Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2022; 28(10): 1055-1066
Published online Mar 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i10.1055
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of ulcerative colitis patients with neoplastic lesions (mean ± SD)

UCAN group (n = 19)
SN group (n = 22)
P value
Age at UC onset (yr)35.7 ± 10.948.8 ± 14.60.003a
Disease duration (yr)17.8 ± 9.412.9 ± 10.70.120a
Sex0.829b
Male1112
Female810
Extent of disease0.231b
Total colitis1614
Left-sided colitis36
Proctitis02
Clinical type0. 139b
Relapse and remission1015
Chronic persistent95
First attack02
Pathological type< 0.001b
LGD216
HGD115
Shallow submucosal invasive carcinoma 30
Deep submucosal invasive carcinoma 52
Primary sclerosing cholangitis100.463c
Family history of colorectal cancer120.639c
Table 2 Characteristics of endoscopic and macroscopic findings

UCAN group (n = 21)
SN group (n = 23)
P value
Tumor location0.044a
Proctosigmoid colon1712
Others411
Tumor color0.032a
Red159
Pale or the same as the surrounding mucosa614
Lesion border< 0.001a
Clear523
Unclear160
Tumor morphology0.173a
Pedunculated00
Sessile87
Superficial elevated714
Flat20
Depressed42
UCEIS (median, range)2 (0–4)0 (0–5)< 0.001b
Table 3 Diagnostic performance (95% confidence interval) for each type in the Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team classification

Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
PPV (%)
NPV (%)
Accuracy (%)
UCAN JNET type 2A
Experts50.0 (10.2–85.6)94.7 (90.5–98.5)50.0 (10.2–85.6)94.7 (90.5–98.5)90.5 (82.9–97.3)
Non-experts100 (36.9–100)78.9 (72.3–78.9)33.3 (12.3–33.3)100 (91.6–100)81.0 (68.9–81.0)
UCAN JNET type 2B
Experts78.6 (64.6–89.5)57.1 (29.2–79.1)78.6 (64.6–89.5)57.1 (29.2–79.1)71.4 (52.8–86.1)
Non-experts78.6 (63.8–87.9)71.4 (41.9–90.0)84.6 (68.7–94.6)62.5 (36.6–78.8)76.2 (56.5–88.6)
UCAN JNET type 3
Experts60.0 (27.5–75.9)93.8 (83.6–98.7)75.0 (34.4–94.9)88.2 (78.7–92.9)85.7 (70.3–93.3)
Non-experts40.0 (14.9–40.0)100 (92.2–100)100 (37.3–100)84.2 (77.6–84.2)85.7 (73.8–85.7)
SN JNET type 2A
Experts75.0 (62.6–75.0)100 (71.6–100)100 (83.4–100)63.6 (45.5–63.6)82.6 (65.3–82.6)
Non-experts87.5 (74.7–92.5)85.7 (56.4–97.1)93.3 (79.6–98.7)75.0 (49.3–85.0)87.0 (69.1–93.9)
SN JNET type 2B
Experts100 (63.4–100)83.3 (73.2–83.3)62.5 (39.6–62.5)100 (87.8–100)87.0 (71.0–87.0)
Non-experts80.0 (42.6–96.1)83.3 (72.9–87.8)57.1 (30.4–68.7)93.8 (82.1–98.8)82.6 (66.4–89.6)
SN JNET type 3
Experts50.0 (11.2–50.0)100 (96.3–100)100 (22.4–100)95.5 (91.9–95.5)95.7 (88.9–95.7)
Non-experts50.0 (11.2–50.0)100 (96.3–100)100 (22.4–100)95.5 (91.9–95.5)95.7 (88.9–95.7)
Table 4 Diagnostic performance (95% confidence interval) for each type in the pit pattern classification

Sensitivity, (%)
Specificity, (%)
PPV, (%)
NPV, (%)
Accuracy, (%)
UCAN pit pattern type III/IV
Experts100 (37.3–100)84.2 (77.6–84.2)40.0 (14.9–40.0)100 (92.2–100)85.7 (73.8–85.7)
Non-experts100 (36.4–100)57.9 (51.2–57.9)20.0 (7.3–20.0)100 (88.4–100)61.9 (49.8–61.9)
UCAN pit pattern type VI low irregularity
Experts50.0 (35.2–59.8)71.4 (41.9–91.0)77.8 (54.8–93.0)41.7 (24.4–53.1)57.1 (37.5–70.2)
Non-experts42.9 (28.4–48.7)85.7 (56.7–97.3)85.7 (56.7–97.3)42.9 (28.4–48.7)57.1 (37.8–64.9)
UCAN pit pattern type VI high irregularity/VN
Experts60.0 (26.1–85.8)81.3 (70.7–89.3)50.0 (21.8–71.5)86.7 (75.4–95.3)76.2 (60.1–88.5)
Non-experts60.0 (27.5–75.9)93.8 (83.6–98.7)75.0 (34.4–94.9)88.2 (78.7–92.9)85.7 (70.3–93.3)
SN pit pattern type III/IV
Experts87.5 (75.6–87.5)100 (72.8–100)100 (86.4–100)77.8 (56.6–77.8)91.3 (74.8–91.3)
Non-experts81.3 (68.1–86.3)85.7 (55.6–97.3)92.9 (77.8–98.6)66.7 (43.3–75.6)82.6 (64.3–89.6)
SN pit pattern type VI low irregularity
Experts100 (63.4–100)83.3 (73.2–83.3)62.5 (39.6–62.5)100 (87.8–100)87.0 (71.0–87.0)
Non-experts60.0 (26.0–85.9)83.3 (73.9–90.5)50.0 (21.7–71.6)88.2 (78.2–95.8)78.3 (63.5–89.5)
SN pit pattern type VI high irregularity/VN
Experts50.0 (11.2–50.0)100 (96.3–100)100 (22.4–100)95.5 (91.9–95.5)95.7 (88.9–95.7)
Non-experts50.0 (10.2–85.6)95.2 (91.4–98.6)50.0 (10.2–85.6)95.2 (91.4–98.6)91.3 (84.4–97.5)
Table 5 Intra-observer agreement

Experts
Non-experts
UCAN
JNET classification0.387 (0.369–0.521)0.640 (0.566–0.708)
Pit pattern classification0.454 (0.391–0.509)0.569 (0.422–0.599)
SN
JNET classification0.803 (0.581–0.832)0.828 (0.686–0.849)
Pit pattern classification0.567 (0.477–0.595)0.628 (0.422–0.766)
Table 6 Inter-observer agreement

Experts
Non-experts
UCAN
JNET classification0.4010.237
Pit pattern classification0.3640.378
SN
JNET classification0.6660.503
Pit-pattern classification0.5970.437
Table 7 Diagnostic results of Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team classification type 2A and pit pattern classification type III/IV in ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasms
NumberPathological result
LGD (n = 2)
HGD-sSM (n = 14)
dSM (n = 5)
Endoscopist 1
JNET type 2A8170
Pit type III/IV7232
Endoscopist 2
JNET type 2A2110
Pit type III/IV5230
Endoscopist 3
JNET type 2A2011
Pit type III/IV7250
Endoscopist 4
JNET type 2A9261
Pit type III/IV8251
Endoscopist 5
JNET type 2A5221
Pit type III/IV8260
Endoscopist 6
JNET type 2A7250
Pit type III/IV9261