Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2020; 26(22): 3012-3023
Published online Jun 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i22.3012
Table 1 Post-operative outcomes of extralevator abdominoperineal excision vs abdominoperineal excision
Refereces
GroupnCRM+(%)IOP(%)Local recurr-ence(%)Post-operative complications
QoL scores
AuthorsYearTypePerineal wound compli-cations (%)Urinary retention(%)Sexual dysfunc-tion (%)Chronic perineal pain (%)
West et al[11]2010Retro case-controlELAPE/APR176/12420.3/49.6, P < 0.0018.2/28.3, P < 0.001-38/20, P = 0.01946/17, P = 0.57946/33, P = 0.192--
Han et al[13]2012RCTELAPE/APR35/325.7/28.15.7/15.6, P = 0.2462.8/18.8, P = 0.04837.1/31.3 P = 0.61240/28.1, P = 0.30774/60, P = 0.30651.4/6.3, P < 0.001-
Asplund et al[17]2012Retro case-controlELAPE/APR79/7917/20, P = 0.64713/10, P > 0.059/9, P = 146/28, P < 0.05----
Vaughan-Shaw et al[58]2012Pro case-controlELAPE/LAPR/OAPR16/10/100/1/2, P > 0.050/0/1, P > 0.05-2/5/2, P = 0.213/2/2, P = 0.99--85.4/77.5/78.5, P > 0.05
Ortiz et al[66]2014Retro case-controlELAPE/APR457/45713.6/13.1, P > 0.8467.7/7,9, P > 0.9025.6/2.7, P > 0.66421.9/26, P > 0.141----
Shen et al[55]2015Pro case-controlELAPE/APR36/334/12, P = 0.2975.6/21.2, P = 0.0280/15.2, P < 0348.3/27.3, P = 0.03911.1/3, P = 0.35911.8/36.4, P = 0.127-P > 0.05
Wang et al[57]2015Retro case-controlELAPE/APR23/254.3/28, P = 0.0280/20, P = 0.0238.7/32, P = 0.04739.1/24, P = 0.25926.1/12, P = 0.21260/37.5, P = 0.21047.8/8, P = 0.002P > 0.05
Klein et al[19]2015Retro case-controlELAPE/APR301/25316/7, P = 0.0012/3, P = 0.373-14/10, P = 0.143----
Prytz et al[67]2016Pro case-controlELAPE/APR518/20941.5/38.4, P < 0.0001P < 0.001P < 0.001P < 0.001----
Stelzner et al[16]2016Pro case-controlELAPE/APR36/362.9/2.8, P = 10/16.7, P = 0.0255.9/18.2, P = 0.15316.7/36.1, P = 0.061----
Kamali et al[54]2017Pro case-controlELAPE/APR27/217.4/9.5, P = 0.50-3.7/4.7, P = 137/24, P > 0.05---77.3/65.3, P = 0.27
Habr-Gama et al[12]2017Retro case-controlELAPE/APR22/5013.6/16.6, P = 0.700/8, P = 0.304.5/28.6, P = 0.0122.7/46, P = 0.007----
Carpelan et al[18]2018Retro case-controlELAPE/APR42/2724/41, P = 0.13610/22, P = 0.1347/19, P = 0.24745/30, P = 195--5/4, P > 0.05-
Shen et al[15]2019Retro case-controlELAPE/APR106/884.2/6.5, P > 0.05-3.8/11.25, P = 0.02717.0/14.8, P = 0.6997.5/3.4, P = 0.353---