Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2021; 27(32): 5424-5437
Published online Aug 28, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i32.5424
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients in Groups A, B, and C

Group A (n = 41)
Group B (n = 30)
Group C (n = 63)
P value
Age (yr)70 (43–89)67 (41–87)69 (48–87)0.233
Sex
Male, n (%)33 (80.5)22 (73.3)44 (69.8)0.481
Child-Pugh class, n (%)0.288
A33 (80.5)27 (90.0)57 (90.5)
B8 (19.5)3 (10.0)6 (9.5)
Etiology, n (%)
HCV22 (53.7)11 (36.7)44 (69.8)0.235
HBV9 (21.9)10 (33.3)11 (17.5)0.417
Other10 (24.4)9 (30.0)8 (12.7)0.109
Portal vein thrombosis14 (34.1)10 (33.3)11 (17.5)0.099
Extrahepatic spread, n (%)20 (48.8)19 (63.3)28 (44.4)0.230
AFP (ng/mL), n (%)
> 40017 (41.5)17 (56.7)29 (46.0)0.437
BCLC staging, n (%)0.333
Stage B15 (36.6)10 (33.3)30 (47.6)
Stage C26 (63.4)20 (66.7%)33 (52.4)
ECOG performance status, n (%)0.955
030 (75.6)22 (73.3)46 (73.0)
110 (24.4)8 (26.7)17 (27.0)
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)0.99 ± 0.360.91 ± 0.370.83 ± 0.330.052
Albumin (g/L)3.61 ± 0.503.73 ± 0.543.82 ± 0.490.301
INR1.14 ± 0.111.15 ± 0.161.14 ± 0.190.481
Pre-sorafenib TACE procedures, n (%)0.531
013 (31.7)9 (30.0)20 (31.8)
13 (7.3)6 (20.0)13 (20.6)
26 (14.6)1 (3.3)4 (6.4)
34 (9.8)2 (6.7)8 (12.7)
45 (12.2)3 (10.0)12 (19.0)
> 510 (24.4)9 (30.0)6 (9.5)
Table 2 Prevalence of adverse events after beginning sorafenib, according to CTCAE version 5.0, n (%)

Group A (n = 41)
Group B (n = 30)
Group C (n = 63)
All grades
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
All grades
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
All grades
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Any adverse event37 (90.2)30 (73.2)18 (43.9)5 (12.2)30 (100)28 (93.3)24 (80.0)14 (46.6)63 (100)58 (92.1)36 (57.1)14 (22.2)
Hand-foot skin reaction0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)30 (100)15 (50.0)10 (33.3)5 (16.7)63 (100)39 (61.9)19 (30.2)5 (7.9)
Anemia17 (41.5)8 (19.5)8 (19.5)1 (2.4)20 (66.6)13 (43.3)4 (13.3)3 (10.0)23 (36.5)14 (22.2)7 (11.1)2 (3.2)
Diarrhea15 (36.6)12 (29.3)3 (7.3)0 (0)11 (36.6)9 (30.0)1 (3.3)1 (3.3)27 (42.8)21 (33.3)2 (3.2)4 (6.3)
Fatigue14 (34.1)10 (26.8)3 (7.3)0 (0)11 (36.6)7 (23.3)4 (13.3)0 (0)16 (25.4)10 (15.9)6 (9.5)0 (0)
Anorexia14 (34.1)10 (24.4)3 (7.3)1 (2.4)7 (23.3)5 (16.7)1 (3.3)1 (3.3)19 (30.1)15 (23.8)4 (6.3)0 (0)
Hypertension12 (29.3)10 (24.4)2 (4.9)0 (0)7 (23.3)2 (6.6)5 (16.7)0 (0)23 (36.5)16 (25.4)4 (6.3)3 (4.8)
Thrombocytopenia9 (22.0)2 (4.9)4 (9.7)3 (7.3)23 (76.7)10 (33.3)8 (26.7)5 (16.7)20 (31.7)10 (15.9)5 (7.9)5 (7.9)
Alopecia6 (14.6)4 (9.7)2 (4.9)0 (0)2 (6.6)2 (6.6)0 (0)0 (0)20 (31.7)19 (30.2)1 (1.6)0 (0)
Hepatic encephalopathy1 (2.4)0 (0)1 (2.4)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Table 3 Dose modification related to adverse events

