Clinical Trials Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2017; 23(8): 1450-1457
Published online Feb 28, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i8.1450
Table 1 Association analysis of immunohistochemistry staining for Arpin vs clinicopathological factors of gastric cancer, n (%)
Clinicopathological featuresNumber of patients (n = 176)Arpin expression
χ2P value
High (n = 54)Low (n = 122)
Age (yr)
> 5097 (55.11)29 (29.90)68 (70.10)0.0630.802
≤ 5079 (44.89)25 (31.65)54 (68.35)
Gender
Male110 (62.50)31 (28.18)79 (71.82)0.8650.353
Female66 (37.50)23 (34.85)43 (65.15)
Tumer size (cm)
> 5120 (68.18)37 (30.83)83 (69.17)0.0040.949
≤ 556 (31.82)17 (30.36)39 (69.64)
Depth of invasion
T1 + T244 (25.00)24 (54.55)20 (45.45)15.790.000
T3 + T4132 (75.00)30 (22.73)102 (77.27)
Lymph node metastasis
Yes131 (74.43)25 (19.08)106 (80.92)32.4040.000
No45 (25.57)29 (64.44)16 (35.56)
TNM stage
I70 (39.77)30 (42.86)40 (57.14)9.3790.009
II50 (28.41)14 (28.00)36 (72.00)
III56 (31.82)10 (17.86)16 (82.14)
Histology
Well + moderate80 (45.45)21 (26.25)59 (73.75)1.3540.245
Poor96 (54.55)33 (34.38)63 (65.62)
Tumor site
Upper66 (37.50)24 (36.36)42 (63.64)1.6480.439
Middle16 (9.09)4 (25.00)12 (75.00)
Low94 (53.41)26 (27.66)68 (72.34)
Table 2 Immunohistochemistry staining for Arpin in gastric cancer and normal gastric tissues, n (%)
GroupNo. of patientsArpin expression
χ2P value
(n = 219)High (n = 80)Low (n = 139)
Normal4326 (60.47)17 (39.53)13.221< 0.001
Cancer17654 (30.68)122 (69.32)
Table 3 Association analysis of expression of Arpin protein vs TNM stage of gastric cancer, n (%)
TNM stageNo. of patientsArpin expression
P value
High (n = 54)Low (n = 122)
I70 (39.77)30 (42.86)40 (57.14)0.0961
II50 (28.41)14 (28.00)36 (72.00)0.2132
III56 (31.82)10 (17.86)46 (82.14)0.0033
Table 4 Correlation of Arpin and Arp2/3 complex expressions in gastric cancer patients
Arp2/3 complexArpin
χ2P value
High (n = 54)Low (n = 122)
Positive (n = 114)278730.5350.000
Negative (n = 62)2735
Table 5 Univariate and multivariate survival analysis of 3-year DFS in 176 patients with gastric cancer
VariableUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HRP valueHRP value
Age1.140.488
Gender1.3730.098
tumor size1.4110.08
Depth of invasion1.8180.0171.1170.732
Lymph node metastasis2.4980.0351.4130.225
tumor site1.3360.612
TNM stage4.985< 0.0015.3440.001
Arpin expression0.4940.0050.5510.029