Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2015; 21(30): 9134-9141
Published online Aug 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9134
Table 1 Characteristics of the patient population, n = 56
Characteristicn (%)
Mean age, yr (range)69 (52-91)
Sex (men:women)36:20 (64.3:35.7)
Chemotherapy37 (66.1)
Etiology
Gastric cancer35 (62.5)
Pancreatic cancer21 (37.5)
Cancer status
Locally advanced5 (8.9)
Metastasis51 (91.1)
Stent
Covered27 (48.2)
Uncovered29 (51.8)
WHO score
149 (12.5)
27 (87.5)
GOOSS score
019 (33.9)
136 (64.2)
21 (1.8)
30 (0)
Table 2 Comparison of patient characteristics according to stent failure n (%)
Stent failure
P value
Yes (n = 40)No (n = 16)
Age (yr)67 ± 13.273.9 ± 12.10.72
Sex0.43
Men27 (67.5)9 (56.2)
Women13 (32.5)7 (43.8)
Procedure time (min)36.4 ± 19.931.5 ± 18.60.39
Chemotherapy29 (72.5)8 (50)0.10
Response13 (32.5)1 (6.3)0.09
CEA (ng/mL)31.1 ± 111.55.1 ± 5.90.39
Type of stent0.31
Covered21 (52.5)6 (37.5)
Uncovered19 (47.5)10 (62.5)
Carcinoma peritonei14 (35.0)6 (37.5)0.86
Cancer stage10.47
III4 (10)1 (6.2)
IV36 (90)15 (93.6)
Gastric cancer
Chemotherapy19 (73.1)3 (33.3)0.03
Covered stent16 (61.5)5 (55.6)0.75
CEA (ng/mL)44.6 ± 138.35.7 ± 6.90.44
Pancreatic cancer,
Chemotherapy10 (71.4)5 (71.4)1.00
Covered stent5 (35.7)1 (14.3)0.30
CEA (ng/mL)7.0 ± 7.14.4 ± 4.90.42
CA 19-9 (IU/mL)24.597 ± 73.1201.731 ± 2.4840.46
Location of obstruction0.57
Gastric body4 (10)1 (6.2)
Pylorus22 (55)7 (43.8)
Duodenum14 (35)8 (50)
Table 3 Factors associated with stent patency in Cox proportional hazards models
HR95%CIP value
Age0.990.96-1.020.604
Sex (male)2.020.94-4.300.068
CEA > 6 ng/mL2.921.36-6.250.006
WHO score3.731.35-10.310.011
Palliative chemotherapy0.270.10-0.720.009
Covered stent2.201.06-4.570.034
Carcinoma peritonei2.641.16-6.020.020