Group A (n = 41)
Group B (n = 30)
Group C (n = 63)
Group A vs Group B, P value
Group A vs Group C, P value
Group B vs Group C, P value
Dose reduction to initial dose of sorafenib8/41 (19.5%)2/30 (6.7%)26/63 (41.3%)0.7000.1080.005
Re-escalation to initial dose of sorafenib2/8 (25.0%)2/2 (100.0%)2/26 (7.7%)NANANA
Table 4 Radiological response according to the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors

Group A (n = 41)
Group B (n = 30)
Group C (n = 63)
Complete response011
Partial response115
Stable disease101135
Progressive disease301722
Response rate2.4%6.7%9.5%
Disease control rate26.8%43.3%65.1%
Table 5 Reasons for permanent sorafenib discontinuation, n (%)

Group A (n = 41)
Group B (n = 30)
Group C (n = 63)
Group A vs Group B, P value
Group A vs Group C, P value
Group B vs Group C, P value
Progression26 (63.4)7 (23.3)33 (52.4)0.0061.0000.046
Intolerance7 (17.1)18 (60.0)13 (20.6)0.0021.0000.001
Liver failure6 (14.6)3 (10.0)8 (12.7)1.0001.0001.000
Other2 (4.9)2 (6.7)9 (14.3)1.0000.6901.000
Table 6 Prognostic factors of overall survival by multivariable Cox regression analysis

Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR
95%CI
P value
HR
95%CI
P value
Age (within 70 yr)0.8670.603–1.2460.440---
Male1.2160.802–1.8420.357---
Etiology (HBV)1.3130.809–2.1330.271--
BCLC stage B0.6670.459–0.9690.0330.6010.405–0.8910.011
Portal vein thrombosis1.6771.092–2.5750.0181.1330.674–1.9030.638
Extrahepatic spread0.7400.509–1.0740.1130.6710.419–1.0760.098
AFP (> 400 ng/mL)1.2820.893–1.8390.1781.3700.936–2.0060.105
ECOG Performance status 10.7520.488–1.1580.1961.0420.636–1.7080.869
Group A vs Group B0.7030.431–1.1470.1590.6580.398–1.0880.103
Group A vs Group C0.4310.281–0.663< 0.0010.4070.253–0.654< 0.001
Sorafenib administration period (second half vs first half)1.2050.840–1.7280.311---
Table 7 Prognostic factors of time-to-treatment failure by multivariable Cox regression analysis


Univariate analysis


Multivariate analysis

HR
95%CI
P value
HR
95%CI
P value
Age (within 70 yr)1.0590.747–1.5010.747---
Male0.9260.625–1.3720.703---
Etiology (HBV)1.2080.768–1.9010.413---
BCLC stage C1.3110.921–1.8660.132---
Portal vein thrombosis1.3790.925–2.056 0.1151.0110.662–1.5450.958
Diarrhea0.6750.473–0.9650.0310.6540.449–0.9520.027
Hypertension1.0700.735–1.5560.725---
ECOG Performance status 10.6870.446–1.0580.0890.7250.463–1.1350.159
Group B vs Group A1.6701.034–2.6980.0361.6941.044–2.7480.033
Group C vs Group A0.4950.328–0.747< 0.0010.5290.346–0.8110.003
Sorafenib administration period (second half vs first half)0.9800.694–1.3840.908---
Table 8 Prognostic factors of proportion of days covered by logistic regression analyses

Adjusted analyses
OR
95%CI
P value
Male0.3520.141–0.8770.025
Child-Pugh stage B3.8301.180–12.4000.025
Diarrhea0.4720.198–1.1200.089
Group B vs Group A0.1130.036–0.356< 0.001
Group B vs Group C0.0910.031–0.266< 0.001