Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2019; 25(5): 608-621
Published online Feb 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i5.608
Table 1 Clinical findings of the patients with intrahepatic sarcomatoid cholangiocarcinoma
CaseSexAgeChief complaintStoneCSChronic hepatitisLCHCCTumor size (cm)Number of massMetastasisStage (TNM)
1M45RUQ pain--CHB++7.57LN, IHIVB
2M67Lt. flank pain--CHC+-2.51Bone, LNIVB
3M55RUQ pain, feverCST+---6.52LNIVA
4M66RUQ pain, feverGB stone----10.01Lung, LNIVB
5M56RUQ pain, Fatigue--CHB+-8.01Thymus, LNIVB
6F66RUQ painCST----7.51LNIVB
7M68Wt. loss, FatigueCST--+-6.01Lung, Bone, LNIVB
8F55RUQ pain, fever-----8.53LNIVA
9M49LUQ pain, fever--CHB+-9.53LNIVA
10M65RUQ pain----9.515LN, IHIVA
11M61RUQ pain----5.01Diaphragm, LNIVB
Table 2 Baseline clinical characteristics of the patients of intrahepatic bile duct adenocarcinoma and sarcomatoid cholangiocarcinoma n (%)
AdenocarcinomaSarcomatoidP value
GenderMale155 (71.8)9 (81.8)0.732
Female61 (28.2)2 (18.2)
Age< 6073 (33.8)5 (45.5)0.518
≥ 60143(66.2)6 (54.5)
Abdominal painNo106 (49.1)1 (9.1)0.011
Pain110 (50.9)10 (90.9)
FeverNo195 (90.3)7 (63.6)0.022
Fever21 (9.7)4 (36.4)
JaundiceNo199 (92.1)11 (100.0)1.000
Jaundice17 (7.9)0 (0.0)
Weight lossNo201 (93.1)10 (90.9)0.561
Weight loss15 (6.9)1 (9.1)
GB stoneNo164 (75.9)8 (72.7)0.730
GB stone52 (24.1)3 (27.3)
HepatitisNo190 (88.0)7 (63.6)0.063
CHB21 (9.7)3 (27.3)
CHC5 (2.3)1 (9.1)
LCNo183 (84.7)6 (54.5)0.022
LC33 (15.3)5 (45.5)
Serum CEA< 5 ng/mL123 (56.9)10 (90.9)0.029
≥ 5 ng/mL93 (43.1)1 (9.1)
Serum CA19-9< 37 U/mL64 (29.6)6 (54.5)0.098
≥ 37 U/mL152 (70.4)5 (45.5)
Main massSingle145 (67.1)6 (54.5)0.513
Multiple71 (32.9)5 (45.5)
Mass size< 5 cm90 (41.7)1 (9.1)0.054
≥ 5 cm126 (58.3)10 (90.9)
LN metastasisNo84 (38.9)1 (9.1)0.057
LN meta.132 (61.1)10 (90.9)
Distant metastasisNo140 (64.8)4 (36.4)0.104
Distant meta.76 (35.2)7 (63.6)
TNM stageI or II76 (35.2)0 (0.0)0.018
III or IV140 (64.8)11 (100.0)
Table 3 Laboratory findings of the patients with intrahepatic sarcomatoid cholangiocarcinoma
CaseCEA (ng/mL)CA19-9 (U/mL)AFP (ng/mL)PIVKA-II (mAU/mL)AST (U/L)ALT (U/L)TB (mg/dL)DB (mg/dL)ALP (U/L)GGT (U/L)
10.74> 1200.00131.676925191.00.4387115
21.453.3866.451631100.70.225232
30.103.002.543554960.40.2892137
42.351809.571.73N/A42300.90.61385N/A
51.812.332.312043571.00.61520203
612.70710.383.92N/A23390.70.31133253
71.1812.592.702023160.60.4638224
83.15> 1200.001.71N/A30311.10.6757323
91.08< 2.001.52N/A80300.70.547698
103.56599.141.02N/A37471.10.8804N/A
111.815.773.021434360.30.136935
Table 4 Imaging findings of the patients with intrahepatic sarcomatoid cholangiocarcinoma
CaseUSCT Non-ECT arterialCT portalCT delayedInitial radiologic impression
