Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2019; 25(36): 5505-5514
Published online Sep 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i36.5505
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study patients (n = 46)
CharacteristicValue
Age, yr, mean ± SD72.1 ± 11.2
Male gender, n (%)27 (58.7)
Indication for ERCP, n (%)
Common bile duct stone32 (69.6)
Benign biliary stricture20 (43.5)
Pancreaticobiliary malignancy6 (13.0)
Foreign body at the anastomotic site10 (21.7)
Duration since bilioenteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis, n (%)
≤ 5 yr
> 5 yr
Prior operation history
Pancreatico-duodenectomy18 (39.1%)
Bilioenteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis25 (54.3%)
Total pancreatectomy1 (2.2%)
Billroth II gastroenterostomy + pancreatico-duodenectomy1 (2.2%)
Bilioenteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis + pancreatico-duodenectomy1 (2.2%)
Table 2 Clinical outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the study cohort
OutcomeNo. of patients, n (%)
Technical success
Enteroscopy success60 (93.8)
Diagnostic success59 (92.2)
ERCP success59 (92.2)
Intervention
Stone extraction31(48.4)
Holmium laser lithotripsy8 (12.5)
Anastomotic incision10 (15.6)
Balloon dilation of stenotic anastomosis19 (29.7)
ENBD30 (46.8)
Biliary plastic stent placement and removal6 (9.4)
Foreign body extraction10 (15.6)
Reason for ERCP failure
Failure to reach the papilla4 (6.3)
Failure of selective bile duct cannulation1 (1.6)
Failure of bile duct stone removal or ERBD insertion0 (0)
Failure because of afferent loop perforation0 (0)
Overall adverse events0 (0)
Perforation0 (0)
Pancreatitis0 (0)
Bleeding0 (0)
Table 3 Summary of reports of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using single-balloon enteroscopy technique in patients with Roux-en-Y anastomosis
AuthorPublication yearNumber of proceduresEnteroscopy success rateERCP success rateComplication rate
Dellon et al[18]2009475%75%0
Saleem et al[19]20105075%66%0
Shah et al[10]20134569%60%No data
Tomizawa et al[20]20141468%50%0
Soh et al[21]2015683.3%50%16.7%
Yane et al[22]201618391.8%80.3%No data