Natriuretic peptides are involved in the cascade of pathophysiological events occurring in liver cirrhosis, counterbalancing vasoconstriction and anti-natriuretic factors. The effects of natriuretic peptides as treatment of cirrhotic ascites have been investigated only in small studies, and definitive results are lacking.

To examine the effects and safety of natriuretic peptides in cirrhosis patients with ascites.

We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Embase for all available studies applying intravenous administration of any natriuretic peptide to patients suffering from cirrhotic ascites. Inclusion was not limited by treatment duration or dose, or by follow-up duration. Both randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was change in renal sodium excretion. Secondary outcomes included safety measures and changes in renal water excretion, plasma aldosterone concentration, and plasma renin activity.

Twenty-two studies were included. Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) was the only intensively studied treatment. Sodium excretion increased in response to continuous ANP infusion and was more pronounced when infusion rates of > 30 ng/kg/min were administered compared with ≤ 30 ng/kg/min (P < 0.01). Moreover, natriuresis was significantly higher in study subgroups with mild/moderate ascites compared with moderate/severe and refractory ascites (P < 0.01). ANP infusions increased renal water excretion, although without reaching a statistically significant dose-response gradient. Plasma aldosterone concentration and plasma renin activity were significantly lower at baseline in study subgroups achieving a negative sodium balance in response to an ANP administration compared with treatment non-responders (P < 0.01). Blood pressure decreases occurred less frequently when ANP doses ≤ 30 ng/kg/min were applied. The quality of evidence for a natriuretic response to ANP was low, mainly due to small sample sizes and considerable between-study heterogeneity. Data were sparse for the other natriuretic peptides; B-type natriuretic peptide and urodilatin.

Intravenous ANP infusions increase sodium excretion in patients with cirrhotic ascites. Continuous infusion rates > 30 ng/kg/min are the most effective. However, safety increases with infusion rates ≤ 30 ng/kg/min.

Cold ischemia time and the presence of postoperative hepatic arterial thrombosis have been associated with biliary complications (BC) after liver transplantation. An ABO-incompatible blood group has also been suggested as a factor for predisposal towards BC. However, the influence of Rh nonidentity has not been studied previously.

Three hundred fifty six liver transplants were performed from 1995 to 2000 at our hospital. BC incidence and risk factors were studied in 345 patients.

Seventy patients (20%) presented BC after liver transplantation. Bile leakage (24/45%) and stenotic anastomosis (21/30%) were the most frequent complications. Presence of BC in Rh-nonidentical graft-host cases (23/76, 30%) was higher than in Rh-identical grafts (47/269, 17%) (P=0.01). BC was also more frequent in grafts with arterial thrombosis (9/25, 36% vs 60/319, 19%; P=0.03) and grafts with cold ischemia time longer than 430 min (26/174, 15% vs 44/171, 26%; P=0.01). Multivariate logistic regression confirmed that Rh graft-host nonidentical blood groups [RR=2(1.1-3.6); P=0.02], arterial thrombosis [RR=2.6(1.1-6.4); P=0.02] and cold ischemia time longer than 430 min [RR=1.8(1-3.2); P=0.02] were risk factors for presenting BC.

Liver transplantation using Rh graft-host nonidentical blood groups leads to a greater incidence of BC.

We sought to evaluate MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) as the only imaging procedure used in the diagnosis and management of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

MRCP is a useful imaging procedure in the assessment of biliary complications after OLT.

In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that inhibition of renal phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites increases sodium excretion. The effect of sildenafil citrate was studied in a randomized double-blind. placebo-controlled crossover study. Diuretics were withdrawn, and a fixed sodium diet (100 mmol/day) was given to the patients for 5 days before both study days. After a 60-min basal period, eight patients received either oral sildenafil (50 mg) or placebo. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal blood flow (RBF) were determined by 99mTc-diethylenetriamine-pentaacetate and (131)I-hippuran clearances. In human nephrectomy specimens, PDE5 mRNA was expressed at similar levels in the cortex (n = 6) and inner medulla (n = 4). Histochemical staining showed PDE5 immunoreactivity in collecting ducts and vascular smooth muscle. At baseline, cirrhotic patients exhibited elevated plasma concentrations of ANP, renin, ANG II, and aldosterone that did not differ on the 2 study days. Basal sodium excretion was similar at the 2 study days (median 17 and 18 mmol, respectively), and patients were in positive sodium balance. Sildenafil increased heart rate, plasma renin activity, plasma ANG II, and aldosterone concentrations significantly after 60 min. Plasma cGMP concentration was increased after 120 and 180 min, and urinary sodium excretion and mean arterial blood pressure were decreased significantly at 120 and 180 min. Plasma ANP concentration, GFR, and RBF did not change after sildenafil. In patients with ascites and cirrhosis, inhibition of PDE5 did not promote natriuresis but led to increased plasma levels of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.

A good response to diuretics is obtained initially in the treatment of cirrhotic ascites. However, unresponsiveness to therapy and various complications may develop with disease progression. This makes obligatory the search for new treatment methods that may be alternative to standard diuretics. In our study, we investigated the effect of mannitol infusion on current therapies in patients with cirrhotic ascites who were using diuretic treatment.