1Lobulated, heterogeneously hyperechoicN/AThin rim enhancementGradual centripetal enhancementGradual centripetal enhancementHCC
2Lobulated hypoechoicIll-defined hypodenseMinimal to mild heterogeneous enhancementProgressive heterogeneous enhancementProgressive heterogeneous enhancementHCC
3Lobulated, heterogeneously hypoechoic internal hyperechoicN/ANon to minimal rim enhancementMild irregular rim enhancementN/AIHCC
4Ill-defined hypoechoicheterogeneously hypodenseIrregular rim enhancementGradual centripetal enhancementN/AHepatic abscess
5Lobulated, heterogenoeusly hypo- and hyper-echoicN/APeripheral enhancementGradual centripetal enhancementGradual centripetal enhancementHCC
6Lobulated hyperechoicN/AIrregular rim enhancementIrregular rim enhancementN/AIHCC
7Lobulated, heterogeneously hypoechoic internal hyperechoicIll-defined hypodenseIrregular peripheral enhancementGradual centripetal enhancementGradual centripetal enhancementHCC
8Ill-defined heterogenoeusly hypo- and hyper-echoicIll-defined hypodenseIrregular peripheral enhancementGradual centripetal enhancementN/AIHCC
9Lobulated, heterogenoeusly hypo- and hyper-echoicN/AIrregular peripheral enhancementGradual centripetal enhancementN/ALymphoma
10Lobulated, heterogeneously hyperecmoicN/AMinimal rim enhancementRim enhancementN/AIHCC
11Well-defined, heterogeneously hypoechoicLobulated hypodenseIrregular peripheral enhancementIrregular peripheral enhancementN/AIHCC
Table 5 Immunohistochemistry of the patients with intrahepatic sarcomatoid cholangiocarcinoma
CaseSpecimenPositive IHC resultsNegative IHC results
1Needle biopsyCK19, vimentinHSA, CD10
2Needle biopsyCK, vimentin, CEA, AFPCK7, CK19, HSA, c-kit, CD117
3Needle biopsyCK, CK19, vimentinCK8, Desmin, EMA, CEA, c-kit, S-100
4Needle biopsyCK, CK8, CK19, vimentin, CEA, EMAHSA, AFP, TTF-1
5Needle biopsyCK, CK8, CK19, vimentin, SMAHSA, CD5, CD68, HMW-CK
6Needle biopsyCK7, CK8, CK19, vimentin, CEAHSA
7Needle biopsyCK7, CK8, CK19, vimentin, CD34HSA, CEA, HMW-CK
8Needle biopsyCK19, vimentin, CEA, p53CD31, CD34
9Needle biopsyCK19, vimentin, CEACK7, Desmin, HSA, SMA, c-kit, S-100
10Needle biopsyCK, CK19, vimentin, CEAHSA, CD31
11Needle biopsyCK7, CK19, vimentin, MUC1HSA, CD10
Table 6 Treatment and outcome of the patients with intrahepatic sarcomatoid cholangiocarcinoma
CaseSexAgeTumor size (cm)Number of massStage (TNM)TreatmentOutcomeF/U duration (d)
1M457.57IVBChemotherapyDied47
2M672.51IVBChemotherapyDied148
3M556.52IVAChemotherapyDied129
4M6610.01IVBSupportiveDied20
5M568.01IVBChemotherapyDied72
6F667.51IVBChemotherapyDied125
7M686.01IVBSupportiveDied19
8F558.53IVAChemotherapyDied31
9M499.53IVAChemotherapyF/U loss43
10M659.515IVASupportiveDied14
11M615.01IVBviscum albumSurvived379