Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2026; 32(44): 120795
Published online Nov 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.120795
Published online Nov 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.120795
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study populations, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Variables | EOGC (n = 105) | M-GC (n = 532) | P value |
| Age (year) | 44.51 ± 4.25 | 63.95 ± 7.16 | < 0.001 |
| Sex | 0.101 | ||
| Male | 70 (66.67) | 396 (74.44) | |
| Female | 35 (33.33) | 136 (25.56) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.22 ± 4.03 | 23.84 ± 3.69 | 0.357 |
| Underlying disease | 33 (31.43) | 308 (57.89) | < 0.001 |
| Previous history of other malignancies | 4 (3.81) | 42 (7.89) | 0.139 |
| CCI score | 2.66 ± 1.31 | 4.50 ± 1.43 | < 0.001 |
| Extent of resection | 0.369 | ||
| Subtotal gastrectomy | 72 (68.57) | 399 (75.00) | |
| Total gastrectomy | 26 (24.76) | 108 (20.30) | |
| Palliative resection | 7 (6.67) | 25 (4.70) | |
| pTNM stage | 0.290 | ||
| I | 49 (46.67) | 298 (56.02) | |
| II | 24 (22.86) | 104 (19.55) | |
| III | 24 (22.86) | 105 (19.74) | |
| IV | 8 (7.62) | 25 (4.70) |
Table 2 Comparison of pathologic results of patients with radical resection, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Variables | EOGC (n = 97) | M-GC (n = 503) | P value |
| pT stage | 0.521 | ||
| T1a | 26 (26.80) | 126 (25.05) | |
| T1b | 23 (23.71) | 156 (31.01) | |
| T2 | 9 (9.28) | 54 (10.74) | |
| T3 | 25 (25.77) | 99 (19.68) | |
| T4 | 14 (14.43) | 68 (13.52) | |
| pN stage | 0.777 | ||
| N0 | 60 (61.86) | 325 (64.61) | |
| N1 | 11 (11.34) | 64 (12.72) | |
| N2 | 10 (10.31) | 50 (9.94) | |
| N3 | 16 (16.49) | 64 (12.72) | |
| Tumor size (cm) | 4.47 ± 3.23 | 4.08 ± 2.87 | 0.228 |
| Number of retrieved LNs | 37.79 ± 12.94 | 35.28 ± 14.20 | 0.094 |
| Number of metastatic LNs | 3.73 ± 10.15 | 2.66 ± 6.19 | 0.545 |
| Multiplicity | 0.782 | ||
| Single lesion | 94 (96.91) | 482 (95.83) | |
| Multiple lesions | 3 (3.09) | 21 (4.17) | |
| Lauren classification | < 0.001 | ||
| Intestinal type | 25 (25.77) | 277 (55.07) | |
| Diffuse type | 51 (52.58) | 112 (22.27) | |
| Mixed type | 15 (15.46) | 69 (13.72) | |
| Indeterminate type | 6 (6.19) | 45 (8.95) | |
| LV invasion | 24 (24.74) | 177 (35.19) | 0.046 |
| PN invasion | 33 (34.02) | 122 (24.25) | 0.044 |
| Extent of omentectomy | 0.916 | ||
| Total omentectomy | 37 (38.14) | 189 (37.57) | |
| Partial omentectomy | 60 (61.86) | 314 (62.43) | |
| Postoperative complications | 0.242 | ||
| No | 93 (95.88) | 482 (95.83) | |
| CDC I | 2 (2.06) | 3 (0.60) | |
| > CDC II | 2 (2.06) | 18 (3.58) | |
| In-hospital mortality | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.40) | 1 |
| Adjuvant CTx | 44 (45.36) | 153 (30.42) | 0.004 |
Table 3 Hazard ratios of recurrence-free survival by pathological stage
| Unadjusted | IPTW-adjusted | ||||
| HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | ||
| pStage I | M-GC | 1.00 | 0.064 | 1.00 | 0.234 |
| EOGC | 0.38 (0.14-1.06) | 0.60 (0.26-1.40) | |||
| pStage II | M-GC | 1.00 | 0.080 | 1.00 | 0.136 |
| EOGC | 0.47 (0.17-1.10) | 0.50 (0.20-1.25) | |||
| pStage III | M-GC | 1.00 | 0.043 | 1.00 | 0.032 |
| EOGC | 0.53 (0.29-0.98) | 0.50 (0.26-0.94) | |||
| Total population | M-GC | 1.00 | 0.014 | 1.00 | 0.021 |
| EOGC | 0.57 (0.36-0.89) | 0.50 (0.38-0.93) | |||
Table 4 Hazard ratios of overall survival by pathological stage
| Unadjusted | IPTW-adjusted | ||||
| HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | ||
| pStage I | M-GC | 1.00 | 0.051 | 1.00 | 0.016 |
| EOGC | 0.31 (0.10-1.00) | 0.32 (0.10-1.03) | |||
| pStage II | M-GC | 1.00 | 0.095 | 1.00 | 0.225 |
| EOGC | 0.42 (1.48-1.16) | 0.55 (0.21-1.44) | |||
| pStage III | M-GC | 1.00 | 0.125 | 1.00 | 0.120 |
| EOGC | 0.62 (0.34-1.14) | 0.61 (0.32-1.14) | |||
| pStage IV | M-GC | 1.00 | 0.222 | 1.00 | 0.052 |
| EOGC | 0.60 (0.27-1.36) | 0.34 (0.11-1.01) | |||
| Total population | M-GC | 1.00 | 0.072 | 1.00 | 0.016 |
| EOGC | 0.69 (0.46-1.03) | 0.58 (0.37-0.90) | |||
- Citation: Jeong SA, Lee JB, Kim JH. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of early-onset vs mid-aged gastric cancer using an evidence-based age cutoff. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(44): 120795
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i44/120795.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.120795