BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2017; 23(39): 7059-7076
Published online Oct 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i39.7059
Table 1 Causes of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency
Definite association with EPI
Chronic pancreatitis
Pancreatic tumor/cancer
Cystic fibrosis
Pancreatic resection
Pancreatic hemochromatosis
Mechanisms associated with EPI not fully identified
Type 1 and 2 diabetes
Type 3c (pancreatogenic) diabetes
Gastrointestinal diseases
Celiac disease
Inflammatory bowel disease
Crohn’s disease
Ulcerative colitis
Gastrointestinal surgery
Aging
Table 2 Factors involved with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in different medical conditions[1,16,77,78,107,129,131,133,143,144,152-154,164]
Mechanism involvedPancreatic cancerDiabetes mellitusCeliac diseaseIBDGI surgery
Normal pancreas√√√√
Abnormal pancreas√√√√
Low or absent pancreatic enzyme production√√√√√
Lack of stimulus for pancreatic enzyme production√√√
Postcibal asynchrony√√√√√
Pancreatic or biliary tract abnormalities√√√
GI malabsorption√√√
Table 3 Common signs and symptoms of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency[1,14-16,18,19,22]
Sign/symptomAssociated findings
Excessive flatulenceAbdominal bloating or distension, cramps, belching
SteatorrheaFatty, bulky stools; increased bowel movements
MalnutritionWeight loss, anorexia, fatigue
Vitamin D deficiencyDeficient bone mineralization, osteomalacia, osteoporosis
Vitamin K deficiencyCoagulation abnormalities, ecchymoses, bone metabolism deficiencies
Vitamin A deficiencyNight blindness, decreased immune competence
Vitamin E deficiencyAtaxia and peripheral neuropathy
HypocalcemiaMuscle spasms, osteomalacia, osteoporosis
HypoalbuminemiaNail leukonychia
Table 4 Symptoms and tests used in the diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency[2,16,23,24]
Clinical symptoms
Steatorrhea
Diarrhea
Flatulence
Weight loss
Laboratory findings
Fecal fat > 7 g/d on a 100-g fat/d diet
Inconvenient; special high-fat diet and prolonged collection of feces
Considered gold standard
An abnormal coefficient of fat absorption is not specific for EPI
Fecal elastase-1 level ≤ 200 μg/g stool; < 100 μg/g stool = severe EPI
Simple, convenient, and widely available
Measured on a random stool sample
Liquid stools may lead to falsely low results due to dilution
Less accurate in mild stages of disease
Positive qualitative fecal fat (Sudan III) staining
Special high-fat diet
Less accurate; semi-quantitative microscopic method
Insensitive for mild disease
Fecal chymotrypsin ≤ 6 U/g stool
Less sensitive than fecal elastase for mild EPI
Fluorescein dilaurate (pancreolauryl test)
Easy to perform
Not widely available
13C-mixed triglyceride breath test
Well established
Not widely available
Imaging/endoscopy
Pancreatic duct dilatation
Main pancreatic duct calculi
Endosonographic criteria of chronic pancreatitis
Secretin-enhanced diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography imaging
New
Not widely available
Table 5 Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy clinical trials
StudyStudy design, duration (when given), and number of patientsDiseaseResultsAdverse effects
Bruno et al[66]DBRPC, 8 wk, 24 adults (21 analyzed)Pancreatic cancerThe mean absolute difference for PERT vs placebo in percentage change in body weight was 4.9% (P = 0.02); other outcomes were numerically improved with PERT vs placebo [fat absorption coefficient, 12% increase vs 8% decrease (P = 0.13); stool frequency, decrease of 1/d vs increase of 2/d (P = 0.07)]No treatment-related AEs
Woo et al[70]DBRPC, 8 wk, 67 adultsPancreatic cancerThe mean change in body weight at 8 wk was similar with PERT vs placebo (-1.49% vs -2.99%; P = 0.381), but the mean change in nutritional status was superior with PERT vs placebo in the subset of patients with cancer of the pancreatic head (PG-SGA score, -42.65% vs 32.93%; P = 0.039)Three patients died [PERT group, 2/34 (6%); placebo group, 1/33 (3%)]
There were no PERT-related serious AEs
Perez et al[60]Open-label, 12 adultsPancreatic cancerMost patients with moderate to severe fat (6/7) or protein (3/3) malabsorption improved, but no patients with mild fat or protein (0/8) malabsorption improvedNo descriptions regarding TEAEs
Ewald et al[49]DBRPC, 16 wk, 80 adultsType 1 diabetesNo significant change in HbA1c, fasting glucose, or postprandial glucose; increase in mean vitamin D from baseline to week 16 (PERT, from 54.1 to 59.4 nmol/L; placebo, 60.2 to 62.7 nmol/L)TEAEs occurred in 33 patients (84.6%) in PERT group and in 35 (85.4%) in PBO group; most frequent AEs were headache, infection, pain, diarrhea, and dyspepsia
Carroccio et al[150]DBRPC, 2 mo, 40 childrenCeliac diseaseSignificant mean ± SD weight gain in first 30 d (1131 ± 461 g with PERT vs 732 ± 399 g with placebo; P < 0.006), not significant at 60 dNo undesired side effects were reported
Evans et al[141]Open-label, up to 4 yr, 20 adultsCeliac diseaseSignificant increase in fecal elastase from median of 90 μg/g to 365 μg/g (P < 0.0001) and improvement in chronic diarrhea with reduction in median stool frequency from 4/d to 1/d (P ≤ 0.0001), but no weight increase (P = 0.3)No descriptions regarding TEAEs
Leeds et al[135]Open-label, up to 2 yr, 20 adultsCeliac diseaseSignificant improvement in chronic diarrhea with reduction in median stool frequency from 4/d to 1/d (P ≤ 0.0001), but no weight increase (P = 0.3)No descriptions regarding TEAEs
Huddy et al[181]Open-label, 10 adultsEsophagectomyImprovement in diarrhea and steatorrhea (9/10), increased weight (7/10)Nausea in 1 patient
Armbrecht et al[183]DBRPC crossover trial, 2 wk (plus 1-wk washout), 15 adultsTotal gastrectomyImproved stool consistency (score, 7.6 with PERT vs 9.3 with placebo; P < 0.05), but not the number of bowel movements or abdominal symptomsNo descriptions regarding TEAEs
Hillman et al[166]Open-label, 6 mo, 30 adultsPartial gastrectomyMean ± SE weight gain of 6.73 ± 0.77 (P < 0.001), mean ± SE decrease in steatorrhea of 49.7% ± 7.7% (P < 0.001)No descriptions regarding TEAEs
Brägelmann et al[184]DBRPC, 14 d, 52 adultsTotal gastrectomyImprovement of overall well-being (15/23 with PERT vs 6/24 with placebo; P = 0.006), but no improvement of specific symptomNo descriptions regarding TEAEs


Write to the Help Desk