临床研究
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
世界华人消化杂志. 2018-07-18; 26(20): 1247-1252
在线出版 2018-07-18. doi: 10.11569/wcjd.v26.i20.1247
表1 两组患者治疗前一般情况比较 (n = 55, mean ± SD)
分组年龄 (岁)性别比 (男/女)Ranson评分APACHE-Ⅱ评分是否合并脏器功能障碍
对照组49.8 ± 7.837/183.8 ± 1.610.6 ± 2.94015
TPF-DM组50.4 ± 8.136/193.7 ± 1.510.8 ± 3.03916
t20.39570.04070.33810.35550.0449
P0.69310.84010.73590.72290.8322
表2 两组患者不同时段炎症水平比较 (n = 55, mean±SD)
分组WBC (×109/L)
CRP (mg/L)
入院时7 d14 d入院时7 d14 d
对照组17.2 ± 5.213.8 ± 2.17.8 ± 1.8355.7 ± 48.6198.6 ± 25.966.2 ± 16.6
TPF-DM组16.9 ± 4.912.1 ± 2.26.2 ± 1.4358.9 ± 50.8169.7 ± 19.451.1 ± 12.7
t0.31144.14535.20350.33766.62325.3579
P0.75610.0001<0.0010.7363<0.001<0.001
表3 两组患者不同时段相关生化指标比较 (n = 55, mean±SD)
分组ALB (g/L)
AMY (U/L)
ET (EU/mL)
入院时7 d14 d入院时7 d14 d入院时7 d14 d
对照组33.1 ± 2.735.5 ± 2.636.4 ± 2.9985.5 ± 148.2724.5 ± 98.1158.7 ± 41.10.49 ± 0.120.38 ± 0.070.22 ± 0.04
TPF-DM组33.4 ± 2.637.1 ± 2.838.3 ± 3.1976.8 ± 141.7607.3 ± 80.6129.6 ± 34.80.51 ± 0.110.33 ± 0.060.10 ± 0.02
t0.59363.10553.31940.31476.84584.00730.91114.022019.8997
P0.55400.00240.00120.7536<0.0010.00010.36420.0001<0.001
表4 两组患者不同时段免疫指标比较 (n = 55, mean±SD)
分组IgG (g/L)
IgM (g/L)
IgA (g/L)
入院时7 d14 d入院时7 d14 d入院时7 d14 d
对照组13.8 ± 2.115.7 ± 2.217.4 ± 2.11.48 ± 0.291.67 ± 0.321.74 ± 0.331.41 ± 0.241.58 ± 0.251.69 ± 0.26
TPF-DM组13.9 ± 2.217.7 ± 2.319.1 ± 2.41.51 ± 0.311.71 ± 0.341.96 ± 0.351.40 ± 0.221.72 ± 0.271.89 ± 0.28
t0.24384.66023.95340.52410.63543.39170.22782.82163.8670
P0.8078<0.0010.00010.60130.52650.00100.82020.00570.0002
表5 两组患者医疗指标比较 (n = 55)
分组腹痛消失时间住院时间住院费用死亡率
对照组12.5 ± 2.818.7 ± 3.67.8 ± 1.16 (10.90)
TPF-DM组11.8 ± 2.517.6 ± 3.47.4 ± 1.23 (5.45)
统计值1.38301.64751.82231.0891
P0.16950.10240.07120.2967

引文著录: 王博, 陈飞翔, 孙崖霄, 张存海. TPF-DM对急性重症胰腺炎伴肠道菌群移位患者免疫功能的影响. 世界华人消化杂志 2018; 26(20): 1247-1252