Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2018; 24(34): 3898-3907
Published online Sep 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i34.3898
Table 1 Relationship between CDK5RAP3 and DDRGK1 protein expression in gastric cancer tissues and various clinicopathological variables
VariablesTotalCDK5RAP3 expression
DDRGK1 expression
LowHighχ2P valueLowHighχ2P value
Gender1.6590.1983.0570.080
Male10784237433
Female28253244
Age (yr)4.4410.0350.7190.397
> 609178136427
≤ 604431133410
Tumor size(cm)0.1250.7230.0430.835
> 55342113914
≤ 57267155923
Location of tumor3.8600.2771.5370.674
Lower 1/3554873718
Middle 1/320155164
Upper 1/3453693411
More than 1/315105114
Borrmann type0.2850.5931.3120.252
I + II Type31247256
III + IV Type10485197331
Degree of differentiation0.1870.6664.4140.036
Well/moderate5747103621
Poor and not7862166216
Histological type1.2710.7368.5470.036
Papillary5848103919
Tubular4232102715
Mucinous109191
Signet-ring cell25205232
Depth of invasion5.6740.0171.4280.232
T1 + T221138138
T3 + T411496188529
Lymph node metastasis0.0080.9276.0230.014
Negative201641010
Positive11593228827
TNM stage1.3830.2402.6320.105
I + II4433112816
III + IV9176157021
Distant metastasis1.7610.1840.6390.424
Negative128102269236
Positive77061
Table 2 Relationship between different CDK5RAP3 and DDRGK1 protein expression status in gastric cancer tissues and various clinicopathological variables
VariablesTotalC53 and DDRGK1 low expressionC53 and/or DDRGK1 high expressionχ2P value
Gender
Male10759485.0770.024
Female28226
Age (yr)
> 609155360.0220.881
≤ 60442618
Tumor size (cm)
> 55332210.0050.943
≤ 5824933
Location of tumor
Lower 1/35533221.4810.687
Middle 1/320128
Upper 1/3452916
More than 1/31578
Borrmann type
I + II Type3120110.3420.559
III + IV Type1046143
Degree of differentiation
Well/moderate5731261.2960.255
Poor and not785028
Histological type
Papillary5733254.4150.220
Tubular422220
Mucinous1082
Signet-ring cell25187
Depth of invasion
T1 + T2218134.9720.026
T3 + T41147341
Lymph node metastasis
Negative208123.9130.048
Positive1157342
TNM stage
I + II4420245.7540.016
III + IV916130
Distant metastasis
Negative12675532.0340.154
Positive761
Table 3 Univariate analysis of the correlation between clinicopathological parameters and survival of patients with gastric cancer
Clinicopathological parametersThree-year cumulative survival rateLog-rank testP value
Gender
Male75.40.3950.53
Female71.4
Age (yr)
> 6075.40.1630.686
≤ 6073.8
Tumor size (cm)
> 568.30.9880.32
≤ 579.3
Location of tumor
Lower 1/378.23.4380.329
Middle 1/383.6
Upper 1/363.3
More than 1/386.7
Borrmann type
I + II76.90.3730.541
III + IV74
Degree of differentiation
Well/moderate75.50.1110.739
Poor and not74.2
Histological type
Papillary704.3860.223
Tubular85.6
Mucinous70
Signet-ring cell69.1
Depth of invasion
T1 + T291.74.950.026
T3 + T471.7
Lymph node metastasis
Negative954.6290.031
Positive71.2
TNM stage
I + II92.311.4240.001
III + IV66.3
Distant metastasis
Negative76.78.0150.005
Positive42.9
CDK5RAP3 expression
Low71.15.1680.023
High90.8
DDRGK1 expression
Low67.75.9710.015
High91.9
CDK5RAP3/DDRGK1 expression
CDK5RAP3 and/or DDRGK1 high90.110.4150.001
CDK5RAP3 and DDRGK1 low64.2
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of the correlation between clinicopathological parameters and survival time of patients with gastric cancer
CovariatesCoefficientStandard errorHR95%CI for HRP value
CDK5RAP3 expression (high vs low)-1.2260.7350.2940.070-1.2390.095
DDRGK1 expression (high vs. low)-0.9790.5360.3760.131-1.0740.068
CDK5RAP3 and DDRGK1 expression (low/low vs. high and/or high)1.1780.4533.2471.336-7.8910.009
Depth of invasion (T3,T4 vs T1,T2)1.0711.0452.9200.376-22.6350.305
Lymph node metastasis (positive vs negative)1.5381.0201.9740.631-34.3670.132
Distant metastasis (positive vs negative)0.8610.5442.3650.815-6.86310.113
TNM stage (stage III and IV vs I and II)-1.6300.6087.1950.060-0.6450.007