Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2018; 24(41): 4698-4707
Published online Nov 7, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i41.4698
Table 1 Patient demographics
Patients
Total, n60 (100%)
Average age at EMR (IQR)70 (66-75)
Gender
Male51 (85%)
Female9 (15%)
Barrett's oesophagus
Circumference (range)5 (0-13)
Maximum (range)7 (1-15)
In surveillance program
Yes, median years (IQR)36 (61%), 6 (3-9)
No, new finding19 (32%)
Data N/A5 (7%)
Table 2 Tumour index endoscopic mucosal resection characteristics n (%)
Tumour location
Oesophagus55 (92)
Cardia (Siewert 2)5 (8)
Tumour histopathology
Differentiation
Well (G1)2 (3)
Moderate (G2)28 (47)
Poor (G3)29 (49)
X (GX)1 (1)
Depth of submucosal invasion
Sm1 (< 500 μm)25 (42)
Sm2/3 (> 500 μm)25 (42)
X10 (16)
Lymphovascular invasion
Negative (LVI-)40 (67)
Positive (LVI+)14 (23)
X (LVX)6 (10)
Resection (vertical margin)
Complete (R0)17 (28)
Incomplete (R1)43 (84)
Tumour risk group
Low-risk (LR)13 (22)
High-risk (HR)47 (78)
Table 3 Histopathologic tumour characteristics of all patients with T1b oesophageal adenocarcinoma on endoscopic mucosal resection who underwent surgery - comparison of endoscopic and surgical resection specimens’ pathology report
CaseEndoscopic resection specimenSurgical resection specimenNote
1Sm1, G3, LVI-, R1T1a, LVI-, R0/
2Sm1, G3, LVI-, R1T1b Sm1, G3, R0/
3SmX, G2, LVI-, R1T1b, G3, LVI-, R0/
4Sm2/3, G3, LVI-, R1No residual cancerLGD in surgical margin
5Sm1, G2, LVI-, R1No residual cancerHGD in surgical margin
6Sm1, G3, LVI-, R1T1b, G2, R0/
7Sm2/3, G3, LVI+, R1T1a, G3, R0Positive for LNM (2/16)
8Sm2/3, G2, LVI-, R1No residual cancerLGD in surgical margin
9Sm2/3, G3, LVI-, R1No residual cancer/
10Sm2/3, G3, LVI-, R1T1a, G3, LVI+, R0/
11Sm2/3, G3, LVIX, R1T1b, G2, R0Positive for LNM (3/12)
12Sm2/3, G3, LVI+, R1T2, G3, R1R1, negative for LNM (16), preop EUS T1b
13Sm2/3, G2, LVI+, R1No residual cancer/
14Sm1, G3, LVI+, R1T1b, G1, LVI-, R0/
15SmX, G3, LVI+, R1T1b, G3, R0Positive for LNM (1/23)
16Sm2/3, G3, LVI+, R1No residual cancer/
17Sm1, G3, LVIX, R1T2, R0Preop EUS T1 stage
18SmX, G3, LVI+, R1T3, G3, R0Positive for LNM (3/78), preop EUS T1b
19Sm2/3, G3, LVI-, R1T1a, G3, R0/
20Sm2/3, G2, LVI-, R1T1, R0/
21SmX, G3, LVI-, R1No residual cancer/
22Sm1, G2, LVI-, R0No residual cancerLR tumour, HGD in surgical margin
Table 4 Overview of patients with metastatic T1b OAC
CaseEMR tumour histopathologyTreatment after index EMRTime till metastases (mo)1Additional treatmentEnd study outcomeCause of deathSurvival2 (mo)
1Sm2/3, G3, LVIX, R1Surgery4ChemotherapyDeceasedOAC45
2SmX, G3, LVI+, R1Surgery2NoneAlive/87
3SmX, G3, LVI+, R1Surgery4CRTDeceasedOAC8
4Sm2/3, G3, LVI+, R1Surgery2ChemotherapyAlive/55
5Sm2/3, G3, LVIX, R1Conservative38CRTDeceasedOAC40
6Sm2/3, G2, LVI+, R1Conservative4CRTDeceasedOAC9
7Sm2/3, G2, LVI-, R1Conservative3CRTDeceasedOAC31
8Sm2/3, G2, LVI+, R1Conservative4CRTDeceasedOAC18
9Sm1, G2, LVI-, R1Conservative17EMR T1a, CRTAlive/26
10Sm2/3, G3, LVI-, R1Conservative13RadiotherapyDeceasedOAC30