Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2019; 25(35): 5356-5375
Published online Sep 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i35.5356
Table 1 Incidence of de novo malignancies in adult orthotopic liver transplant patients
Number and % incidence of de novo malignancy types in all orthotopic liver transplant recipients
AuthorYrNumber of patientsNumber of DNMPTLDSkin and KaposiHead and NeckLungRenalColonProstateBreastGynecologicalOthers
Jonas et al[72]1997458337 (1.5)8 (1.7)2 (0.4)3 (0.7)0003 (0.7)7 (1.5)3 (0.6)
Jain et al[134]1998100057NA24 (2.4)7 (0.7)8 (0.8)2 (0.2)4 (0.4)3 (0.3)3 (0.3)06 (0.6)
Kelly et al[135]199888831NA8 (0.9)6 (0.7)1 (0.1)03 (0.3)02 (0.2)1 (0.1)10 (1.1)
Jimenez et al[136]20025056213 (2.6)16 (3.2)10 (2.0)6 (1.2)NANANANANA17 (3.3)
Saigal et al[73]2002114030NA14 (1.2)3 (0.3)03 (0.3)1 (0.1)02 (0.2)1 (0.1)6 (0.5)
Sanchez et al[137]2002142112535 (2.5)42 (3.0)4 (0.3)11 (0.8)3 (0.2)9 (0.6)07 (0.5)2 (0.1)13 (0.8)
Benlloch et al[17]20047724110 (1.3)NA9 (1.2)8 (1.0)3 (0.4)2 (0.3)1 (0.1)2 (0.3)2 (0.3)4 (0.5)
Oo et al[138]2005177814118 (1.0)51 (2.9)NA14 (0.8)NA18 (1.0)NA11 (0.6)1 (0.06)28 (1.6)
Yao et al[12]20061043539 (0.9)17 (0.6)3 (0.3)5 (0.5)2 (0.2)6 (0.6)04 (0.4)2 (0.2)5 (0.5)
Aberg et al[81]2008540399 (1.7)11 (2.0)2 (0.3)NA2 (0.3)2 (0.3)2 (0.3)1 (0.1)NA10 (1.8)
Jiang et al[20]2008203411344 (2.1)NA3 (0.1)10 (0.5)4 (0.2)14 (0.7)5 (0.2)5 (0.2)NA24 (1.2)
Baccarani et al[139]2010417439 (2.1)8 (1.9)8 (1.9)4 (0.9)02 (0.5)01 (0.2)3 (0.7)8 (1.9)
Engels et al[5]2011378881563365 (1.0)NANA300 (0.8)67 (1.8)NANANANA831 (2.2)
Chatrath et al[140]20135348016 (3.0)24 (4.5)9 (1.7)13 (2.4)1 (0.2)1 (0.2)1 (0.2)NA1 (0.2)14 (2.6)
Schrem et al[141]2013200012023 (1.1)NA11 (0.5)14 (0.7)7 (0.3)13 (0.6)5 (0.2)8 (0.4)10 (0.5)29 (1.4)
Krynitz et al[32]2013122115027 (2.2)58 (4.7)4 (0.3)6 (0.5)2 (0.1)6 (0.5)4 (0.3)7 (0.6)10 (0.8)26 (2.1)
Mouchli et al[62]20173736422 (5.9)5 (1.3)NANA11 (2.9)11 (2.9)7 (1.9)5 (1.3)3 (0.8)0
Egeli et al[142]20174299NA1 (0.2)2 (0.4)5 (1.1)NANANANANA1 (0.2)
Taborelli et al[143]2018283226637 (1.3)72 (2.5)34 (1.2)28 (1.0)4 (0.2)21 (0.7)2 (0.1)4 (0.2)3 (0.1)65 (2.1)
Table 2 Clinical operational tolerance literature and clinical trials in adult orthotopic liver transplant recipients[9,90]
First authorsYr/Trial startNumber of patientsComplete IS weaning, %Median follow-up mo from IS withdrawalRejection rate, for acute, %Weaned patients due to DNM diagnosis
Ramos et al[110]199539411538.4None
Devlin et al[144]19981827.8> 3644.4None
Eason et al[145]2005185.5961.1None
Girlanda et al[146]20051811845.5None
Tisone et al[109]20063423.445.5 ± 5.821.0None
Assy et al[147]20072642658.0None
Pons et al[148]20081238.010-3058.0None
Tryphonopoulos et al[149]20102322.087 ± 3.05.0None
Manzia et al[106]20132821.4113 ± 20.021.0None
De la Garza et al[150]20132462.514.037.5None
Benitez et al[151]201410240.248.959.8None
Bohne et al[152]201434501244.1None
Todo et al[153]20161070NA30.0None
Manzia et al[107]20187542.678.50None
Shaked[154]2005 (clinical trial)27520.3NA5.5None
Markman[155]2016 (ongoing trial)60NANANANA
Markman et al[156]2019 (ongoing trial)NANANANANA
Table 3 De novo malignancy features in orthotopic liver transplant recipients: The Tor Vergata experience between April 1998 and December 2014
Patients under standard IS,n = 234Median age: 53.6 ± 7.1 yrTolerant patients,n = 22Median age: 52.3 ± 6.0 yrNon-tolerant patients, n = 43Median age: 51.5 ± 9.6 yr
Number of patients2342243
Median follow-up time from OLT to IS weaning, mo-112.959.8
Median follow-up time from weaning start to IS withdrawal, mo-6.04.9
Median follow-up time with no IS, mo-92.32.3
Median follow-up time after IS resumption, mo--149.1
Patients who developed DNMs, %13.706.4
Median time from OLT to DNM development, mo44.5-113.0
Incidence and type of DNMs(n = 32) Lung (7) Head and neck (5) Colon (4) Oral cavity (4) PTLD (4) Genito-urinary (3) Esophagus (2) Liver (1) Mesothelioma (1) KS (1)NoneBladder (1) Larynx (1) Lung (1)
Table 4 Clinical operational tolerance trials in pediatric orthotopic liver transplant recipients
First authorYrType of studyNumber of patientsDNM-Patients indicated to withdraw ISComplete IS weaning, %Time interval: OLT to withdrawal, mo/yrRejection rate, for acute, %
Ramos et al[110]1995Prospective20 (12-20 yr at entry) (59 total patients)227.10%> 5 yr20.3%
Mazariegos et al[157]1997Historical cohort (self-weaned) and prospective cases31 (≤ 20 yr) (100 total patients)12Pediatric cohort: 29%> 5 yr10%
Takatsuki et al[111]2001Prospective63NA38.1%≥ 2 yr25.4%
Oike et al[112]2002Prospective115NA42.6%≥ 2 yr20%
Koshiba et al[113]2007Retrospective581NA15%≥ 2 yr1.5%
Ohe et al[114]2012Historical cohort190NA44.2%≥ 2 yr26.3%
Hurwitz et al[116]2004Retrospective3819 (PTLD)21% (n = 4 PTLD; n = 4 EBV)Mean time to PTLD onset: 1.8 ± 2.3 yr; Mean time to EBV infection onset: 1.1 ± 1.1 yr55.2%
Lee et al[117]2009Prospective51 (PTLD)100%1.2-2 yr0%
Feng et al[118,158] (WISP-R trial)2012Prospective20NA60%≥ 4 yr35%
Feng et al[159] (iWITH trial, partial results, 2016)2012Prospective88NA60%≥ 4 yr40%
Waki et al[120]2013Retrospective52NA42.5%> 2 yr57.5%
Lin et al[121]2015Prospective16NA40%> 2 yr40%