Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2020; 26(26): 3800-3813
Published online Jul 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i26.3800
Table 1 Participant characteristics
VariableCohort, n (%)
Training (n = 207)Validation (n = 89)P value
Age, yrs48.5 ± 13.251.3 ± 8.20.07
Gender0.52
Male145 (70.0)59 (66.3)
Female62 (30.0)30 (33.7)
Tobacco use40 (19.3)25 (28.1)0.09
Coexisting medical conditions
Hypertension19 (9.2)13 (14.6)0.17
Diabetes20 (9.7)13 (14.6)0.22
Ischemic heart disease8 (3.9)9 (10.1)0.05
Previous history of DVT39 (18.8)17 (19.1)0.81
Malignant disease24 (2.4)5 (5.6)0.11
Clinical manifestations
Diarrhea22 (10.6)14 (15.7)0.22
Hematochezia or melena62 (30.0)19 (21.3)0.13
Fever26 (12.6)13 (14.6)0.63
Physical findings
Abdominal distention109 (52.7)37 (41.6)0.16
Abdominal tenderness39 (18.8)24 (27.0)0.12
Rebound tenderness38 (18.4)21 (23.6)0.3
Laboratory findings
White blood cells, 109/L7.0 (4.7-11.4)11.0 (7.5-14.4)0.05
Hemoglobin, g/L109 (82-122)113 (92-130)0.11
Platelets, 109/L191 (100-288)168 (133-214)0.06
C-reactive protein, mg/L51.3 (7.7-67.5)53.9 (18.2-75.1)0.23
Serum lactate levels, mmol/L4.3 (2.7-6.5)3.9 (1.3-5.7)0.31
Creatinine, µmol/L72 (60-91)76 (65-108)0.07
D-dimer, mg/L16.9 (3.0-179.6)14.1 (6.9-60.2)0.61
Procalcitonin, µg/L0.5 (0.4-0.6)0.4 (0.1-1.8)0.17
Radiologic features
Distal thrombosis63 (30.4)25 (28.1%)0.69
Portal vein or/and splenic vein extension143 (69.1)54 (60.7)0.16
Decreased bowel wall enhancement70 (33.8)36 (40.4)0.28
Bowel wall thickening42 (21.3)19 (21.3)0.84
Bowel loop dilation41 (19.8)16 (18.0)0.71
Pneumatosis intestinalis52 (25.1)27 (30.3)0.13
Ascites91 (44.0)31 (34.8)0.14
Other risk factors
Recent surgery46 (22.2)15 (16.9)0.3
Intraperitoneal inflammation73 (35.3)31 (34.8)0.94
Liver cirrhosis82 (39.6)37 (41.6)0.75
Table 2 Univariate analysis of risk factors associated with transmural bowel infarction in the training cohort
VariableOR (95%CI)P value
Age, yr0.97 (0.95-0.99)0.01
Gender, male vs female2.22 (1.06-4.65)0.03
Tobacco use1.03 (0.48-2.23)0.94
Hypertension1.10 (0.38-3.20)0.86
Diabetes3.85 (0.86-17.14)0.08
Ischemic heart disease2.81 (0.34-23.36)0.34
Previous history of DVT3.14 (1.53-6.47)0.002
Malignant disease0.41 (0.21-1.78)0.99
Diarrhea1.04 (0.39-2.81)0.93
Hematochezia2.53 (1.33-4.79)0.004
Fever1.16 (0.47-2.83)0.75
Abdominal distention3.56 (1.82-6.97)< 0.001
Abdominal tenderness7.25 (3.40-15.46)< 0.001
Rebound tenderness9.14 (4.17-20.04)< 0.001
White blood cells, > 10 × 109/L vs ≤ 10 × 109/L1.12 (1.06-1.17)< 0.001
Hemoglobin, > 120 g/L vs ≤ 120 g/L1.01 (1.00-1.02)0.35
Platelets, > 100 × 109/L vs ≤ 100 × 109/L1.00 (0.99-1.01)0.96
C-reactive protein, > 50 mg/L vs ≤ 50 mg/L1.02 (1.01-1.02)0.05
Serum lactate levels, > 2 mmol/L vs ≤ 2 mmol/L6.53 (3.27-13.04)< 0.001
Creatinine, > 106 µmol/L vs ≤ 106 µmol/L2.05 (0.96-4.41)0.07
D-dimer, > 0.5 mg/L vs ≤ 0.5 mg/L1.00 (1.00-1.01)0.50
Procalcitonin, > 0.5 µg/L vs ≤ 0.5 µg/L1.02 (0.92-1.12)0.72
Distal thrombosis2.13 (1.07-4.36)0.02
Portal vein or/and splenic vein extension1.01 (0.52-1.94)0.98
Decreased bowel wall enhancement9.00 (4.24-19.12)< 0.001
Bowel wall thickening1.99 (0.98-2.01)0.24
Bowel loop dilation2.21 (1.67-3.54)0.03
Pneumatosis intestinalis1.36 (1.23-3.15)0.04
Ascites1.40 (0.76-2.58)0.28
Recent surgery1.13 (0.54-2.38)0.74
Intraperitoneal inflammation1.63 (0.84-3.16)0.15
Liver cirrhosis2.44 (1.28-4.68)0.007
Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors associated with transmural bowel infarction in the training cohort
VariableβOR95%CIP value
Decreased bowel wall enhancement1.856.372.55-15.90< 0.001
Rebound tenderness1.977.142.73-18.65< 0.001
Serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L1.443.141.33-7.410.009
DVT history1.816.372.55-15.90< 0.001
Table 4 Performance of the nomogram for estimating the risk of transmural bowel infarction
VariableValue (95%CI)
Training cohort (207)Validation cohort (89)
Cutoff value9090
AUC0.860 (0.771-0.925)0.851 (0.796-0.897)
Sensitivity, %88.89 (71.94-96.15)84.48 (73.07-91.62)
Specificity, %67.74 (55.37-78.05)71.81 (64.11-78.42)
Positive predictive value, %54.55 (40.07-68.29)53.85 (43.66-63.72)
Negative predictive value, %93.33 (82.14-97.71)92.24 (85.91-95.86)
Positive likelihood ratio2.76 (2.43-3.07)3.00 (2.84-3.16)
Negative likelihood ratio0.16 (0.08-0.32)0.22 (0.17-0.27)
Diagnostic accuracy, %74.16 (64.20-82.12)75.36 (69.07-80.73)