Thirty cirrhotic patients with ascites who were using diuretic treatment were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups; a dose of 100-mL 20% mannitol was administered to the first group, and 100-mL 5% dextrose solution was administered to the second group. The patients' urinary volumes and serum and urine electrolyte levels (sodium, potassium) were determined before and after the test.

In the mannitol group, a significant increase in urinary volume was observed (p < 0.05). However, in the control group no significant differences in urinary sodium excretion were observed after the test (p > 0.05). In the mannitol group, a concomitant increase in urinary volume and sodium excretion was observed in eight cases (53%). The urinary sodium excretions and serum sodium levels before the test were significantly lower in patients who responded to mannitol than in patients who did not respond (p = 0.001 and p = 0.04, respectively).

As a result, short-term mannitol therapy makes a significant contribution to diuretic therapy in approximately half of cases with cirrhotic ascites. The results we obtained suggest that mannitol may be a useful alternative in the treatment of ascites.

Advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of sodium retention and ascites formation in cirrhosis has helped improve the treatment of ascites in these patients. It is likely that further unraveling of these pathophysiologic changes will lead to the development of novel and better treatment options. For example, the development of aquaretic agents for the management of hyponatremia in cirrhosis may allow more effective use of diuretic therapy. The ultimate challenge is to use the understanding of the pathophysiology to develop new strategies to prevent the development of ascites in cirrhosis.

The pathogenesis of renal sodium retention and ascites formation in cirrhosis is a subject of much controversy. The generally accepted 'peripheral arterial vasodilatation hypothesis' seems to best explain the mechanism of sodium retention and other clinical findings, such as the hyperdynamic circulation of cirrhosis. However, recent data in pre-ascites and in early ascites do not seem to conform to the peripheral arterial vasodilatation hypothesis. Sodium handling abnormalities can be demonstrated in pre-ascitic cirrhosis when patients are challenged with a sodium load, in the absence of systemic vasodilatation or arterial underfilling. Therefore, an alternative hypothesis with a direct hepatorenal interaction, acting via sinusoidal portal hypertension and/or hepatic dysfunction as the affector mechanism, is proposed to be the initiating event in renal sodium retention in cirrhosis. The second and later process is the development of systemic arterial vasodilatation, possibly due to the presence of excess systemic vasodilators and/or decreased responsiveness of the vasculature to endogenous vasoconstrictors. This, in turn, will lead to a relatively underfilled circulation with consequent activation of neurohumoral systems, promoting further renal sodium retention as described by the peripheral arterial vasodilatation hypothesis and ultimately leading to ascites. When compensatory natriuretic mechanisms fail, refractory ascites develops and hepatorenal syndrome sets in. Thus, renal sodium retention in cirrhosis is the result of interplay of many factors, with direct hepatorenal interaction predominating in earlier stages of the cirrhotic process, while systemic vasodilatation becomes a more important pathogenetic factor as the disease progresses.

Patients with cirrhosis and ascites have high plasma levels of atrial (ANP) and brain (BNP) natriuretic peptides, two cardiac hormones released by the atria and ventricles, respectively. We evaluated renal hemodynamics, sodium excretion, and intrarenal sodium handling (lithium clearance method) in seven cirrhotic patients with ascites and avid sodium retention before, during, and after the infusion of synthetic human BNP, at the dose of 4 pmol/kg.min for 1 hour, which has been shown to increase renal plasma flow, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and sodium excretion in healthy subjects without affecting systemic hemodynamics. Plasma BNP levels were 7.31 +/- 0.85 pmol/L in baseline conditions, and increased to 33.60 +/- 2.96 pmol/L at the end of the infusion (P < .01 vs. baseline). Urinary excretion of guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) also significantly increased during the infusion, indicating stimulation of natriuretic peptide receptors by BNP. BNP administration did not modify renal plasma flow, GFR, sodium excretion or tubular sodium reabsorption to any appreciable extent. Arterial pressure heart rate, plasma norepinephrine, and plasma renin activity (PRA) where also unchanged, whereas plasma aldosterone concentration showed a significant, 35% reduction at the end of the postinfusion period, ruling out the possibility that BNP-induced vasodilation might be responsible for failure of the peptide to induce a natriuretic response. Overactivity of antinatriuretic factors is probably the main determinant of the blunted natriuretic effect of BNP in these patients.

The effects of C-type and brain natriuretic peptides (CNP and BNP, respectively) on renal excretion of sodium and hemodynamics have not yet been studied in cirrhosis.

This study aimed to examine the effects of saline, CNP (300 ng.kg-1.min-1 i.v. for 30 min) and BNP (600 ng.kg-1.min-1 i.v. for 30 min) on natriuresis and diuresis in normal and rats with cirrhosis. Moreover, regional and systemic hemodynamics were measured prior to and following CNP and BNP administration in normal rats and rats with cirrhosis with ascites.

