Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2021; 27(12): 1182-1193
Published online Mar 28, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i12.1182
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of malignant and benign focal liver lesions of 73 patients
Characteristic
Malignant
Benign
Total
Per-patient basis
No. of patients (%)49 (67.1)24 (32.9)73
Age (yr)
mean ± SD56.3 ± 10.352.1 ± 12.955.0 ± 11.2
Range40-8131-7331-81
Sex, n (%)
Male30 (61.2)11 (45.8)41
Female19 (38.8)13 (54.2)32
Per-lesion basis
No. of lesions78 (72.3)30 (27.8)108
Maximum diameter (mm)
mean ± SD48.2 ± 37.732.3 ± 22.543.8 ± 34.8
Range11-16314-9411-163
Methods of diagnosis (%)
Pathology42 (38.9)7 (6.5)49 (45.4)
Imaging follow-up25 (23.1)23 (21.3)48 (44.4)
PET-CT11 (10.2)11 (10.2)
Table 2 Clinicopathological characteristics of 108 focal liver lesions
Characteristic

Malignant

Benign


HCC
IHCC
Hemangioma
FNH
Abscess
No. of lesions (%)32 (29.6) 9 (8.3)37 (34.3)25 (23.1)3 (2.8)2 (1.9)
Maximum diameter (mm)
mean ± SD66.3 ± 43.061.9 ± 5.929.1 ± 24.129.4 ± 21.832.0 ± 8.569.5 ± 12.0
Range15-16332-11111-12214-9423-4061-78
Methods of diagnosis (%)
Pathology29 (26.9)6 (5.6)7 (6.5)5 (4.6)2 (1.9)0 (0)
Imaging follow-up3 (2.8)3 (2.8)19 (17.6)20 (18.5)1 (0.9)2 (1.9)
PET-CT11 (10.2)
Viral infection
HBV30634912
Non-HBV233910
NA000710
Cirrhosis on pathology (%)
Yes25
No1
NA6
AFP (ng/mL)
≤ 2512929
> 252007
NA001
CA 19-9 (U/mL)
≤ 3421415
> 349520
NA202
CEA (ng/mL)
≤ 527715
> 55222
NA000
Table 3 Mean R2* values for different focal liver lesions
FFL2D-ROI methodVOI method
Malignant
Liver metastasis44.17 ± 21.9048.42 ± 23.61
HCC33.45 ± 10.1535.41 ± 10.04
IHCC28.72 ± 10.2131.34 ± 9.65
Benign
Hemangioma16.66 ± 8.1819.36 ± 8.93
FNH26.21 ± 5.6127.87 ± 7.46
Abscess23.29 ± 9.3125.29 ± 10.46