Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2016; 22(5): 1844-1853
Published online Feb 7, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1844
Table 1 Overview on patient characteristics, indications and overall success rates
Patients, n84
Sex50 males
34 females
Age (yr), median71 (2-98)
Clip type
12/6T77
14/6T24
OTSCs (n total)101
Indication for OTSC placement
Upper GI bleeding41
Lower GI bleeding3
Gastrointestinal perforation7
Fistula3
Bleeding prevention12
Perforation prevention18
Technical success78/84 (92.85%)
Clinical success75/84 (89.28%)
Table 2 Indications and succes of over-the-scope-clip placement
IndicationnTechnical successNeed for surgeryDeath due to relapseDeath due to other cause
Perforation closure
Incomplete perforation (laceration of mucosa/inner muscle layer)
After mechanical stress at the level of the rectosigmoid33NoNoNo
After balloon dilation of pyloric stenosis11YesNoNo
Perforation
After colonic EMR11YesNoNo
Due to colonic methane gas explosion11YesNoNo
Intraoperative during cholecystectomy; perforation of a large duodenal diverticulum11NoNoNo
Prevention of secondary perforation after resective techniques
EMR
Esophageal EMR22NoNoNo
Gastric EMR22NoNoNo
Duodenal EMR22NoNoNo
Cecal EMR22NoNoNo
EMR ascending colon11NoNoNo
Sigmoid EMR11NoNoNo
ESD
Esophageal ESD33NoNoNo
Rectal ESD55NoNoNo
Hemostasis severe bleeding
Upper GI bleeding
Acute ulcer bleeding
Forrest Ia94441
Forrest Ib33NoNoNo
Forrest IIa2323NoNo4
Forrest IIb32111
Severe bleeding at GE junction after balloon dilation for achalasia11NoNoNo
Gastric adenocarcinoma111NoNo
Gastric lymphoma11NoNoNo
Lower GI bleeding
Severe bleeding from rectal ulcer
Forrest Ia22NoNoNo
Forrest IIb11NoNoNo
Prevention of secondary bleeding after resective techniques
EMR
Gastric EMR11NoNoNo
Duodenal EMR33NoNoNo
Colorectal EMR33NoNoNo
ESD
Esophageal ESD11NoNoNo
Rectal ESD44NoNoNo
Fistula closure
After PEG removal22NoNoNo
After dilation of pseudocyst access, false tract11NoNoNo