Randomized Controlled Trial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2020; 26(39): 6098-6110
Published online Oct 21, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i39.6098
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study subjects
RC group, n = 152CC group, n = 151P value
Age in yr, mean ± SD44.4 ± 17.646.7 ± 17.00.248
Children1, n (%)4 (2.6)4 (2.6)1.000
Male, n (%)76 (50.0)79 (52.3)0.687
Body mass index in kg/m2, mean ± SD21.1 ± 3.821.6 ± 3.30.243
Disease category, n (%)
Ulcerative colitis46 (30.3)42 (27.8)0.639
Constipation43 (28.3)50 (33.1)0.363
Irritable bowel syndrome14 (9.2)18 (11.9)0.443
Crohn's disease6 (3.9)3 (2.0)0.501
Healthy volunteers3 (2.0)3 (2.0)1.000
Others240 (26.3)35 (23.2)0.527
Previous surgery, abdominal or pelvic, n (%)38 (25.0)33 (21.9)0.518
Table 2 Outcomes related to transendoscopic enteral tubing procedure
RC group,n = 152CC group,n = 151P value
Cecal intubation rate after inserting TET tube, n (%) (%)148 (97.4)151 (100)-
The first cecal intubation time in min, median (IQR)5.9 (4.3-8.5)6.2 (4.1-8.3)0.921
The second cecal intubation time in min, median (IQR)2.8 (1.8-4.0)2.2 (1.6-3.2)0.000
The second cecal intubation time of constipation patients3.8 (2.2-5.6)2.6 (1.9-3.7)0.004
The second cecal intubation time of ulcerative colitis patients2.5 (1.6-3.5)2.0 (1.5-3.0)0.152
Average fixation time per endoscopic clip in min, mean ± SD1.1 ± 0.41.2 ± 0.60.238
Number of endoscopic clips, mean ± SD2.7 ± 1.12.6 ± 1.10.339
Colonoscopy type, n (%)
Sedated133 (87.5)137 (90.7)0.367
Unsedated19 (12.5)14 (9.3)0.367
Maximum pain score, mean ± SD5.4 ± 1.93.8 ± 1.70.015
TET success rate, n (%)152 (100)151 (100)-
Serious adverse event, n (%)00-
Adverse events, n (%)4 (2.6)5 (3.3)0.750
Anal pain2 (1.3)1 (0.7)1.000
Mild anal discomfort1 (0.7)3 (2.0)0.371
Transient anal bleeding1 (0.7)1 (0.7)1.000
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with the retention time of transendoscopic enteral tube < 8 d
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
OR (95%CI)P valueOR (95%CI)P value
Age in yr1.008 (0.992-1.025)0.343--
Sex, male vs female1.517 (0.804-2.862)0.1981.930 (0.966-3.858)0.063
Disease type, IBD vs others0.589 (0.339-1.025)0.0610.960 (0.499-1.846)0.903
Number of endoscopic clips2.137 (1.546-2.954)0.0002.201 (1.541-3.143)0.000
Grouping, RC vs CC0.775 (0.455-1.320)0.348--
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with the second cecal intubation time of < 3.1 min in difficult colonoscopy
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
OR (95%CI)P valueOR (95%CI)P value
Age in yr1.002 (0.477-2.102)0.996--
Sex, male vs female0.930 (0.487-1.774)0.825--
Body mass index, < 21 vs ≥ 21 kg/m20.855 (0.452-1.616)0.629--
Previous surgery, abdominal or pelvic10.868 (0.414-1.822)0.709--
Colonoscopy, sedated vs unsedated1.062 (0.406-2.781)0.902--
Constipation10.559 (0.291-1.073)0.0800.514 (0.263-1.005)0.052
Grouping, RC vs CC2.103 (1.101-4.017)0.0242.250 (1.161-4.360)0.016
Table 5 Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with the length of transendoscopic enteral tube inserted into the colon ≥ 86 cm
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
OR (95%CI)P valueOR (95%CI)P value
Age in yr0.996 (0.967-1.025)0.774--
Height, < 165 vs ≥ 165 cm)9.750 (2.523-37.675)0.0011.144 (1.027-1.275)0.014
Sex, male vs female0.352 (0.117-1.062)0.0641.184 (0.246-5.693)0.833
IBD11.161 (0.346-3.901)0.809--
Constipation11.212 (0.329-4.466)0.773--
Grouping, RC vs CC1.895 (0.645-5.569)0.245