Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2025; 31(31): 109630
Published online Aug 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i31.109630
Published online Aug 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i31.109630
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of participants with hepatocellular carcinoma
Baseline characteristic | Total (n = 56) | NAC (n = 28) | DEXA (n = 28) | P value |
Male | 47 (83.9) | 24 (85.7) | 23 (82.1) | 1.0004 |
Age (years) | 59.7 ± 8.7 | 59.0 ± 6.6 | 60.3 ± 10.4 | 0.2593 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.3 ± 3.9 | 24.5 ± 4.5 | 24.1 ± 3.4 | 0.7542 |
Underlying diseases | ||||
Hypertension | 25 (44.6) | 13 (46.4) | 12 (42.9) | 0.7881 |
Diabetes mellitus | 14 (25.0) | 3 (10.7) | 11 (39.3) | 0.0294 |
Dyslipidemia | 7 (12.5) | 1 (3.6) | 6 (21.4) | 0.1014 |
Etiology of cirrhosis | ||||
Chronic hepatitis B | 20 (35.7) | 11 (39.3) | 9 (32.14) | 0.5771 |
Chronic hepatitis C | 23 (41.1) | 13 (46.4) | 10 (35.7) | 0.4151 |
Alcohol | 19 (33.9) | 11 (39.3) | 8 (28.6) | 0.3971 |
MASLD | 10 (17.9) | 2 (7.1) | 8 (28.6) | 0.0784 |
Child-Pugh score | 1.0004 | |||
A (5-6) | 52 (92.9) | 26 (92.9) | 26 (92.9) | |
B (7-8) | 4 (7.1) | 2 (7.1) | 2 (7.1) | |
MELD score | 0.7781 | |||
< 10 | 37 (66.1) | 18 (64.3) | 19 (67.9) | |
≥ 10 | 19 (33.9) | 10 (35.7) | 9 (32.1) | |
MELD score | 9.0 ± 1.8 | 9.2 ± 2.0 | 8.8 ± 1.6 | 0.6113 |
MELD-Na | 9.8 ± 4.4 | 9.4 ± 4.3 | 10.2 ± 4.5 | 0.4592 |
ALBI grade | 0.0944 | |||
1 | 5 (8.9) | 4 (14.3) | 1 (3.6) | |
2 | 30 (53.6) | 11 (39.3) | 19 (67.9) | |
3 | 21 (37.5) | 13 (46.4) | 8 (28.6) | |
ALBI score | -2.3 ± 0.5 | -2.2 ± 0.6 | -2.4 ± 0.4 | 0.2623 |
BCLC stage B | 0.2171 | |||
B1 | 14 (25.0) | 9 (32.1) | 5 (17.9) | |
B2 | 42 (75.0) | 19 (67.9) | 23 (82.1) | |
Maximum tumor size (cm) | 6.2 ± 3.7 | 5.2 ± 2.0 | 7.2 ± 4.6 | 0.1323 |
Tumor number | 0.3264 | |||
1 | 8 (14.3) | 2 (7.1) | 6 (21.4) | |
2-5 | 37 (66.1) | 21 (75.0) | 16 (57.1) | |
> 5 | 11 (19.6) | 5 (17.9) | 6 (21.4) | |
Tumor size plus number (Beyond up to 7) | 39 (69.6) | 18 (64.3) | 21 (75.0) | 0.3831 |
AST (U/L) | 68.1 ± 40.3 | 75.5 ± 43.9 | 60.6 ± 35.5 | 0.2483 |
ALT (U/L) | 44.1 ± 35.2 | 48.5 ± 33.3 | 39.6 ± 37.0 | 0.0703 |
Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0.9 ± 0.5 | 0.9 ± 0.6 | 0.8 ± 0.5 | 0.7243 |
Albumin (mg/dL) | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.6 | 3.7 ± 0.4 | 0.1812 |
Mitomycin dose (mL) | 14.5 ± 6.1 | 11.4 ± 6.1 | 17.5 ± 4.4 | < 0.0013 |
Lipiodol dose (mL) | 9.4 ± 5.6 | 8.4 ± 7.3 | 10.4 ± 3.0 | 0.0313 |
Table 2 Effectiveness of N-acetylcysteine compared to dexamethasone on the postembolization syndrome and the association of the characteristic of hepatocellular carcinoma (beyond up to 7) on postembolization syndrome
Variables | PES (n = 27) | No PES (n = 29) | OR (95%CI) | P value | Adjusted OR | P value |
Treatment group | ||||||
N-acetylcysteine | 9 (32.1) | 19 (67.9) | 0.26 (0.09- 0.80) | 0.018 | 0.17 (0.03- 0.87) | 0.0331 |
Dexamethasone | 18 (64.3) | 10 (35.7) | Reference | Reference | ||
Beyond up to 7 | ||||||
Yes | 22 (56.4) | 17 (43.6) | 3.11 (0.92-10.52) | 0.069 | 1.00 (0.16-6.30) | 1.0002 |
No | 5 (29.4) | 12 (70.6) | Reference | Reference |
Table 3 The dynamic change of albumin-bilirubin score between the N-acetylcysteine and dexamethasone group
Endpoints | NAC group (n = 28) | DEXA group (n = 28) | Mean ALBI change (NAC group)2 | P value | Mean ALBI change (DEXA group)2 | P value | Difference of mean ALBI change between the two group3 | P value |
ALBI | 0.18 (-0.07 to 0.42), P = 0.1581 | |||||||
Day 0 | -2.2 ± 0.6 | -2.4 ± 0.4 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
Day 2 | -1.6 ± 0.5 | -1.9 ± 0.3 | 0.60 (0.48 – 0.72) | < 0.001 | 0.55 (0.43 – 0.67) | < 0.001 | 0.05 (-0.12 – 0.22) | 0.568 |
Day 28 | -2.1 ± 0.6 | -2.1 ± 0.6 | 0.11 (-0.04 – 0.27) | 0.140 | 0.27 (0.11 – 0.42) | < 0.001 | -0.15 (-0.36 – 0.06) | 0.167 |
- Citation: Koonsiripaiboon P, Ruamtawee W, Simasingha N, Tanasoontrarat W, Claimon T, Sethasine S. Efficacy of N-acetylcysteine vs dexamethasone in preventing postembolization syndrome post-transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(31): 109630
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i31/109630.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i31.109630