Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2020; 26(27): 3952-3962
Published online Jul 21, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i27.3952
Table 1 Demographic characteristics and clinical features in our patient cohort
ALL (n = 275)Training group (n = 138)Validation group (n = 137)P value
Age (yr)40.25 ± 9.6540.90 ± 9.9039.61 ± 9.370.267
GenderMale194 (70.5%)101 (73.2%)93 (67.9%)0.335
Female81 (29.5%)37 (26.8%)44 (32.1%)
CP (mg/L)213.01 ± 43.28212.72 ± 42.68213.29 ± 44.030.914
Total bilirubin (μmol/L)13.51± 7.1613.31 ± 6.4613.71 ± 7.800.652
Albumin (g/L)42.84 ± 3.6842.93 ± 3.7442.75 ± 3.630.692
Globulin (g/L)28.19 ± 18.4929.43 ± 6.0427.01 ± 4.280.291
ALT (IU/L)29.56 ± 9.8629.65 ± 9.6929.46 ± 10.070.872
AST (IU/L)26.91 ± 7.1726.71 ± 7.1927.11 ± 7.160.645
GGT (IU/L)29.48 ± 21.8729.23 ± 24.3429.71 ± 19.280.860
TCHO (mmol/L)4.69 ± 0.894.61 ± 0.754.77 ± 1.000.149
TG (mmol/L)1.15 ± 0.681.25 ± 0.801.05 ± 0.500.113
CHE (IU/mL)8215.20 ± 2312.228409.96 ± 2358.018027.75 ± 2260.290.182
WBC (109/L)5.68 ± 1.485.74 ± 1.485.62 ± 1.490.509
PLT (109/L)191.96 ± 51.77193.78 ± 51.91190.11 ± 51.760.558
HBsAg (Log IU/mL)3.95 ± 0.953.89 ± 0.993.40 ± 0.900.346
HBV-DNA (Log IU/mL)5.13 ± 2.025.08 ± 2.015.19 ± 2.030.666
PT (s)12.11 ± 2.3112.04 ± 2.5612.18 ± 2.040.626
INR1.00 ± 0.190.99 ± 0.211.01 ± 0.170.662
Fibrosis stage, n (%)0.670
F019 (6.9)12 (8.7)7 (5.1)
F1106 (38.5)52 (37.7)54 (39.4)
F257 (20.7)26 (18.8)31 (22.6)
F340 (14.5)19 (13.8)21 (15.3)
F453 (19.3)29 (21.0)24 (17.5)
Table 2 Accuracy of serum ceruloplasmin in diagnosing F ≥ 2, F ≥ 3, and F = 4 as measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (n = 138)
Steatosis degreeAUC (95%CI)Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)PPV (%)NPV (%)Cut-off point
F ≥ 20.774 (0.696-0.851)81.364.966.780≤ 203.5
F ≥ 30.812 (0.732-0.892)82.865.983.764.4≤ 190.5
F = 40.853 (0.781-0.925)89.365.491.758.6≤ 182.5
Table 3 Clinical parameters associated with significant fibrosis in the training group (138 patients)
No significant fibrosis (n = 64)Significant fibrosis (n = 74)P value
Age (yr)39.88 ± 9.6839.61 ± 9.370.260
GenderMale47 (73.4%)54 (73.0%)0.951
Female17 (26.6%)20 (27.0%)
CP (mg/L)231.22 ± 35.26196.73 ± 42.27< 0.0001
Total bilirubin (μmol/L)13.11 ± 6.9713.48 ± 6.050.747
Albumin (g/L)44.27 ± 3.2941.79 ± 3.75<0.0001
Globulin (g/L)27.15 ± 5.1531.35 ± 5.030.363
ALT (IU/L)29.25 ± 10.3230.00 ± 9.170.652
AST (IU/L)25.77 ± 7.2127.53 ± 7.110.152
GGT (IU/L)23.69 ± 13.9633.90 ± 29.780.017
TCHO (mmol/L)4.82 ± 0.834.44 ± 0.620.004
TG (mmol/L)1.31 ± 0.741.21 ± 0.850.474
CHE (IU/mL)9254.48 ± 2583.767710.21 ± 1903.41< 0.0001
WBC (109/L)5.78 ± 1.365.71 ± 1.590.766
PLT (109/L)212.63 ± 50.24177.49 ± 47.94< 0.0001
HBsAg (Log IU/mL)4.40 ± 0.783.45 ± 0.96< 0.0001
HBV-DNA (Log IU/mL)5.17 ± 2.335.00 ± 1.700.614
PT (s)11.71 ± 2.8112.33 ± 2.310.161
INR0.96 ± 0.231.02 ± 0.190.103
Table 4 Diagnostic value of ceruloplasmin hepatitis B virus in the training and validation groups
Variable
Training group (n = 138)
Validation group (n = 137)
F ≥ 2F ≥ 3F = 4F ≥ 2F ≥ 3F = 4
AUC0.8420.9200.9040.8050.8860.863
95%CI0.777-0.9070.872-0.9670.842-0.9550.733-0.8770.827-0.9460.784-0.943
Cut-off0.03040.4960.5530.1740.1760.206
Sensitivity, %81.190.996.272.489.197.1
Specificity71.978.771.480.372.570.6
Youden’s index0.5300.6960.6760.5270.6160.677
PPV76.966.743.982.162.153.1
NPV76.794.998.870.093.098.6
Table 5 Comparisons of ceruloplasmin hepatitis B virus with other predictive models for assessing F ≥ 2 (n = 275)
ModelAUC (95%CI)Youden indexSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)PPV (%)NPV (%)P value
CPHBV0.839 (0.792-0.886)0.51280.171.176.272.4
APRI0.704 (0.639-0.768)0.35575.959.668.566.1< 0.001
FIB-40.678 (0.612-0.745)0.33071.961.468.864.2< 0.001
GPR0.704 (0.640-0.768)0.35074.560.570.166.7< 0.001
Forn’s index0.687 (0.622-0.753)0.35963.172.874.261.5< 0.001
S-index0.722 (0.659-0.784)0.35778.757.069.969.70.0034