Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2016; 22(10): 3031-3037
Published online Mar 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.3031
Table 1 Comparison of clinical data between the effective and ineffective groups
GroupsAverage age (yr)Maximum tumor diameter (cm)
Before treatmentAfter 2 wk of treatmentAfter 12 wk of treatment
Effective group (n = 73)57.7 ± 5.93.45 ± 0.813.29 ± 0.751.87 ± 0.38
Ineffective group (n = 83)59.6 ± 6.23.62 ± 0.853.47 ± 0.883.45 ± 0.62
t value1.9531.2741.36518.874
P value0.0530.2050.1740
Table 2 Changes in apparent diffusion coefficient values before and after chemotherapy treatment between the effective and ineffective groups
GroupsBefore treatmentAfter 2 wk of treatmentAfter 12 wk of treatmentAfter 2 wk of treatment
After 12 wk of treatment
t valueP valuet valueP value
Effective group1.01 ± 0.061.26 ± 0.111.34 ± 0.1817.0470.00014.860.000
Ineffective group1.24 ± 0.081.26 ± 0.051.22 ± 0.171.9310.0550.970.334
t value2.7471.4911.783////
P value0.0070.1380.077////
Table 3 Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient values and tumor diameter changes
Correlationr valueP value
Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values before treatment vs mean maximum tumor diameter0.1240.108
ADC values 2 wk after treatment vs mean maximum tumor diameter after 2 wk of treatment0.0930.183
ADC values after 12 wk of treatment vs mean maximum tumor diameter after 12 wk of treatment0.0520.118
ADC values before treatment vs reduced percentage of the mean maximum tumor diameter after 12 wk of treatment-0.7180.001
Increased percentage of ADC values after 12 wk of treatment vs reduced percentage of maximum tumor diameter0.7420.002
Percent decrease in tumor size vs mean maximum diameter of metastatic tumors before treatment-0.0150.279