Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2026; 32(35): 121133
Published online Sep 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121133
Published online Sep 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121133
Table 1 Influences of nanoparticle physicochemical properties on immune modulation in colorectal cancer immunotherapy
| Physicochemical property | Parameter range | Immune-correlated effects in CRC | Ref. |
| Size | 4-14 nm | M1 macrophage polarization through cellular uptake efficiency and lysosomal stress | [56] |
| 10-100 nm | Efficient lymphatic drainage and lymph node accumulation | [54] | |
| 750-1000 nm | M1 macrophage polarization through membrane interaction | [56] | |
| Shape | Spherical | Higher cellular internalization efficiency | [60] |
| Spiky | Physical activation of innate immunity | [61] | |
| Surface charge | Positive | Enhanced cellular uptake; increased immunogenicity | [62] |
| Negative | Efficient lymph node accumulation; longer circulation | [63] | |
| Elasticity | Soft | Activate Piezo1; reprogram TAMs | [64] |
| Surface funtionalization | PEGylation | Reprogram protein corona; extended circulation half-life | [68] |
| Glycosylation | Promoted M1 polarization of macrophages through interaction with TLR4 receptors | [69] | |
| Cell membrane coating | Homologous targeting to CRC cells; immune evasion and enhanced tumor immunogenicity | [70,71] |
Table 2 Summary of organic nanomaterial-based in vitro and in vivo studies in colorectal cancer
| Nanoformulation | Compound/system | Model | Key findings | Ref. |
| Dendrimers | Au NR@PAMAM-GX1/FAM172A | In vitro (HCT-8, L929 cells) and in vivo (tumor-bearing mice) | Reduced cell viability to ~20% under laser irradiation; enabled combined gene and photothermal therapy | Ye et al[143], 2021 |
| Dendrimers | G5-HP/CpG | In vitro (MC38 cells) and in vivo (tumor-bearing mice) | Induced tumor ablation and immunogenic cell death | Zhong et al[145], 2025 |
| Liposomes | Metformin + 2-deoxyglucose-loaded liposomes | In vitro (CT26 cells) and in vivo (tumor-bearing mice) | Demonstrated efficacy in both localized and metastatic CRC models | Li et al[150], 2024 |
| Liposomes | LBP-CD155 L nanovesicles | In vitro (HT-29 cells) and in vivo (tumor-bearing mice) | Enhanced therapeutic efficacy in CRC through immune modulation | Yan et al[151], 2025 |
| Polymeric nanoparticles | EpCAM aptamer-functionalized 5-FU-loaded PLGA NPs (Ap-FU-NPs) | In vitro (HCT-116, CT-26, HEK-293 cells) and in vivo (tumor-bearing mice) | Showed targeted delivery and enhanced efficacy in EpCAM-overexpressing CRC cells | Yavari et al[155], 2023 |
| Polymeric nanoparticles | Berberine-loaded PEG-PLGA NPs | In vitro (HCT-116 cells) and in vivo (tumor-bearing mice) | Improved tumor accumulation, sustained release, and enhanced anticancer activity | Shen et al[156], 2024 |
Table 3 Summary of inorganic nanomaterial-based in vitro and in vivo studies in colorectal cancer
| Nanoformulation | Compound/system | Model | Key findings | Ref. |
| QDs | Carbon quantum dots-silver heterostructure (CQD/Ag) | In vitro (HCT116 cells) | Exhibited potent anticancer activity via Akt signaling with minimal toxicity to normal cells | Mishra et al[110], 2023 |
| QDs | QD-P (PLAC-1-targeted quantum dots) | In vitro (HCT-29, HCT-116, LS-180 cells) | Demonstrated theranostic potential for detection and targeted treatment of PLAC-1-positive CRC cells | Haider et al[112], 2023 |
| IONPs | 5-FU-loaded IONPs with magnetic hyperthermia | In vivo (HT-29 tumor-bearing mice) | Showed significant tumor inhibition when combined with magnetic hyperthermia | Dabaghi et al[116], 2021 |
| IONPs | 5-FU-loaded IONPs | In vitro (Caco-2 cells) | Optimized formulation (IONP:5-FU = 1.5:1) showed highest antitumor activity | Predoi et al[117], 2023 |
| IONPs | Oleic acid-modified superparamagnetic IONPs and PLL (OPPL nanodrug) | In vitro and in vivo (CRC models) | Enhanced tumor accumulation, increased cytotoxicity, and suppressed tumor growth | Li et al[118], 2024 |
| CNTs | ADP@SWNT/TNFα | In vitro (HCT116 cells) and in vivo (tumor-bearing mice) | Suppressed tumor growth and metastasis; activity enhanced under near-infrared irradiation | Chen et al[125], 2022 |
| CNTs | CNTs combined with 5-FU, tacrine, and ethionamide | In vitro (HT-29 cells) | Improved anticancer activity of both chemotherapeutic and repurposed drugs | Abreu et al[127], 2023 |
| AuNPs | Cetuximab-conjugated AuNPs | In vitro (HT-29 cells) | Enhanced cytotoxicity and altered phenotypic behavior of CRC cells | El Hallal et al[136], 2021 |
| AgNPs | Citrate-coated (AgNP-cit) and EG6OH-coated (AgNP-EG6OH) | In vitro (LoVo and HT-29 cells) | EG6OH-coated AgNPs showed minimal toxicity toward CRC cells and primary colonocytes | Barbalinardo et al[139], 2025 |
