Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2017; 23(4): 638-645
Published online Jan 28, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i4.638
Table 1 Comparison between inflammatory bowel disease patients with and without available vitamin D concentration n (%)
IBD patients without available vitamin D concentration(n = 26)IBD patients with available vitamin D concentration(n = 211)P value
CD10 (38.5)129 (61.1)0.034
Age (yr), median (IQR)32 (26)41 (25)0.030
Female12 (46.2)125 (59.2)0.213
AA11 (42.3)91 (43.1)0.391
BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR)25.6 (9.9)27 (8.9)0.176
Patients on vitamin D supplementation2 (8.33)36 (17.06)0.271
Table 2 Comparison between inflammatory bowel disease and non- inflammatory bowel disease patients n (%)
ControlsIBD patientsP value
(n = 98)(n = 211)
Patients with vitamin D deficiency56 (57.1)143 (61.6)0.0694
Age at vitamin D testing (yr), median (IQR)60.5 (14.5)41 (25)< 0.0001
Female86 (87.8)125 (59.2)< 0.0001
AA23 (23.9)91 (43.1)0.0009
BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR)29.3 (7.5)27 (8.9)0.0438
Patients receiving vitamin D supplementationNot available36 (17.06)Not Applicable
Table 3 Distribution of vitamin D concentration across various diagnosis, demographics (age, race, gender) and body mass index (modifiable risk factor) n (%)
Vitamin D
P value
DeficientInsufficientSufficient
Total30910099110
(32.4)(32.0)(35.6)
Diagnosis
Controls98 (31.7)27.6%29.6%42.8%0.0407
CD129 (41.7)40.3%33.3%26.4%
UC82 (26.5)25.6%32.9%41.5%
Age (yr)
< 3572 (23.3)38.9%34.7%26.4%0.0415
35-4973 (23.6)34.2%28.8%37.0%
50-6499 (32.0)37.4%28.3%34.3%
> 6565 (21.0)15.4%38.5%46.2%
Race
White189 (61.2)21.7%34.4%43.9%< 0.0001
AA114 (36.9)50.9%28.1%21.0%
Other6 (1.9)16.7%33.3%50.0%
Gender
Female211 (68.3)33.7%32.2%34.1%0.6857
Male98 (31.7)29.6%31.6%38.8%
BMI (kg/m2)
< 2597 (31.4)29.9%25.8%44.3%0.0110
25-30102 (33.0)27.5%31.4%41.2%
> 30110 (35.6)39.1%38.2%22.7%
Table 4 Associations of body mass index with diagnosis and demographic variables
n (%)BMI < 25 kg/m2BMI 25-30 kg/m2BMI > 30 kg/m2P value
Total30997102110
(31.4)(33.0)(35.6)
Diagnosis
Controls98 (31.7)20.4%34.7%44.9%0.0048
CD129 (41.7)42.6%29.5%27.9%
UC82 (26.5)26.8%36.6%36.6%
Age (yr)
< 3572 (23.3)52.8%29.2%18.1%0.0007
35-4973 (23.6)26.0%30.1%43.8%
50-6499 (32.0)23.2%37.4%39.4%
> 6565 (21.0)26.2%33.9%40.0%
Race
White189 (61.2)28.6%36.5%34.9%0.5253
AA114 (36.9)36.0%27.2%36.8%
Other6 (1.9)33.3%33.3%33.3%
Gender
Female211 (68.3)27.5%30.3%42.2%0.0017
Male98 (31.7)39.8%38.8%21.4%
Table 5 Distribution of vitamin D concentration across stratified levels of body mass index and diagnosis
n (%)Vitamin D deficientVitamin D insufficientVitamin D sufficientP value
BMI < 25 (kg/m2)
Total97292543
(29.9)(25.8)(44.3)
Diagnosis
Controls20 (20.6)15.0%15.0%70.0%0.0026
CD55 (56.7)43.6%27.3%29.1%
UC22 (22.7)9.1%31.8%59.1%
BMI = 25-30 (kg/m2)
Total102283242
(27.5)(31.4)(41.2)
Diagnosis
Controls34 (33.3)26.5%26.5%47.1%0.3894
CD38 (37.3)34.2%36.8%29.0%
UC30 (29.4)20.0%30.0%50.0%
BMI > 30 (kg/m2)
Total110434225
(39.1)(38.2)(22.7)
Diagnosis
Controls44 (40.0)34.1%38.6%27.3%0.8823
CD36 (32.7)41.7%38.9%19.4%
UC30 (27.3)43.3%36.7%20.0%
Table 6 Results of multivariate modelling with age, race, gender, body mass index and diagnosis as predictors of deficient, insufficient and sufficient vitamin D
Full model
GlobalReduced model
Global
ORORP value (full)ORORP value (reduced)
(95%CI),(95%CI),(95%CI),(95%CI),
deficient vs sufficientinsufficient vs sufficientdeficient vs sufficientinsufficient vs sufficient
Diagnosis0.14820.0852
ControlsRef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
CD1.712.112.222.16
(0.74, 3.94)(0.95, 4.69)(1.07, 4.63)(1.07, 4.36)
UC0.731.130.921.2
(0.30, 1.76)(0.50, 2.53)(0.42, 2.02)(0.59, 2.48)
Gender0.9584
FemaleRef.Ref.
Male0.90.95
(0.46, 1.79)(0.50, 1.81)
Age (yr)0.1578
< 353.621.47
(1.18, 11.12)(0.56, 3.83)
35-491.90.68
(0.68, 5.30)(0.28, 1.63)
50-642.610.86
(1.04, 6.58)(0.40, 1.86)
> 65Ref.Ref.
Race0.00061< 0.00011
AARef.Ref.Ref.Ref.
White0.2510.670.2310.64
(0.13, 0.48)(0.34, 1.29)(0.12, 0.43)(0.33, 1.22)
Other0.30.680.180.57
(0.03, 3.38)(0.09, 4.89)(0.02, 1.95)(0.08, 3.96)
BMI (kg/m2)0.001710.00301
< 250.680.570.710.63
(0.32, 1.43)(0.28, 1.17)(0.34, 1.48)(0.31, 1.26)
25-30Ref.Ref.Ref.Ref.
> 302.7112.3612.6112.271
(1.28, 5.73)(1.17, 4.75)(1.26, 5.42)(1.14, 4.52)