BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Stem Cells. Aug 26, 2026; 18(8): 121648
Published online Aug 26, 2026. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.121648
Table 1 Summary of key clinical studies evaluating mesenchymal stem cell therapy in Crohn’s disease
Ref.
Country
n (control vs MSC)
Autologous/allogeneic
Cell type/product
Follow-up
Main outcomes
Molendijk et al[48], 2015Netherlands6 vs 15AllogeneicBM-MSC24 weeksFistula healing 40% vs 0%; good safety
Panés et al[42], 2016Europe/Israel107 vs 105AllogeneicAD-MSC (Cx601, darvadstrocel)24 weeksCombined remission 50% vs 34%; similar safety
Panés et al[6], 2018Europe/Israel103 vs 102AllogeneicAD-MSC (Cx601)52 weeksSustained remission 56% vs 36%
Zhou et al[49], 2020China11 vs 11AutologousAD-MSC52 weeksHealing 63.6%; CDAI & PDAI improved; safe
Garcia-Olmo et al[50], 2022Europe/Israel15 vs 25AllogeneicAD-MSC (Cx601)104 weeksSustained closure approximately 65%; no long-term safety issues
Lightner et al[51], 2023United States2-4 vs 4-15AllogeneicBM-MSC/Remestemcel-L6 weeks to 3 monthsFistula healing; CDAI & CRP improvement; acceptable safety
Lindsay et al[52], 2017United Kingdom9 vs 13AutologousHSC48 weeksCDAI, SES-CD, IBDQ, MARIA, PRO2 improved; reversible AEs
Table 2 Comparative studies of mesenchymal stem cell sheets and cell suspensions across different disease models
Ref.
Model
MSC source
Comparison
Outcome type
Main outcome
Gao et al[62], 2022Porcine myocardial infarctionhUC-MSCCell sheet vs suspensionFunctional recoveryCell sheets improved cardiac function and reduced infarct size more effectively than MSC suspension
Takemura et al[66], 2020Rat diabetic nephropathyAD-MSCCell sheet vs IV suspensionAnti-inflammatory/anti-fibroticCell sheets showed greater attenuation of renal inflammation and fibrosis than suspended MSCs
Imafuku et al[65], 2019Rat renal ischemia-reperfusion injuryBM-MSCCell sheet vs IV suspensionAnti-fibroticCell sheets more effectively reduced renal fibrosis and preserved microvasculature than MSC suspension
Chen et al[63], 2017Mouse skin wound/subcutaneous implantationAD-MSCCell sheet vs suspensionRetention/paracrine activityCell sheets exhibited higher cell retention and stronger paracrine factor secretion than suspended MSCs
Long et al[64], 2014Mouse critical-sized femoral defectBM-MSCCell sheet vs suspensionStructural regenerationCell sheets promoted superior bone regeneration and graft integration compared with MSC suspension
Qi et al[67], 2014Rabbit cartilage/meniscal defectBM-MSCCell sheet vs suspensionCartilage repairCell sheets achieved better matrix deposition and defect repair than injected MSCs
Table 3 Comparison between mesenchymal stem cell therapy and myoblast cell sheet therapy
Item
MSC therapy
Myoblast cell sheet therapy
Main effectImmunomodulation and improvement of the local inflammatory environmentLocal repair with potential muscle layer reconstruction
DeliveryUsually local injection; cells may be easily lostTransplanted as a cell sheet, with better local retention
Repair patternRegulatory repairPotential structural support and repair
Evidence in CDSupported by several clinical studiesDirect evidence remains limited
Potential rolePromotes fistula closure and inflammation controlMay support tissue reconstruction in complex fistulas


Write to the Help Desk