Table 4 Comparative summary of major nanocarriers used in colorectal cancer drug delivery
| Nanocarrier class | Representative examples | Key properties | Main advantages in CRC | Main limitations | Typical applications in CRC |
| Polymeric nanoparticles | PLGA, PEG-PLGA, polymeric micelles, polymersomes, nanospheres | Biodegradable, tunable size and surface chemistry, controlled drug release | Good biocompatibility, sustained release, flexible ligand modification, suitable for small molecules and nucleic acids | Possible burst release, formulation complexity, scale-up challenges | Chemotherapy delivery, gene/miRNA delivery, combination therapy, targeted delivery |
| Dendrimers | PAMAM, poly(propyleneimine), poly(L-lysine) dendrimers | Highly branched 3D architecture, multiple surface groups, high loading capacity | Precise surface functionalization, strong drug/gene conjugation potential, useful for multifunctional systems | Potential toxicity at higher generations, synthesis cost, limited large-scale translation | Targeted chemotherapy, gene delivery, photothermal and photoimmunotherapy |
| Liposomes | Conventional liposomes, PEGylated liposomes, liposomal nanovaccines | Phospholipid bilayer vesicles with aqueous core, biocompatible, able to carry hydrophilic and hydrophobic cargo | Strong translational maturity, reduced systemic toxicity, good encapsulation flexibility, suitable for immunomodulators | Stability issues, leakage during storage, RES clearance if not optimized | Chemotherapy, metabolic therapy, immunotherapy, vaccine delivery |
| Nanoemulsions/Lipid nanoparticles | Nanoemulsions, solid lipid nanoparticles, lipid-based nanocarriers | Lipid-rich structure, good solubilization of hydrophobic drugs, oral-delivery potential | Improved bioavailability, useful for colon-targeted and mucosal delivery, relatively low toxicity | Physical instability, limited drug-loading for some agents, formulation sensitivity | Oral delivery, colon-specific release, hydrophobic drug delivery |
| Quantum dots | Carbon quantum dots, graphene oxide quantum dots, peptide-functionalized QDs | Strong fluorescence, tunable optical properties, nanoscale imaging capability | Theranostic potential, real-time tracking, combined imaging and treatment | Concern about long-term toxicity and clinical translation, especially for non-carbon systems | Imaging, biomarker-targeted detection, theranostics |
| Iron oxide nanoparticles | Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, 5-FU-loaded IONPs, Fe3O4 nanocatalysts | Magnetic responsiveness, imaging capability, possible hyperthermia effects | Useful for image-guided therapy, magnetic targeting, hyperthermia, ferroptosis-related strategies | Need careful control of biodistribution and safety, variable tumor penetration | MRI contrast, magnetic hyperthermia, targeted chemotherapy, sonodynamic/chemodynamic therapy |
| Gold nanoparticles | AuNPs, antibody-conjugated AuNPs, drug-loaded AuNPs | High surface area, optical responsiveness, good surface functionalization | Useful for targeted delivery, photothermal therapy, receptor-specific systems, signal amplification | Cost, long-term accumulation concerns, translational standardization issues | Chemotherapy enhancement, receptor-targeted therapy, photothermal therapy |
| Silver nanoparticles | Citrate-coated AgNPs, surface-functionalized AgNPs | Reactive surface, antimicrobial and cytotoxic properties | Potential anticancer activity and carrier function | Greater concern about toxicity and off-target effects, less mature translational profile | Experimental cytotoxic systems, drug delivery carriers |
| CNTs | SWCNTs, MWCNTs, functionalized CNTs | High aspect ratio, large surface area, strong mechanical and thermal properties | Excellent loading capacity, membrane penetration, useful for photothermal and gene delivery strategies | Biopersistence and safety concerns, regulatory challenges | Drug delivery, gene delivery, photothermal therapy, combination therapy |
| Hydrogels/nanogel-associated systems | Thermosensitive hydrogels, injectable hydrogels, nanocomposite hydrogels | High water content, local depot effect, controlled release | Strong potential for local delivery, postoperative recurrence prevention, prolonged release | Limited systemic use, formulation-dependent stability, translation still emerging | Local drug delivery, postoperative CRC control, combination immunotherapy |
- Citation: Yang ZH, Huang QL, Luo L, Wu XX, Nie SW, Xu MM. Nanotechnology for drug delivery systems in colorectal cancer: Recent developments and future prospects. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(35): 121133
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i35/121133.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.121133