Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2019; 25(48): 6939-6948
Published online Dec 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6939
Table 1 Characteristics of the markers used for the mutation analysis[16,17]
MarkerExon numberTarget codonsSize of PCR product (bp)LOD (%)DCE separation temperature (°C)
KRAS212, 131120.0350
359, 611000.0551
4117, 1461500.0545
TP535170-1871070.158
6187-2241690.552
7225-2611600.552
8262-3071510.0356
APC15854-8961280.748
151275-13081000.748
151290-13351360.652
151389-14461740.348
151430-1463101148
151479-1530156151
151539-15851410.852
PIK3CA95421060.248
201025, 1031, 10471360.349
BRAF156002300.0548
CTNNB13451520.452
Table 2 Clinical patient data
CharacteristicsValue
Number of patients47
Agemean, range (yr)63.6 ± 12.3, 32-87
GenderFemale/male16/31
Localization of primaryRectum13
Colon14
Rectosigmoid8
Sigmoid7
Cecum3
Others2
Localization of metastasisLiver only35
Liver and/or other12
Surgical treatment
Number of surgeries163
Synchronous mCRCCombined (primary and liver)12
Primary before metastases8
Liver first2
Liver in the second stage14
Metachronous mCRCLiver24
Other metastases3
RadicalityR040
R17
R216
Recurrence (R0 surgeries)Number227
Mean time to reccurence, range (mo)9.0 ± 5.1, 3-22
Table 3 Correlation of surgical radicality and postoperative circulating tumor DNA
NumberState (time to recurrence or follow-up time)
R028
ctDNA positive22 recurrence (6 mo)
ctDNA negative2610 no recurrence (6-36 mo), 14 recurrence (4-22 mo)1
R17
ctDNA positive44 recurrence (3-7 mo)
ctDNA negative31 no recurrence (5 mo), 2 recurrence (7 or 22 mo)
R215
ctDNA positive1512/2/1 metastasis/primary tumor/both present
ctDNA negative0-
Table 4 Comparison of circulating tumor DNA and standard detection methods
Number of recurrencesctDNAImaging methodsCA19-9 and/or CEA markers
13+++
3++-
2+-+
4+--