Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2016; 22(15): 4009-4019
Published online Apr 21, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i15.4009
Table 1 Dietary adherence at follow-up, estimated by the FODMAP adherence report scale n (%)
FARS questionsAll patientsIBDIBS
“I change the content of a LFD meal despite the recommended content”57 (35)12 (28)45 (37)
“I follow a modified LFD compared to the recommended LFD”61 (37)15 (34)46 (38)
“I replace a LFD meal with a regular meal containing FODMAPs”90 (55)27 (63)63 (53)
“I forget to follow the LFD”111 (68)33 (75)78 (65)
“I stop taking the LFD for a period of time”107 (65)34 (77)73 (61)
Table 2 Demographic data at follow-up n (%)
IBSIBD
Patients131 (73)49 (27)
Participation in eHealth studies63 (48)40 (82)
IBD type
UC32 (65)
CD12 (25)
IBDU5 (10)
Female107 (82)40 (82)
Age, median (range)43 (18-85)44 (19-70)
Height, median (range)168 (133-189)171 (160-189)
Weight, median (range)65 (43-115)75 (49-146)
BMI, median (range)23 (16-45)25 (18-53)
Smokers15 (14)5 (12)
IBS subtypes
IBS-D47 (40)28 (67)
IBS-C44 (37)6 (14)
IBS-M17 (14)3 (7)
IBS-U10 (9)5 (12)
IBS disease severity
Mild41 (32)23 (53)
Moderate56 (43)14 (33)
Severe32 (25)6 (14)
Lactose intolerance118 (25)1 (6)
Gluten intolerance22 (2)1 (8)
Food allergy35 (24)5 (42)
Dietary consultations
None4 (4)0 (0)
130 (28)14 (33)
233 (30)22 (53)
3 or more41 (38)6 (14)
Follow-up time, median (range)15 (2-80)17 (5-32)