Esophageal Cancer
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2003.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 15, 2003; 9(11): 2409-2412
Published online Nov 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i11.2409
Table 1 Relationship between cellular DNA content and cytologic diagnosis
Cellular diagnosisNo.of casesDI value (¯x ± s)P value (t test)
Normal2171.01 ± 0.06> 0.2
Mild dysplasia3061.03 ± 0.10< 0.01
Moderte dysplasia9521.06 ± 0.27< 0.01
Severe dysplasia3491.09 ± 0.14< 0.01
Cancer921.24 ± 0.18< 0.01
Table 2 Relationship between DNA ploid and cytologic diagnosis
Cellular diagnosisNo.of casesDNA
ploidy pattern
Rate ofheteroploid (%)P value χ² test
diploidheteroploid
Normal217196219.7> 0.05
Mild dysplasia306280268.5> 0.01
Moderate dysplasia95279116116.9< 0.01
Severe dysplasia34922912034.4< 0.01
Cancer92207278.3< 0.01
Table 3 Expression of P53, P21 in various lesions of esophageal epithelial cells
Cytological groupNo.of casesP53 FI (¯x ± s)P53+ cases (%)P21 FI (¯x ± s)P21+ cases (%)
Normal101.00 ± 0.1101.00 ± 0.190
Mild dysplasia241.10 ± 0.155 (20.8%)1.09 ± 0.216 (25.0%)
Severe dysplasia611.36 ± 0.3234 (54.8%)1.34 ± 0.3535 (57.4%)
Cancer52.28 ± 0.205 (100%)1.82 ± 0.245 (100%)
Table 4 Results of cyclin D1 and TP1 expression in various lesions of esophageal epithelia
Cytologic diagnosisNo.of casesCyclin D1, FI (¯x ± s)Cyclin D1+ casesTP FI (¯x ± s)TP1+ cases
Normal71.00 ± 0.0700.99 ± 0.070
Mild dysplasia110.97 ± 0.121 (9.1%)1.22 ± 0.157 (63.6%)
Severe dysplasia761.21 ± 0.2245 (59.2%)1.33 ± 0.2764 (84.2%)
Cancer61.84 ± 0.186 (100%)1.70 ± 0.156 (100%)