensitivity of assays and detectable levels in HBsAg-negative patients, the long-term utility of HBcrAg needs future research.

Cessation of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is uncommon. Although criteria for discontinuation appear in some guidelines, the indicators for assessing discontinuation of NAs are limited, whether NAs can be safely ceased remains a difficult clinical issue. Our study aimed to investigate the role of serum pregenomic RNA (pgRNA) and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) at the end of treatment (EOT) in guiding the safe discontinuation of NAs in CHB patients.

This is a retrospective study, clinical data of all CHB patients who discontinued NAs treatment at West China Hospital between June 2020 and January 2021 were collected, including EOT pgRNA, HBcrAg, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), etc. All patients should meet the Asian-Pacific guideline for discontinuation. Observing virological relapse (VR) rates during 1 year of NAs discontinuation and analyzing the relationship between EOT pgRNA, HBcrAg, and VR.

A total of 64 patients were enrolled in this study and 33 (51.5%) patients experienced VR in 1 year. EOT pgRNA positivity (OR = 14.59, p = 0.026) and EOT higher HBcrAg levels (OR = 14.14, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for VR. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) value of EOT HBcrAg for VR was 0.817 (p < 0.001), optimal cut-off value was 3.3 log10 U/mL. Patients with EOT pgRNA positivity and EOT HBcrAg >3.3 log10 U/mL were more likely to experience VR after discontinuation of NAs (88.9 vs. 45.5%, p = 0.027).

According to current guidelines, a higher VR rate occurs after cessation of NAs. EOT pgRNA positivity and higher HBcrAg level carries a higher risk of VR. Combining these novel markers can better help us assess whether patients can safely cease NAs treatment.