In rats with cirrhosis, the effects of CNP or BNP or natriuresis and diuresis did not significantly differ from the effects of saline. CNP significantly decreased portal pressure and systemic vascular resistance and significantly increased the cardiac index. BNP significantly decreased portal tributary blood flow, portal pressure and cardiac index. In normal rats, natriuresis and diuresis were significantly higher with CNP and BNP than with saline. Systemic hemodynamics were not changed by CNP. A decrease in arterial pressure was the sole BNP-induced hemodynamic change.

In conclusion, this study shows that the natriuretic response to pharmacological doses of CNP and BNP is blunted in rats with cirrhosis. This blunting may be related to an activation of the endogenous antinatriuretic systems secondary to systemic vasodilation (by CNP) or to a decreased cardiac index (by BNP). Finally, this study shows that CNP and BNP have a portal hypotensive action.

Sodium retention in cirrhosis has been attributed to an imbalance between vasoconstrictive, antinatriuretic forces such as the renin aldosterone angiotensin system and the sympathetic nervous system, and vasodilatory, natriuretic agents such as atrial natriuretic factor (ANF). Patients with diuretic resistant refractory ascites may require peritoneovenous shunting (PVS) to control ascites.

To study the factors responsible for the improvement in sodium homeostasis post-PVS, we compared the response to ANF infusion before and 1 month after PVS in 6 patients with massive ascites.

Before PVS, sodium excretion at baseline and in response to ANF infusion was blunted but became more normal post-PVS. ANF infusion post-PVS induced a significant increase in the glomerular filtration rate and filtration fraction and also in distal delivery of sodium. ANF's distal effect of increasing the fractional excretion of distally delivered sodium was present pre-PVS and was not significantly increased post-PVS. Changes in sodium handling were accompanied by a significant decrease in antinatriuretic forces (baseline aldosterone, 2079 +/- 507 vs. 647 +/- 17 nmol/L; P < 0.04) post-PVS.

The improvement in sodium homeostasis and response to ANF infusion post-PVS appears to be associated with the decrease in antinatriuretic forces with the loss of massive refractory ascites. Thus, PVS restores the balance toward ANF responsiveness.

The role of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and potential defects of ANP in liver disease are reviewed. Patients with cirrhosis of the liver show no decrease of ANP plasma concentrations nor changes in the pattern of ANP immunoreactivity nor changes of splanchnic ANP clearance. The renal effects of exogenously administered as well as endogenously released ANP are blunted in cirrhosis, in particular in patients with ascites. This seems due to increased activity of sodium-retaining hormonal systems and changes of the renal ANP receptor status. Pharmacological inhibition of ANP-degradation or clearance may yield therapeutic potential.

Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) is thought to exert its major effect within the cortical and inner medullary collecting ducts (CCD and IMCD) by inhibiting Na+ transport along conductive channels and electroneutral pathways. These transport routes are also thought to be inhibited by a combination of amiloride, thiazide and bradykinin. We tested the ability of normal dogs to respond to ANP when various combinations of these Na+ transport inhibitors were present. In 24 dogs ANP raised UNaV from 31 +/- 6 to 223 +/- 41 mu Eq/min (P < 0.05), a delta of 192 mu Eq/min. Bradykinin alone did not depress delta UNaV in response to an ANP infusion. In the presence of extreme natriuresis caused by amiloride and thiazide, the response to ANP was magnified, presumably due to augmented Na+ delivery to the CCD and IMCD. When distal delivery of Na+ to one kidney was controlled by aortic clamping in the presence of amiloride, thiazide and bradykinin. delta UNaV in response to ANP was depressed (48 vs. 168 mu Eq/min). We conclude that in the presence of extreme inhibition of Na+ transport within the collecting ducts, ANP can still cause a further natriuresis, probably in the absence of augmented distal Na+ delivery.

Resistance to the natriuretic action of atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) in cirrhosis with ascites has been correlated with rising levels of antinatriuretic factors, such as renin, angiotensin II (AII), and aldosterone, as well as increased sympathetic nerve activity. To determine whether AII can serve as a mediator rather than only as a marker of the antinatriuresis, a nonpressor dose of AII (5 ng/kg/min) was given during an ANF infusion in eight patients with cirrhosis and ascites who responded to ANF infusion with a natriuresis. Patients were maintained in metabolic balance and measurements of para-aminohippuric acid, inulin, and lithium clearance were taken before and during infusion of ANF with or without AII. Atrial natriuretic factor infusion was associated with a natriuretic response accompanied by an increase in glomerular filtration rate, filtration fraction, and lithium clearance compared with baseline. The addition of AII was associated with a return of the glomerular filtration rate to baseline, with no change in filtration fraction. This was reversible on withdrawal of AII infusion. Natriuresis induced by ANF occurred despite baseline elevations of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system and was associated with an increase in distal delivery of sodium and a decrease in fractional reabsorption of distally delivered sodium as estimated by lithium clearance parameters. Angiotensin II infusion exerted effects on both proximal and distal nephron sites to abrogate ANF-induced natriuresis. These results suggest that AII may serve as a mediator as well as a marker of resistance to the natriuretic effect of ANF in patients with cirrhosis and ascites.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)